Maureen S. Kolasa

The Role of Schools in Strengthening Delivery of New Adolescent Vaccinations

Schools offer an opportunity to deliver new vaccines to adolescents who may not receive them in their medical home. However, school budgets and health priorities are set at the local level; consequently resources devoted to health-related activities vary widely. Partnering with schools requires soliciting buy-in from stakeholders at district and school levels and providing added value to schools. With appropriate resources and partnerships, schools could carry out vaccination-related activities from educating students, parents, and communities to developing policies supporting vaccination, providing vaccines, or serving as the site at which partners administer vaccines. Activities will vary among schools, but every school has the potential to use some strategies that promote adolescent vaccination.

Decline in physician referrals to health department clinics for immunizations: the role of vaccine financing.

BACKGROUND Physicians frequently refer children to health department clinics (HDCs) for immunizations because of high out-of-pocket costs to parents and poor reimbursement for providers. Referrals for immunizations can lead to scattered care. In 1994, two vaccine financing reforms began in New York State that reduced patient costs and improved provider reimbursement: the Vaccines for Children Program (VFC, mostly for those on Medicaid and uninsured) and a law requiring indemnity insurers to cover childhood immunizations and preventive services. OBJECTIVE To measure reported changes in physician referrals to HDCs for immunizations before and after the vaccine financing reforms. DESIGN In 1993, a self-administered survey measured immunization referral practices of primary care physicians. In 1997, we resurveyed respondents of the 1993 survey to evaluate changes in referrals. SETTING/ PARTICIPANTS Three hundred twenty-eight eligible New York State primary care physicians (65% pediatricians and 35% family physicians) who responded to the 1997 follow-up immunization survey (response rate of 82%). RESULTS The proportion of physicians reporting that they referred some or all children out for immunizations decreased from 51% in 1993 to 18% in 1997 (p<0.001). In 1997, physicians were more likely to refer if they were family physicians (28% vs. 13%,p<0.01), or did not obtain VFC vaccines (29% vs. 13%,p<0.001). According to physicians who referred in 1993, decreased referrals in 1997 were due to the new insurance laws (noted by 61%), VFC (60%), Child Health Plus (a statewide insurance program for poor children, 28%), growth in commercial managed care (23%), Medicaid managed care (19%), and higher Medicaid reimbursement for immunizations that is due to VFC (18%). For physicians noting a decline in referrals, the magnitude of the decline was substantial-60% fewer referrals for VFC-eligible patients and 50% fewer for patients eligible under the new insurance law. CONCLUSIONS Vaccine financing reforms decreased the proportion of physicians who referred children to HDCs for immunizations, and may have reduced scattering of pediatric care.

Out-of-Pocket Costs of Childhood Immunizations: A Comparison by Type of Insurance Plan

BACKGROUND. The “Guide to Community Preventive Services” strongly recommends reducing out-of-pocket costs to increase vaccination rates among children. Nevertheless, out-of-pocket expenses are still incurred during the receipt of childhood vaccines, vaccine administration, and associated well-child visits. OBJECTIVE. Our goal was to estimate total and out-of-pocket costs of childhood immunization. METHODS. We used the 2003 benefit-plan data for all 1217 private and public health plans registered in Georgia and the 2003 Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices recommended vaccine schedule to calculate costs to vaccinate children aged 0 to 5 years in 2003 dollars. By applying published estimates of health insurance enrollment of Georgia children, we calculated the total and out-of-pocket costs per child according to insurance status and race/ethnicity. Immunization coverage according to payer type was based on National Immunization Survey data. RESULTS. Out-of-pocket costs ranged between

Progress toward Implementation of a Second-Dose Measles Immunization Requirement for All Schoolchildren in the United States

0 (Medicaid/Peachcare) and

Do Laws Bring Children in Child Care Centers Up to Date for Immunizations

652 (uninsured/Medicare). Most out-of-pocket costs were incurred during the first year of life. Up-to-date immunization status ranged from 63.7% for uninsured persons to 83.2% for privately insured persons. Up-to-date status was negatively correlated with out-of-pocket costs and the proportion of the population below 250% of the federal poverty level. CONCLUSIONS. For most Georgia families, out-of-pocket expenses for childhood immunizations were low, favoring compliance with the recommended immunization schedule. However, families least able to afford the expense faced disproportionately high out-of-pocket costs. Out-of-pocket costs were inversely correlated with immunization coverage levels. Uninsured children whose families lived below 250% of the federal poverty level experienced the lowest immunization coverage levels. Immunization coverage through the Vaccines for Children Program and Medicaid/State Childrens Health Insurance Programs should be promoted to minimize or eliminate out-of-pocket costs related to childhood immunizations, especially among children of low-income families.

Practice-based electronic billing systems and their impact on immunization registries.

In 1998, the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices and the American Academy of Pediatrics recommended that states ensure that all children in grades kindergarten through 12 receive 2 doses of measles-mumps-rubella (MMR) vaccine by 2001. In 2000, the National Immunization Program surveyed states, the District of Columbia, and United States territories, commonwealths, and protectorates to assess progress toward this goal. Almost all respondents (53 [98%] of 54) reported a second-dose requirement for entry to elementary school, middle school, or both. By fall of 2001, most (82%) school-aged children in the United States were in grades requiring a second dose of measles vaccine. For 29 responding programs, the requirement did not yet affect all grades. By 2009, 52 of 54 responding programs will require a second dose for all grades. Although not all states have achieved coverage of all schoolchildren with 2 doses of MMR vaccine, most states are well on their way toward this goal.

Impact of multiple injections on immunization rates among vulnerable children

BACKGROUND Pennsylvania state law requires licensed child care centers (CCCs) to document that each enrolled child is up to date (UTD) for routine immunizations within 60 days of enrollment. This study evaluates the laws impact on immunization coverage among children aged <or=59 months who attend CCCs in Philadelphia. METHODS Out of Philadelphias 440 commercial CCCs, 75 were randomly selected. Of these, 9 had closed, 3 did not accept children aged <or=59 months, and 3 refused assessment. For the remaining 60 CCCs, vaccination dates were abstracted from CCC records for all enrolled children <or=59 months. For children not UTD for all vaccines according to CCC records, additional data were sought from Philadelphias immunization registry, health care providers, and parents. RESULTS Records of 2847 children were assessed. According to CCC records, information from the immunization registry, vaccination providers, and parents, 71% of children aged 0-18 months, 77% of children 19-35 months, and 84% of children 36-59 months were UTD for their age for diphtheria, tetanus toxoids, and pertussis vaccine; polio; Haemophilus influenzae type b; and measles, mumps, and rubella vaccines. No significant increase in immunization coverage levels was found between the date children enrolled in a CCC and 60 days later. CONCLUSIONS Up to one quarter of children <5 years of age enrolled in Philadelphias CCCs are not UTD for immunizations, with children 0-18 months of age being most behind in their immunizations. Furthermore, many children do not receive vaccines within 60 days of enrollment. These low coverage levels combined with the potential exposures inherent in group care settings indicate that children in CCCs are at risk for contracting vaccine-preventable diseases.

Seasonal Influenza Vaccination at School: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Many providers rely on electronic billing systems to report information to immunization registries. If billing data fail to capture some administered immunizations, the registry will not reflect a childs true immunization status. Our objective was to assess differences between immunizations administered and immunizations reported to a registry from electronic billing systems. Philadelphias Department of Public Health conducted chart audits in 45 providers serving 50 or more children aged 7-35 months and using electronic billing systems to report data to Philadelphias immunization registry in 2001-2003. Chart records were compared to registry records to identify immunizations administered in these practices but not reported to the registry. The study practices administered 256,969 immunizations to 20,611 children. Of these 256,969 administered immunizations, 62,213 (24%) were not in the registry. The electronic billing systems submitted data for all administered immunizations for 69% of immunization visits, some but not all for 11% of visits, and none for 20% of visits. Immunizations administered but not billed cost these providers up to

Provider chart audits and outreach to parents: impact in improving childhood immunization coverage and immunization information system completeness.

980,477 in lost revenue from administrative fees alone. Improvement of billing data quality would result in more complete registries, higher reported immunization coverage rates, and recovered revenue for immunization providers.

Influenza vaccination coverage rate among high-risk children during the 2002-2003 influenza season

BACKGROUND In 1997, the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) recommended a switch from oral polio vaccine (OPV) to inactivated polio vaccine (IPV) for the first two infant doses. The ACIP also recommended use of diphtheria, tetanus, and acellular pertussis vaccine (DTaP) for infants. These recommendations resulted in two additional injections at the 2- and 4-month immunization visits. This study evaluates the implementation of new IPV and DTaP immunization recommendations and their impact on immunization coverage levels. METHODS Immunization coverage was assessed in public clinics in three urban areas before and after the recommendations. One pre- and three post-recommendation cohorts were followed to 12 months of age. RESULTS Almost all (> or = 88%) infants in the pre-recommendation cohort received OPV, DTP, and only one or two injections. Almost all (> or = 78%) infants in the post-recommendation cohorts received IPV, DTaP, and three or four injections. The percentage of infants in the post-recommendation cohorts up-to-date for immunizations at 12 months of age was slightly higher than those in the pre-recommendation cohort. CONCLUSIONS Providers rapidly switched from OPV and DTP to IPV and DTaP. Coverage at 12 months of age was higher among IPV/DTaP recipients than among OPV/DTP recipients. Provider and parent acceptance of four injections at a visit was high. The recent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine recommendations potentially add a fifth injection at 2 and 4 months of age. Acceptance or rejection of five injections by providers and parents needs early assessment.