Maurizio Tommasini

Hepatocellular carcinoma in Italian patients with cirrhosis.

BACKGROUND AND METHODS Patients with cirrhosis of the liver are recognized as being at risk for hepatocellular carcinoma. The magnitude of the risk, the natural history of this disease, and the possibilities for detecting potentially curable tumors in patients in the Western world are unknown. To address these questions, we examined 447 Italian patients with well-compensated cirrhosis (which was of viral origin in 62 percent of them) from 1985 through 1990, performing serum alpha-fetoprotein assays and real-time ultrasonography every 3 to 12 months. RESULTS Hepatocellular carcinoma was found in 30 patients (7 percent) at base line and in another 29 patients (7 percent of 417 patients free of tumor at base line) during follow-up periods averaging 33 months (range, 1 to 48). The cumulative hazard of the development of hepatocellular carcinoma during follow-up was higher among patients with persistently elevated serum alpha-fetoprotein levels (12 with tumors among 42 with such levels) than among those with fluctuating levels (11 among 82) or those with consistently normal levels (6 among 255). Only 17 patients had potentially operable tumors. The proportion of potentially operable tumors among those detected during follow-up was significantly lower than the proportion at enrollment (4 of 29 vs. 13 of 30, P = 0.027). The survival at one year of the 12 patients who underwent surgery was 67 percent, and the tumor-recurrence rate was 60 percent. Outcome was not appreciably different for the five patients who refused surgery. CONCLUSIONS In the West, as in Asia, patients with cirrhosis of the liver are at substantial risk for hepatocellular carcinoma, with a yearly incidence rate of 3 percent. Our screening program did not appreciably increase the rate of detection of potentially curable tumors.

PREVALENCE OF ANTIBODIES TO HEPATITIS C VIRUS IN ITALIAN PATIENTS WITH HEPATOCELLULAR CARCINOMA

A sensitive radioimmunoassay was used to detect antibodies to hepatitis C virus (HCV) in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma and chronic hepatitis. HCV antibodies (anti-HCV) were detected in 86 of 132 patients with hepatocellular carcinoma with no relation to the presence or absence of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg). The prevalence of anti-HCV was also high in patients with diseases thought to predispose to hepatocellular carcinoma, such as non-A, non-B chronic hepatitis and cirrhosis (74%). In HBsAg-negative patients with hepatocellular carcinoma the prevalence of anti-HCV was lower than that in patients with non-A, non-B chronic hepatitis (16% vs 55%); the prevalence of serum antibodies to hepatitis B core antigen (anti-HBc), a marker of hepatitis B virus infection, was 70% and 28%, respectively. In HBsAg-negative patients with hepatocellular carcinoma, anti-HCV and anti-HBc occurred together nearly three times as often as in patients with chronic hepatitis (54% vs 19%). These data indicate that, in Italy, HCV is an important factor associated with hepatocellular carcinoma and non-A, non-B chronic hepatitis.

Diagnostic value of HSP70, glypican 3, and glutamine synthetase in hepatocellular nodules in cirrhosis

Hepatocellular nodules in cirrhosis include regenerative (large regenerative, LRN) and dysplastic (low and high grade, LGDN and HGDN) nodules, early and grade 1 HCC (eHCC‐G1), and overt HCC. The differential diagnosis may be particularly difficult when lesions such as HGDN and eHCC‐G1 are involved. We investigated the diagnostic yield of a panel of 3 putative markers of hepatocellular malignancy such as HSP70, glypican 3 (GPC3), and glutamine synthetase (GS). We selected 52 surgically removed nonmalignant nodules (15 LRNs, 15 LGDNs, 22 HGDNs) and 53 HCCs (10 early, 22 grade 1, and 21 grade 2‐3) and immunostained them for HSP70, GPC3, and GS. The sensitivity and specificity of the individual markers for the detection of eHCC‐G1 were 59% and 86% for GS, 69% and 91% for GPC3, and 78% and 95% for HSP70. We identified 2 main phenotypes: (1) all negative, seen in 100% LRN and LGDN, 73% HGDN and 3% eHCC‐G1; (2) all positive, a feature detected in less than half the eHCC‐G1. Using a 3‐marker panel, when at least 2 of them, regardless which, were positive, the sensitivity and specificity for the detection of eHCC‐G1 were respectively 72% and 100%; the most sensitive combination was HSP70+/GPC3+ (59%) when a 2‐marker panel was used. Conclusion: The adopted panel of 3 markers is very helpful in distinguishing eHCC‐G1 from dysplastic nodules arising in cirrhosis. (HEPATOLOGY 2007;45:725–734.)

Ultrasound-assisted percutaneous liver biopsy: Superiority of the Tru-Cut over the Menghini needle for diagnosis of cirrhosis

A total of 1192 consecutive patients with diffuse liver disease were randomized to have percutaneous liver biopsy specimens taken with the Menghini or the Tru-Cut needle, to compare tissue yield, safety, and accuracy of the two needles for diagnosing cirrhosis. The sites of puncture were determined by prebiopsy ultrasound scans. Adequate samples were obtained from 94% with the Tru-Cut needle and from 79.2% with the Menghini needle (p less than 0.001). Accuracy in diagnosing cirrhosis was 89.5% for the Tru-Cut needle and 65.5% for the Menghini needle (p less than 0.05). Complication rates were very low and similar for both needles. Under these conditions, the Tru-Cut needle is superior to the Menghini needle for diagnosing cirrhosis.

Observation of thoracic duct morphology in portal hypertension by endoscopic ultrasound

BACKGROUND Thoracic duct dilation has been demonstrated in portal hypertension and hepatic cirrhosis by lymphangiography and laparotomy and at autopsy. It is thought to be secondary to increased hepatic lymph flow and has been described in the absence of ascites or esophageal varices. The aim of the present study was to observe thoracic duct morphology by endoscopic ultrasound in various subsets of patients with portal hypertension and hepatic cirrhosis and also to validate existing radiologic/surgical data. METHODS The thoracic duct of 33 patients with cirrhosis and portal hypertension was studied by endoscopic ultrasound. Patients were divided into four groups: 1, patients with ascites and esophageal varices; 2, esophageal varices without ascites; 3, without esophageal varices or ascites; 4, extrahepatic portal hypertension due to pancreatic malignancy. The thoracic duct diameter was also measured in 14 control subjects (group 5). RESULTS When the thoracic duct diameter for the five groups was compared with analysis of variance, significance was p < 0.0001; by pairwise comparison, group 1 differed from the other four groups (p < 0.05). Thoracic duct dilation (5.61 mm) was seen in group 1 patients, whereas no dilation was present in groups 2 through 4. Additionally, thoracic duct diameter in 33 portal hypertensive and/or cirrhotic patients was significantly different from that in the 14 control subjects (p = 0. 003). CONCLUSION The thoracic duct can be reliably identified by EUS in patients with hepatic cirrhosis and portal hypertension. Dilation of the duct is seen only in patients with hepatic cirrhosis, ascites, and esophageal varices. No thoracic duct dilation is present in extrahepatic portal hypertension. Contrary to existing radiologic/surgical data, thoracic duct dilation is not seen in all patients with hepatic cirrhosis and portal hypertension signifying advanced disease. A dilated thoracic duct by endoscopic ultrasound should be considered yet another sign of portal hypertension.

Hepatitis C antibody in patients with chronic liver disease and hepatocellular carcinoma

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) is the major etiologic agent of parenterally transmitted non-A,non-B hepatitis. To determine whether there is a relationship between this virus agent and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), the sera of patients with HCC and chronic hepatitis were assessed using a sensitive immunoassay for HCV antibody. Anti-HCV was detected in 65% of 132 patients with HCC, without any relationship with the presence of the hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg). The prevalence (74%) of anti-HCV was high, as expected in patients with putative non-A,non-B cirrhosis also. The prevalence of anti-HCV was less in patients with HBsAg-positive cirrhosis (28%) and in patients with disease not related to viral hepatitis and healthy controls (8%). These data suggest, but do not prove, that HCV is an important factor associated with HCC.

Is it time to reconsider the BCLC/AASLD therapeutic flow-chart?

Recommendations of the Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) therapeutic flow‐chart, endorsed by the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD), are the most applied worldwide. Over recent years, however, several referral centers have questioned some of the BCLC treatment allocations and proposed alternative strategies. The present study plans to review and discuss these suggestions, with the aim to evaluate whether there are well‐grounded reasons to reconsider some of the BCLC/AASLD recommendations.

Hepatic arterial embolization with microencapsulated mitomycin C for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma in cirrhosis

From 1986 to 1988, 35 patients with a hepatoma judged either inoperable or unresectable because of coexistent cirrhosis were treated with hepatic arterial embolization of mitomycin C microcapsules. Five of these 35 patients (14.5%) could not be treated because of inability to selectively cannulate the hepatic artery and were therefore excluded from the evaluation (feasibility rate, 86%). There were 24 men and six women with a median age of 57 years (range, 47 to 79) who could be classified as Okuda I (14 pts) or Okuda II(16 pts) and Child Class A:18 and Child Class B:12 in the remaining patients. A median dose of 0.5 mg mitomycin C/kg was administered to each subject and the treatment was repeated at 5 to 6 week intervals. Seventy courses were administered to these 30 patients (median, two courses/patient; range, 1 to 4). Minor complications were frequent (63%) but always either resolved spontaneously or after appropriate medical treatment. Neither severe renal nor hepatic toxicity was observed. No specific treatment related mortality was observed. When alpha‐fetoprotein levels and tumor volume were assessed to evaluate the response to treatment using established criteria for identifying a response, an objective response was found in 43% of the cases treated. The actuarial median survival was 7 months and the 1‐year actuarial survival was 36% (51% for those rated as Child Class A and 0% for those identified as Child Class B, P = 0.04 and 78% rated as Okuda Types I and 0% Okuda type II, P = 0.0001). The excellent quality of life and the increased survival rate experienced after mitomycin C microcapsule embolization suggest that this treatment modality can be used successfully in patients seen in the West who have unresectable hepatoma.

Intrahepatic doxorubicin in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. The unfavorable role of cirrhosis

To investigate the relationship between the presence of cirrhosis and the antitumor effects of locoregional chemotherapy with doxorubicin, 16 patients with nonresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and satisfactory baseline clinical conditions (Child class A or B, Karnofsky index > 70%) were studied. Eight patients had post-necrotic cirrhosis, five had serum HBsAg. The dose of doxorubicin was 0.3 mg/kg body weight/day, given by continuous intracoeliac infusion for 8 consecutive days. Eight patients (six with cirrhosis) died prematurely after the first course of chemotherapy. Six (2 with cirrhosis) responded to therapy; they survived 3–33 months (median: 10). In these patients, the type and severity of drug-related side effects were comparable to those reported for patients treated by intravenous chemotherapy. The implication that in many patients with cirrhosis intrahepatic chemotherapy with doxorubicin may hasten death, lessens our interest in its use for nonresectable HCC. In fact, in Italy these cancers frequently occur in association with cirrhosis.

Case-control study of hepatitis B virus infection in chronic liver disease and hepatocellular carcinoma.

SummaryThe prevalence of serum hepatitis B virus markers was studied in three groups of age- and sex-matched patients:a. 31 patients with liver cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma (c-HCC);b. 31 patients with chronic liver disease (CLD) andc. 62 hospitalized control subjects. The overall exposure rate to the hepatitis B virus was 90% in c-HCC, 80% in CLD and 58% in control subjects. The prevalence of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) was 29%, 13% and 1.6% in the three groups, respectively. The prevalence of hepatitis B surface antibody was significantly lower in c-HCC (9.6%) than CLD (42%) and control subjects (40%). The serological evidence of continuous viral replication (HBsAg positivity or isolated high titre hepatitis B core antibody positivity) was more common in c-HCC (39%) than CLD (12%) and control subjects (1.6%). The prevalence and patterns of aggregation of serum hepatitis B virus markers were similar in the 31 patients with c-HCC and in 11 patients with HCC without concomitant liver cirrhosis (n-HCC). In conclusion, the overall exposure rate to the hepatitis B virus is similar in c-HCC and CLD. However, serological evidence of continuous viral replication is more common in the former group. A defective clearance of the hepatitis B virus in hepatocellular carcinoma is a possible explanation of the phenomenon. The strength of the association between hepatitis B virus infection and hepatocellular carcinoma appears to be similar in c-HCC and n-HCC.