Maurizio Ventura
University of Bologna
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Maurizio Ventura.
Gcb Bioenergy | 2015
Maurizio Ventura; Giorgio Alberti; Maud Viger; Joseph R. Jenkins; Cyril Girardin; Silvia Baronti; Alessandro Zaldei; Gail Taylor; Cornelia Rumpel; Franco Miglietta; Giustino Tonon
As studies on biochar stability in field conditions are very scarce, the carbon sequestration potential of biochar application to agricultural soils remains uncertain. This study assessed the stability of biochar in field conditions, the effect of plant roots on biochar stability and the effect of biochar on original soil organic matter (SOM) decomposition in two (Italy and United Kingdom) short rotation coppice systems (SRCs), using continuous soil respiration monitoring and periodic isotopic (δ13CO2) measurements. When root growth was excluded, only 7% and 3% of the biochar carbon added was decomposed after 245 and 164 days in Italy and United Kingdom sites respectively. In the presence of roots, this percentage was increased to 9% and 8%, suggesting a small positive priming effect of roots on biochar decomposition. A decreased decomposition rate of original SOM was observed at both sites after biochar incorporation, suggesting a protective effect of biochar on SOM. This study supports the carbon sequestration potential of biochar and highlights the role of root activity on biochar decomposition, questioning the applicability of laboratory incubation studies to assess biochar stability.
Gcb Bioenergy | 2017
Joseph R. Jenkins; Maud Viger; Elizabeth C. Arnold; Zoe Harris; Maurizio Ventura; Franco Miglietta; Cyril Girardin; Richard J. Edwards; Cornelia Rumpel; Flavio Fornasier; Costanza Zavalloni; Giustino Tonon; Giorgio Alberti; Gail Taylor
Wide‐scale application of biochar to soil has been suggested as a mechanism to offset increases in CO2 emissions through the long‐term sequestration of a carbon rich and inert substance to the soil, but the implications of this for soil diversity and function remain to be determined. Biochar is capable of inducing changes in soil bacterial communities, but the exact impacts of its application are poorly understood. Using three European sites [UK SRC, short rotation coppice, French grassland (FR) and Italian SRF, short rotation forestry (IT)] treated with identical biochar applications, we undertook 16S and ITS amplicon DNA sequencing. In addition, we carried out assessments of community change over time and N and P mobilization in the UK. Significant changes in bacterial and community structure occurred due to treatment, although the nature of the changes varied by site. STAMP differential abundance analysis showed enrichment of Gemmatimonadete and Acidobacteria in UK biochar plots 1 year after application, whilst control plots exhibited enriched Gemmataceae, Isosphaeraceae and Koribacteraceae. Increased mobility of ammonium and phosphates was also detected after 1 year, coupled with a shift from acid to alkaline phosphomonoesterase activity, which may suggest an ecological and functional shift towards a more copiotrophic ecology. Italy also exhibited enrichments, in both the Proteobacteria (driven by an increase in the order Rhizobiales) and the Gemmatimonadetes. No significant change in the abundance of individual taxa was noted in FR, although a small significant change in unweighted UNIFRAC occurred, indicating variation in the identities of taxa present due to treatment. Fungal β diversity was affected by treatment in IT and FR, but was unaffected in UK samples. The effects of time and site were greater than that of biochar application in UK samples. Overall, this report gives a tantalizing view of the soil microbiome at several sites across Europe and suggests that although application of biochar has significant effects on microbial communities, these may be small compared with the highly variable soil microbiome that is found in different soils and changes with time.
In Vitro Cellular & Developmental Biology – Plant | 1997
Grazia Marino; Maurizio Ventura
SummaryTreatments differing from each other for the type of tube closure (i.e., cotton plug for free gas exchange, airtight rubber cap, and rubber cap with ethysorb) and/or rooting culture medium (i.e., enriched or not by 25 to 100 µM acetylsalicylic acid) were compared for their effects on gaseous composition of the culture atmosphere and microcutting rooting of the GF 677 (Prunus persica × Prunus amygdalus) hybrid. Rubber capping, which leads to rapid ethylene accumulation inside tubes, strongly reduced rooting time and in some cases enhanced final rooting percentage over that of cotton plugs. Ethysorb almost completely absorbed ethylene produced by shoots, which showed lower rooting percentages within 9 d than microcuttings cultured in the absence of ethysorb. In contrast, no significant difference in rooting was found between the two treatments after 14 d. Carbon dioxide concentration was similar in all treatments within 5 to 9 d and seemed to be ineffective for rooting. The influence of acetylsalicylic acid on rooting was unclear. Root number and length were not significantly influenced by the treatments. These results demonstrate that the use of airtight closures, leading to rapid ethylene accumulation, can reduce time of rooting expression for GF 677 microcuttings. However, free gas exchange towards the end of the rooting period (from Day 9 to Day 14) is advisable to prevent leaf yellowing. No significant difference in plantlet survival and growth after transfer ex vitro was found among treatments.
Journal of Environmental Engineering and Landscape Management | 2016
Priit Tammeorg; Ana Catarina Bastos; Simon Jeffery; Frédéric Rees; Juergen Kern; Ellen R. Graber; Maurizio Ventura; M.G. Kibblewhite; António Amaro; Alice Budai; C.M.d.S. Cordovil; Xavier Domene; Ciro Gardi; G. Gascó; Ján Horák; Claudia Kammann; Elena Kondrlova; David A. Laird; Susana Loureiro; Martinho António Santos Martins; Pietro Panzacchi; Munoo Prasad; Marija Prodana; Aline Peregrina Puga; Greet Ruysschaert; Lidia Sas-Paszt; F. Silva; Wenceslau Geraldes Teixeira; Giustino Tonon; Gemini Delle Vedove
Key priorities in biochar research for future guidance of sustainable policy development have been identified by expert assessment within the COST Action TD1107. The current level of scientific understanding (LOSU) regarding the consequences of biochar application to soil were explored. Five broad thematic areas of biochar research were addressed: soil biodiversity and ecotoxicology, soil organic matter and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, soil physical properties, nutrient cycles and crop production, and soil remediation. The highest future research priorities regarding biochar’s effects in soils were: functional redundancy within soil microbial communities, bioavailability of biochar’s contaminants to soil biota, soil organic matter stability, GHG emissions, soil formation, soil hydrology, nutrient cycling due to microbial priming as well as altered rhizosphere ecology, and soil pH buffering capacity. Methodological and other constraints to achieve the required LOSU are discussed and options for efficient progress of biochar research and sustainable application to soil are presented.
Trees-structure and Function | 2017
Jens Dahlhausen; Enno Uhl; Michael Heym; Peter Biber; Maurizio Ventura; Pietro Panzacchi; Giustino Tonon; Tamás Horváth; Hans Pretzsch
Key messageRelative biomass of tree compartments is dependent on plant size and stand density, with stand density being an important predictor, especially for belowground biomass and at high stand densities.AbstractEstimation of biomass production is an important issue against the background of climate change and carbon storage. Even though many studies investigated the biomass productivity of trees or single compartments, only few considered the belowground biomass. Further, there is a lack of studies focusing on young trees and considering further influencing factors such as the prevailing stand density. In the present study, young Quercus robur trees were sampled on Nelder trials, which comprise different stand densities, on four European sites differing in climatic conditions. Besides the estimation of logarithmically transformed power equations, Dirichlet regressions were applied for deriving biomass functions for the single compartments leaves, branches, stem and roots. Thereby, the dependence of total and compartment biomass allocation on diameter at root collar (d0), tree height and stand density is tested. The results show that besides d0, the local Stand Density Index (SDIl) is an important predictor for biomass. Especially, the belowground biomass shows a significant relation to the SDIl, which is less the case for the aboveground biomass. Not considering the SDIl leads to an overestimation of the biomass productivity, especially when the stand density is high. Furthermore, the results show that the belowground biomass is lower than the aboveground biomass, but with 50–80% of the aboveground biomass still of considerable size. This indicates the importance of including stand characteristics when estimating above- and belowground tree biomass in future studies.
European Journal of Soil Science | 2017
Marta Dondini; Giorgio Alberti; G. Delle Vedove; Maurizio Ventura; Giustino Tonon; Maud Viger; Zoe Harris; Joseph R. Jenkins; M. Richards; Mark Pogson; Gail Taylor; J. U. Smith; Pete Smith
Acknowledgements This work contributes to the ELUM (Ecosystem Land Use Modelling & Soil Carbon GHG Flux Trial) project, which was commissioned and funded by the Energy Technologies Institute (ETI), and to Carbo-BioCrop (http://www.carbobiocrop.ac.uk; a NERC funded project; NE/H010742/1), UKERC Phase II and III (NERC; NE/H013237/1), MAGLUE (http://www.maglue.ac.uk; an EPSRC funded project; EP/M013200/1) and as part of the Seventh Framework For Research Programme of the EU, within the EUROCHAR project (N 265179) and EXPEER within WU FP7-Infrastructures. We acknowledge the use of the E-OBS dataset from the EU-FP6 project ENSEMBLES (http://ensembles-eu.metoffice.com) and the data providers in the ECA&D project (http://www.ecad.eu). We thank two anonymous reviewers and Dr William van Dijk for their valuable suggestions.
Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research | 2017
Francesco Giammarchi; Giorgio Vacchiano; Andrea Bertagnolli; Maurizio Ventura; Pietro Panzacchi; Paolo Cherubini; Giustino Tonon
ABSTRACT Knowledge about the stand structure and dynamics of subalpine forests is crucial to preserve their multifunctionality. In the present study, we reconstructed the spatiotemporal dynamics of a subalpine Pinus cembra forest in the eastern Italian Alps in response to natural disturbances and forest management. We adopted a concurrent point pattern, dendroecological and growth dominance (GD) analysis. We mapped and measured all trees of Pinus cembra and Larix decidua in a 1 ha plot. We analyzed intra- and interspecific spatial patterns and spatial autocorrelation of tree size and age. We explored establishment dynamics and shifts in competition by analyzing growth suppression/release patterns and GD trends. Results showed a clumped, uneven-aged, multilayered structure where pine was dominant. The synergic action of ecological and human-induced factors is discussed to explain the prevalence of pine over time. Spatial pattern and autocorrelation analyses suggest a different colonization strategy of the two species, in which pine established after small-scale perturbations and experienced a stronger inter- and intra-specific competition. The interruption of tree establishment and shift in GD toward large trees resulting from the lack of forest management are the most important findings of this research. This highlights the importance of an active management to avoid the homogenization of the forest structure that is generally associated with a reduction in biodiversity and protective ability of forests.
Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems | 2011
Gustavo Brunetto; Maurizio Ventura; Francesca Scandellari; Carlos Alberto Ceretta; João Kaminski; George Wellington Bastos de Melo; Massimo Tagliavini
Plant and Soil | 2011
Christian Ceccon; Pietro Panzacchi; Francesca Scandellari; Luca Prandi; Maurizio Ventura; Barbara Russo; Peter Millard; Massimo Tagliavini
European Journal of Agronomy | 2008
Maurizio Ventura; Francesca Scandellari; Francesca Ventura; B. Guzzon; P. Rossi Pisa; Massimo Tagliavini