Mauro Contini

Improvement of Alveolar–Capillary Membrane Diffusing Capacity With Enalapril in Chronic Heart Failure and Counteracting Effect of Aspirin

BACKGROUND KII ACE, the enzyme that converts angiotensin I and inactivates bradykinin, is highly concentrated in the lungs; its blockade reduces exposure to angiotensin II and enhances exposure to prostaglandins generated by local kinin hyperconcentration. Our hypothesis is that ACE inhibitors improve pulmonary function in chronic heart failure (CHF) by readjusting lung vessel tone and permeability or alveolar-capillary membrane diffusion. METHODS AND RESULTS In 16 CHF patients and 16 normal volunteers or mild untreated hypertensives, pulmonary function and exercise tests with respiratory gas analysis were assessed on placebo, enalapril (10 mg BID), enalapril plus aspirin (325 mg/d), or aspirin, in random order and double blind, for 15 days each. In CHF, enalapril increased pulmonary carbon monoxide diffusion (DLCO), oxygen consumption (VO2), and exercise tolerance and reduced the ratio of dead space to tidal volume (VD/VT) and the ventilatory equivalent for carbon dioxide production (VE/VCO2). On enalapril, VO2 (r = .80, P < .0001) and VD/VT (r = -.69, P = .003) changes from placebo correlated with those in DLCO. These effects were inhibited by aspirin and were absent in control subjects. In 8 additional patients, hydralazine-isosorbide dinitrate, as an alternative treatment for reducing pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP) and increasing exercise capacity, were more effective than enalapril for the PCWP but did not affect DLCO and VE/VCO2; amelioration in VO2 and VD/VT was unrelated to DLCO and was not modified by aspirin. CONCLUSIONS ACE inhibition improved pulmonary diffusion in CHF. Hydralazine-isosorbide dinitrate failed to provide this result. Counteraction by aspirin, a prostaglandin inhibitor, bespeaks prostaglandin participation while on enalapril that might readjust capillary permeability or alveolar-capillary membrane diffusion.

Spectral analysis of sympathetic discharge, R-R interval and systolic arterial pressure in decerebrate cats

In 19 decerebrate and artificially ventilated cats, we analyzed, with a power spectral methodology, the variability simultaneously present in R-R interval and in thoracic preganglionic sympathetic outflow. R-R interval was characterized, as already described in humans and other experimental preparations, by two rhythmic components occurring at a frequency of about 0.1 Hz (low-frequency, LF) and at one corresponding to respiratory rate (high-frequency, HF) which, in these experiments, was set at 0.32 Hz. Two similar rhythmic components were also present in the sympathetic discharge. Arterial pressure changes were produced by aorta or vena cava flow obstruction in order to produce reflex responses in sympathetic activity. Reflex sympathetic excitations induced an increase in the LF component of both R-R interval and sympathetic discharge variabilities, while the HF components were simultaneously reduced. In contrast, reflex sympathetic inhibitions were accompanied by a decrease in LF components of both variability signals, while the HF components were simultaneously increased. A significant and positive correlation was found between changes in impulse activity and the amplitude of LF component of either R-R interval or sympathetic discharge variabilities. These data support the hypothesis that the low-frequency component of R-R variability can be used as a marker of sympathetic modulation.

Metabolic exercise test data combined with cardiac and kidney indexes, the MECKI score: A multiparametric approach to heart failure prognosis

OBJECTIVES We built and validated a new heart failure (HF) prognostic model which integrates cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET) parameters with easy-to-obtain clinical, laboratory, and echocardiographic variables. BACKGROUND HF prognostication is a challenging medical judgment, constrained by a magnitude of uncertainty. METHODS Our risk model was derived from a cohort of 2716 systolic HF patients followed in 13 Italian centers. Median follow up was 1041days (range 4-5185). Cox proportional hazard regression analysis with stepwise selection of variables was used, followed by cross-validation procedure. The study end-point was a composite of cardiovascular death and urgent heart transplant. RESULTS Six variables (hemoglobin, Na(+), kidney function by means of MDRD, left ventricle ejection fraction [echocardiography], peak oxygen consumption [% pred] and VE/VCO2 slope) out of the several evaluated resulted independently related to prognosis. A score was built from Metabolic Exercise Cardiac Kidney Indexes, the MECKI score, which identified the risk of study end-point with AUC values of 0.804 (0.754-0.852) at 1year, 0.789 (0.750-0.828) at 2years, 0.762 (0.726-0.799) at 3years and 0.760 (0.724-0.796) at 4years. CONCLUSIONS This is the first large-scale multicenter study where a prognostic score, the MECKI score, has been built for systolic HF patients considering CPET data combined with clinical, laboratory and echocardiographic measurements. In the present population, the MECKI score has been successfully validated, performing very high AUC.

Lung function with carvedilol and bisoprolol in chronic heart failure: Is β selectivity relevant?

Carvedilol is a β‐blocker with similar affinity for β1‐ and β2 receptors, while bisoprolol has higher β1 affinity. The respiratory system is characterized by β2‐receptor prevalence. Airway β receptors regulate bronchial tone and alveolar β receptors regulate alveolar fluid re‐absorption which influences gas diffusion.

Carvedilol reduces exercise-induced hyperventilation: A benefit in normoxia and a problem with hypoxia

To evaluate whether carvedilol influences exercise hyperventilation and the ventilatory response to hypoxia in heart failure (HF).

Circulating Plasma Surfactant Protein Type B as Biological Marker of Alveolar-Capillary Barrier Damage in Chronic Heart Failure

Background—Surfactant protein type B (SPB) is needed for alveolar gas exchange. SPB is increased in the plasma of patients with heart failure (HF), with a concentration that is higher when HF severity is highest. The aim of this study was to evaluate the relationship between plasma SPB and both alveolar-capillary diffusion at rest and ventilation versus carbon dioxide production during exercise. Methods and Results—Eighty patients with chronic HF and 20 healthy controls were evaluated consecutively, but the required quality for procedures was only reached by 71 patients with HF and 19 healthy controls. Each subject underwent pulmonary function measurements, including lung diffusion for carbon monoxide and membrane diffusion capacity, and maximal cardiopulmonary exercise test. Plasma SPB was measured by immunoblotting. In patients with HF, SPB values were higher (4.5 [11.1] versus 1.6 [2.9], P=0.0006, median and 25th to 75th interquartile), whereas lung diffusion for carbon monoxide (19.7±4.5 versus 24.6±6.8 mL/mm Hg per min, P<0.0001, mean±SD) and membrane diffusion capacity (28.9±7.4 versus 38.7±14.8, P<0.0001) were lower. Peak oxygen consumption and ventilation/carbon dioxide production slope were 16.2±4.3 versus 26.8±6.2 mL/kg per min (P<0.0001) and 29.7±5.9 and 24.5±3.2 (P<0.0001) in HF and controls, respectively. In the HF population, univariate analysis showed a significant relationship between plasma SPB and lung diffusion for carbon monoxide, membrane diffusion capacity, peak oxygen consumption, and ventilation/carbon dioxide production slope (P<0.0001 for all). On multivariable logistic regression analysis, membrane diffusion capacity (&bgr;, −0.54; SE, 0.018; P<0.0001), peak oxygen consumption (&bgr;, −0.53; SE, 0.036; P=0.004), and ventilation/carbon dioxide production slope (&bgr;, 0.25; SE, 0.026; P=0.034) were independently associated with SPB. Conclusion—Circulating plasma SPB levels are related to alveolar gas diffusion, overall exercise performance, and efficiency of ventilation showing a link between alveolar-capillary barrier damage, gas exchange abnormalities, and exercise performance in HF.

Adenosine activates cardiac sympathetic afferent fibers and potentiates the excitation induced by coronary occlusion.

Adenosine is a possible mediator of cardiac pain during myocardial ischemia; however, little is known about the influence of adenosine on cardiac sympathetic afferent activity and thereby on its algogenic mechanism. In 20 anaesthetized, decerebrated, curarized and artificially ventilated cats, we studied the impulse activity of 20 single afferent sympathetic fibers with a left ventricular receptive field in relation to epicardial applications of adenosine, coronary artery occlusions and arterial pressure rises. All fibers increased their impulse activity (from 1.2 +/- 0.2 to 2.6 +/- 0.5 imp/s; P < 0.001) during slight (20 +/- 8%) rises in aortic pressure, thus exhibiting low-threshold receptor characteristics. In 10 cats, epicardial applications of three different doses of adenosine (0.1, 1 and 10 mg/ml) caused a brief increase in neural activity with dose-related responses. This response was abolished by aminophylline, a P1 purinergic inhibitor. In the other group of 10 cats, four subsequent 30-s occlusions of the coronary arterial vessel supplying the receptive fields of the fibers were performed, in control conditions and 30 s, 3 and 7 min, respectively, after the end of excitation induced by adenosine (1 mg/ml) application. During the control coronary occlusion the impulse activity increased from 1.1 +/- 0.1 to 5.5 +/- 0.7 imp/s (P < 0.0001). A similar activation was present during the second occlusion initiated 30 s after the end of adenosine-induced activation. In contrast, a significant potentiation of the response was observed (8.8 +/- 1.2 vs. 5.3 +/- 0.9 imp/s; P < 0.001) during the occlusion initiated 3 min after the end of excitation by adenosine. This effect was no longer present during the last occlusion performed after 7 min. When the protocol was repeated substituting adenosine with saline (n = 5) or after i.v. administration of aminophylline (n = 5), no potentiation was observed, even though the excitatory response to coronary occlusion was preserved. These data show that adenosine can activate cardiac sympathetic afferent fibers in a dose-related manner, and potentiate their responses to coronary occlusion, while leaving unaffected the responsiveness to a hemodynamic stimulus. The excitatory effects are likely to involve the P1 purinergic receptors. The potentiation phenomenon might play a role in the genesis of an algogenic code.

Prognostic Value of Indeterminable Anaerobic Threshold in Heart Failure

Background—In patients with heart failure (HF), during maximal cardiopulmonary exercise test, anaerobic threshold (AT) is not always identified. We evaluated whether this finding has a prognostic meaning. Methods and Results—We recruited and prospectively followed up, in 14 dedicated HF units, 3058 patients with systolic (left ventricular ejection fraction <40%) HF in stable clinical conditions, New York Heart Association class I to III, who underwent clinical, laboratory, echocardiographic, and cardiopulmonary exercise test investigations at study enrollment. We excluded 921 patients who did not perform a maximal exercise, based on lack of achievement of anaerobic metabolism (peak respiratory quotient ⩽1.05). Primary study end point was a composite of cardiovascular death and urgent cardiac transplant, and secondary end point was all-cause death. Median follow-up was 3.01 (1.39–4.98) years. AT was identified in 1935 out of 2137 patients (90.54%). At multivariable logistic analysis, failure in detecting AT resulted significantly in reduced peak oxygen uptake and higher metabolic exercise and cardiac and kidney index score value, a powerful prognostic composite HF index (P<0.001). At multivariable analysis, the following variables were significantly associated with primary study end point: peak oxygen uptake (% pred; P<0.001; hazard ratio [HR]=0.977; confidence interval [CI]=0.97–0.98), ventilatory efficiency slope (P=0.01; HR=1.02; CI=1.01–1.03), hemoglobin (P<0.05; HR=0.931; CI=0.87–1.00), left ventricular ejection fraction (P<0.001; HR=0.948; CI=0.94–0.96), renal function (modification of diet in renal disease; P<0.001; HR=0.990; CI=0.98–0.99), sodium (P<0.05; HR=0.967; CI=0.94–0.99), and AT nonidentification (P<0.05; HR=1.41; CI=1.06–1.89). Nonidentification of AT remained associated to prognosis also when compared with metabolic exercise and cardiac and kidney index score (P<0.01; HR=1.459; CI=1.09–1.10). Similar results were obtained for the secondary study end point. Conclusions—The inability to identify AT most often occurs in patients with severe HF, and it has an independent prognostic role in HF.

Multiparametric comparison of CARvedilol, vs. NEbivolol, vs. BIsoprolol in moderate heart failure: The CARNEBI trial

BACKGROUND Several β-blockers, with different pharmacological characteristics, are available for heart failure (HF) treatment. We compared Carvedilol (β1-β2-α-blocker), Bisoprolol (β1-blocker), and Nebivolol (β1-blocker, NO-releasing activity). METHODS Sixty-one moderate HF patients completed a cross-over randomized trial, receiving, for 2 months each, Carvedilol, Nebivolol, Bisoprolol (25.6 ± 12.6, 5.0 ± 2.4 and 5.0 ± 2.4 mg daily, respectively). At the end of each period, patients underwent: clinical evaluation, laboratory testing, echocardiography, spirometry (including total DLCO and membrane diffusion), O2/CO2 chemoreceptor sensitivity, constant workload, in normoxia and hypoxia (FiO2=16%), and maximal cardiopulmonary exercise test. RESULTS No significant differences were observed for clinical evaluation (NYHA classification, Minnesota questionnaire), laboratory findings (including kidney function and BNP), echocardiography, and lung mechanics. DLCO was lower on Carvedilol (18.3 ± 4.8*mL/min/mmHg) compared to Nebivolol (19.9 ± 5.1) and Bisoprolol (20.0 ± 5.0) due to membrane diffusion 20% reduction (*=p<0.0001). Constant workload exercise showed in hypoxia a faster VO2 kinetic and a lower ventilation with Carvedilol. Peripheral and central sensitivity to CO2 was lower in Carvedilol while response to hypoxia was higher in Bisoprolol. Ventilation efficiency (VE/VCO2 slope) was 26.9 ± 4.1* (Carvedilol), 28.8 ± 4.0 (Nebivolol), and 29.0 ± 4.4 (Bisoprolol). Peak VO2 was 15.8 ± 3.6*mL/kg/min (Carvedilol), 16.9 ± 4.1 (Nebivolol), and 16.9 ± 3.6 (Bisoprolol). CONCLUSIONS β-Blockers differently affect several cardiopulmonary functions. Lung diffusion and exercise performance, the former likely due to lower interference with β2-mediated alveolar fluid clearance, were higher in Nebivolol and Bisoprolol. On the other hand, Carvedilol allowed a better ventilation efficiency during exercise, likely via a different chemoreceptor modulation. Results from this study represent the basis for identifying the best match between a specific β-blocker and a specific HF patient.

Effects of β-blockers on ventilation efficiency in heart failure

BACKGROUND Hyperventilation and consequent reduction of ventilation (VE) efficiency are frequently observed during exercise in heart failure (HF) patients, resulting in an increased slope of VE/carbon dioxide (VE/Vco(2)) relationship. The latter is an independent predictor of HF prognosis. beta-Blockers improve the prognosis of HF patients. We evaluated the effect on the efficiency of VE of a beta(1)-beta(2) unselective (carvedilol) versus a beta(1) selective (bisoprolol) beta-blocker. METHODS We analyzed consecutive maximal cardiopulmonary exercise tests performed on 572 clinically stable HF patients (New York Heart Association class I-III, left ventricle ejection fraction < or =50%) categorized in 3 groups: 81 were not treated with beta-blocker, 304 were treated with carvedilol, and 187 were treated with bisoprolol. Clinical conditions were similar. RESULTS The VE/Vco(2) slope was lower in carvedilol- compared with bisoprolol-treated patients (29.7 +/- 0.4 vs 31.6 +/- 0.5, P = .023, peak oxygen consumption adjusted) and with patients not receiving beta-blockers (31.6 +/- 0.7, P = .036). Maximum end-tidal CO(2) pressure during the isocapnic buffering period was higher in patients treated with carvedilol (39.0 +/- 0.3 mm Hg) than with bisoprolol (37.2 +/- 0.4 mm Hg, P < .001) and in patients not receiving beta-blockers (37.2 +/- 0.5 mm Hg, P = .001). CONCLUSIONS Reduction of hyperventilation, with improvement of VE efficiency during exercise (reduction of VE/Vco(2) slope and increase of maximum end-tidal CO(2) pressure), is specific to carvedilol (beta(1)-beta(2) unselective blocker) and not to bisoprolol (beta(1)-selective blocker).