Max J. Gordon
Oregon Health & Science University
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Max J. Gordon.
European Journal of Haematology | 2016
Max J. Gordon; Olga V. Danilova; Stephen E. Spurgeon; Alexey V. Danilov
The purpose of this study was to describe the clinical characteristics and outcomes in cardiac non‐Hodgkins lymphoma (NHL).
Leukemia Research | 2017
Max J. Gordon; Paul Tardi; Marc Loriaux; Stephen E. Spurgeon; Elie Traer; Tibor Kovacsovics; Lawrence D. Mayer; Jeffrey W. Tyner
PURPOSE Identify AML patients most likely to respond to CPX-351, a nano-scale liposome formulation containing cytarabine and daunorubicin co-encapsulated at a 5:1 molar ratio. METHODS We examined the ex vivo cytotoxic activity of CPX-351 against leukemic cells isolated from 53 AML patients and an additional 127 samples including acute lymphoblastic leukemia, myelodysplastic syndrome/myeloproliferative neoplasms, or chronic lymphocytic leukemia/lymphoma. We assessed activity with respect to common molecular lesions and used flow cytometry to assess CPX-351 cellular uptake. RESULTS AML specimen sensitivity to CPX-351 was similar across conventional risk groups. FLT3-ITD cases were five-fold more sensitive to CPX-351. CPX-351 was active across other indications with nearly all cases exhibiting IC50 values markedly lower than reported 72-h plasma drug concentration in patients receiving CPX-351. The range and distribution of CPX-351 IC50 values were comparable for AML, CLL, and ALL, whereas MDS/MPN cases were less sensitive. CPX-351 uptake analysis revealed a correlation between uptake of CPX-351 and cytotoxic potency. CONCLUSIONS Our findings are consistent with clinical data, in which CPX-351 activity is retained in high-risk AML patients. Ex vivo analysis of cytotoxic potency may provide a means to identify specific AML subsets, such as FLT3-ITD, that benefit most from CPX-351 and warrant additional clinical evaluation.
Expert Review of Hematology | 2017
Max J. Gordon; Lionel D. Lewis; Jennifer R. Brown; Alexey V. Danilov
ABSTRACT Introduction: The majority of patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) and chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) present with comorbidities. Many of them are poor candidates for intensive chemo-immunotherapy regimens, such as FCR (fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, rituximab). Still, most clinical trials aim to enroll ‘fit’ patients, who poorly represent the community oncology population. Areas covered: In the past decade, bendamustine hydrochloride, a cytotoxic agent with structural similarities to both alkylating agents and purine analogs, has received widespread use in therapy of NHL and CLL, and has demonstrated a relatively favorable toxicity profile. However, bendamustine has not been well studied in patients with hematologic malignancies who have comorbidities. Here we review the clinical data on use of bendamustine in older and unfit patients with NHL and CLL, and analyze whether there is an optimal dose of bendamustine in patients who have significant comorbidities, including renal dysfunction. Expert commentary: Reduced intensity regimens of bendamustine are effective in CLL patients with comorbidities and renal dysfunction. Even with the introduction of targeted therapies, bendamustine will likely continue to be an important therapeutic option in patients with comorbidities because of its tolerability, efficacy and cost.
Cancer | 2018
Max J. Gordon; Michael Churnetski; Hamood Alqahtani; Xavier Rivera; Adam Kittai; Stephen Marc Amrock; Spencer L. James; Sheila Hoff; Sudhir Manda; Stephen E. Spurgeon; Michael Choi; Jonathon B. Cohen; Daniel O. Persky; Alexey V. Danilov
Most patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) present with multiple comorbidities. Although comorbidities negatively affect outcomes for patients treated with chemoimmunotherapy, their impact on patients who receive targeted therapies is unknown.
British Journal of Haematology | 2017
Max J. Gordon; Philipp W. Raess; Kathleen Young; Stephen E. Spurgeon; Alexey V. Danilov
Amin Rahemtulla Kikkeri N. Naresh Department of Cellular and Molecular Pathology, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, Hammersmith Hospital Campus, London, UK, Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland, Almamoon University College, Baghdad, Iraq and Department of Haematology, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, Hammersmith Hospital Campus, London, UK. E-mail: [email protected]
Cancer | 2018
I. Brian Greenwell; Ashley D. Staton; Michael Lee; Jeffrey M. Switchenko; Debra Saxe; Joseph Maly; Kristie A. Blum; Natalie S. Grover; Stephanie Mathews; Max J. Gordon; Alexey V. Danilov; Narendranath Epperla; Timothy S. Fenske; Mehdi Hamadani; Steven I. Park; Christopher R. Flowers; Jonathon B. Cohen
Risk stratification of newly diagnosed patients with mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) primarily is based on the MCL International Prognostic Index (MIPI) and Ki‐67 proliferative index. Single‐center studies have reported inferior outcomes in patients with a complex karyotype (CK), but this remains an area of controversy.
Expert Opinion on Pharmacotherapy | 2015
Julie N. Graff; Max J. Gordon; Tomasz M. Beer
Introduction: Enzalutamide (MDV3100) is a second-generation androgen receptor antagonist that improves survival in metastatic, castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). Alternatives include chemotherapy, radiation, immunotherapy and abiraterone. Areas covered: The Phase I/II study showed early evidence of efficacy and determined that fatigue is the dose-limiting toxicity. Two randomized, placebo-controlled trials have demonstrated superiority of enzalutamide 160 mg by mouth daily over placebo in terms of overall survival, radiographic progression-free survival as well as a broad range of secondary and exploratory end points in men who had received previous chemotherapy (AFFIRM) and in those who were chemotherapy naive (PREVAIL). Common side effects include fatigue, arthralgias and constipation. A post hoc analysis from AFFIRM found that enzalutamide is safe and effective in men aged ≥ 75 years. The Phase I/II studies as well as AFFIRM and PREVAIL are described in this review. Expert opinion: Enzalutamide extends overall and progression-free survival and is associated with robust response rates and quality of life benefits in men with mCRPC. Enzalutamide has not been proven to be effective in biochemically relapsed disease or in castration-sensitive prostate cancer. It should not be used in men at high risk for seizure, and patients should be counseled about the increased risk of falls.
Leukemia & Lymphoma | 2018
Oscar Calzada; Jeffrey M. Switchenko; Joseph Maly; Kristie A. Blum; Natalie S. Grover; Stephanie Mathews; Steven I. Park; Max J. Gordon; Alexey V. Danilov; Narendranath Epperla; Timothy S. Fenske; Mehdi Hamadani; Christopher R. Flowers; Jonathon B. Cohen
Abstract Prospective identification of candidates for deferred therapy is not standardized and many patients receive immediate therapy regardless of risk. We conducted a retrospective, multi-center cohort analysis of MCL patients with comprehensive clinical data to examine the use and safety of deferred therapy for newly diagnosed patients. Previously untreated patients ≥18 years-old with MCL diagnosed in 1993–2015 at five academic sites were included. Of 395 patients, 72 (18%) received deferred therapy (defined as receipt of first treatment >90 days following initial diagnosis). Patients receiving deferred therapy were more likely to have an ECOG performance status of 0 (67 versus 44% p = .001), have no B symptoms (83 versus 65% p = .003) and have normal LDH levels at diagnosis (87 versus 55% p < .001). In multivariable analysis, deferred therapy was not associated with a significant difference in OS (HR 0.64: 95% CI 0.22–1.84, p = .407).
Cancer Research | 2017
David K. Edwards; Nathalie Javidi-Sharifi; Angela Rofelty; Max J. Gordon; Riley Roth-Carter; Paul Tardi; Lawrence Mayer; Jeffrey W. Tyner
Introduction: CPX-351 (Vyxeos) is a liposomal combination of cytarabine and daunorubicin at a synergistic 5:1 molar ratio. Recently, CPX-351 has been shown to be significantly more effective than the 7+3 standard of care chemotherapy in treating high-risk AML patients, including patients with the FLT3-ITD mutation. We previously treated primary patient samples with CPX-351 ex vivo and found that FLT3-ITD+ samples were significantly more sensitive to CPX-351 and showed enhanced drug uptake. We hypothesized that dysregulated FLT3 signaling results in an activation of liposome uptake pathways, leading to increased sensitivity to CPX-351 and ultimately cell death. Furthermore, we examined the effect of combining CPX-351 with existing FLT3 inhibitors (e.g. quizartinib and midostaurin). Methods: To examine drug uptake dynamics, we exposed AML cell lines (including MOLM-13 and MOLM14 that contain FLT3-ITD, and ME1 that contains an activating FLT3 mutation) to varying concentrations of CPX-351, with or without pre-treatment of quizartinib and midostaurin. We evaluated cell viability using a colorimetric assay and measured intracellular daunorubicin fluorescence, an indicator of drug uptake, by flow cytometry. Additionally, we analyzed the synergy of exposing these cell lines to CPX-351 and FLT3 inhibitors in combination and at different dose schedules, followed by measuring cell viability and daunorubicin fluorescence. Results: We observed that cell lines containing FLT3-ITD or FLT3-activating mutation were more sensitive to CPX-351 and exhibited increased drug uptake compared to cell lines with other genetic abnormalities. Interestingly, we observed that pre-treatment with quizartinib for 16 hrs produced a population of cells (approximately 50% of the total population) that exhibited decreased daunorubicin fluorescence, suggesting that prolonged FLT3 inhibition may decrease CPX-351 uptake. Consistent with this, we observed robust synergy when combining CPX-351 with FLT3 inhibitors simultaneously or with CPX-351 exposure scheduled 24 hours prior to FLT3 inhibitor exposure. However, exposure to FLT3 inhibitors 24 hours prior to CPX-351 administration was less synergistic and even antagonistic at certain doses. Conclusions: These data provide additional supportive evidence that FLT3 activation results in increased uptake of CPX-351. This is consistent with results from the CPX-351 Phase III trial in which FLT3-ITD+ patients survived significantly longer when treated with CPX-351 compared to 7+3 chemotherapy. We also show that combining CPX-351 with existing FLT3 inhibitors can elicit a synergistic response when administered in dosing regimens where FLT3 inhibition does not precede CPX-351 treatment. Cumulatively, our data support further testing of CPX-351 in combination with FLT3 inhibitors for treating AML patients with genetic dysregulation of FLT3 signaling. Citation Format: David K. Edwards, Nathalie Javidi-Sharifi, Angela Rofelty, Max Gordon, Riley Roth-Carter, Paul Tardi, Lawrence Mayer, Jeffrey W. Tyner. CPX-351 works synergistically in combination with FLT3 inhibitors against AML with FLT3-ITD [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2017; 2017 Apr 1-5; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 1087. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2017-1087
Journal of Clinical Oncology | 2016
I. Brian Greenwell; Ashley D. Staton; Michael Lee; Jeffrey M. Switchenko; Joseph Maly; Kristie A. Blum; Natalie S. Grover; Stephanie Mathews; Steven I. Park; Max J. Gordon; Alexey V. Danilov; Christopher R. Flowers; Jonathon B. Cohen