Maxim Boycko
Russian Academy of Sciences
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Maxim Boycko.
The Economic Journal | 1996
Maxim Boycko; Andrei Shleifer; Robert W. Vishny
Public enterprises around the world have proved to be highly inefficient, primarily because they pursue strategies, such as excess employment, that satisfy the political objectives of politicians who control them. Privatization of public enterprises can raise the cost to politicians of influencing them, since subsidies to private firms necessary to force them to remain inefficient are politically harder to sustain than wasted profits of the state firms. In this way, privatization leads to efficient restructuring of firms. Moreover, privatization is more effective when combined with a tight monetary policy and when the new owners of firms are profit maximizing investors, rather than their employees or even managers. Copyright 1996 by Royal Economic Society.
Brookings Papers on Economic Activity | 1992
Robert J. Shiller; Maxim Boycko; Vladimir Korobov
ing from the current economic situation: MI 1. Which of the following achievements would please you more? A. You win fortune without fame: you make enough money through successful business dealings so that you can live comfortably for the rest of your life. B. You win fame without fortune: for example, you win a medal at the Olympics or you become a respected journalist or scholar. Responses in percent Fortune Fame without without Sluvey fame fortune size Ukraine (pre-coup) 67 33 90 Russia (Moscow) 65 35 92 Russia (Omsk) 81 19 107 U.S.A. (New York) 54 46 117 Japan (Tokyo) 68 32 126 Rober t J. Shiller, Maxim Boycko, and Vladimir Korobov 147 Little difference across countries appears in the responses: the exception is Omsk, where money appears to be most important. Virtually no difference in answers appears to exist between Japan and Ukraine or Ja-
European Economic Review | 1996
Maxim Boycko; Andrei Shleifer; Robert W. Vishny
Abstract Economic policy advice is often dispensed based on a model of a unified, benevolent government. For some transition economies, this model is inappropriate and can lead to bad advice. The more appropriate model — that of a badly divided government — often leads to very different policy recommendations. We illustrate this point using the example of pre-privatization restructuring of state firms, and discuss its implications for foreign economic assistance.
The Economic Journal | 1996
Andrei Shleifer; Maxim Boycko; Robert W. Vishny
The American Economic Review | 1990
Robert J. Shiller; Maxim Boycko; Vladimir Korobov
MIT Press Books | 1993
Olivier J. Blanchard; Maxim Boycko; Marek Dabrowski; Rudiger Dornbusch; Richard Layard; Andrei Shleifer
Oxford Review of Economic Policy | 1991
Maxim Boycko
Russia: Creating Private Enterprises and Efficient Markets | 1994
Maxim Boycko; Andrei Shleifer; Ira W. Lieberman; John Nellis
Archive | 1992
Maxim Boycko; Andrei Shleifer; Robert W. Vishny
Journal of Money, Credit and Banking | 1995
John Bennett; Maxim Boycko