Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Maxim Norkin is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Maxim Norkin.


Biology of Blood and Marrow Transplantation | 2015

Increasing Incidence of Chronic Graft-versus-Host Disease in Allogeneic Transplantation: A Report from the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research

Sally Arai; Mukta Arora; Tao Wang; Stephen Spellman; Wensheng He; Daniel R. Couriel; Alvaro Urbano-Ispizua; Corey Cutler; Andrea Bacigalupo; Minoo Battiwalla; Mary E.D. Flowers; Mark Juckett; Stephanie J. Lee; Alison W. Loren; Thomas R. Klumpp; Susan E. Prockup; Olle Ringdén; Bipin N. Savani; Gérard Socié; Kirk R. Schultz; Thomas R. Spitzer; Takanori Teshima; Christopher Bredeson; David A. Jacobsohn; Robert J. Hayashi; William R. Drobyski; Haydar Frangoul; Gorgun Akpek; Vincent T. Ho; Victor Lewis

Although transplant practices have changed over the last decades, no information is available on trends in incidence and outcome of chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD) over time. This study used the central database of the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research (CIBMTR) to describe time trends for cGVHD incidence, nonrelapse mortality, and risk factors for cGVHD. The 12-year period was divided into 3 intervals, 1995 to 1999, 2000 to 2003, and 2004 to 2007, and included 26,563 patients with acute leukemia, chronic myeloid leukemia, and myelodysplastic syndrome. Multivariate analysis showed an increased incidence of cGVHD in more recent years (odds ratio = 1.19, P < .0001), and this trend was still seen when adjusting for donor type, graft type, or conditioning intensity. In patients with cGVHD, nonrelapse mortality has decreased over time, but at 5 years there were no significant differences among different time periods. Risk factors for cGVHD were in line with previous studies. This is the first comprehensive characterization of the trends in cGVHD incidence and underscores the mounting need for addressing this major late complication of transplantation in future research.


Blood | 2016

Early cytomegalovirus reactivation remains associated with increased transplant-related mortality in the current era: a CIBMTR analysis

Minoo Battiwalla; Muthalagu Ramanathan; A. John Barrett; Kwang Woo Ahn; Min Chen; Jaime S. Green; Ayman Saad; Joseph H. Antin; Bipin N. Savani; Hillard M. Lazarus; Matthew D. Seftel; Wael Saber; David I. Marks; Mahmoud Aljurf; Maxim Norkin; John R. Wingard; Caroline A. Lindemans; Michael Boeckh; Marcie L. Riches; Jeffery J. Auletta

Single-center studies have reported an association between early (before day 100) cytomegalovirus (CMV) reactivation and decreased incidence of relapse for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) following allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation. To substantiate these preliminary findings, the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research (CIBMTR) Database was interrogated to analyze the impact of CMV reactivation on hematologic disease relapse in the current era. Data from 9469 patients transplanted with bone marrow or peripheral blood between 2003 and 2010 were analyzed according to 4 disease categories: AML (n = 5310); acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL, n = 1883); chronic myeloid leukemia (CML, n = 1079); and myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS, n = 1197). Median time to initial CMV reactivation was 41 days (range, 1-362 days). CMV reactivation had no preventive effect on hematologic disease relapse irrespective of diagnosis. Moreover, CMV reactivation was associated with higher nonrelapse mortality [relative risk [RR] among disease categories ranged from 1.61 to 1.95 and P values from .0002 to <.0001; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.14-2.61). As a result, CMV reactivation was associated with lower overall survival for AML (RR = 1.27; 95% CI, 1.17-1.38; P <.0001), ALL (RR = 1.46; 95% CI, 1.25-1.71; P <.0001), CML (RR = 1.49; 95% CI, 1.19-1.88; P = .0005), and MDS (RR = 1.31; 95% CI, 1.09-1.57; P = .003). In conclusion, CMV reactivation continues to remain a risk factor for poor posttransplant outcomes and does not seem to confer protection against hematologic disease relapse.


Leukemia | 2014

Ph+ ALL patients in first complete remission have similar survival after reduced intensity and myeloablative allogeneic transplantation: Impact of tyrosine kinase inhibitor and minimal residual disease

Veronika Bachanova; David I. Marks; Mei-Jie Zhang; Hsin Tzu Wang; M de Lima; Mahmoud Aljurf; M. Arellano; Andrew S. Artz; Ulrike Bacher; Jean-Yves Cahn; Y. B. Chen; Edward A. Copelan; William R. Drobyski; Robert Peter Gale; John P. Greer; Vinita Gupta; Gregory A. Hale; Partow Kebriaei; Hillard M. Lazarus; Ian D. Lewis; Victor Lewis; Jane L. Liesveld; Mark R. Litzow; Alison W. Loren; Alan M. Miller; Maxim Norkin; Betul Oran; Joseph Pidala; Jacob M. Rowe; Bipin N. Savani

The efficacy of reduced intensity conditioning (RIC) allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) for Philadelphia chromosome positive (Ph+) acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is uncertain. We analyzed 197 adults with Ph+ ALL in first complete remission; 67 patients receiving RIC were matched with 130 receiving myeloablative conditioning (MAC) for age, donor type and HCT year. Over 75% received pre-HCT tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), mostly imatinib; 39% (RIC) and 49% (MAC) were minimal residual disease (MRD)neg pre-HCT. At a median 4.5 years follow-up, 1-year transplant-related mortality (TRM) was lower in RIC (13%) than MAC (36%; P=0.001) while the 3-year relapse rate was 49% in RIC and 28% in MAC (P=0.058). Overall survival (OS) was similar (RIC 39% (95% confidence interval (CI) 27–52) vs 35% (95% CI 27–44); P=0.62). Patients MRDpos pre-HCT had higher risk of relapse with RIC vs MAC (hazard ratio (HR) 1.97; P=0.026). However, patients receiving pre-HCT TKI in combination with MRD negativity pre-RIC HCT had superior OS (55%) compared with a similar MRD population after MAC (33%; P=0.0042). In multivariate analysis, RIC lowered TRM (HR 0.6; P=0.057), but absence of pre-HCT TKI (HR 1.88; P=0.018), RIC (HR 1.891; P=0.054) and pre-HCT MRDpos (HR 1.6; P=0.070) increased relapse risk. RIC is a valid alternative strategy for Ph+ ALL patients ineligible for MAC and MRDneg status is preferred pre-HCT.


Biology of Blood and Marrow Transplantation | 2014

Reduced-Intensity Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation for Patients with Primary Myelofibrosis: A Cohort Analysis from the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research

Vikas Gupta; Adriana K. Malone; Parameswaran Hari; Kwang Woo Ahn; Zhen Huan Hu; Robert Peter Gale; Karen K. Ballen; Mehdi Hamadani; Eduardo Olavarria; Aaron T. Gerds; Edmund K. Waller; Luciano J. Costa; Joseph H. Antin; Rammurti T. Kamble; Koen M. Van Besien; Bipin N. Savani; Harry C. Schouten; Jeff Szer; Jean Yves Cahn; Marcos de Lima; Baldeep Wirk; Mahmoud Aljurf; Uday Popat; Nelli Bejanyan; Mark R. Litzow; Maxim Norkin; Ian D. Lewis; Gregory A. Hale; Ann E. Woolfrey; Alan M. Miller

We evaluated outcomes and associated prognostic factors in 233 patients undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) for primary myelofibrosis (MF) using reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC). The median age at RIC HCT was 55 yr. Donors were a matched sibling donor (MSD) in 34% of RIC HCTs, an HLA well-matched unrelated donor (URD) in 45%, and a partially matched/mismatched URD in 21%. Risk stratification according to the Dynamic International Prognostic Scoring System (DIPSS) was 12% low, 49% intermediate-1, 37% intermediate-2, and 1% high. The probability of survival at 5 yr was 47% (95% confidence interval [CI], 40% to 53%). In a multivariate analysis, donor type was the sole independent factor associated with survival. Adjusted probabilities of survival at 5-yr were 56% (95% CI, 44% to 67%) for MSD, 48% (95% CI, 37% to 58%) for well-matched URD, and 34% (95% CI, 21% to 47%) for partially matched/mismatched URD (P = .002). The relative risk (RR) for NRM was 3.92 (P = .006) for well-matched URD and 9.37 (P < .0001) for partially matched/mismatched URD. Trends toward increased NRM (RR, 1.7; P = .07) and inferior survival (RR, 1.37; P = .10) were observed in DIPSS intermediate-2/high-risk patients compared with DIPSS low/intermediate-1 risk patients. Our data indicate that RIC HCT is a potentially curative option for patients with MF, and that donor type is the most important factor influencing survival in these patients.


Bone Marrow Transplantation | 2015

Secondary solid cancer screening following hematopoietic cell transplantation.

Yoshihiro Inamoto; Nirali N. Shah; Bipin N. Savani; Bronwen E. Shaw; A. A Abraham; Ibrahim Ahmed; Goerguen Akpek; Yoshiko Atsuta; K. S. Baker; Grzegorz W. Basak; Menachem Bitan; Zachariah DeFilipp; T. K Gregory; Hildegard Greinix; Mehdi Hamadani; Betty K. Hamilton; Robert J. Hayashi; David A. Jacobsohn; R. Kamble; Kimberly A. Kasow; Nandita Khera; Hillard M. Lazarus; Adriana K. Malone; Maria Teresa Lupo-Stanghellini; Steven P. Margossian; Lori Muffly; Maxim Norkin; Muthalagu Ramanathan; Nina Salooja; Hélène Schoemans

Hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HCT) recipients have a substantial risk of developing secondary solid cancers, particularly beyond 5 years after HCT and without reaching a plateau overtime. A working group was established through the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research and the European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation with the goal to facilitate implementation of cancer screening appropriate to HCT recipients. The working group reviewed guidelines and methods for cancer screening applicable to the general population and reviewed the incidence and risk factors for secondary cancers after HCT. A consensus approach was used to establish recommendations for individual secondary cancers. The most common sites include oral cavity, skin, breast and thyroid. Risks of cancers are increased after HCT compared with the general population in skin, thyroid, oral cavity, esophagus, liver, nervous system, bone and connective tissues. Myeloablative TBI, young age at HCT, chronic GVHD and prolonged immunosuppressive treatment beyond 24 months were well-documented risk factors for many types of secondary cancers. All HCT recipients should be advised of the risks of secondary cancers annually and encouraged to undergo recommended screening based on their predisposition. Here we propose guidelines to help clinicians in providing screening and preventive care for secondary cancers among HCT recipients.


Bone Marrow Transplantation | 2013

Umbilical cord blood graft enhancement strategies: has the time come to move these into the clinic?

Maxim Norkin; Hillard M. Lazarus; John R. Wingard

Umbilical cord blood (UCB) is an attractive stem cell graft option for patients who need allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell support, but lack a suitable HLA-matched donor. However, the limited number of hematopoietic progenitor cells in a single cord blood unit can lead to an increased risk of graft failure, delayed hematological recovery and prolonged immunosuppression, particularly in adult patients. Several strategies to overcome these potential limitations are being evaluated. In this review, we discuss promising ex vivo manipulations to enhance cord blood engraftment capacity such as culture of UCB cells with stimulatory cytokines and growth factors, mesenchymal cells, Notch ligand, copper chelators, prostaglandins, complement components, nicotinamide and CD26/DPPIV inhibitors. All these approaches are now in early clinical trials. However, despite the fact that several cord blood enhancement strategies have resulted in increased numbers of progenitor cells and faster neutrophil recovery, the ability of these techniques to significantly shorten engraftment time and permit the use of cord units with low numbers of total nucleated cells, or accomplish reliable engraftment with a single cord, have yet to be convincingly demonstrated. The ultimate clinical value of ex vivo cord blood expansion or manipulation has not been defined yet, and the current data do not permit predicting which technology will prove to be the optimal strategy. Nevertheless, expectations remain high that eventually ex vivo enhancement will be able to improve clinical outcomes and significantly extend the applicability of UCB transplantation.


Seminars in Hematology | 2012

Quality of Life, Social Challenges, and Psychosocial Support for Long-Term Survivors After Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem-Cell Transplantation

Maxim Norkin; Jack W. Hsu; John R. Wingard

Over the last two decades quality of life (QoL) and the social challenges of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (allo-HSCT) survivors have been emerging as subjects of extensive research and are now considered as very important aspects in the pretransplant evaluation and management of allo-HSCT recipients. Recognition of QoL challenges in allo-HSCT survivors allows timely interventions leading to improvement of post-transplant outcomes. It needs to be recognized that long-lasting life changes associated with survivorship after allo-HSCT also significantly affect QoL of partners of allo-HSCT survivors. Currently, resources should be focused on how research findings can be used by patients, their partners, and physicians to optimize QoL and psychosocial adjustment.


American Journal of Hematology | 2016

Pediatric-inspired therapy compared to allografting for Philadelphia chromosome-negative adult ALL in first complete remission

Matthew D. Seftel; Donna Neuberg; Mei-Jie Zhang; Hai Lin Wang; Karen K. Ballen; Julie Bergeron; Stephen Couban; Cesar O. Freytes; Mehdi Hamadani; Mohamed A. Kharfan-Dabaja; Hillard M. Lazarus; Taiga Nishihori; Kristjan Paulson; Wael Saber; Stephen E. Sallan; Robert J. Soiffer; Martin S. Tallman; Ann E. Woolfrey; Daniel J. DeAngelo; Daniel J. Weisdorf; Gorgun Akpek; Ulrike Bacher; Veronika Bachanova; Frédéric Baron; Jean Yves Cahn; Bruce M. Camitta; Edward A. Copelan; Marcos de Lima; Abhinav Deol; Robert Peter Gale

For adults with Philadelphia chromosome‐negative (Ph−) acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) in first complete remission (CR1), allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) is an established curative strategy. However, pediatric‐inspired chemotherapy may also offer durable leukemia‐free survival in the absence of HCT. We compared 422 HCT recipients aged 18–50 years with Ph‐ALL in CR1 reported to the CIBMTR with an age‐matched concurrent cohort of 108 Ph− ALL CR1 patients who received a Dana‐Farber Consortium pediatric‐inspired non‐HCT regimen. At 4 years of follow‐up, incidence of relapse after HCT was 24% (95% CI 19–28) versus 23% (95% CI 15–32) for the non‐HCT (chemo) cohort (P=0.97). Treatment‐related mortality (TRM) was higher in the HCT cohort [HCT 37% (95% CI 31–42) versus chemo 6% (95% CI 3–12), P<0.0001]. DFS in the HCT cohort was 40% (95% CI 35–45) versus 71% (95% CI 60–79) for chemo, P<0.0001. Similarly, OS favored chemo [HCT 45% (95% CI 40–50)] versus chemo 73% [(95% CI 63–81), P<0.0001]. In multivariable analysis, the sole factor predictive of shorter OS was the administration of HCT [hazard ratio 3.12 (1.99–4.90), P<0.0001]. For younger adults with Ph− ALL, pediatric‐inspired chemotherapy had lower TRM, no increase in relapse, and superior overall survival compared to HCT. Am. J. Hematol. 91:322–329, 2016.


Biology of Blood and Marrow Transplantation | 2015

Impact of Pretransplantation 18F-fluorodeoxy Glucose-Positron Emission Tomography Status on Outcomes after Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation for Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma

Veronika Bachanova; Linda J. Burns; Kwang Woo Ahn; Ginna G. Laport; Gorgun Akpek; Mohamed A. Kharfan-Dabaja; Taiga Nishihori; Edward Agura; Philippe Armand; Samantha Jaglowski; Mitchell S. Cairo; Amanda F. Cashen; Jonathon B. Cohen; Anita D'Souza; Cesar O. Freytes; Robert Peter Gale; Siddhartha Ganguly; Nilanjan Ghosh; Leona Holmberg; David J. Inwards; Abraham S. Kanate; Hillard M. Lazarus; Adriana K. Malone; Reinhold Munker; Alberto Mussetti; Maxim Norkin; Tim Prestidge; Jacob M. Rowe; Prakash Satwani; Tanya Siddiqi

Assessment with (18)F-fluorodeoxy glucose (FDG)-positron emission tomography (PET) before hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) for lymphoma may be prognostic for outcomes. Patients with chemotherapy-sensitive non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) undergoing allogeneic HCT reported to the Center of International Blood and Marrow Transplantation Registry between 2007 and 2012 were included. Pre-HCT PET status (positive versus negative) was determined by the reporting transplantation centers. We analyzed 336 patients; median age was 55 years and 60% were males. Follicular lymphoma (n = 104) was more common than large cell (n = 85), mantle cell (n = 69), and mature natural killer or T cell lymphoma (n = 78); two thirds of the cohort received reduced-intensity conditioning; one half had unrelated donor grafts. Patients underwent PET scanning a median of 1 month (range, .07 to 2.83 months) before HCT; 159 were PET positive and 177 were PET negative. At 3 years, relapse/progression, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) in PET-positive versus PET-negative groups were 40% versus 26%; P = .007; 43% versus 47%; P = .47; and 58% versus 60%; P = .73, respectively. On multivariate analysis, a positive pretransplantation PET was associated with an increased risk of relapse/progression (risk ratio [RR], 1.86; P = .001) but was not associated with increased mortality (RR, 1.29, 95% confidence interval [CI], .96 to 1.7; P = .08), therapy failure (RR, 1.32; 95% CI, .95 to 1.84; P = .10), or nonrelapse mortality (RR, .75; 95% CI, .48 to 1.18; P = .22). PET status conferred no influence on graft-versus-host disease. A positive PET scan before HCT is associated with increased relapse risk but should not be interpreted as a barrier to a successful allograft. PET status does not appear to predict survival after allogeneic HCT for NHL.


Biology of Blood and Marrow Transplantation | 2016

Metabolic Syndrome and Cardiovascular Disease after Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation: Screening and Preventive Practice Recommendations from the CIBMTR and EBMT

Zachariah DeFilipp; Rafael F. Duarte; John A. Snowden; Navneet S. Majhail; Diana Greenfield; José López Miranda; Mutlu Arat; K. Scott Baker; Linda J. Burns; Christine Duncan; Maria Gilleece; Gregory A. Hale; Mehdi Hamadani; Betty K. Hamilton; William J. Hogan; Jack W. Hsu; Yoshihiro Inamoto; Rammurti T. Kamble; Maria Teresa Lupo-Stanghellini; Adriana K. Malone; Philip L. McCarthy; Mohamad Mohty; Maxim Norkin; Pamela Paplham; Muthalagu Ramanathan; John M. Richart; Nina Salooja; Harry C. Schouten; Hélène Schoemans; Adriana Seber

Metabolic syndrome (MetS) is a constellation of cardiovascular risk factors that increases the risk of cardiovascular disease, diabetes mellitus, and all cause mortality. Long-term survivors of hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) have a substantial risk of developing MetS and cardiovascular disease, with the estimated prevalence of MetS being 31–49% amongst HCT recipients. While MetS has not yet been proven to impact cardiovascular risk after HCT, an understanding of the incidence and risk factors for MetS in HCT recipients can provide the foundation to evaluate screening guidelines and develop interventions that may mitigate cardiovascular-related mortality. A working group was established through the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research and the European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation with the goal to review literature and recommend practices appropriate to HCT recipients. Here we deliver consensus recommendations to help clinicians provide screening and preventive care for MetS and cardiovascular disease among HCT recipients. All HCT survivors should be advised of the risks of MetS and encouraged to undergo recommended screening based on their predisposition and ongoing risk factors.

Collaboration


Dive into the Maxim Norkin's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Hillard M. Lazarus

Case Western Reserve University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Bipin N. Savani

Vanderbilt University Medical Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge