Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Maximilian A. Meyer is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Maximilian A. Meyer.


American Journal of Sports Medicine | 2017

The Influence of Evidence-Based Surgical Indications and Techniques on Failure Rates After Arthroscopic Shoulder Stabilization in the Contact or Collision Athlete With Anterior Shoulder Instability.

Timothy Leroux; Bryan M. Saltzman; Maximilian A. Meyer; Rachel M. Frank; Bernard R. Bach; Brian J. Cole; Anthony A. Romeo; Nikhil N. Verma

Background: It has been reported that arthroscopic shoulder stabilization yields higher rates of failure in contact or collision athletes as compared with open shoulder stabilization; however, this is largely based upon studies that do not employ modern, evidence-based surgical indications and techniques for arthroscopic shoulder stabilization. Purpose: To (1) determine the pooled failure rate across all studies reporting failure after primary arthroscopic shoulder stabilization for anterior shoulder instability in contact or collision athletes and (2) stratify failure rates according to studies that use evidence-based surgical indications and techniques. Study Design: Systematic review. Methods: A review of PubMed, Medline, and Embase was performed to identify all clinical studies with a minimum of 1-year follow-up that reported failure rates after arthroscopic shoulder stabilization for anterior shoulder instability in contact or collision athletes. Data pertaining to patient demographics, clinical and radiographic preoperative assessment, surgical indications, surgical technique, rehabilitation, and outcome were collected from each included study. An overall failure rate was determined across all included studies. After this, a secondary literature review was performed to identify factors related to patient selection and surgical technique that significantly influence failure after primary arthroscopic shoulder stabilization. Failure rates were then determined among included studies that used these evidence-based indications and techniques. Results: Overall, 26 studies reporting on 779 contact or collision athletes met the inclusion criteria. The mean patient age was 19.9 years, 90.3% were male, and the most common sport was rugby. There was considerable variability in the reporting of patient demographics, preoperative assessment, surgical indications, surgical technique, and patient outcomes. Across all included studies, the pooled failure rate after arthroscopic shoulder stabilization in the contact or collision athlete was 17.8%; however, among studies that excluded patients with significant bone loss, used a minimum of 3 suture anchors, and performed the stabilization in the lateral decubitus position, the failure rate was 7.9%. Conclusion: The rate of failure after arthroscopic shoulder stabilization in contact or collision athletes decreases from 17.8% to 7.9% after the use of evidence-based surgical indications and techniques.


American Journal of Sports Medicine | 2017

The Therapeutic Effect of Intra-articular Normal Saline Injections for Knee Osteoarthritis: A Meta-analysis of Evidence Level 1 Studies

Bryan M. Saltzman; Timothy Leroux; Maximilian A. Meyer; Bryce A. Basques; Jaskarndip Chahal; Bernard R. Bach; Adam B. Yanke; Brian J. Cole

Background: Intra-articular normal saline (IA-NS) injections have been utilized as a placebo in a number of randomized controlled trials pertaining to the management of knee osteoarthritis (OA); however, it is believed that these “placebo” injections may have a therapeutic effect that has not been quantified in the literature. Purpose: To (1) quantify the effect of IA-NS injections on patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and (2) compare postinjection PROs to established minimal clinically important difference (MCID) criteria to demonstrate a potential therapeutic effect. Study Design: Meta-analysis. Methods: A review was conducted to identify all randomized, placebo-controlled trials on injection therapy for knee OA between 2006 and 2016. Patient demographics and PROs before the injection and at 3 and 6 months after the injection were collected for patients in the IA-NS injection group in each study. A random-effects model was used to compare preinjection scores and scores at each postinjection time point in a pairwise fashion. Results: In total, there were 14 placebo cohorts in 13 studies that were analyzed after meeting inclusion criteria for this meta-analysis. This included 1076 patients (Kellgren-Lawrence grade 1-4), with a weighted mean age of 62.53 years and mean body mass index of 28.67 kg/m2. There was only sufficient information to perform analyses of visual analog scale (VAS) pain and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) total scores. At 3 months after the IA-NS placebo injection, there was a significant improvement in VAS pain scores (mean difference [MD], 12.10 [95% CI, 3.27 to 20.93]; P = .007), whereas improvement in the WOMAC total scores approached but did not reach statistical significance (MD, 19.75 [95% CI, –0.50 to 40.09]; P = .06). At 6 months, both VAS pain scores (MD, 16.62 [95% CI, 12.13-21.10]; P < .00001) and WOMAC total scores (MD, 11.34 [95% CI, 7.03-15.65]; P < .00001) were significantly improved in comparison to preinjection values. Furthermore, improvements in both the VAS pain and WOMAC total scores at 6 months were clinically significant (MCID, 1.37 and 9, respectively). Conclusion: The administration of an IA-NS placebo injection yields a statistically and clinically meaningful improvement in PROs up to 6 months after the injection in patients with knee OA. This observation supports the notion that the so-called placebo effect for IA-NS injections achieves a clinically meaningful response in patients with OA when provided during comparison studies to an active treatment group (ie, hyaluronic acid).


American Journal of Sports Medicine | 2017

Prospective Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes After Concomitant Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction and Meniscal Allograft Transplantation at a Mean 5-Year Follow-up

Bryan M. Saltzman; Maximilian A. Meyer; Alexander E. Weber; Sarah G. Poland; Adam B. Yanke; Brian J. Cole

Background: Concomitant anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and meniscal allograft transplantation (ACLR/MAT) has demonstrated short-term success in small, retrospective cohort studies. Patient- and disease-specific predictors of success after ACLR/MAT are largely unknown. Purpose: To (1) prospectively evaluate the subjective and objective clinical and radiographic outcomes after ACLR/MAT and (2) conduct a subgroup analysis to identify patient- or disease-related factors that correlate with failure. Study Design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) were prospectively collected on 40 patients undergoing concomitant ACLR/MAT. Nineteen athletes responded to return-to-sport data. Clinical data (physical examination including Lachman and pivot-shift testing and KT-1000 arthrometer testing) were obtained on 28 patients who returned for an evaluation, while 24 of those patients additionally had radiographic data (progression of Kellgren-Lawrence [KL] grade and joint-space narrowing) evaluated. Reoperations and failures were documented for all patients at their final follow-up. Results: The overall cohort of 40 patients had a mean age of 30.3 ± 9.6 years (range, 16.0-54.0 years) and a mean body mass index of 27.7 ± 4.2 kg/m2. The mean follow-up time was 5.7 ± 3.2 years (range, 1.7-16.5 years). There were 33 (83%) medial meniscal transplants performed compared with 7 (17%) lateral meniscal transplants. Patients underwent a mean of 2.9 ± 1.9 prior surgical procedures. Nineteen patients underwent concomitant procedures, including, most commonly, 9 hardware removals and 9 osteochondral allografts. There were significant improvements in 11 of 14 PRO measures as well as a 50% return-to-sport rate. Knee stability significantly improved in 28 patients who returned for a physical examination, and KT-1000 arthrometer testing indicated no differences between the affected and unaffected sides at final follow-up (mean, 0.9 ± 1.5 mm [range, –2 to 4 mm] in comparison to contralateral knee at 30 lb of testing; mean, 0.9 ± 1.9 mm [range, –4 to 4 mm] in comparison to contralateral knee at maximum manual strength). Significant improvements were seen in patients with Lachman grade ≥2A at final follow-up (18% vs 97%, respectively; P < .01) and with pivot shift ≥1+ at final follow-up (36% vs 94%, respectively; P < .01) compared with preoperatively. For the 24 patients with radiographic data, no significant joint-space decrease was recorded in the medial compartment for medial MAT–treated patients or the lateral compartment for lateral MAT–treated patients. The mean KL grade increased from 0.7 ± 0.8 to 1.6 ± 0.9 at final follow-up (P < .01). There were no major (0%) and 2 minor (5%) complications, which constituted early postoperative drainage treated successfully with oral antibiotics. While 35% of patients underwent reoperations, the majority of these were simple arthroscopic debridements and occurred after nearly 4 years from the index surgery. The overall survival rate at final follow-up was 80%. Failures occurred at a mean of 7.3 years, and those who converted to arthroplasty did so at a mean of 8.3 years from the time of index ACLR/MAT. Patients with failed grafts were more frequently associated with workers’ compensation claims (38% vs 13%, respectively) and less frequently self-identified as athletes (13% vs 56%, respectively) compared with patients with intact grafts. Conclusion: Concomitant ACLR/MAT can provide significant improvements in clinical outcomes and enhancement in objective knee stability and was associated with an insignificant degree of radiographic joint-space narrowing changes with a 5-year survivorship of more than 80% for those with data available. Athlete status may be a preoperative predictor of midterm survival.


American Journal of Sports Medicine | 2017

Outcomes After Shoulder and Elbow Injury in Baseball Players: Are We Reporting What Matters?:

Eric C. Makhni; Bryan M. Saltzman; Maximilian A. Meyer; Vasilios Moutzouros; Brian J. Cole; Anthony A. Romeo; Nikhil N. Verma

Background: Return to play, as well as time to return to play, are the most important metrics considered by athletes when attempting to make treatment decisions after injury. However, the consistency of reporting of these metrics in the scientific literature is unknown. Purpose: To investigate patterns of outcomes reporting in the medical literature of shoulder and elbow injuries in active baseball players. Study Design: Systematic review. Methods: A systematic review of literature published within the past 10 years was performed to identify all recent clinical studies focusing on shoulder and elbow injuries in baseball players across all levels. Review articles, case reports, and laboratory/biomechanical studies were all excluded. Results: A total of 49 studies were included for review. The majority of studies were either level 3 or level 4 evidence (96%). In total, 71% of studies reported on rates of return to preinjury level of play, whereas 31% of studies reported on time to return to preinjury level of play. Only 47% of studies reported on both rate and time of return to preinjury level of play. A minority of studies (8%) reported patient satisfaction rates. Finally, 27 different subjective and patient-reported outcomes were reported, and none of these appeared in more than 14% of all studies. Conclusion: Time to return to preinjury level of play is inadequately reported in studies of shoulder and elbow injury in baseball players. Similarly, satisfaction rates and scores are underreported. Finally, the significant variability of subjective and patient-reported outcomes utilized may undermine the ability of clinicians to accurately compare results from different studies.


Cartilage | 2017

Effectiveness of Lavage Techniques in Removing Immunogenic Elements from Osteochondral Allografts

Maximilian A. Meyer; Mark A. McCarthy; Matthew E. Gitelis; Sarah G. Poland; Atsushi Urita; Susan Chubinskaya; Adam B. Yanke; Brian J. Cole

Objective This study aimed to compare standard saline lavage to combination saline and high-pressure carbon dioxide (CO2) lavage in removing marrow elements from osteochondral allografts. Design Six fresh hemicondyles were obtained. Three osteochondral allograft plugs (15-mm diameter, 6-mm depth) were harvested from each hemicondyle and randomized to 1 of 3 treatment arms: A, no lavage; B, 1 L standard saline lavage; C, simultaneous saline (1 L) and 1-minute high-pressure CO2 lavage. After hematoxylin and eosin staining, a “percentage fill” of remaining marrow elements was calculated for each overall sample and then repeated in 3 distinct compartments for each sample based on depth from surface: 1, deepest third; 2, middle third; and 3, most superficial third. Trial arms B and C were compared with 1-tailed Student t tests. Results Group A had an overall percentage fill of 51.2% ± 8.8%. While both lavage techniques decreased overall remaining marrow elements, group B yielded significantly higher percentages of remaining marrow elements than group C (28.6% ± 16.5%, 14.6% ± 8.7%, P = 0.045). On depth analysis, group A exhibited homogenous filling of trabecular space (63.0% ± 15.5%, 67.6% ± 13.7%, and 55.2% ± 10.1% in zones 1, 2, and 3, respectively). Both lavage arms equally removed marrow elements from superficial zone 3 (B, 17.4% ± 9.2%; C, 15.6% ± 12.4%, P = 0.41) and middle zone 2 (B, 30.2% ± 17.7%; C, 21.4% ± 15.5%, P = 0.18). However, group C lavage removed significantly more marrow elements in deep zone 1 than group B (29.7% ± 10.9%, 58.5% ± 25.2%, P = 0.01). Conclusion Combination saline and high-pressure CO2 lavage more effectively clears marrow elements from osteochondral allografts than saline alone.


Orthopedics | 2016

Deciding How Best to Treat Cartilage Defects

Lucy Oliver-Welsh; Justin W. Griffin; Maximilian A. Meyer; Matthew E. Gitelis; Brian J. Cole

The decision-making regarding and treatment of cartilage abnormalities requires a systematic approach. This article reviews the concepts and principles that guide the management of this complex problem. The precise incidence, demographics, and progression of cartilage lesions have not been clearly delineated. Pursuing a patient-centered approach that considers the available nonsurgical and surgical options remains the cornerstone of patient care. The importance of determining concomitant knee pathologies, the proper interpretation and implications of imaging findings, and an accurate determination of the intra-articular and subchondral findings represent the primary elements of the decision analysis. Treatment options vary depending on patient goals, the disposition of the lesion, and a variety of other factors. The authors recommend proper patient education and consideration of how nonsurgical treatment or less invasive options such as arthroscopic debridement might be effective. If these strategies should fail, appropriate matching of a surgical procedure to the patients pathology, goals, and expectations is warranted. Surgical options include debridement, marrow stimulation techniques, surface allograft treatments, autologous chondrocyte implantation, and osteochondral grafting (autograft and allograft) in addition to some emerging technologies. This article focuses on the decision-making process. [Orthopedics. 2016; 39(6):343-350.].


Cartilage | 2018

The Effect of Surgical Insertion and Proinflammatory Cytokines on Osteochondral Allograft Survival and Metabolism

Samantha L. Gitelis; Ariel Bodker; Michel P. Laurent; Spencer S. Kirk; Giuseppe Filardo; Maximilian A. Meyer; Arnavaz Hakimiyan; L. Rappoport; Markus A. Wimmer; Brian J. Cole; Susan Chubinskaya

Objective To investigate the responses of refrigerated osteochondral allograft cartilage (OCA) and fresh cartilage (FC), including cell survival and metabolism, to surgical impaction and proinflammatory cytokines. Design Osteochondral plugs (8 mm diameter) were harvested from prolonged-refrigerated (14-28 days) and fresh (≤24 hours postmortem) human femoral hemicondyles and subjected to a 0.2 N s pneumatic impaction impulse. Cartilage explants were removed from subchondral bone and randomized to 1 of 6 treatment groups: (1) Unimpacted control (UIC), (2) Impacted control (IC), (3) Impacted + interleukin (IL)-1β (0.1 ng/mL), (4) Impacted + IL-1β (0.1 ng/mL) + IL-6, (5) Impacted + IL-1β (10 ng/mL), and (6) Impacted + IL-1β (10 ng/mL) + IL-6. Samples were measured for cell viability, histology, and proteoglycan (PG) content at days 0, 2, 7, and 14 of culture. Results In UIC, cell viability was indistinguishable between OCA and FC and remained constant. Impaction alone decreased cell viability by 30% (P < 0.01) in the OCA superficial layer and by 26% (P < 0.01) in the entire tissue, but did not affect viability in FC. Cytokine addition did not further influence cell viability. Impaction alone did not affect PG synthesis. Addition of cytokines to impacted tissue decreased PG synthesis by ~3-fold in both tissue types in comparison with corresponding impacted controls (P < 0.01). Throughout 2-week culture, PG release remained stable in all FC groups, but peaked at day 14 in OCA cartilage subjected to cytokines. Conclusions Mechanical impaction, mimicking surgical insertion, has a more profound effect on cell viability in OCA than in FC. Addition of proinflammatory cytokines further decreases OCA tissue metabolism and integrity.


Cartilage | 2018

Effect of Vertical or Beveled Chondral Defect Creation on Rim Deformation and Contact

Adam B. Yanke; Megan L. Konopka; Davietta C. Butty; Maximilian A. Meyer; Eric J. Cotter; Alejandro Espinoza; Brian J. Cole

Objective To determine biomechanical effects of knee cartilage defect perimeter morphology based on cartilage strain and opposing subchondral bone contact. Design Articular cartilage defects were created in 5 bovine femoral condyles: group 1, 45° inner bevel with 8-mm rim; group 2, vertical with 8-mm rim; and group 3, 45° outer bevel with 8-mm base. Samples were placed into a custom-machined micro–computed tomography tube and subjected to 800 N of axial loading. DICOM data were used to calculate cartilage thickness 4 and 6 mm from the center, distance between tibial cartilage surface and femoral subchondral bone, and contact width between tibial cartilage and subchondral bone. Strain 4 mm from the center and both absolute and change in distance (mm) to subchondral bone were compared between groups 1 and 2 using paired t tests. Strain at 6 mm and distance changed, loaded distance, and contact width (mm) were compared between groups using the Friedman test with post hoc analysis using Wilcoxon signed rank test. Results No significant differences in rim strain were noted between groups 1 and 2 at 4 mm (P = 0.10) and between groups 1, 2, and 3 at 6 mm (P = 0.247) from the defect center. The loaded distance was significantly different between groups 1 and 3 (P = 0.013). No significant change in distance to the subchondral bone was found between groups (P = 0.156). The difference in subchondral bone contact area approached but did not reach significance (P = 0.074). Conclusion When debriding focal articular cartilage defects, establishment of an inner bevel decreases tissue deformation and contact with opposing subchondral bone.


Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine | 2017

Flexion Posteroanterior Radiographs Affect Both Enrollment for and Outcomes After Injection Therapy for Knee Osteoarthritis

Maximilian A. Meyer; Timothy Leroux; David M. Levy; Annemarie K. Tilton; Paul B. Lewis; Adam B. Yanke; Brian J. Cole

Background: Knee injection therapy is less effective for severe osteoarthritis (OA), specifically Kellgren-Lawrence (KL) grade 4. Patient selection for knee injection trials has historically been based on extension anteroposterior (AP) radiographic evaluation; however, emerging evidence suggests that KL grading using a flexion posteroanterior (PA) radiograph more accurately and reproducibly predicts disease severity. The impact of radiographic view on patient selection and outcome after knee injection therapy remains unknown. Hypothesis: A 45° flexion PA radiograph will reveal more advanced knee OA in certain patients. These patients will report worse pre- and postinjection outcomes. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: Four raters independently graded extension AP and flexion PA radiographs from 91 patients previously enrolled in a knee injection trial. Patients determined to have KL grade 4 OA by any rater on extension AP radiographs were excluded. Among included patients, those upgraded to KL grade 4 on flexion PA radiographs by at least 2 raters constituted group 2, while all remaining patients constituted group 1. Demographic data and patient-reported outcome scores before injection and at 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months postinjection were compared between groups. Results: Overall, 64 patients met the inclusion criteria, of which 19 patients (30%) constituted group 2. Compared with group 1, patients in group 2 were older (58.7 vs 52.3 years, P = .02), had worse visual analog scale pain scores before (6.6 vs 5.3, P = .03) and 6 months after injection (5.3 vs 3.5, P = .01), had less improvement in both Lysholm (8.5 vs 20.5, P = .02) and Short Form–12 physical component (–2.2 vs 1.7, P = .03) scores from preinjection to 6 months postinjection, and had less improvement in both Lysholm (1.6 vs 13.1, P = .03) and Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score sport subscale (–2.1 vs 16, P = .01) scores from preinjection to 12 months postinjection. Conclusion: One in 3 patients considered to have mild to moderate knee OA on extension AP radiography is upgraded to severe knee OA (KL grade 4) on flexion PA radiography. These patients report worse preinjection outcomes, worse pain scores at short-term follow-up, and decreased improvement in knee function scores between 6 months and 1 year postinjection.


Journal of orthopaedics | 2018

Evaluation of angle trunk rotation measurements to improve quality and safety in the management of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis

Jill E. Larson; Maximilian A. Meyer; Barrett Boody; John F. Sarwark

Purpose The evaluation, management and follow-up of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) occur frequently within a pediatric orthopedic surgery practice. Curve status can be assessed with Scoliometer measurements of angle trunk rotation (ATR), which are reliable and reproducible to within 3°. This study assessed the longitudinal efficacy, safety and cost savings of integrating ATR measurements to monitor curve status and progression in AIS, and suggests a quality-based management strategy. Methods A retrospective review of medical records between 2004 and 2014 included patients with AIS between 10-17 years, excluding those with Cobb angle >52° at presentation. Two cohorts were analyzed based on presentation prior to menarche (PRE) or after menarche (POST). The PRE groups was further classified based on whether the curve was Stable or Unstable. The cost of a single PA thoracolumbar radiograph was defined based on the 2015 CMS fee schedule (

Collaboration


Dive into the Maximilian A. Meyer's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Brian J. Cole

Rush University Medical Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Adam B. Yanke

Rush University Medical Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Timothy Leroux

Rush University Medical Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Bryan M. Saltzman

Rush University Medical Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Atsushi Urita

Rush University Medical Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Annemarie K. Tilton

Rush University Medical Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Anthony A. Romeo

Rush University Medical Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

David M. Levy

Rush University Medical Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Susan Chubinskaya

Rush University Medical Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Alexander E. Weber

University of Southern California

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge