Maxwell W. Weinberg

Imaging in syndesmotic injury: a systematic literature review

ObjectivesTo give a systematic overview of current diagnostic imaging options for assessment of the distal tibio-fibular syndesmosis.Materials and methodsA systematic literature search across the following sources was performed: PubMed, ScienceDirect, Google Scholar, and SpringerLink. Forty-two articles were included and subdivided into three groups: group one consists of studies using conventional radiographs (22 articles), group two includes studies using computed tomography (CT) scans (15 articles), and group three comprises studies using magnet resonance imaging (MRI, 9 articles).The following data were extracted: imaging modality, measurement method, number of participants and ankles included, average age of participants, sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of the measurement technique. The Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 (QUADAS-2) tool was used to assess the methodological quality.ResultsThe three most common techniques used for assessment of the syndesmosis in conventional radiographs are the tibio-fibular clear space (TFCS), the tibio-fibular overlap (TFO), and the medial clear space (MCS). Regarding CT scans, the tibio-fibular width (axial images) was most commonly used. Most of the MRI studies used direct assessment of syndesmotic integrity. Overall, the included studies show low probability of bias and are applicable in daily practice.ConclusionsConventional radiographs cannot predict syndesmotic injuries reliably. CT scans outperform plain radiographs in detecting syndesmotic mal-reduction. Additionally, the syndesmotic interval can be assessed in greater detail by CT. MRI measurements achieve a sensitivity and specificity of nearly 100%; however, correlating MRI findings with patients’ complaints is difficult, and utility with subtle syndesmotic instability needs further investigation. Overall, the methodological quality of these studies was satisfactory.

Isolated avulsion fracture of the first metatarsal base at the peroneus longus tendon attachment: a case report

Avulsion fractures of the first metatarsal (MT1) base at the peroneus longus (PL) tendon attachment are rare and may be undiagnosed during an emergency visit. If the injury is not treated properly, chronic pain or persistent impairment for inversion and plantar-flexion of the first ray may occur. This case report presents a 30-year-old woman who presented 10xa0weeks post trauma to a foot and ankle surgeon due to a swollen right midfoot with diffuse tenderness over the medial Lisfranc joint. Further evaluation showed an isolated avulsion fracture of the first metatarsal, which was undiagnosed during the emergent visit following the accident. In this case, the patient was successfully treated conservatively. The goal of this article is to raise awareness of this rare injury for radiologists and orthopedic surgeons.

Currently used imaging options cannot accurately predict subtalar joint instability

PurposeTo give a systematic overview of current diagnostic imaging options and surgical treatment for chronic subtalar joint instability.MethodsA systematic literature search across the following sources was performed: PubMed, ScienceDirect, and SpringerLink. Twenty-three imaging studies and 19 outcome studies were included. The Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 (QUADAS 2) tool was used to assess the methodologic quality of the imaging articles, while the modified Coleman Score was used to assess the methodologic quality of the outcome studies.ResultsConventional radiographs were most frequently used to assess chronic subtalar joint instability. Talar tilt, anterior talar translation, and subtalar tilt were the three most commonly used measurement methods. Surgery often included calcaneofibular ligament reconstruction.ConclusionCurrent imaging options do not reliably predict subtalar joint instability. Distinction between chronic lateral ankle instability and subtalar joint instability remains challenging. Recognition of subtalar joint instability as an identifiable and treatable cause of ankle pain requires vigilant clinical investigation.Level of evidenceSystematic Review of Level III and Level IV Studies, Level IV.

Surgical outcome in chronic syndesmotic injury: A systematic literature review

BACKGROUNDnChronic injuries of the distal tibio-fibular syndesmosis often present with non-specific clinical and radiographic findings. If chronic instability to the distal tibio-fibular syndesmosis is verified, various reconstruction options are available. The purpose of this article is to give a systematic review of current surgical treatment options in patients with chronic syndesmotic injury.nnnMETHODSnThree major medical databases were searched from inception through December 12, 2017: PubMed, ScienceDirect, and SpringerLink. Studies were included if they were original research studies which assessed the outcome of patients treated surgically for chronic syndesmotic instability. Only studies written in English were considered. The following data were extracted from each study: number of patients and ankles included, average patients age, gender, study design, preoperative examination, time between the initial injury and the operation, postoperative follow-up time, operative technique, complication rates, and clinical outcome. The modified Coleman Score was used to assess the methodologic quality of the included studies.nnnRESULTSnSeventeen (17) studies were included. All studies were retrospective or prospective case series. Each study was performed at a single center. In general, good functional outcomes and low complication rates were reported. The American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle (AOFAS) score was most frequently used outcome tool to measure postoperative outcomes. The quality of the included studies was overall satisfactory.nnnCONCLUSIONSnA few studies have reported on the operative outcomes after treating chronic syndesmotic instability. Several different techniques were used to treat this problem. The quality of current studies is overall satisfactory but could be improved with larger patient numbers and prospective analysis. Recognition of this clinical entity as an identifiable and treatable cause of ankle pain requires vigilant clinical investigation.nnnLEVEL OF EVIDENCEnLevel IV; Systematic Review of Level IV Studies.

Does Open versus Arthroscopic Surgical Technique Affect the Union Rate of Tibiotalar Arthrodesis

Category: Arthroscopy Introduction/Purpose: To date, there are only a handful of studies directly comparing outcomes of open versus arthroscopic ankle arthrodesis. Major limitations of these studies are small patient cohorts, lack of long-term follow-up, lack of assessment pre-operative patient demographics and imaging, and post-operatively evaluation of clinical outcomes but not union rates. The purpose of this clinical study is to compare the rate of union in ankle fusions in patients that underwent open arthrodesis to those that underwent arthroscopic arthrodesis. The hypothesis of this study was that there would be no difference in union rate in patients that underwent open versus arthroscopic arthrodesis. Methods: This is a retrospective review of 521 consecutive patients from October 2002 to April 2016. One hundred twenty-five ankles from 121 patients met inclusion criteria. These patients underwent primary tibiotalar arthrodesis without the use of autograft. Fifty-nine patients underwent open tibiotalar arthrodesis and 66 patients underwent arthroscopic tibiotalar arthrodesis. Age, gender, body mass index, smoking, and preoperative radiographic deformity were controlled. The primary outcome measure was union rate of tibiotalar arthrodesis. Secondary outcome measures were time to union, rate of wound complications, rate of return to operating room, and rate of development of post-operative deep vein thrombosis (DVT). Results: One hundred twenty-one patients (125 ankles) were available for final follow-up. Average age of the patients was 55.3 +/- 17.2 years. Mean follow-up time was 35.4 months. Unions were assessed on routine post-operative radiographs. If there was a concern for nonunion, computerized tomography scan was utilized for further assessment. Nonunion rate of patients who had open surgery was 10/59 (17%) and nonunion rate of those who had arthroscopic surgery was 13/66 (20%) (p=0.69) [Table 1]. There was a statistically significant difference between those who had open versus arthroscopic surgery in wound complication rate (39% vs 6%, p=<0.001) and DVT rate (7% vs 0%, p=0.047). There was no statistically significant difference in rate of return to the operating room. No major complications occurred in this study. Conclusion: This study is the largest study to directly compare union rate and complications in patients who had open versus arthroscopic ankle arthrodesis. In this study, no significant association was found between surgical technique and union rate in patients undergoing ankle arthrodesis. Additionally, use of the arthroscopic technique has significantly lower rates of wound complication and post-operative DVTs.

Does Concurrent Distal Tibiofibular Joint Arthrodesis Affect the Nonunion and Complication Rates of Tibiotalar Arthrodesis

Category: Ankle Introduction/Purpose: Tibiotalar arthrodesis is generally a successful treatment option for patients with end stage ankle arthritis. However, there is a 9% risk of nonunion in patients undergoing primary tibiotalar arthrodesis. To date, it is unclear whether concurrent distal tibio-fibular joint arthrodesis affects this nonunion rate as there have been no studies directly comparing patients with and without arthrodesis of the distal tibio-fibular joint. The purpose of this clinical study is to compare the rate of nonunion in patients with a distal tibio-fibular fusion to those without a distal tibio-fibular fusion in the setting of a primary, open ankle arthrodesis. The hypothesis of this study was that the addition of a distal tibio-fibular fusion would decrease the nonunion rate in patients undergoing open ankle arthrodesis. Methods: This is a retrospective review of 521 consecutive patients from October 2002 to April 2016. 366 ankles from 354 unique patients met inclusion criteria. All patients underwent primary, open tibiotalar arthrodesis. 250 patients underwent open tibiotalar arthrodesis with a distal tibio-fibular fusion and 116 patients underwent open tibiotalar arthrodesis without a distal tibio-fibular fusion. Age, gender, body mass index, smoking, and preoperative radiographic deformity were controlled. The primary outcome measure was nonunion rate of tibiotalar arthrodesis. Secondary outcome measures were time to union, rate of wound complications, and rate of development of post-operative deep vein thrombosis (DVT)/Pulmonary embolism (PE). Results: Average age of the patients was 56.2 +/- 14.2 years. Mean follow-up time was 33.8 months. Unions were assessed on routine post-operative radiographs and by clinical examination. If there was a concern for nonunion, computerized tomography scan was utilized for further assessment. Nonunion rate of patients who had the distal tibio-fibular joint included was 19/250 (8%) and nonunion rate of those who did not have the distal tibio-fibular joint fused was 14/116 (12%) (p=0.16). There was no significant difference between those who had the distal tibio-fibular joint included versus who did not in wound complication rate (27% vs 31%, p=0.40), time to union (4.9 weeks versus 5 weeks, p =0.54), and DVT/PE rate (5% vs 3%, p=0.41), respectively [Table 1]. There were no major complications. Conclusion: To our knowledge, this is the first study directly comparing nonunion rates and complication rates in patients who underwent primary, open ankle arthrodesis with and without distal tibio-fibular joint arthrodesis. In this study, inclusion of the distal tibio-fibular joint in tibiotalar arthrodesis does not affect nonunion rate in patients undergoing primary, open ankle arthrodesis. Additionally, inclusion of the distal tibio-fibular joint does not affect rate of wound complication, time to union, and DVT/PE rate.

Comparison of Non-Union and Complication Rates in Primary versus Revision Tibiotalar Arthrodesis

Category: Ankle Arthritis Introduction/Purpose: Tibiotalar arthrodesis is generally a successful treatment option for patients with end stage ankle arthritis. However, there is a 9% risk of nonunion in patients undergoing primary tibiotalar arthrodesis. Patients with a nonunion often undergo revision ankle arthrodesis, as it is the most common salvage procedure in this situation. To date, only a few studies have evaluated outcomes in patients with revision ankle arthrodesis. The purpose of this clinical study is to directly compare the rate of union and complications in primary versus revision tibiotalar arthrodesis. The hypothesis of this study was that there would be no difference in rate of union and complications between primary and revision ankle arthrodesis. Methods: This is a retrospective review of 455 consecutive patients that underwent either primary or revision tibiotalar arthrodesis between March 2002 to November 2014. Three-hundred eighty-five patients underwent primary arthrodesis and 70 patients underwent revision arthrodesis. Age, gender, body mass index, smoking, and preoperative radiographic deformity were controlled. The primary outcome measure was union rate of tibiotalar arthrodesis. Secondary outcome measures were time to union, rate of wound complications, rate of return to operating room, and rate of development of post-operative deep vein thrombosis (DVT). Results: Average age of the patients was 56 +/- 15 years (range 18-89). The mean follow-up time was 38.3 +/- 27.4 months (range 12-150.4 months). All patients had a minimum follow-up of 12 months. Unions were assessed on routine post-operative radiographs. If there was a concern for nonunion, patients were further assessed with a computerized tomography scan. The nonunion rate of patients who had primary arthrodesis was 37/385 (9.6%) and revision arthrodesis was 6/70 (8.5%) (p=0.74) (Table 1). Additionally, there was not a significant difference between those who had primary versus revision ankle arthrodesis surgery in rate of wound complication, return to the operating room, and post-operative DVT (Table 2). There were no major complications in this study. Conclusion: This is the largest study to directly compare union rates and complication rates in patients who underwent primary versus revision ankle arthrodesis. In this study, primary versus revision tibiotalar arthrodesis does not affect union rate, time to union, rate of wound complications, rate of return to operating room, and rate of development of post-operative DVT.

Conversion of painful tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis to total ankle replacement using a 3-component mobile bearing prosthesis

BACKGROUNDnThe aim of this study was to assess the short-term clinical and radiographic outcomes in patients who underwent conversion of a painful tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis to a total ankle replacement.nnnMETHODSnSix patients with painful ankle arthrodesis after tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis were included in this study. In all patients, conversion to total ankle replacement was performed using a 3rd-generation, non-constrained, cementless three-component prosthesis. The outcomes were analyzed at a mean follow-up of 3.4±1.9years (range 1.0-6.5).nnnRESULTSnOne patient with painful arthrofibrosis underwent two open arthrolysis procedures at 1.2 and 5.6 years post index surgery, respectively. No revision of tibial or talar prosthesis components was necessary in this study. All patients reported significant pain relief and significant improvement in functional status.nnnCONCLUSIONnIn the present study, the conversion of a painful ankle arthrodesis following tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis to a total ankle replacement was a reliable surgical treatment.