Mayank Goyal

Complications in MS patients after CCSVI procedures abroad (Calgary, AB).

BACKGROUNDnThe chronic cerebrospinal venous insufficiency or CCSVI hypothesis, namely that multiple sclerosis (MS) is caused by abnormalities in the azygous and internal jugular veins with subsequent alterations in venous hemodynamics in the central nervous system, has been a dominant topic in MS care in Canada over the past year. Although there is no methodologically rigorous evidence to support this hypothesis presently, a considerable number of MS patients have undergone endovascular CCSVI procedures. Such procedures include angioplasty or stent placement in jugular and azygous veins. The safety and efficacy of these procedures is unknown, but not without risk.nnnMETHODSnChart and patient review of five patients with confirmed MS followed in Calgary were undertaken after patients came to medical attention by referral or admission secondary to complications believed to be associated with CCSVI procedures.nnnRESULTSnComplications upon investigation and review included internal jugular vein stent thrombosis, cerebral sinovenous thrombosis, stent migration, cranial nerve injury and injury associated with venous catheterization.nnnCONCLUSIONSnAs the debate about CCSVI and its relationship to MS continues, the complications and risks associated with venous stenting and angioplasty in jugular and azygous veins are becoming clearer. As increasing numbers of MS patients are seeking such procedures, these five cases represent the beginning of a wave of complications for which standardized care guidelines do not exist. Our experience and that of our colleagues will be used to develop guidelines and strategies to monitor and manage these patients as their numbers increase.

State of acute endovascular therapy: report from the 12th thrombolysis, Thrombectomy, and acute stroke therapy conference

Acute endovascular therapy for ischemic stroke is at a pivotal juncture. Until recently, on the basis of randomized trials comparing devices, we knew that endovascular treatment options were effective in quickly restoring blood flow and that successful early recanalization was associated with better functional outcome when compared with sustained occlusion.1,2 We did not have randomized evidence that available acute endovascular therapy improved patient outcomes; the 3 initial randomized controlled trials of endovascular recanalization treatment published in February of 2013—the Phase II Mechanical Retrieval and Recanalization of Stroke Clots Using Embolectomy (MR RESCUE), Phase III Interventional Management of Stroke (IMS) III, and Local Versus Systemic Thrombolysis for Acute Ischemic Stroke (SYNTHESIS) trials—failed to demonstrate improved clinical outcomes.3–5nnMany factors may have contributed to the failure of these 3 initial trials to show endovascular benefits. These trials were performed during a period of rapid evolution of imaging and treatment options, and used intra-arterial thrombolysis, or first-generation device therapies at best, with little use of newer generation devices, such as stent retrievers, demonstrated to achieve significantly higher rates of recanalization.1,2 Patients with mild or moderate stroke severity may have been less likely to benefit from endovascular reperfusion based on IMS III and Prolyse in Acute Cerebral Thromboembolism (PROACT) II post hoc analyses and others.3,6,7 The power of these trials was diluted by including subjects without intracranial vessel occlusions, and post hoc analyses of IMS III suggested a potential treatment effect among stroke patients with baseline computed tomographic (CT) angiographic occlusions.8 Larger vessel occlusions, which are more resistant to recanalization by intravenous recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator (r-tPA), such as intracranial internal carotid artery (ICA) location or occlusions >8 mm, may have been more likely to show a treatment effect …

Carotid Webs and Recurrent Ischemic Strokes in the Era of CT Angiography

Carotid web was defined on CTA as a thin intraluminal filling defect along the posterior wall of the carotid bulb just beyond the carotid bifurcation on oblique sagittal section CTA that was seen as a septum on axial CTA. In the prospective series in this study, the mean age was 50 years, and 5 of 7 patients were women. Recurrent stroke was seen in 5 of 7. Histopathology suggested a high probability of fibromuscular dysplasia. In the retrospective series, carotid webs were seen in 7 of 576 patients. Carotid web may be an important cause of ischemic stroke in patients with otherwise no determined mechanism of stroke and may present a high risk of recurrent stroke. BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Carotid webs may cause recurrent ischemic stroke. We describe the prevalence, demographics, clinical presentation, imaging features, histopathology, and stroke risk associated with this under-recognized lesion. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A carotid web was defined on CTA as a thin intraluminal filling defect along the posterior wall of the carotid bulb just beyond the carotid bifurcation on oblique sagittal section CTA that was seen as a septum on axial CTA. Using a prospective case series from April 2013 to April 2014, we describe the demographics, spectrum of imaging features on CTA, and histopathology of these carotid webs. From a retrospective analysis of patients at our center from May 2012 to April 2013 who had a baseline head and neck CTA followed by a brain MR imaging within 1–2 days of the CTA, we determine the period prevalence of carotid webs and the prevalence of ipsilateral stroke on imaging. RESULTS: In the prospective series, the mean age was 50 years (range, 41–55 years); 5/7 patients were women. Recurrent stroke was seen in 5/7 (71.4%) patients with the carotid web; time to recurrence ranged from 1 to 97 months. Histopathology suggested a high probability of fibromuscular dysplasia. In the retrospective series, carotid webs were seen in 7/576 patients for a hospital-based-period prevalence of 1.2% (95% CI, 0.4%–2.5%). Two of these 7 patients had acute stroke in the vascular territory of the carotid web. CONCLUSIONS: A carotid web may contribute to recurrent ischemic stroke in patients with no other determined stroke mechanism. Intimal variant fibromuscular dysplasia is the pathologic diagnosis in most cases. The prevalence of carotid web is low, while the optimal management strategy remains unknown.

Endovascular revascularization results in IMS III: intracranial ICA and M1 occlusions

Background Interventional Management of Stroke III did not show that combining IV recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rt-PA) with endovascular therapies (EVTs) is better than IV rt-PA alone. Objective To report efficacy and safety results for EVT of intracranial internal carotid artery (ICA) and middle cerebral artery trunk (M1) occlusion. Methods Five revascularization methods for persistent occlusions after IV rt-PA treatment were evaluated for prespecified primary and secondary endpoints, after accounting for differences in key baselines variables using propensity scores. Revascularization was scored using the arterial occlusive lesion (AOL) and the modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Ischemia (mTICI) scores. Results EVT of 200 subjects with intracranial ICA or M1 occlusion resulted in 81.5% AOL 2–3 recanalization, in addition to 76% mTICI 2–3 and 42.5% mTICI 2b–3 reperfusion. Adverse events included symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (SICH) (8.0%), vessel perforations (1.5%), and new emboli (14.9%). EVT techniques used were standard microcatheter n=51; EKOS n=14; Merci n=77; Penumbra n=39; Solitaire n=4; multiple n=15. Good clinical outcome was associated with both TICI 2–3 and TICI 2b–3 reperfusion. Neither modified Rankin scale (mRS) 0–2 (28.5%), nor 90-day mortality (28.5%), nor asymptomatic ICH (36.0%) differed among revascularization methods after propensity score adjustment for subjects with intracranial ICA or M1 occlusion. Conclusions Good clinical outcome was associated with good reperfusion for ICA and M1 occlusion. No significant differences in efficacy or safety among revascularization methods were demonstrated after adjustment. Lack of high-quality reperfusion, adverse events, and prolonged time to treatment contributed to lower-than-expected mRS 0–2 outcomes and study futility compared with IV rt-PA. Trial registration number NCT00359424.

A collaborative sequential meta-analysis of individual patient data from randomized trials of endovascular therapy and tPA vs. tPA alone for acute ischemic stroke: ThRombEctomy And tPA (TREAT) analysis: statistical analysis plan for a sequential meta-analysis performed within the VISTA-Endovascular collaboration.

Rationale Endovascular treatment has been shown to restore blood flow effectively. Second-generation medical devices such as stent retrievers are now showing overwhelming efficacy in clinical trials, particularly in conjunction with intravenous recombinant tissue plasminogen activator. Aims and Design This statistical analysis plan utilizing a novel, sequential approach describes a prospective, individual patient data analysis of endovascular therapy in conjunction with intravenous recombinant tissue plasminogen activator agreed upon by the Thrombectomy and Tissue Plasminogen Activator Collaborative Group. Study outcomes This protocol will specify the primary outcome for efficacy, as ‘favorable’ outcome defined by the ordinal distribution of the modified Rankin Scale measured at three-months poststroke, but with modified Rankin Scales 5 and 6 collapsed into a single category. The primary analysis will aim to answer the questions: ‘what is the treatment effect of endovascular therapy with intravenous recombinant tissue plasminogen activator compared to intravenous tissue plasmi-nogen activator alone on full scale modified Rankin Scale at 3 months?’ and ‘to what extent do key patient characteristics influence the treatment effect of endovascular therapy?’. Key secondary outcomes include effect of endovascular therapy on death within 90 days; analyses of modified Rankin Scale using dichotomized methods; and effects of endovascular therapy on symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage. Several secondary analyses will be considered as well as expanding patient cohorts to intravenous recombinant tissue plasminogen activator-ineligible patients, should data allow. Discussion This collaborative meta-analysis of individual participant data from randomized trials of endovascular therapy vs. control in conjunction with intravenous thrombolysis will demonstrate the efficacy and generalizability of endovascular therapy with intravenous thrombolysis as a concomitant medication.