Mayur Pandya

A Randomized Sham-Controlled Trial of Deep Brain Stimulation of the Ventral Capsule/Ventral Striatum for Chronic Treatment-Resistant Depression

BACKGROUND Multiple open-label trials of deep brain stimulation (DBS) for treatment-resistant depression (TRD), including those targeting the ventral capsule/ventral striatum target, have shown encouraging response rates. However, no randomized controlled trials of DBS for TRD have been published. METHODS Thirty patients with TRD participated in a sham-controlled trial of DBS at the ventral capsule/ventral striatum target for TRD. Patients were randomized to active versus sham DBS treatment in a blinded fashion for 16 weeks, followed by an open-label continuation phase. The primary outcome measure was response, defined as a 50% or greater improvement on the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale from baseline. RESULTS There was no significant difference in response rates between the active (3 of 15 subjects; 20%) and control (2 of 14 subjects; 14.3%) treatment arms and no significant difference between change in Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale scores as a continuous measure upon completion of the 16-week controlled phase of the trial. The response rates at 12, 18, and 24 months during the open-label continuation phase were 20%, 26.7%, and 23.3%, respectively. CONCLUSION The results of this first randomized controlled study of DBS for the treatment of TRD did not demonstrate a significant difference in response rates between the active and control groups at the end of the 16-week controlled phase. However, a range of 20% to 26.7% of patients did achieve response at any time during the open-label continuation phase. Future studies, perhaps utilizing alternative study designs and stimulation parameters, are needed.

Parkinson disease: not just a movement disorder.

Nonmotor symptoms are common in Parkinson disease and can significantly worsen the health and quality of life of the patient and family members. These symptoms can be broadly categorized as sensory, autonomic, cognitive-behavioral, and sleep-related. Clinicians can improve the care of these patients by recognizing and addressing these problems. Nonmotor symptoms—sensory, autonomic, and behavioral—are common and important to recognize, as they can lead to even more serious complications and impair quality of life.

Where in the brain is depression

Major depressive disorder is a serious medical illness which is responsible for considerable morbidity and disability. Despite decades of research, the neural basis for depression is still incompletely understood. In this review, evidence from neuroimaging, neuropsychiatric and brain stimulations studies are explored to answer the question regarding the localization of depression in the brain. Neuroimaging studies indicate that although many regions of the brain have been repeatedly implicated in the pathophysiology of depression, not many consistent findings have been found until present. In recent times, the focus of neuroimaging has shifted from regional brain abnormalities to circuit level connectivity abnormalities. However, connectivity models are inherently more complicated, and the validity of these models remains to be tested. Neuropsychiatric studies of illnesses such as Parkinson’s disease and stroke provide promising clues regarding areas involved in depression, but again consistent findings are rare. Similarly, stimulation of a variety of brain regions and circuits has been reported as being effective in depression. Therefore, the current knowledge indicates that the pathophysiology of depression may be distributed across many brain regions and circuits. In future studies, this distributed nature of depression needs to be further investigated, primary and secondary areas affected need to be identified, and new paradigms to explain complex mental functions need to be explored.

Valproate for the treatment of medication-induced impulse-control disorders in three patients with Parkinson’s disease

Impulse-control disorders (ICDs) are becoming more commonly recognized in the Parkinson disease (PD) population. To date, there are no definitive methods of treating dopamine dysregulation syndromes in PD patients. We sought to uncover an effective treatment option for future study. We report a series of 3 PD patients with ICDs who were effectively treated with valproate. Based on these encouraging preliminary observations, future controlled clinical trials investigating the efficacy of valproate for ICDs in PD are recommended.

Impact of mild cognitive impairment on outcome following deep brain stimulation surgery for Parkinson's disease.

INTRODUCTION Unlike dementia, the effect of mild cognitive impairment (MCI) on outcomes after deep brain stimulation (DBS) in Parkinsons disease (PD) is less clear. We aimed to examine the effect of MCI on short- and long-term DBS outcomes. METHODS To study the effect of MCI type, cognitive domains (attention, language, visuospatial, memory, executive function), and Dementia Rating Scale (DRS) score on immediate postoperative outcomes (postoperative confusion, hospitalization days), PD patients who underwent DBS at our Center from 2006 to 2011 were analyzed. To determine cognitive predictors of intermediate (6-month) and long-term (1-year) post-operative outcomes, the changes in functional and quality-of-life (QOL) scores were analyzed in a smaller group with available preoperative health status measures. RESULTS We identified 130 patients [71% male, mean age: 63 ± 9.1, mean PD duration: 10.7 ± 5.1]. At preoperative assessment, 60% of patients had multiple-domain MCI, 21% had single-domain MCI, and 19% had normal cognition. MCI presence and type as well as DRS performance did not affect immediate outcomes. Attention impairment predicted longer postoperative hospitalization (P = 0.0015) and showed a trend towards occurrence of postoperative confusion (P = 0.089). For intermediate and long-term outcomes we identified 56 patients [73.2% male, mean age: 61.3 ± 9.6, mean PD duration: 10.6 ± 4.7]. Visuospatial impairment showed a trend towards less improvement in 6-month functional score (P = 0.0652), and 1-year QOL score (P = 0.0517). CONCLUSION The presence of MCI did not affect DBS outcomes. However, the types of impaired domains were more detrimental. Detailed cognitive testing can help stratify low- and high-risk patients based on their pattern of cognitive dysfunction.

Preserving cortico-striatal function: deep brain stimulation in Huntington's disease

Huntington’s disease (HD) is an incurable neurodegenerative disease characterized by the triad of chorea, cognitive dysfunction and psychiatric disturbances. Since the discovery of the HD gene, the pathogenesis has been outlined, but to date a cure has not been found. Disease modifying therapies are needed desperately to improve function, alleviate suffering, and provide hope for symptomatic patients. Deep brain stimulation (DBS), a proven therapy for managing the symptoms of some neurodegenerative movement disorders, including Parkinson’s disease, has been reported as a palliative treatment in select cases of HD with debilitating chorea with variable success. New insights into the mechanism of action of DBS suggest it may have the potential to circumvent other manifestations of HD including cognitive deterioration. Furthermore, because DBS is already widely used, reversible, and has a risk profile that is relatively low, new studies can be initiated. In this article we contend that new clinical trials be considered to test the effects of DBS for HD.

Comprehensive, Multidisciplinary Deep Brain Stimulation Screening for Parkinson Patients: No Room for “Short Cuts”

Careful, often cumbersome, screening is a fundamental part of DBS evaluation in Parkinsons disease (PD). It often involves a brain MRI, neuropsychological testing, neurological, surgical, and psychiatric evaluation, and “ON/OFF” motor testing. Given that DBS has now been a standard treatment for advanced PD, with clinicians’ improved comfort and confidence in screening and referring patients for DBS, we wondered whether we can now streamline our lengthy evaluation process. We reviewed all PD patients evaluated for DBS at our center between 2006 and 2011 and analyzed the reasons for exclusion and for dropping out despite passing the screening process. A total of 223 PD patients who underwent DBS evaluation had complete charting. Only 131 (58.7%) patients were successfully implanted. Sixty‐one (27.3%) patients were excluded after screening because of significant cognitive decline (32.7%), early disease with room for medication adjustment (29.5%), behavioral dysfunction (21.3%), suspected secondary parkinsonism or atypical parkinsonism syndrome (13.1%), PD, but with poor levodopa response (11.4%), unrealistic goals (9.8%), PD with predominant axial symptoms (6.5%), significant comorbidities (6.5%), or abnormal brain imaging (3.2%). In addition, 31 (13.9%) patients were cleared for surgery, but either chose not have it (18 patients), were lost to follow‐up (12 patients), or were denied by medical insurance (1 patient). Through careful screening, a significant percentage of surgical candidates continue to be identified as less suitable because of a variety of reasons. This underscores the continued need for a comprehensive, multidisciplinary screening process.

Randomized clinical trial of deep brain stimulation for poststroke pain

The experience with deep brain stimulation (DBS) for pain is largely based on uncontrolled studies targeting the somatosensory pathways, with mixed results. We hypothesized that targeting limbic neural pathways would modulate the affective sphere of pain and alleviate suffering.

A Malignant Neuroleptic Spectrum: Review of Diagnostic Criteria and Treatment Implications in Three Case Reports

Prompt identification of cases of Neuroleptic Malignant Syndrome (NMS) pose a diagnostic and treatment challenge. Three hospital cases of neuroleptic toxicity were reviewed and compared across five published diagnostic criteria sets for NMS. Of these criteria sets, only Levensons criteria led to the detection of NMS in two out of our three patients. This criteria set supports a NMS spectrum concept, allowing earlier diagnosis and intervention. Lorazepam was used as initial treatment, which provided significant improvement. Use of Levensons criteria for early diagnosis of NMS and lorazepam for its treatment may be useful tools for the early management of NMS.

Depression in Humans: The Ventral Capsule/Ventral Striatum

The use of deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the ventral capsule/ventral striatum (VC/VS) for the treatment of major depressive disorder (MDD) stems from pioneering work in obsessive–compulsive disorder. Understanding the rationale for the VC/VS target chosen for investigation of MDD requires an appreciation of the neuroanatomical structures and their positioning relative to each other. Presently, there are no consensus guidelines or algorithms for DBS patient selection, surgical implantation, or programming in depression. DBS of the VC/VS for the treatment of depression remains investigational and not approved by the Food and Drug Administration. With our experience over the past decade in 16 patients who underwent DBS electrode implantation at the VC/VS for the treatment of depression at our clinic, we have been able to delineate trends and common responses that may assist in the programming of this population. The development of this emerging therapy depends on advances in neurosurgical technique and patient selection, as well as furthering our understanding of the circuitry involved in the targeted region.