McLellan At

A new measure of substance abuse treatment: Initial studies of the Treatment Services Review.

This paper describes the development and initial testing of the Treatment Services Review (TSR). The TSR is a 5-minute, technician-administered interview that provides a quantitative profile of the number and types of treatment services received by patients during alcohol and drag abuse rehabilitation. Test-retest studies indicated satisfactory reliability administered either in person or over the phone. Tests of concurrent validity showed the ability to discriminate different levels of treatment services and good correspondence with independent measures of treatment provided. While additional studies are still needed with this instrument, the data collected thus far suggest that the TSR may serve two types of needs. First, at the programmatic level, the TSR may prove useful in describing and comparing programs in terms, of the nature and number of services actually delivered to patients. At the individual patient level, the TSR may offer a means of evaluating the “match” between a patients needs and the services actually provided.

Similarity of outcome predictors across opiate, cocaine, and alcohol treatments: role of treatment services.

This study examined the patient and treatment factors associated with 6-month outcome in 649 opiate-, alcohol-, and cocaine-dependent (male and female) adults, treated in inpatient and outpatient settings, in 22 publicly and privately funded programs. Outcomes were predicted by similar factors, regardless of the drug problem of the patient or the type of treatment setting or funding. Greater substance use at follow-up was predicted only by greater severity of alcohol and drug use at treatment admission, not by the number of services received during treatment. Better social adjustment at follow-up was negatively predicted by more severe psychiatric, employment, and family problems at admission and positively predicted by more psychiatric, family, employment, and medical services provided during treatment.

Meta‐Analysis of Therapist Effects in Psychotherapy Outcome Studies

In a meta-analysis, we examined factors that could account for the differences in therapist efficacy evidenced in psychotherapy outcome studies. The factors investigated were: (1) the use of a treatment manual, (2) the average level of therapist experience, (3) the length of treatment, and (4) the type of treatment (cognitive/behavioral versus psychodynamic). Data were obtained from fifteen psychotherapy outcome studies that produced 27 separate treatment groups. For each treatment group, the amount of outcome variance due to differences between therapists was calculated and served as the dependent variable for the meta-analysis. Each separate treatment group was coded on the above four variables, and multiple regression analyses related the independent variables to the size of therapist effects. Results indicated that the use of a treatment manual and more experienced therapists were associated with small differences between therapists, whereas more inexperienced therapists and no treatment manual were a...

Increased effectiveness of substance abuse treatment. A prospective study of patient-treatment "matching".

An earlier study retrospectively evaluated the effectiveness of six separate substance abuse treatment programs and generated a set of hypotheses for matching patients to the most appropriate programs. In the present study, these predictors and the matching strategy were tested in a prospective design, using the same treatment programs and a new sample of 130 alcohol-and 256 drug-dependent patients. The new group of patients who were treated in their predicted program (matched patients) were compared with those patients from the same sample who were not treated in their predicted program (mismatched patients). Treatment staff were not apprised of the matching criteria or which patients were matched, thus permitting an experimental test of the predictions. Results indicated superior performance during treatment and an average of 19 per cent better 6-month outcomes for the matched patients than for their mismatched counterparts. The matching effect was seen in both the alcohol-and drug-dependent samples and in all treatment programs. The authors discuss the application of these findings to other types of patients and treatments in substance abuse and other fields of psychiatry.

Do therapists vary much in their success? Findings from four outcome studies

Success rates of psychotherapists were compared across each of four treatment outcome studies, with results indicating: considerable difference between therapists in their average success rates; considerable variability in outcome within the caseload of individual therapists; little support for the widely held view that certain therapists are best for certain kinds of patients; and variations in success rate typically have more to do with the therapist than with the type of treatment.

Are the "addiction-related" problems of substance abusers really related?

The “addiction-related” medical, social, and psychological problems of substance abusers are often considered by-products of prolonged alcohol or drug abuse which will be generally improved following achievement of abstinence. As a test of this view, measures of problem severity in six areas commonly related to addiction were intercorrelated in 460 alcoholic and 282 drug addicted male veterans. Both before and after treatment, the low intercorrelations in each sample indicated little relation between the severity of alcohol or drug use and the severity of the other problem areas. Intercorrelations among residualized admission to follow-up change scores were similarly low, also showing the lack of a general relationship between improvement in substance abuse and improvement in other areas. However, there was one exception: improvement in psychological function was clearly related to general improvement in most other areas, including chemical abuse, indicating the potential importance of psychologically oriented therapy in substance abuse treatment. Most of the evidence suggests that addiction may be a common pathway for a variety of specific disorders, rather than a general, progressive disease.

Alcohol and Drug Abuse Treatment in Three Different Populations: Is There Improvement and is It Predictable?

Prior research had shown that alcohol and drug abuse treatments were effective and that the results of treatments could be predicted from pretreatment information regarding the patients employment, family, and especially psychiatric problems. However, this research had been conducted entirely with adult male service veterans, largely from lower socioeconomic strata. Three treatment centers were included in the present study to examine these conclusions with other populations containing adolescents, females, and patients from higher socioeconomic strata. Data from the Addiction Severity Index was collected at treatment admission and again at independent follow-up, 6 months later. Results confirmed prior observations. Both alcohol and drug abuse treatments showed substantial improvements in the chemical use problems of their patients and in the important areas of employment, criminal behavior, family relations, and psychological health. As in earlier reports, a global measure of the nature and extent of pretreatment psychiatric problems was the single best predictor of treatment response for both alcoholics and drug-dependent samples.

Psychiatric Comorbidity: Prevalence in Methadone Maintenance Treatment

This study examines prevalence rates for DSM-III-R anxiety and affective disorders in three follow-up samples of opioid addicts who were treated with methadone maintenance. At least one anxiety disorder was diagnosed in 55% of the total sample. Affective disorders were found in 58%. At least one anxiety disorder coexisted with at least one affective disorder in 36% of the sample. The research demonstrates that opiate addiction in this sample is most often associated with other comorbid psychopathology. It suggests a need for thorough assessment for general psychopathology in opioid addicts entering addiction treatment, especially assessment for anxiety and affective disorders. It also suggests the need for treatment that focuses on diagnosed mental disorders in addition to drug counseling for the substance abuse disorder.

High-Risk Sexual Behaviors of Intravenous Drug Users In- and Out-of-Treatment: Implications for the Spread of HIV Infection

This paper examines the sexual behaviors of 255 intravenous drug users (IVDUs) to assess the potential for the sexual transmission of HIV and to examine differences in sexual behaviors between in- and out-of-treatment IVDUs. In-treatment subjects (N = 152) were a random sample of clients at a large, publicly funded methadone maintenance program. Out-of-treatment subjects (N = 103) were recruited through a chain referral technique, using the in-treatment subjects. Forty-five percent of the study subjects reported multiple partners and 32% reported exchanging sex for money or drugs in the preceding 6 months. Fifty-three percent reported no use of condoms. After controlling for demographic differences between the in- and out-of-treatment groups, out-of-treatment IVDUs reported significantly more partners than in-treatment IVDUs (4.6 vs 2.3, significant t < 0.01), and more often had exchanged sex for money or drugs (44 vs 26%, relative odds 1.8, p < .05). In- and out-of-treatment subjects did not differ with respect to condom use. We conclude that IVDUs both in- and out-of-treatment continue to be at risk of contracting and spreading HIV infection through sexual behaviors, and that being in drug treatment is associated with a lower incidence of high risk sexual behaviors.

The Psychiatrically Severe Drug Abuse Patient: Methadone Maintenance or Therapeutic Community?

The present research was conducted to examine the effects of pretreatment psychiatric status and treatment duration on improvement following drug abuse rehabilitation. Percent improvement from admission to 6-month follow-up was measured on three criteria: drug use, employment, and criminality. Analyses of the total samples in both the Therapeutic Community (TC) and Methadone Maintenance (MM) programs indicated some quantitative differences between the two modalities but all measures showed a strong and positive relation between treatment duration and percent improvement. When patients in the two program samples were divided, on the basis of admission psychiatric status, into LOW, MID, and HIGH severity groups, different findings emerged. LOW severity patients in both programs showed the greatest absolute levels of improvement in most measures, more improvement at shorter treatment durations, and less additional improvement at longer treatment durations. MID severity patients in both programs showed the most dramatic effects of treatment duration, with generally large improvements in all criteria at greater treatment lengths. Qualitatively different results were seen between the treatment programs for the HIGH severity patients. HIGH severity MM patients showed low absolute levels of improvement but longer treatment durations were associated with modest improvements. HIGH severity TC patients also showed low absolute levels of improvement but unlike any other group, greater lengths of treatment were associated with negative change (worsened status) across all measures. The authors discuss these results with regard to the general efficacy of drug-dependence treatment and the specific issue of the psychiatrically impaired drug abusers.