Meera Sreedhara
University of Massachusetts Medical School
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Meera Sreedhara.
JMIR Research Protocols | 2016
Sarah L. Cutrona; Meera Sreedhara; Sarah L. Goff; Lloyd D. Fisher; Peggy Preusse; Madeline Jackson; Devi Sundaresan; Lawrence Garber; Kathleen M. Mazor
Background Clinical decision support (CDS), including computerized reminders for providers and patients, can improve health outcomes. CDS promoting influenza vaccination, delivered directly to patients via an electronic health record (EHR) patient portal and interactive voice recognition (IVR) calls, offers an innovative approach to improving patient care. Objective To test the effectiveness of an EHR patient portal and IVR outreach to improve rates of influenza vaccination in a large multispecialty group practice in central Massachusetts. Methods We describe a nonblinded, randomized controlled trial of EHR patient portal messages and IVR calls designed to promote influenza vaccination. In our preparatory phase, we conducted qualitative interviews with patients, providers, and staff to inform development of EHR portal messages with embedded questionnaires and IVR call scripts. We also provided practice-wide education on influenza vaccines to all physicians and staff members, including information on existing vaccine-specific EHR CDS. Outreach will target adult patients who remain unvaccinated for more than 2 months after the start of the influenza season. Using computer-generated randomization and a factorial design, we will assign 20,000 patients who are active users of electronic patient portals to one of the 4 study arms: (1) receipt of a portal message promoting influenza vaccines and offering online appointment scheduling; (2) receipt of an IVR call with similar content but without appointment facilitation; (3) both (1) and (2); or (4) neither (1) nor (2) (usual care). We will randomize patients without electronic portals (10,000 patients) to (1) receipt of IVR call or (2) usual care. Both portal messages and IVR calls promote influenza vaccine completion. Our primary outcome is percentage of eligible patients with influenza vaccines administered at our group practice during the 2014-15 influenza season. Both outreach methods also solicit patient self-report on influenza vaccinations completed outside the clinic or on barriers to influenza vaccination. Self-reported data from both outreach modes will be uploaded into the EHR to increase accuracy of existing provider-directed EHR CDS (vaccine alerts). Results With our proposed sample size and using a factorial design, power calculations using baseline vaccination rate estimates indicated that 4286 participants per arm would give 80% power to detect a 3% improvement in influenza vaccination rates between groups (α=.05; 2-sided). Intention-to-treat unadjusted chi-square analyses will be performed to assess the impact of portal messages, either alone or in combination with the IVR call, on influenza vaccination rates. The project was funded in January 2014. Patient enrollment for the project described here completed in December 2014. Data analysis is currently under way and first results are expected to be submitted for publication in 2016. Conclusions If successful, this study’s intervention may be adapted by other large health care organizations to increase vaccination rates among their eligible patients. ClinicalTrial ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02266277; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02266277 (Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/6fbLviHLH).
Journal of the American Geriatrics Society | 2016
Jerry H. Gurwitz; Catherine E. DuBeau; Kathleen M. Mazor; Meera Sreedhara; Celeste A. Lemay; Ann Spenard; Michelle M. Pandolfi; Florence Johnson; Terry S. Field
To describe the epidemiology of indwelling urinary catheter use in nursing homes (NHs).
Preventing Chronic Disease | 2017
Meera Sreedhara; Karin Valentine Goins; Semra Aytur; Rodney Lyn; Jay E. Maddock; Robin Riessman; Thomas L. Schmid; Heather Wooten; Stephenie C. Lemon
Introduction Transportation and land-use policies can affect the physical activity of populations. Local health departments (LHDs) are encouraged to participate in built-environment policy processes, which are outside their traditional expertise. Cross-sector collaborations are needed, yet stakeholders’ perceptions of LHD involvement are not well understood. The objective of this study was to describe the perceived value of LHD participation in transportation and land-use decision making and potential contributions to these processes among stakeholders. Methods We analyzed qualitative data from 49 semistructured interviews in 2015. Participants were professionals in 13 US states and 4 disciplines: land-use planning (n = 13), transportation/public works (n = 11), public health (n = 19), and other (municipal administration and bike and pedestrian advocacy [n = 6]). Two analysts conducted directed content analysis. Results All respondents reported that LHDs offer valuable contributions to transportation and land-use policy processes. They identified 7 contributions (interrater agreement 91%): 1) physical activity and health perspective (n = 44), 2) data analysis and assessment (n = 41), 3) partnerships in the community and across sectors (n = 35), 4) public education (n = 27), 5) knowledge of the public health evidence base and best practices (n = 23), 6) resource support (eg, grant writing, technical assistance) (n = 20), and 7) health equity (n = 8). Conclusion LHDs can leverage their strengths to foster cross-sector collaborations that promote physical activity opportunities in communities. Our results will inform development of sustainable capacity-building models for LHD involvement in built-environment decision making.
Clinical Lung Cancer | 2017
Tianhong Li; Bilal Piperdi; William V. Walsh; Mimi Kim; Laurel Beckett; Rasim Gucalp; Missak Haigentz; Venu Gopal Bathini; Huiyu Wen; Kaili Zhou; Patricia Pasquinelli; Srikanth Gajavelli; Meera Sreedhara; Xianhong Xie; Primo N. Lara; David R. Gandara; Roman Perez-Soler
Background: Pharmacodynamic separation of pemetrexed and erlotinib avoids negative cellular interactions and results in antitumor synergy in erlotinib‐resistant non–small‐cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cells, independent of EGFR (epidermal growth factor receptor) genotype. Patients and Methods: Patients with platinum‐treated metastatic nonsquamous NSCLC were randomly assigned 1:2 to pemetrexed alone (500 mg/m2 provided intravenously on day 1) or pemetrexed followed by erlotinib (150 mg provided orally once daily on days 2–17) every 21 days. EGFR genotype was centrally confirmed by Sequenom multiplex oncogenotyping assay. The primary end point was progression‐free survival (PFS), which would be considered promising for future study if median PFS was ≥ 4.5 months. Results: Of 83 patients enrolled, 79 were randomized to either pemetrexed alone (n = 27) or in combination (n = 52). Fifty‐nine (79%) of 75 eligible patients had tumors with confirmed EGFR genotype: 7 with activating mutations and 52 wild type. Median PFS was 4.7 and 2.9 months in the combination and pemetrexed‐alone groups, respectively. In patients with EGFR wild‐type tumors, median PFS was 5.3 and 3.5 months in the combination and pemetrexed‐alone groups, respectively. Objective response rate (29% vs. 10%, P = .17), 6‐month PFS (45% vs. 29%, P = .26), and 12‐month PFS (23% vs. 10%, P = .28) were all higher in the combination arm. Rash (67% vs. 26%, P = .0007) and diarrhea (44% vs. 11%, P = .003) were significantly more common in the combination arm. Conclusion: In patients with unselected or EGFR wild‐type advanced nonsquamous NSCLC, pharmacodynamic separation of pemetrexed and intercalated erlotinib had promising antitumor activity without new safety concerns. The combination merits further evaluation as maintenance or second‐line therapy against new standards in patients with EGFR wild‐type advanced NSCLC. Micro‐Abstract: This randomized phase 2 study demonstrated promising clinical synergism between pemetrexed and intercalated erlotinib in patients with unselected nonsquamous non–small‐cell lung cancer (NSCLC) as second‐line therapy. EGFR (epidermal growth factor receptor) genotyping by Sequenom multiplex oncogenotyping assay was feasible in 79% of eligible patients using tumor DNA from either archival specimens and/or plasma. Because patients with EGFR‐mutant NSCLC respond well to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor monotherapy alone or in combination with bevacizumab, the combination might merit further evaluation as second‐line or maintenance therapy against new standards in patients with EGFR wild‐type advanced NSCLC.
Preventive medicine reports | 2018
Valerie J. Silfee; Christina F. Haughton; Danielle E. Jake-Schoffman; Andrea Lopez-Cepero; Christine N. May; Meera Sreedhara; Milagros C. Rosal; Stephenie C. Lemon
Valid, reliable, and direct measures of physical activity (PA) are critical to assessing the impact of lifestyle PA interventions. However, little is known about the extent to which objective measures have been used to assess the outcomes of lifestyle PA interventions. This systematic review had two aims: 1) evaluate the extent to which PA is measured objectively in lifestyle PA interventions targeting adults and 2) explore and summarize what objective measures have been used and what PA dimensions and metrics have been reported. Pubmed, Cochrane Central Register, and PsychInfo were searched for lifestyle PA interventions conducted between 2006 and 2016. Of the 342 articles that met the inclusion criteria, 239 studies measured PA via subjective measures and 103 studies measured PA via objective measures. The proportion of studies using objective measures increased from 4.4% to 70.6% from 2006 to 2016. All studies measuring PA objectively utilized wearable devices; half (50.5%) used pedometers only and 40.8% used accelerometers only. A majority of the 103 studies reported steps (73.8%) as their PA metric. Incorporating objective measures of PA should continue to be a priority in PA research. More work is needed to address the challenges of comprehensive and consistent collecting, reporting, and analyzing of PA metrics.
Family Practice | 2018
Meera Sreedhara; Valerie J. Silfee; Milagros C. Rosal; Molly E. Waring; Stephenie C. Lemon
Background Regular physical activity (PA) lowers the risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD), but few US adults meet PA guidelines. The United States Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) recommends primary care providers offer PA counselling for CVD prevention. We examined the association between adherence to PA guidelines and reported provider advice to increase PA among US adults with overweight/obesity and ≥1 additional CVD risk factor. Methods Cross-sectional data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (2011-2014) on PA and provider advice to increase PA were analysed for 4158 adults (≥20 years old) with overweight/obesity who reported ≥1 of hypertension, high cholesterol or impaired fasting glucose. Adherence to federal PA guidelines was determined using self-reported PA data from the Global Physical Activity Questionnaire. Meeting PA guidelines was defined as ≥150 minutes/week moderate intensity PA, ≥75 minutes/week vigorous intensity, or an equivalent combination. Participants self-reported provider advice to increase PA. Results In total, 57.7% of US adults with overweight/obesity and ≥1 additional CVD risk factor who did not meet PA guidelines reported provider advice to increase PA compared to 49.7% of adults who met PA guidelines. Adults who did not meet PA guidelines were more likely to report provider PA advice (aOR = 1.21; 95% CI = 1.00-1.47). Conclusions US adults with CVD risk factors who do not meet PA guidelines are more likely to receive provider advice to increase PA, but only half receive such advice. Strategies to increase provider advice are needed to improve adherence to USPSTF guidelines among US adults with overweight/obesity and additional CVD risk factors.
BMC Public Health | 2016
Valerie J. Silfee; Milagros C. Rosal; Meera Sreedhara; Vilma Lora; Stephenie C. Lemon
Archive | 2018
Meera Sreedhara; Karin Valentine Goins; Milagros C. Rosal; Stephenie C. Lemon
Archive | 2018
Christina F. Haughton; Meera Sreedhara; Lori Pbert; Molly E. Waring; Milagros C. Rosal; Stephenie C. Lemon
Archive | 2017
Meera Sreedhara; Andrea Lopez-Cepero; Milagros C. Rosal; Stephenie C. Lemon