Meg Franklin
Presbyterian College
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Meg Franklin.
Journal of Medical Economics | 2011
Ken O’Day; Kellie Meyer; Ross M. Miller; Sonalee Agarwal; Meg Franklin
Abstract Background: With the addition of new agents for the treatment of multiple sclerosis (MS) (e.g., fingolimod), there is a need to evaluate the relative value of newer therapies in terms of cost and effectiveness, given healthcare resource constraints in the United States. Objective: To assess the cost-effectiveness of natalizumab vs fingolimod in patients with relapsing MS. Methods: A decision analytic model was developed to estimate the incremental cost per relapse avoided of natalizumab and fingolimod from a US managed care payer perspective. Two-year costs of treating patients with MS included drug acquisition costs, administration and monitoring costs, and costs of treating MS relapses. Effectiveness was measured in terms of MS relapses avoided (data from AFFIRM and FREEDOMS trials). One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were conducted to assess uncertainty. Results: Mean 2-year estimated treatment costs were
Annals of Pharmacotherapy | 2008
Edith A. Nutescu; Andrew F. Shorr; Eileen Farrelly; Ruslan Horblyuk; Laura E. Happe; Meg Franklin
86,461 (natalizumab) and
Current Medical Research and Opinion | 2009
Laura E. Happe; Sunil V. Rao; Ruslan Horblyuk; Meg Franklin; Orsolya Lunacsek; Laura Menditto
98,748 (fingolimod). Patients receiving natalizumab had a mean of 0.74 relapses avoided per 2 years vs 0.59 for fingolimod. Natalizumab dominated fingolimod in the incremental cost-effectiveness analysis, as it was less costly and more effective in reducing relapses. One-way sensitivity analysis showed the results of the model were robust to changes in drug acquisition costs, administration costs, and costs of treating MS relapses. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis showed natalizumab was cost-effective 95.1% of the time, at a willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of
Annals of Pharmacotherapy | 2008
Andrew F. Shorr; Edith A. Nutescu; Eileen Farrelly; Ruslan Horblyuk; Laura E. Happe; Meg Franklin
0 per relapse avoided, increasing to 96.3% of the time at a WTP threshold of
Journal of Medical Economics | 2011
Heidi C. Waters; Julie Vanderpoel; Scott McKenzie; Orsolya Lunacsek; Meg Franklin; Barbara J. Lennert; John Goff; Damian H. Augustyn
50,000 per relapse avoided. Limitations: Absence of data from direct head-to-head studies comparing natalizumab and fingolimod, use of relapse rate reduction rather than sustained disability progression as primary model outcome, assumption of 100% adherence to MS treatment, and not capturing adverse event costs in the model. Conclusions: Natalizumab dominates fingolimod in terms of incremental cost per relapse avoided, as it is less costly and more effective.
Current Medical Research and Opinion | 2009
Robin Farias-Eisner; Ruslan Horblyuk; Meg Franklin; Orsolya Lunacsek; Laura E. Happe
Background Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a known complication of major orthopedic surgery (MOS) with important clinical and economic consequences. Recently published orthopedic guidelines have focused on prevention of pulmonary embolism as a primary outcome, but deep vein thrombosis (DVT) occurrence should not be readily dismissed. Objective To describe the burden of DVT following hospital discharge for MOS by assessing the impact of DVT on costs and resource utilization from the Third-party payer perspective. Methods Retrospective analysis used outpatient medical and pharmacy data from the PharMetrics Patient-Centric Database (January 1, 2002–March 31. 2006). Patients 18 years of age or older with a record of MOS were eligible for inclusion. Included patients were stratified based on the presence of a DVT during the first month after hospital discharge. Characteristics of the samples were described. The impact of DVT on total 6–month costs and resource utilization (readmissions, outpatient, emergency department visits) was assessed through statistical models. Results: Of the 32,899 patients in the analysis, 1221 (3.71%) had a record of DVT during the first month following discharge for MOS. Compared with patients who did not develop DVT, patients who developed DVT postdischarge were slightly older (56.5 vs 55.8 y; p = 0.0127), had a higher occurrence of prior VTE (26.2% vs 3.4%; p < 0.0001), and had undergone recent surgical procedures other than MOS (73.0% vs 69.6%; p = 0.0116). After controlling for potential confounders, DVT was associated with a 22% and 74% increase in the average number of expected outpatient and emergency department visits, respectively, during the 6-month postdischarge period but did not significantly impact the number of readmissions. Furthermore, total 6-month costs were significantly higher for patients who developed DVT with an incremental increase of over
Current Medical Research and Opinion | 2018
Meg Franklin; Leah Burns; Samuel Perez; Deepak Yerragolam; Dinara Makenbaeva
2000. Conclusions: The burden of DVT following hospital discharge for MOS is substantial. Specifically, DVT increases total costs and outpatient and emergency department visits.
Gastroenterology | 2009
Heidi C. Waters; R. S. McKenzie; Orsolya Lunacsek; Meg Franklin; Barbara J. Lennert; Catherine T. Piech
ABSTRACT Objective: To evaluate the burden of major bleed in patients with non-ST segment elevation acute coronary syndromes (NSTE ACS) receiving injectable anticoagulation from the hospital perspective. Methods: Retrospective analysis of inpatient medical and pharmacy data from the Premier Perspective Comparative Database between 1/1/2003 and 3/31/2006. Hospitalized patients aged ≥18 years with a diagnosis of UA or NSTEMI who received an injectable anticoagulant agent during the same hospital stay were stratified into two cohorts: those who experienced a major bleed during hospitalization and those who did not, defined by the presence of ≥1 pre-specified ICD-9 codes. Length of hospital stay (LOS), inpatient mortality, 30-day readmissions, and hospitalization costs over 30 days were assessed between the cohorts using statistical models to control for covariates which may have impacted the outcomes. Results: Patients with a major bleed had significantly longer length of stay (13.8 days vs 5.6 days), higher readmission rates (31.3% vs 14.7%), and increased all-cause mortality (15.0% vs 4.5%) compared with patients who did not bleed. After controlling for covariates, major bleeding was significantly associated with increased length of stay, readmission rate, and mortality. Adjusted costs were
Journal of Managed Care Pharmacy | 2014
Meg Franklin; Laura E. Happe; Rachel Dillman; Landon Z. Marshall
13 856 higher on average for patients with a major bleed (95% CI:
Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning | 2014
Christopher L. Farrell; Nancy H. Goodbar; Phillip J. Buckhaults; Eddie Grace; Katherine G. Moore; Kathryn N. Freeland; Meg Franklin
13 828–