Megan Lewicki

IgA and IgG hypogammaglobulinemia in Waldenström’s macroglobulinemia

Background Hypogammaglobulinemia is common in Waldenström’s macroglobulinemia. The etiology of this finding remains unclear, but it has been speculated to be based on tumor-induced suppression of the ‘uninvolved’ immunoglobulin production Design and Methods We evaluated the incidence of IgA and IgG hypogammaglobulinemia in 207 untreated patients with Waldenström’s macroglobulinemia and investigated the associated clinicopathological findings and impact of therapy. We also sequenced eight genes (AICDA, BTK, CD40, CD154, NEMO, TACI, SH2D1A, UNG) implicated in immunoglobulin deficiency in 19 Waldenström’s macroglobulinemia patients with IgA and/or IgG hypogammaglobulinemia. Results At baseline 63.3%, 58.0% and 49.3% of the 207 patients had abnormally low serum levels of IgA, IgG, or both. No association between IgA and IgG hypogammaglobulinemia and disease burden, serum IgM levels, β2-microglobulin, International Prognostic Scoring System score, or incidence of recurrent infections was observed, although the presence of adenopathy and/or splenomegaly was associated with a lower incidence of hypogammaglobulinemia. Lower IgA and IgG levels were associated with disease progression in patients managed with a ‘watch and wait’ strategy. IgA and/or IgG levels remained abnormally low despite response to treatment, including complete remissions. A missense mutation in the highly conserved catalytic site of UNG was observed in a patient with hypogammaglobulinemia, warranting further study of this pathway in Waldenström’s macroglobulinemia. Conclusions IgA and IgG hypogammaglobulinemia is common in Waldenström’s macroglobulinemia and persists despite therapeutic intervention and response. IgA and IgG hypogammaglobulinemia does not predict the risk of recurrent infections in patients with Waldenström’s macroglobulinemia, although lower levels of serum IgA and IgG are associated with disease progression in Waldenström’s macroglobulinemia patients being managed with a ‘watch and wait’ strategy.

Associated Malignancies in Patients with Waldenström's Macroglobulinemia and Their Kin

We examined the incidence of other malignancies in 924 Waldenströms Macroglobulinemia (WM) patients and their kin. A total of 225 (24.3%) patients had ≥1 additional malignancy, with 63% predating the WM diagnosis. The most common gender-adjusted malignancies were prostate (9.4%), breast (8.0%), non-melanoma skin (7.1%), hematologic (2.8%), melanoma (2.2%), lung (1.4%) and thyroid 1.1%). Among hematologic malignancies, all 13 cases of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma and 4 cases of acute myelogenous leukemia were diagnosed after WM, and were therapy-related. Familial WM subgroup analysis showed a higher incidence of prostate cancer (P=.046) in sporadic WM patients, while patients with familial WM had a higher incidence of lung cancer (P=.0043). An increased incidence of myeloid leukemias (P<.0001) was reported among kin of familial WM patients. These data reveal specific cancer associations with WM, and provide a basis for exploratory studies aimed at delineating a common genetic basis. Additionally, these studies suggest specific cancer clustering based on familial predisposition to WM.

Family history of non-hematologic cancers among Waldenstrom macroglobulinemia patients: A preliminary study

BACKGROUND Little is known about the epidemiology and etiology of Waldenstrom macroglobulinemia (WM). Despite several studies of the relation between family history and B-cell disorders and WM, family history of non-hematologic cancers has not been systematically investigated. We thus examined associations of family history of breast, colorectal, lung, ovarian, and prostate cancers with WM. METHODS All probands aged 20-79 years with bone marrow biopsy-confirmed diagnosis of WM between May 1, 1999 and January 1, 2010 at the Bing Center for Waldenstrom Macroglobulinemia were eligible for inclusion in our analysis. We reviewed medical records for eligible probands to determine family history of cancer (defined as a cancer diagnosis for ≥1 first-degree relative(s) of the proband). Using expected values constructed from the United States National Health Interview Survey, we estimated age- and race-standardized rate ratios (RRs) for family history of breast, colorectal, lung, ovarian, and prostate cancers by WM subtype. RESULTS Family history of prostate cancer had the largest overall rate ratio (RR=1.4, 95% confidence limits [CL]: 1.1, 1.7), and among sporadic cases, family history of prostate and breast cancer had the largest rate ratios (prostate: RR=1.3, 95% CL: 1.1, 1.7; breast: RR=1.3, 95% CL: 1.2, 1.6). CONCLUSION Our study suggests that it may be worthwhile to pursue these associations in a case-control study with uniform selection and data collection for cases and controls, and at least some record-based information on family history.