Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Megan N. Houston is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Megan N. Houston.


Journal of Athletic Training | 2014

Health-Related Quality of Life in Individuals With Chronic Ankle Instability

Megan N. Houston; Bonnie Van Lunen; Matthew C. Hoch

CONTEXT Individuals with chronic ankle instability (CAI) have reported decreased global and regional function. Despite the identification of functional deficits in those with CAI, more research is required to determine the extent to which CAI influences the multidimensional profile of health-related quality of life. OBJECTIVE To determine whether global, regional, and psychological health-related outcomes differ between individuals with and without CAI. DESIGN Case-control study. SETTING Laboratory. PATIENTS OR OTHER PARTICIPANTS Twenty-five participants with CAI (age = 21.9 ± 2.5 years, height = 170.8 ± 8.6 cm, mass = 69.8.0 ± 11.7 kg) were sex- and limb-matched to 25 healthy participants (age = 22.0 ± 2.1 years, height = 167.4 ± 9.1 cm, mass = 64.8 ± 11.2 kg). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S) Both groups completed the Disablement in the Physically Active Scale, the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM), the FAAM-Sport, the Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia-11, and the Fear-Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire. Dependent variables were scores on these instruments, and the independent variable was group. RESULTS Compared with healthy individuals, those with CAI reported decreased function on the Disablement in the Physically Active Scale, FAAM, and FAAM-Sport (P < .001) and increased fear of reinjury on the Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia-11 and Fear-Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire (P < .001). In the CAI group, the FAAM and FAAM-Sport demonstrated a significant relationship (r = 0.774, P < .01). CONCLUSIONS Individuals with CAI reported decreased function and increased fear of reinjury compared with healthy control participants. Also, within the CAI group, there was a strong relationship between FAAM and FAAM-Sport scores but not between any other instruments. These findings suggest that health-related quality of life should be examined during the rehabilitation process of individuals with CAI.


Journal of Athletic Training | 2015

Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Individuals With Chronic Ankle Instability: A Systematic Review

Megan N. Houston; Johanna M. Hoch; Matthew C. Hoch

CONTEXT A comprehensive systematic literature review of the health-related quality-of-life (HRQOL) differences among individuals with chronic ankle instability (CAI), ankle-sprain copers, and healthy control participants has not been conducted. It could provide a better indication of the self-reported deficits that may be present in individuals with CAI. OBJECTIVE To systematically summarize the extent to which HRQOL deficits are present in individuals with CAI. DATA SOURCES We searched for articles in the electronic databases of EBSCO Host and PubMed Central using key words chronic, functional, mechanical, coper, instability, sprains, and patient-assessed. We also performed a hand search of reference lists, authors, and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) of the articles screened for inclusion. STUDY SELECTION Studies were included if they (1) incorporated a PRO as a participant descriptor or as a study outcome to compare adults with CAI to ankle-sprain copers or healthy controls, (2) were written in English, and (3) were published in peer-reviewed journals. DATA EXTRACTION Two authors independently assessed methodologic quality using the modified Downs and Black Index. Articles were filtered into 3 categories based on between-groups comparisons: CAI and copers, CAI and healthy control participants, copers and healthy participants. We calculated Hedges g effect sizes and 95% confidence intervals to examine PRO group differences. DATA SYNTHESIS Of the 124 studies assessed for eligibility, 27 were included. A total of 24 articles compared PROs in individuals with CAI and healthy controls, 7 compared individuals with CAI and copers, and 4 compared copers and healthy controls. Quality scores on the modified Downs and Black Index ranged from 52.9% to 88.2%, with 8 high-, 16 moderate-, and 3 low-quality studies. Overall, we observed moderate to strong evidence that individuals with CAI displayed deficits on generic and region-specific PROs compared with copers and healthy controls. However, evidence that differences exist between copers and healthy controls was conflicting. In addition, for dimension-specific outcomes, evidence to suggest that fear of reinjury is heightened in individuals with CAI was limited. CONCLUSIONS The evidence suggested that CAI is associated with functional and HRQOL deficits, particularly when examined with region-specific PROs. However, PROs do not appear to differ between copers and healthy controls.


Clinical Journal of Sport Medicine | 2014

Plantar cutaneous sensitivity and balance in individuals with and without chronic ankle instability.

Meaghan R. Powell; Cameron J. Powden; Megan N. Houston; Matthew C. Hoch

Objective:To determine if plantar cutaneous sensation and postural control differ between individuals with and without chronic ankle instability (CAI). Design:Case–control. Setting:Laboratory. Participants:Ten subjects with CAI and 10 subjects with no ankle sprain history participated. Interventions:Light touch was evaluated at 3 sites (heel, base of fifth metatarsal, and head of first metatarsal) on the plantar aspect of the foot using Semmes–Weinstein Monofilaments (SWMs). Postural control was assessed using the single leg firm and foam conditions of the Balance Error Scoring System (BESS) and during eyes open and eyes closed static postural control on a force plate. Main Outcome Measures:Semmes–Weinstein Monofilament detection thresholds, BESS errors, and the mean of time-to-boundary (TTB) minima (TTB-mean) and the SD of TTB minima (TTB-SD) in the anterior–posterior (AP) and medial–lateral directions were evaluated for each subject. Results:Subjects with CAI demonstrated increased SWM detection thresholds at the heel (P = 0.009), head of the first (P = 0.01), and base of the fifth metatarsal (P < 0.001) and postural control deficits on the BESS firm (P = 0.04) and foam (P = 0.001) conditions and with eyes open TTB-mean AP (P = 0.007) and TTB-SD AP (P = 0.02). When combining groups, a negative moderate correlation was observed between the base of the fifth metatarsal detection threshold and eyes open TTB-mean AP (r = −0.50; P = 0.03). Conclusions:Light touch and postural control deficits were observed in individuals with CAI. The correlation between light touch over the base of the fifth metatarsal and eyes open TTB-mean AP suggests that there may be a relevant relationship between these measures. Clinical Relevance:Individuals with CAI demonstrated deficits in light touch over the plantar aspect of the foot. The relationship between base of the fifth metatarsal sensation and TTB-mean AP may provide a starting point to link plantar cutaneous sensory deficits to changes in other aspects of sensorimotor function.


Gait & Posture | 2015

Contributing factors to Star Excursion Balance Test performance in individuals with chronic ankle instability

Michael L. Gabriner; Megan N. Houston; Jessica L. Kirby; Matthew C. Hoch

The purpose of this study was to determine the contributions of strength, dorsiflexion range of motion (DFROM), plantar cutaneous sensation (PCS), and static postural control to Star Excursion Balance Test (SEBT) performance in individuals with chronic ankle instability (CAI). Forty individuals with CAI completed isometric strength, weight-bearing DFROM, PCS, static and dynamic balance assessments. Three separate backward multiple linear regression models were calculated to determine how strength, DFROM, PCS, and static postural control contributed to each reach direction of the SEBT. Explanatory variables included dorsiflexion, inversion, and eversion strength, DFROM, PCS, and time-to-boundary mean minima (TTBMM) and standard deviation (TTBSD) in the medial-lateral (ML) and anterior-posterior (AP) directions. Criterion variables included SEBT-anterior, posteromedial, and posterolateral directions. The strength of each model was determined by the R2-value and Cohens f2 effect size. Regression models with an effect size ≥0.15 were considered clinically relevant. All three SEBT directions produced clinically relevant regression models. DFROM and PCS accounted for 16% of the variance in SEBT-anterior reach (f2=0.19, p=0.04). Eversion strength and TTBMM-ML accounted for 28% of the variance in SEBT-posteromedial reach (f2=0.39, p<0.01). Eversion strength and TTBSD-ML accounted for 14% of the variance in SEBT-posterolateral reach (f2=0.16, p=0.06). DFROM and PCS explained a clinically relevant proportion of the variance associated with SEBT-anterior reach. Eversion strength and TTB ML explained a clinically relevant proportion of the variance in SEBT-posteromedial and posterolateral reach distances. Therefore, rehabilitation strategies should emphasize DFROM, PCS, eversion strength, and static balance to enhance dynamic postural control in patients with CAI.


Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation | 2016

Validity of Single-Item Patient-Rated Outcomes in Adolescent Football Athletes With Concussion

Alison R. Snyder Valier; Cailee E. Welch Bacon; R. Curtis Bay; Megan N. Houston; Tamara C. Valovich McLeod

OBJECTIVE To determine the longitudinal and concurrent validity of single-item patient-rated outcomes (PROs) in adolescent football athletes with concussion. DESIGN Longitudinal. SETTING Athletic training facilities. PARTICIPANTS Convenience sample of male adolescent interscholastic athletes (n=94; mean age, 15.7±1.1y; mean grade, 10.1±1.1) from a larger investigation who suffered a sport-related concussion during football and had at least 3 follow-up assessments at 3, 10, and 30 days postinjury (N=249). INTERVENTIONS Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Participants were administered 3 global rating questions (1 generic, 1 for daily activities, and 1 for athletic activities) along with the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL), Multidimensional Fatigue Scale (MFS), and Headache Impact Test-6 (HIT-6) at 3, 10, and 30 days postconcussion. Longitudinal validity was determined through a mixed linear model with random effects for subjects, with pairwise differences assessed using Bonferroni correction (P<.05). Concurrent validity was determined by examining Spearman ρ correlations between the single-item PROs and multi-item PROs. RESULTS All 3 single-item PROs improved over time, demonstrating longitudinal validity (P<.001), except day 10 versus day 30 for global change (P=.072). Fair to moderate correlations were identified between the single-item PROs and the PedsQL, MFS, and HIT-6. CONCLUSIONS The improvement of single-item PRO scores over a postinjury time period of 30 days suggests that these PROs respond as expected to patient recovery. The correlations identified between the single-item PROs and common multi-item PROs used in athletes with concussion demonstrate concurrent validity. Therefore, single-item PROs appear to measure patient progress in adolescent football athletes postconcussion.


Journal of Athletic Training | 2016

Health-Related Quality of Life in Athletes: A Systematic Review With Meta-Analysis.

Megan N. Houston; Matthew C. Hoch; Johanna M. Hoch

CONTEXT Assessment of health-related quality of life (HRQOL) after injury is important. Differences in HRQOL between nonathletes and athletes and between injured and uninjured athletes have been demonstrated; however, the evidence has not been synthesized. OBJECTIVE To answer the following questions: (1) Does HRQOL differ among adolescent and collegiate athletes and nonathletes? (2) Does HRQOL differ between injured adolescent and collegiate athletes or between athletes with a history of injury and uninjured athletes or those without a history of injury? DATA SOURCES We systematically searched CINAHL, MEDLINE, SPORTDiscus, and PubMed. A hand search of references was also conducted. STUDY SELECTION Studies were included if they used generic instruments to compare HRQOL outcomes between athletes and nonathletes and between uninjured and injured athletes. Studies were excluded if they did not use a generic instrument, pertained to instrument development, or included retired athletes or athletes with a chronic disease. DATA EXTRACTION We assessed study quality using the modified Downs and Black Index Tool. Bias-corrected Hedges g effect sizes and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. The Strength of Recommendation Taxonomy (SORT) was used to determine the overall strength of the recommendation. A random-effects meta-analysis was performed for all studies using the composite or total score. DATA SYNTHESIS Eight studies with modified Downs and Black scores ranging from 70.6% to 88.4% were included. For question 1, the overall random-effects meta-analysis was weak (effect size = 0.27, 95% confidence interval = 0.14, 0.40; P < .001). For question 2, the overall random-effects meta-analysis was moderate (effect size = 0.68, 95% confidence interval = 0.42, 0.95; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS Grade A evidence indicates that athletes reported better HRQOL than nonathletes and that uninjured athletes reported better HRQOL than injured athletes. However, the overall effect for question 1 was weak, suggesting that the differences between athletes and nonathletes may not be clinically meaningful. Clinicians should monitor HRQOL after injury to ensure that all dimensions of health are appropriately treated.


Journal of Sport Rehabilitation | 2016

The Diagnostic Accuracy of Screening Tools to Detect Eating Disorders in Female Athletes

Alyssa J. Wagner; Casey D. Erickson; Dayna K. Tierney; Megan N. Houston; Cailee E. Welch Bacon

Clinical Scenario: Eating disorders in female athletes are a commonly underdiagnosed condition. Better screening tools for eating disorders in athletic females could help increase diagnosis and help athletes get the treatment they need. Focused Clinical Question: Should screening tools be used to detect eating disorders in female athletes? Summary of Key Findings: The literature was searched for studies that included information regarding the sensitivity and specificity of screening tools for eating disorders in female athletes. The search returned 5 possible articles related to the clinical question; 3 studies met the inclusion criteria (2 cross-sectional studies, 1 cohort study) and were included. All 3 studies reported sensitivity and specificity for the Athletic Milieu Direct Questionnaire version 2, the Brief Eating Disorder in Athletes Questionnaire version 2, and the Physiologic Screening Test to Detect Eating Disorders Among Female Athletes. All 3 studies found that the respective screening tool was able to accurately identify female athletes with eating disorders; however, the screening tools varied in sensitivity and specificity values. Clinical Bottom Line: There is strong evidence to support the use of screening tools to detect eating disorders in female athletes. Screening tools with higher sensitivity and specificity have demonstrated a successful outcome of determining athletes with eating disorders or at risk for developing an eating disorder. Strength of Recommendation: There is grade A evidence available to demonstrate that screening tools accurately detect female athletes at risk for eating disorders.


Journal of Athletic Training | 2015

Patient-Reported Outcomes in Male and Female Collegiate Soccer Players During an Athletic Season

Johanna M. Hoch; Beth Druvenga; Brittany A. Ferguson; Megan N. Houston; Matthew C. Hoch

CONTEXT Clinicians are urged to document patient-based outcomes during rehabilitation to measure health-related quality of life (HRQOL) from the patients perspective. It is unclear how scores on patient-reported outcome instruments (PROs) vary over the course of an athletic season because of normal athletic participation. OBJECTIVE Our primary purpose was to evaluate the effect of administration time point on HRQOL during an athletic season. Secondary purposes were to determine test-retest reliability and minimal detectable change scores of 3 PROs commonly used in clinical practice and if a relationship exists between generic and region-specific outcome instruments. DESIGN Cross-sectional study. SETTING Athletic facility. PATIENTS OR OTHER PARTICIPANTS Twenty-three collegiate soccer athletes (11 men, 12 women). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S) At 5 time points over a spring season, we administered the Disablement in the Physically Active Scale (DPA), Foot and Ankle Ability Measure-Sport, and Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS). RESULTS Time effects were observed for the DPA (P = .011) and KOOS Quality of Life subscale (P = .027). However, the differences between individual time points did not surpass the minimal detectable change for the DPA, and no post hoc analyses were significant for the KOOS-Quality of Life subscale. Test-retest reliability was moderate for the KOOS-Pain subscale (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.71) and good for the remaining KOOS subscales, DPA, and Foot and Ankle Ability Measure-Sport (intraclass correlation coefficients > 0.79). The DPA and KOOS-Sport subscale demonstrated a significant moderate relationship (P = .018). CONCLUSIONS Athletic participation during a nontraditional, spring soccer season did not affect HRQOL. All 3 PROs were reliable and could be used clinically to monitor changes in health status throughout an athletic season. Our results demonstrate that significant deviations in scores were related to factors other than participation, such as injury. Finally, both generic and region-specific instruments should be used in clinical practice.


Journal of Sport Rehabilitation | 2017

Collegiate Athletes with Ankle Sprain History Exhibit Greater Fear-Avoidance Beliefs

Megan N. Houston; Johanna M. Hoch; Matthew C. Hoch

CONTEXT Postinjury, college athletes have reported elevated levels of fear. However, it is unclear how a history of ankle sprain impacts injury-related fear. OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to determine if Fear-Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire (FABQ) scores differ between college athletes with a history of a single ankle sprain, those with recurrent ankle sprains, and healthy controls. DESIGN Cross-sectional design. SETTING National Collegiate Athletic Association institutions. PATIENTS From a large database of college athletes, 75 participants with a history of a single ankle sprain, 44 with a history of recurrent ankle sprains (≥2), and 28 controls with no injury history were included. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Participants completed an injury history questionnaire and the FABQ. On the injury history form, the participants were asked to indicate if they had ever sustained an ankle sprain and, if yes, to describe how many. FABQ scores ranged from 0 to 66 with higher scores representing greater fear. RESULTS Athletes with a history of recurrent ankle sprains (median, 28.00; interquartile range, 18.25-38.00) reported higher levels of fear than those with a history of a single ankle sprain (21.00; 8.00-31.00; P = .03; effect size = 0.199) and healthy controls (5.50; 0.00-25.00; P < .001; effect size = 0.431). Athletes with a history of a single sprain reported greater fear than healthy controls (P = .01, effect size = 0.267). Athletes with a history of a single sprain reported greater fear than healthy controls (P = .02, effect size = 0.23). CONCLUSIONS College athletes with a history of ankle sprain exhibited greater levels of fear on the FABQ than healthy controls. These findings suggest that ankle sprains in general may increase injury-related fear and that those with a history of recurrent sprains are more vulnerable.


Journal of Sport Rehabilitation | 2017

The impact of injury on health-related quality of life in collegiate athletes

Megan N. Houston; Johanna M. Hoch; Bonnie Van Lunen; Matthew C. Hoch

CONTEXT Health-related quality of life (HRQOL) is a broad term for the impact of injury or illness on physical, psychological, and social health dimensions. Injury has been associated with decreased HRQOL in athletes. However, the influence of injury history, participation status, time since last injury, and injury severity on HRQOL remains unclear. OBJECTIVE To compare HRQOL in collegiate athletes based on injury history, participation status, time since last injury, and injury severity and to examine relationships between HRQOL outcomes. DESIGN Cross-sectional. SETTING 3 National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) institutions. PARTICIPANTS 467 collegiate athletes (199 males, 268 females; 19.5 ± 1.3 y, 173.9 ± 10.5 cm, 71.9 ± 13.6 kg) were recruited from NCAA Division I (n = 299) and Division III (n = 168) institutions. Athletes were included regardless of participation status, which created a diverse sample of current and past injury histories. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES During a single session, participants completed an injury history form, the Disablement in the Physically Active Scale (DPA), and the Fear-Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire (FABQ). Dependent variables included DPA-Physical Summary Component (DPA-PSC), DPA-Mental Summary Component (DPA-MSC), and FABQ Scores. RESULTS HRQOL differences were detected between groups based on injury history, participation status, and time since last injury. No differences were detected for injury severity. A moderate correlation was identified between the DPA-PSC and FABQ (rs = 0.503, P < .001) and a weak relationship was identified between the DPA-MSC and FABQ (rs = 0.266, P < .001). CONCLUSIONS Injury negatively influenced HRQOL in athletes with a current injury. While those individuals participating injured reported better HRQOL than the athletes sidelined due to injury, deficits were still present and should be monitored to ensure a complete recovery. Identifying the patients perception of impairment will help facilitate evidencebased treatment and rehabilitation strategies that target the physical and psychosocial aspects of health.

Collaboration


Dive into the Megan N. Houston's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge