Megan Rutherford

Placement of the acetabular component

Ideal placement of the acetabular component remains elusive both in terms of defining and achieving a target. Our aim is to help restore original anatomy by using the transverse acetabular ligament (TAL) to control the height, depth and version of the component. In the normal hip the TAL and labrum extend beyond the equator of the femoral head and therefore, if the definitive acetabular component is positioned such that it is cradled by and just deep to the plane of the TAL and labrum and is no more than 4mm larger than the original femoral head, the centre of the hip should be restored. If the face of the component is positioned parallel to the TAL and psoas groove the patient specific version should be restored. We still use the TAL for controlling version in the dysplastic hip because we believe that the TAL and labrum compensate for any underlying bony abnormality. The TAL should not be used as an aid to inclination. Worldwide, > 75% of surgeons operate with the patient in the lateral decubitus position and we have shown that errors in post-operative radiographic inclination (RI) of > 50° are generally caused by errors in patient positioning. Consequently, great care needs to be taken when positioning the patient. We also recommend 35° of apparent operative inclination (AOI) during surgery, as opposed to the traditional 45°.

Statistical Shape Model Based 2D–3D Reconstruction of the Proximal Femur—Influence of Radiographic Femoral Orientation on Reconstruction Accuracy

In recent years, it has been suggested that statistical shape model based 2D–3D reconstruction of the proximal femur could offer a solution to issues with preoperative planning of total hip replacement from 2D radiographs. The purpose of this work was to assess the effect of radiographic femoral rotation on the accuracy of a statistical shape model based 2D–3D femoral reconstruction method. A reconstruction algorithm was tested on input images with varying amounts of internal/external rotation (10 internal to 50 external) using leave-one-out tests and the resulting 3D shape was compared to the CT segmentation by point-to-point distance. The minimum value for mean point-to-point error was 1.24 ± 0.18 mm and occurred at 20o of external rotation (where neutral orientation was the femoral neck axis aligned in the coronal plane). The maximum error calculated was at 50o of external rotation with mean point-to-point error being 1.88 ± 0.41 mm. This work highlights an important source of error for 2D–3D reconstruction algorithms which may be incorporated into future validation studies.

Effect of Combined Flexion and External Rotation on Measurements of the Proximal Femur from Anteroposterior Pelvic Radiographs

INTRODUCTION Fixed flexion and external rotation contractures are common in patients with hip osteoarthritis and, in particular, before total hip replacement (THR). We aimed to answer the following question: how does combined flexion and external rotation of the femur influence the radiographic assessment of (1) femoral offset (FO) (2) neck-shaft angle (NSA) and (3) distance (parallel to the femoral axis) from greater trochanter to femoral head center (GT-FHC)? HYPOTHESIS Combined flexion and external rotation impact the accuracy of two-dimensional (2D) proximal femur measurements. MATERIALS AND METHODS Three-dimensional (3D) CT segmentations of the right femur from 30 male and 42 female subjects were acquired and used to build a statistical shape model. A cohort (n=100; M:F=50:50) of shapes was generated using the model. Each 3D femur was subjected to external rotation (0°-50°) followed by flexion (0°-50°) in 10° increments. Simulated radiographs of each femur in these orientations were produced. Measurements of FO, NSA and GT-FHC were automatically taken on the 2D images. RESULTS Combined rotations influenced the measurement of FO (p<0.05), NSA (p<0.001), and GT-FHC (p<0.001). Femoral offset was affected predominantly by external rotation (19.8±2.6mm [12.2 to 26.1mm] underestimated at 50°); added flexion in combined rotations only slightly impacted measurement error (20.7±3.1mm [13.2 to 28.8mm] underestimated at 50° combined). Neck-shaft angle was reduced with flexion when external rotation was low (9.5±2.1° [4.4 to 14.2°] underestimated at 0° external and 50° flexion) and increased with flexion when external rotation was high (24.4±3.9° [15.7 to 31.9°] overestimated at 50° external and 50° flexion). Femoral head center was above GT by 17.0±3.4mm [3.9 to 22.1mm] at 50° external and 50° flexion. In contrast, in neutral rotation, FHC was 12.2±3.4mm [3.9 to 22.1mm] below GT. DISCUSSION This investigation adds to current understanding of the effect of femoral orientation on preoperative planning measurements through the study of combined rotations (as opposed to single-axis). Planning measurements are shown to be significantly affected by flexion, external rotation, and their interaction. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV Biomechanical study.

Long-term hip loading in unilateral total hip replacement patients is no different between limbs or compared to healthy controls at similar walking speeds

Variation in hip joint contact forces directly influences the performance of total hip replacements (THRs). Measurement and calculation of contact forces in THR patients has been limited by small sample sizes, wide variation in patient and surgical factors, and short-term follow-up. This study hypothesised that, at long-term follow-up, unilateral THR patients have similar calculated hip contact forces compared to controls walking at similar (self-selected) speeds and, in contrast, THR patients walking at slower (self-selected) speeds have reduced hip contact forces. It was further hypothesised that there is no difference in calculated hip contact forces between operated and non-operated limbs at long-term follow-up for both faster and slower patients. Gait analysis data for THR patients walking at faster (walking speed: 1.29 ± 0.12 m/s; n = 11) and slower (walking speed: 0.72 ± 0.09 m/s; n = 11) speeds were used. Healthy subjects constituted the control group (walking speed: 1.36 ± 0.12 m/s; n = 10). Hip contact forces were calculated using static optimisation. There was no significant difference (p > 0.31) in hip contact forces between faster and control groups. Conversely, force was reduced at heel strike by 19% (p = 0.002), toe-off by 31% (p < 0.001) and increased at mid-stance by 15% (p = 0.02) for the slower group compared to controls. There were no differences between operated and non-operated limbs for the slower group or the faster group, suggesting good biomechanical recovery at long-term follow-up. Loading, at different walking speeds, presented here can improve the relevance of preclinical testing methods.

Patient positioning and cup orientation during total hip arthroplasty: assessment of current UK practice:

Introduction: Acetabular cup orientation during total hip arthroplasty (THA) remains a challenge. This is influenced by patient positioning during surgery and the method used to orientate the acetabular cup. The aim of this study was to assess current UK practice for patient positioning and cup orientation, particularly with respect to patient supports and techniques used to achieve target version and inclination. Methods: A literature review and pilot study were initially conducted to develop the questionnaire, which was completed by British Hip Society members (n = 183). As the majority of THA surgical procedures within the UK are performed with the patient in lateral decubitus, orthopaedic surgeons who operated with the patient in the supine position were excluded (n = 18); a further 6% were incomplete and also excluded (n = 11). Results: Of those who operated in lateral decubitus, 76.6% (n = 118/154) used the posterior approach. Only 31% (n = 47/154) considered their supports to be completely rigid. More than 35% (n = 55/154) were unhappy with the supports that they presently use. The most common methods for controlling operative inclination and version were a mechanical alignment guide (MAG; n = 78/154; 50.6%) and the transverse acetabular ligament (TAL; n = 82/154; 53.2%); 31.2% (48/154) used a freehand technique to control operative inclination. Conclusion: Limited studies have been conducted whereby patient supports have been analysed and key design principles outlined. With 35.7% of the orthopaedic surgeons surveyed having issues with their current supports, a greater awareness of essential characteristics for patient supports is required.