Meghan Bathgate
University of Pittsburgh
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Meghan Bathgate.
International Journal of Science Education | 2015
Meghan Bathgate; Amanda Crowell; Christian D. Schunn; Mac Cannady; Rena Dorph
Engaging in science as an argumentative practice can promote students’ critical thinking, reflection, and evaluation of evidence. However, many do not approach science in this way. Furthermore, the presumed confrontational nature of argumentation may run against cultural norms particularly during the sensitive time of early adolescence. This paper explores whether middle-school students’ ability to engage in critical components of argumentation in science impacts science classroom learning. It also examines whether students’ willingness to do so attenuates or moderates that benefit. In other words, does one need to be both willing and able to engage critically with the discursive nature of science to receive benefits to learning? This study of middle-school students participating in four months of inquiry science shows a positive impact of argumentative sensemaking ability on learning, as well as instances of a moderating effect of ones willingness to engage in argumentative discourse. Possible mechanisms and the potential impacts to educational practices are discussed.
CBE- Life Sciences Education | 2018
Andrew J. Cavanagh; Xinnian Chen; Meghan Bathgate; Jennifer Frederick; David I. Hanauer; Mark J. Graham
Predictors of student commitment and engagement in an undergraduate science course featuring active learning are explored. The study identified student trust in the instructor as an important predictor of student commitment and engagement in an active-learning context.
International Journal of Science Education | 2018
Rena Dorph; Meghan Bathgate; Christian D. Schunn; Matthew A. Cannady
ABSTRACT This paper proposes three new measures of components STEM career preferences (affinity, certainty, and goal), and then explores which dimensions of science learning activation (fascination, values, competency belief, and scientific sensemaking) are predictive of STEM career preferences. Drawn from the ALES14 dataset, a sample of 2938 sixth and eighth grade middle-school students from 11 schools in two purposefully selected diverse areas (Western Pennsylvania & the Bay Area of California) was used for the analyses presented in this paper. These schools were chosen to represent socio-economic and ethnic diversity. Findings indicate that, overall, youth who are activated towards science learning are more likely to have affinity towards STEM careers, certainty about their future career goals, and have identified a specific STEM career goal. However, different dimensions of science learning activation are more strongly correlated with different aspects career preference across different STEM career foci (e.g. science, engineering, technology, health, etc.). Gender, age, minority status, and home resources also have explanatory power. While many results are consistent with prior research, there are also novel results that offer important fodder for future research. Critically, our strategy of measuring affinity towards the specific disciplines that make up STEM, measuring STEM and health career goals separately, and looking at career affinity and career goals separately, offers interesting results and underscores the value of disentangling the conceptual melting pot of what has previously been known as ‘career interest.’ Study findings also have implications for design of science learning opportunities for youth.
International Journal of Science Education | 2017
Meghan Bathgate; Christian D. Schunn
ABSTRACT While motivational changes towards science are common during adolescence, our work asks which perceived classroom experiences are most strongly related to these changes. Additionally, we examine which experiences are most strongly associated with learning classroom content. In particular, using self-reports from a sample of approximately 3000 middle school students, this study investigates the influence of perceived science classroom experiences, namely student engagement and perceived success, on motivational change (fascination, values, competency belief) and content knowledge. Controlling for demographic information, school effects, and initial levels of motivation and content knowledge, we find that dimensions of engagement (affect, behavioural/cognitive) and perceived success are differentially associated with changes in particular motivational constructs and learning. Affective engagement is positively associated with motivational outcomes and negatively associated with learning outcomes, behavioural–cognitive engagement is associated only with learning, and perceived success is related only to motivational outcomes. Theoretical and practical implications are discussed.
Science Education | 2014
Meghan Bathgate; Christian D. Schunn; Richard Correnti
Journal of Research in Science Teaching | 2016
Li Sha; Christian D. Schunn; Meghan Bathgate; Adar Ben‐Eliyahu
Journal of Research in Science Teaching | 2015
Li Sha; Christian D. Schunn; Meghan Bathgate
Applied Cognitive Psychology | 2012
Meghan Bathgate; Judith E. Sims-Knight; Christian D. Schunn
Instructional Science | 2016
Meghan Bathgate; Christian D. Schunn
Contemporary Educational Psychology | 2017
Meghan Bathgate; Christian D. Schunn