Mehdi Hosseini

The Soil Moisture Active Passive Validation Experiment 2012 (SMAPVEX12): Prelaunch Calibration and Validation of the SMAP Soil Moisture Algorithms

The National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) Soil Moisture Active Passive (SMAP) satellite is scheduled for launch in January 2015. In order to develop robust soil moisture retrieval algorithms that fully exploit the unique capabilities of SMAP, algorithm developers had identified a need for long-duration combined active and passive L-band microwave observations. In response to this need, a joint Canada-U.S. field experiment (SMAPVEX12) was conducted in Manitoba (Canada) over a six-week period in 2012. Several times per week, NASA flew two aircraft carrying instruments that could simulate the observations the SMAP satellite would provide. Ground crews collected soil moisture data, crop measurements, and biomass samples in support of this campaign. The objective of SMAPVEX12 was to support the development, enhancement, and testing of SMAP soil moisture retrieval algorithms. This paper details the airborne and field data collection as well as data calibration and analysis. Early results from the SMAP active radar retrieval methods are presented and demonstrate that relative and absolute soil moisture can be delivered by this approach. Passive active L-band sensor (PALS) antenna temperatures and reflectivity, as well as backscatter, closely follow dry down and wetting events observed during SMAPVEX12. The SMAPVEX12 experiment was highly successful in achieving its objectives and provides a unique and valuable data set that will advance algorithm development.

Multi-index-based soil moisture estimation using MODIS images

The suitability of using Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) images for surface soil moisture estimation to investigate the importance of soil moisture in different applications, such as agriculture, hydrology, meteorology and natural disaster management, is evaluated in this study. Soil moisture field measurements and MODIS images of relevant dates have been acquired. Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI), Enhanced Vegetation Index (EVI) and Normalized Difference Water Index (NDWI) are calculated from MODIS images. In addition, MODIS Land Surface Temperature (LST) data (MOD11A1) are used in this analysis. Four different soil moisture estimation models, which are based on NDVI–LST, EVI–LST, NDVI–LST–NDWI and EVI–LST–NDWI, are developed and their accuracies are assessed. Statistical analysis shows that replacing EVI with NDVI in the model that is based on LST and NDVI increases the accuracy of soil moisture estimation. Accuracy evaluation of soil moisture estimation using check points shows that the model based on LST, EVI and NDWI values gives a higher accuracy than that based on LST and EVI values. It is concluded that the model based on the three indices is a suitable model to estimate soil moisture through MODIS imagery.

Comparison of optical, radar, and hybrid soil moisture estimation models using experimental data

Different soil moisture estimation models have been developed based on using optical, radar, or a combination of optical and radar data. However, it is not clear which of these models is more suitable to estimate soil moisture in vegetated areas. Soil moisture is estimated in sparse vegetated areas using both optical and synthetic aperture radar (SAR) images. Also a hybrid model that is based on a combination of SAR and optical derived indices is used to decrease the effects of vegetation cover on SAR backscatter coefficients. The results show that the SAR model is more accurate than the optical model. However, after using the hybrid model and removing vegetation cover effects from radar backscattering coefficient, the accuracies improve. This shows that the hybrid model is the most accurate model and can be used as a suitable model to estimate soil moisture.

Characterization of canola canopies using optical and SAR imagery

Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) values extracted from remotely sensed optical imagery are used ubiquitously to monitor crop condition. However, challenges in the operational use of optical imagery are well documented making it difficult to capture measures of crop condition during critical phenology stages when clouds obscure. This study investigates the integration of Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) and optical imagery to characterize the condition of crop canopies in order to deliver daily measures of NDVI during the entire growing season. Multitemporal C-band polarimetric RADARSAT-2 SAR data and RapidEye images were acquired in 2012 for a study site in western Canada. SAR polarimetric parameters and NDVI were extracted. The temporal variations in SAR polarimetric parameters and NDVI were interpreted with respect to the development of the canola canopy. Optical NDVI was statistically related with SAR polarimetric parameters over test canola fields. Significant correlations were documented between a number of SAR polarimetric parameters and optical NDVI, in particular with respect to HV backscatter, span, volume scattering of the Freeman Durden decomposition and the radar vegetation index, with R-values of 0.83, 0.72, 0.81 and 0.71 respectively. Based on the statistical analysis, SAR polarimetric parameters were calibrated to optical NDVI, creating a SAR-calibrated NDVI (SARc-NDVI)). A canopy structure dynamics model (CSDM) was fitted to the SARc-NDVI, providing a seasonal temporal vegetation index curve. The coupling of NDVI from optical and SAR imagery with a CSDM demonstrates the potential to derive daily measures of crop condition over the entire growing season.

Soil Moisture Estimation in a Vegetated Area Using Combination of AIRSAR and Landsat5-TM Images

High difference between dielectric constant of water (dielectric constant about 80) and dielectric constant of dried soil (dielectric constant about 2–3) makes Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) highly capable in soil moisture estimation. However, there are other factors which affect on radar backscattering coefficient. The most important parameters are vegetation cover, surface roughness and sensor parameters (frequency, polarization and incidence angle). In this paper, the importance of considering the effects of these parameters on SAR backscatter coefficients is shown by comparing different soil moisture estimation models. Moreover, an experimental soil moisture estimation model is developed. It is shown that this model can be used to estimate soil moisture under a variety of vegetation cover densities. The new developed model is based on combination of different indices derived from Landsat5-Thematic Mapper and AIRSAR images. The AIRSAR image is used for extraction of backscattering coefficient and incidence angle while TM image is used for calculation of Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI), Enhanced Vegetation Index (EVI), Normalized Difference Water Index (NDWI) and Brightness Temperature. Then a soil moisture estimation model which is named as Hybrid model is developed based on integration of all of these parameters. The accuracies of this model are assessed in the NDVI ranges of 0–0.2, 0.2–0.4 and 0.4–0.7 by using SAR data in C band and L band frequencies and also in different polarizations of HH, HV, VV and TP. The results show that for instance in L band with HV polarization, R-square values of 0.728, 0.628 and 0.527 are obtained between ground measured soil moisture and estimated soil moisture values using the Hybrid model for NDVI ranges of 0–0.2, 0.2–0.4 and 0.4–0.7, respectively.