Mel Brown

Estimating mechanical responses to pulsatile electrical stimulation of the cochlea

This study estimated the mechanical response of the cochlea to pulsatile electrical stimulation of the scala tympani of the cat. The auditory nerve compound action potential evoked by an acoustic probe was forward-masked by a train of charge-balanced biphasic current pulses. Masking as a function of probe frequency reflected the excitation pattern of the response to the masker and resembled the spectrum of the electrical stimulus. Both pulse rate and pulse width influenced the degree of masking. The vibration of a region of the basilar membrane was estimated by recording the local cochlear microphonic evoked by biphasic pulses. The amplitude of the cochlear microphonic was proportional to the amplitude of the spectral component of the electrical stimulus to which the local cochlear microphonic was tuned. These results are consistent with the generation of a mechanical response to the electrical stimulus.

Acoustic and electric forward-masking of the auditory nerve compound action potential: evidence for linearity of electro-mechanical transduction.

We investigated electro-mechanical transduction within the cochlea by comparing masking of the auditory nerve compound action potential (CAP) by acoustical and electrical maskers. Forward-masking of the CAP reflects the response to the masker of the cochlear location tuned to the probe. Electrical stimulation was delivered through bipolar stimulating electrodes within the basal turn of the scala tympani. The growth of masking of high-frequency probes which excite cochlear locations close to the stimulating electrodes was similar for both acoustic and electrical maskers, suggesting a linear transduction of electrical energy to mechanical energy. Exposure to intense acoustic stimulation caused an equal loss of sensitivity to acoustic and electrical maskers. Masking of lower-frequency probes by electrical maskers increased rapidly with masker current, suggesting the direct electrical stimulation of neural elements. This masking was reduced by the administration of strychnine suggesting a contribution by the efferents towards masking of these low-frequency probes.

Comparison of Current Waveforms for the Electrical Stimulation of Residual Low Frequency Hearing

Many cochlear prostheses employ charge-balanced biphasic current pulses. These pulses have little energy at low frequencies resulting in limited stimulation of low frequency hearing by mechanical responses to the electrical stimulus. However, if electro-mechanical transduction within the cochlea is nonlinear, electrical stimulation with asymmetric, charge-balanced current pulses may result in a mechanical response with significantly more low frequency energy. We estimated the mechanical response at low frequencies to pulsatile electrical stimulation of the cochlea. The auditory nerve compound action potential evoked by low frequency tones was forward-masked by a train of symmetric or asymmetric current pulses. Masking by asymmetric current pulses was not significantly different from masking by symmetric pulses matched for pulse duration and charge. In conclusion, there appears to be no advantage to using asymmetric current pulses for the mechanical stimulation of residual low frequency hearing by electrical stimulation of the cochlea.

Variability of Amplitude and Area of the Auditory Nerve Compound Action Potential

The strength of neural response to sensory stimuli is often estimated by measurement of the amplitude of gross neural potentials. These gross potentials reflect the summed activity of a population of neurons. The amplitude of these potentials is dependent upon the synchrony of the contributing neural responses. We compared the variability of the peak-to-peak amplitude of the auditory nerve compound action potential (CAP) with that of the area under the peaks. The area under the peaks was significantly less variable than the amplitude for responses to low frequency stimuli. Responses to other stimuli showed differences in the same direction, but these were not significant. We conclude that the area under these peaks is a more precise measure of neural response than measurement of waveform amplitude at least for responses to low frequency stimuli.