Melanie Wiegerinck
Academic Medical Center
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Melanie Wiegerinck.
Midwifery | 2016
Melanie Wiegerinck; B.Y. van der Goes; A.C.J. Ravelli; J.A. van der Post; J. Klinkert; J. Brandenbarg; Fayette C.D. Buist; M.G.A.J. Wouters; Pieter Tamminga; A. de Jonge; B.W. Mol
OBJECTIVE To compare intrapartum- and neonatal mortality and intervention rates in term women starting labour in primary midwife-led versus secondary obstetrician-led care. DESIGN Retrospective cohort study. SETTING Amsterdam region of the Netherlands. PARTICIPANTS Women with singleton pregnancies who gave birth beyond 37+0 weeks gestation in the years 2005 up to 2008 and lived in the catchment area of the neonatal intensive care units of both academic hospitals in Amsterdam. Women with a primary caesarean section or a pregnancy complicated by antepartum death or major congenital anomalies were excluded. For women in the midwife-led care group, a home or hospital birth could be planned. MEASUREMENTS Analysis of linked data from the national perinatal register, and hospital- and midwifery record data. We assessed (unadjusted) relative risks with confidence intervals. Main outcome measures were incidences of intrapartum and neonatal (<28 days) mortality. Secondary outcomes included incidences of caesarean section and vaginal instrumental delivery. FINDINGS 53,123 women started labour in primary care and 30,166 women in secondary care. Intrapartum and neonatal mortality rates were 37/53,123 (0.70‰) in the primary care group and 24/30,166 (0.80‰) in the secondary care group (relative risk 0.88; 95% CI 0.52-1.46). Women in the primary care group were less likely to deliver by secondary caesarean section (5% versus 16%; RR 0.31; 95% CI 0.30-0.32) or by instrumental delivery (10% versus 13%; RR 0.76; 95% CI 0.73-0.79). KEY CONCLUSIONS We found a low absolute risk of intrapartum and neonatal mortality, with a comparable risk for women who started labour in primary versus secondary care. The intervention rate was significantly lower in women who started labour in primary care. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE These findings suggest that it is possible to identify a group of women at low risk of complications that can start labour in primary care and have low rates of medical interventions whereas perinatal mortality is low.
Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica | 2014
Melanie Wiegerinck; Nora Danhof; Anton H. van Kaam; Pieter Tamminga; Ben Willem J. Mol
To determine whether “neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission” is a valid surrogate outcome measure to assess neonatal condition in clinical studies.
BMJ Open | 2018
Melanie Wiegerinck; Birgit Y. van der Goes; A.C.J. Ravelli; Joris A. M. van der Post; Fayette C.D. Buist; Pieter Tamminga; Ben Willem J. Mol
Objective To compare intrapartum and neonatal mortality in low-risk term women starting labour in midwife-led versus obstetrician-led care. Study design We performed a propensity score matched study using data from our national perinatal register, completed with data from medical files. We studied women without major risk factors with singleton pregnancies who gave birth at term between 2005 and 2008 in the Amsterdam region of the Netherlands. Major risk factors comprised non-vertex position of the fetus, previous Caesarean birth, hypertension, (gestational) diabetes mellitus, post-term pregnancy (≥42 weeks), prolonged rupture of membranes (>24 hours), vaginal bleeding in the second half of pregnancy or induced labour. Groups were devided by midwife-led versus obstetrician-led care at the onset of labour. The primary outcome was intrapartum and neonatal (<28 days) mortality. Secondary outcomes included obstetric interventions, 5 min Apgar scores<7 and neonatal intensive care admittance for >24 hours. Results We studied 57 396 women. Perinatal mortality occurred in 30 of 46 764 (0.64‰) women in midwife-led care and in 2 of 10 632 (0.19‰) women in obstetrician-led care (OR 3.4, 95% CI 0.82 to 14.3). A propensity score matched analysis in a 1:1 ratio with 10 632 women per group revealed an OR for perinatal mortality of 4.0 (95% CI 0.85 to 18.9). Conclusion Among low-risk women, midwife-led care at the onset of labour was associated with a statistically non-significant higher mortality rate.
Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Geneeskunde | 2010
Monique W. M. de Laat; Melanie Wiegerinck; Frans J. Walther; Nicole Boluyt; Ben Willem J. Mol; Joris A. M. van der Post; Jan M. M. van Lith; Martin Offringa
Obstetric Anesthesia Digest | 2013
C. E. Kleinrouweler; Melanie Wiegerinck; C. Ris-Stalpers; P. M. M. Bossuyt; J.A. van der Post; P. von Dadelszen; B.W. Mol; Eva Pajkrt
American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology | 2016
Melanie Wiegerinck; Birgit Y. van der Goes; Ank de Jonge; Anita Ravelli; Joke Klinkert; Joke Brandenbarg; Fayette C.D. Buist; M.G.A.J. Wouters; Pieter Tamminga; Joris A. M. van der Post; Ben Willem J. Mol
Nederlands tijdschrift voor obstetrie & gynaecologie | 2015
Melanie Wiegerinck; J. de Jonge; J.A. van der Post
Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Geneeskunde | 2012
Melanie Wiegerinck; Ben Willem J. Mol
American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology | 2012
Melanie Wiegerinck; Sigrid Huigen; Teus van Barneveld; Ben Willem J. Mol; Hans Duvekot
/data/revues/00029378/v208i1sS/S0002937812011970/ | 2012
Nora Danhof; Melanie Wiegerinck; Anton H. van Kaam; Ben Willem Mol