Melinda Smedema

Comparison of the echinocandin caspofungin with amphotericin B for treatment of histoplasmosis following pulmonary challenge in a murine model.

ABSTRACT Twenty clinical isolates of Histoplasma capsulatum were tested for their in vitro susceptibilities to caspofungin in comparison to those to amphotericin B by following National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards guidelines for yeasts. The mean MICs were 16.6 μg/ml (range, 8 to 32 μg/ml) for caspofungin and 0.56 μg/ml (range, 0.5 to 1.0 μg/ml) for amphotericin B. Survival experiments used a 105 dose in a pulmonary challenge model with B6C3F1 mice. All mice that received amphotericin B at 2 mg/kg of body weight every other day (q.o.d.), 30% of mice that received caspofungin at 8 mg/kg/day, and 20% of mice that received caspofungin at 4 mg/kg/day survived to day 15, while mice that received caspofungin at 2 mg/kg/day and all control mice that received the vehicle died by day 14. Amphotericin B at 2 mg/kg q.o.d. markedly reduced the fungal burden in the lungs and spleens, as measured byHistoplasma antigen detection techniques and quantitative cultures, for each comparison. Caspofungin at 10 mg/kg twice a day (b.i.d.) did not reduce the fungal burden, as measured by antigen detection techniques, but slightly reduced the levels of fungi in both the lungs and spleens, as determined by quantitative cultures. Caspofungin at 5 mg/kg b.i.d. did not affect fungal burden. Overall, caspofungin had only a slight effect on survival or fungal burden.

Comparison of a new triazole, posaconazole, with itraconazole and amphotericin B for treatment of histoplasmosis following pulmonary challenge in immunocompromised mice

ABSTRACT A murine model of intratracheally induced histoplasmosis in immunocompromised B6C3F1 mice was used to evaluate a new triazole antifungal agent, posaconazole. This compound was previously shown to be comparable to amphotericin B and superior to itraconazole for the treatment of histoplasmosis in immunocompetent mice. The current study used mice that were depleted of T lymphocytes by intraperitoneal injection of anti-CD4 and anti-CD8 monoclonal antibodies beginning 2 days before infection and continuing at 5-day intervals until completion of the study. Groups of B6C3F1mice that were depleted of CD4 and CD8 T cells were infected with an inoculum of 104Histoplasma capsulatum yeasts. All mice receiving posaconazole at 1 or 0.1 mg/kg of body weight/day, amphotericin B at 2 mg/kg every other day (qod), or itraconazole at 75 mg/kg/day survived to day 29. Only 60% of mice receiving itraconazole at 10 mg/kg/day and none receiving amphotericin B at 0.2 mg/kg qod survived to that date. Fungal burdens were determined at day 14 of infection, 1 day after discontinuation of therapy. Quantitative colony counts and Histoplasma antigen levels in lung and spleen tissues declined following treatment with amphotericin B at 2 mg/kg qod, posaconazole at 5 and 1 mg/kg/day, and itraconazole at 75 mg/kg/day but not in mice treated with amphotericin B at 0.2 mg/kg qod or itraconazole at 10 mg/kg/day. Posaconazole at 0.1 mg/kg/day reduced fungal colony counts and antigen levels in spleens but not in lungs. This study shows posaconazole activity for the treatment of histoplasmosis in immunosuppressed animals.

Does Long-Term Itraconazole Prophylaxis Result in In Vitro Azole Resistance in Mucosal Candida albicans Isolates from Persons with Advanced Human Immunodeficiency Virus Infection?

ABSTRACT The effects of prolonged itraconazole exposure on the susceptibility of Candida albicans isolates to itraconazole and fluconazole have not been well characterized. A recent placebo-controlled study of long-term itraconazole antifungal prophylaxis in persons with advanced human immunodeficiency virus infection afforded the opportunity to address this question. MucosalCandida sp. isolates were obtained from subjects who developed oropharyngeal or esophageal candidiasis, and in vitro susceptibilities of the last isolate obtained at removal from the study as a prophylaxis failure were compared in itraconazole and placebo recipients. More subjects in the placebo group (74 of 146 [51%]) than in the itraconazole group (51 of 149 [34%]) developed mucosal candidiasis (P = 0.004). A total of 112 isolates were recovered from 56 of the 74 (76%) subjects with mucosal candidiasis assigned to the placebo group, compared to 97 isolates from 45 of the 51 (88%) subjects in the itraconazole group. C. albicansaccounted for 98% of isolates in the placebo group and 89% of isolates in the itraconazole group. The itraconazole MIC at which 50% of the isolates tested were inhibited (MIC50) for last-episode isolates from the itraconazole group was 0.125 μg/ml compared to 0.015 μg/ml for the placebo group subjects,P = 0.0001. The MIC50 of fluconazole for the last isolates from the itraconazole group was 1.5 μg/ml compared to 0.5 μg/ml for the placebo subjects (P = 0.005). A lower proportion of isolates recovered from subjects on itraconazole therapy were classified as susceptible to itraconazole (63%) compared to isolates from the placebo group (96%) (P = 0.001). Similarly, a lower proportion of C. albicans isolates from subjects on itraconazole therapy were susceptible to fluconazole (78%) compared to isolates from the placebo group (96%) (P= 0.01). Also, the proportion of isolates that were not fully susceptible to itraconazole or fluconazole was greater in patients assigned to the itraconazole group than the placebo group (itraconazole susceptibility, 37 and 4%, respectively (P = 0.001); fluconazole susceptibility, 23 and 4%, respectively (P = 0.01). In conclusion, long-term itraconazole prophylaxis in patients with AIDS is associated with reduction in susceptibility to itraconazole and cross-resistance to fluconazole.

Emergence of Resistance to Fluconazole as a Cause of Failure during Treatment of Histoplasmosis in Patients with Acquired Immunodeficiency Disease Syndrome

In sequential clinical trials of treatment for histoplasmosis in patients with acquired immunodeficiency syndrome, therapy with fluconazole failed in a higher proportion of patients than did therapy with itraconazole. To determine the cause for failure with fluconazole, antifungal susceptibility testing that used modified National Committee on Clinical Laboratory Standards procedures was performed on all baseline and failure isolates. Failure occurred more frequently in patients with baseline isolates with fluconazole minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) > or =5 microg/mL versus lower MICs; 29% versus 3%, respectively. There was at least a 4-fold increase in fluconazole MIC in the isolates from 10 (59%) of 17 patients for whom paired pretreatment and failure or relapse isolates were available. Cross-resistance to itraconazole was not seen. In conclusion, fluconazole is less active than itraconazole for Histoplasma capsulatum and induces resistance during therapy, which accounted for treatment failure in some patients.

Antifungal therapy for central nervous system histoplasmosis, using a newly developed intracranial model of infection

The outcome of central nervous system (CNS) histoplasmosis is often unfavorable. Although fluconazole plays an integral role in treatment of fungal meningitis, its role in the treatment of histoplasmosis is hampered by reduced activity and potential development of resistance. A murine model of CNS histoplasmosis was used to evaluate the hypothesis that a combination of amphotericin B and fluconazole therapy would be superior to amphotericin B monotherapy. Groups of B6C3F(1) mice were infected by injection of Histoplasma capsulatum into the subarachnoid space. The addition of fluconazole hindered the antifungal effect of amphotericin B, as determined by measurement of fungal burden, suggesting antagonism in the brain. Fluconazole was less effective as a single agent than was amphotericin B, despite the greater penetration of fluconazole into brain tissues. The hypothesis that amphotericin B-fluconazole combination therapy would be superior to amphotericin B monotherapy for treatment of CNS histoplasmosis was not supported by this study.

Amphotericin B combined with itraconazole or fluconazole for treatment of histoplasmosis.

To investigate the efficacy of combined treatment with fluconazole (Flu) and amphotericin B (AmB) for Histoplasma capsulatum meningitis, MICs were determined for 10 clinical isolates, following National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards guidelines. Weak synergy was observed for 6 of the 10 isolates. For the in vivo models, mice either were sham treated or were given Flu (75 mg/kg/day), AmB (2 mg/kg every other day), itraconazole (Itra; 75 mg/kg/day), AmB+Flu, or AmB+Itra. Following infection with 5x105 yeasts, Flu antagonized AmBs reduction of fungal burden without reducing its effect on survival. When in vivo antagonism was reproduced following infection with 1x104 yeasts, a higher fungal burden was observed in the lungs. Itra had no effect on AmBs activity and was more effective than Flu for clearance of fungal burden. These findings caution against use of AmB+Flu for treatment of histoplasmosis, but studies of the effect of treatment on the fungal burden in the brain are needed to assess combination therapy for meningitis.

Development of a Highly Sensitive and Specific Blastomycosis Antibody Enzyme Immunoassay Using Blastomyces dermatitidis Surface Protein BAD-1

ABSTRACT Serologic tests for antibodies to Blastomyces dermatitidis are not thought to be useful for the diagnosis of blastomycosis, in part due to the low sensitivity of immunodiffusion and complement fixation. Earlier studies have shown that the enzyme immunoassay improves the sensitivity of antibody detection for the diagnosis of blastomycosis. Microplates coated with the B. dermatitidis surface protein BAD-1 were used for testing sera from patients with proven blastomycosis or histoplasmosis and controls. Semiquantification was accomplished by using standards containing human anti-B. dermatitidis antibodies. The antibodies were detected in 87.8% of the patients with blastomycosis by the enzyme immunoassay compared to 15.0% by immunodiffusion. The specificities were 99.2% for patients with nonfungal infections and healthy subjects and 94.0% for patients with histoplasmosis. The results were highly reproducible on repeat testing. When combined with antigen testing, antibody testing improved the sensitivity from 87.8% to 97.6%. Enzyme immunoassay detection of antibodies against BAD-1 is highly specific, has greatly improved sensitivity over immunodiffusion, and may identify cases with negative results by antigen testing. This assay has the potential to aid in the diagnosis of blastomycosis.

Comparison of Nikkomycin Z with Amphotericin B and Itraconazole for Treatment of Histoplasmosis in a Murine Model

ABSTRACT Nikkomycin Z was tested both in vitro and in vivo for efficacy against Histoplasma capsulatum. Twenty clinical isolates were tested for susceptibility to nikkomycin Z in comparison to amphotericin B and itraconazole. The median MIC was 8 μg/ml with a range of 4 to 64 μg/ml for nikkomycin Z, 0.56 μg/ml with a range of 0.5 to 1.0 μg/ml for amphotericin B, and ≤0.019 μg/ml for itraconazole. Primary studies were carried out by using a clinical isolate of H. capsulatum for which the MIC of nikkomycin Z was greater than or equal to 64 μg/ml. In survival experiments, mice treated with amphotericin B at 2.0 mg/kg/dose every other day (QOD) itraconazole at 75 mg/kg/dose twice daily (BID), and nikkomycin Z at 100 mg/kg/dose BID survived to day 14, while 70% of mice receiving nikkomycin Z at 20 mg/kg/dose BID and none of the mice receiving nikkomycin Z at 5 mg/kg/dose BID survived to day 14. All vehicle control mice died by day 12. Fungal burden was assessed on survivors. Mice treated with nikkomycin Z at 20 and 100 mg/kg/dose BID had significantly higher CFUs per gram of organ weight in quantitative cultures and higher levels of Histoplasma antigen in lung and spleen homogenates than mice treated with amphotericin B at 2.0 mg/kg/dose QOD or itraconazole at 75 mg/kg/dose BID. Studies also were carried out with a clinical isolate for which the MIC of nikkomycin Z was 4 μg/ml. All mice treated with amphotericin B at 2.0 mg/kg/dose QOD; itraconazole at 75 mg/kg/dose BID; and nikkomycin Z at 100, 20, and 5 mg/kg/dose BID survived until the end of the study at day 17 postinfection, while 30% of the untreated vehicle control mice survived. Fungal burden assessed on survivors showed similar levels ofHistoplasma antigen in lung and spleen homogenates of mice treated with amphotericin B at 2.0 mg/kg/dose QOD; itraconazole at 75 mg/kg/dose BID; and nikkomycin Z at 100, 20, and 5 mg/kg/dose BID. The three surviving vehicle control mice had significantly higher antigen levels in lung and spleen than other groups (P < 0.05). The efficacy of nikkomycin Z at preventing mortality and reducing fungal burden correlates with in vitro susceptibility.

Improved Diagnosis of Acute Pulmonary Histoplasmosis by Combining Antigen and Antibody Detection

Detection of immunoglobulin M (IgM) and immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibodies by enzyme immunoassay improves the sensitivity for the diagnosis of acute pulmonary histoplasmosis. The highest sensitivity was achieved by testing for antigen and of IgM and IgG antibodies.

Relationship of Blood Level and Susceptibility in Voriconazole Treatment of Histoplasmosis

Monitoring of voriconazole serum levels has been advocated by Smith et al. as a method of ensuring adequate drug exposure in treating invasive mycoses (9). Voriconazole blood levels may vary considerably between subjects as a consequence of genetic polymorphisms that dictate variable clearance and nonlinear elimination (4, 5, 7, 8, 10). Among patients taking 200 mg twice a day, trough voriconazole concentrations range from below 0.100 μg/ml to nearly 10 μg/ml in several studies (2, 4, 5, 6). Although clinical trial data are lacking, voriconazole is occasionally used to treat Histoplasma capsulatum infections. In this report, we determined blood levels in patients treated with voriconazole as a secondary therapy for histoplasmosis, usually because of intolerance of other antifungal therapies, mostly amphotericin B or itraconazole. Serum specimens from nine patients with disseminated histoplasmosis that had been submitted for antigen testing were later tested for serum levels of voriconazole (3). All nine patients were considered to have improved clinically during secondary oral voriconazole treatment at a dose of 200 mg twice daily. All patients had received voriconazole for at least 2 weeks before blood concentrations were determined, but the exact timing of the blood specimens obtained following the oral administration of voriconazole was not recorded. Specimens had been frozen for up to 4 years prior to the determination of serum drug levels. Our experience with a similar compound, itraconazole, showed no loss of activity after 4 years at −20°C. Furthermore, the levels observed in the patients in this study are consistent with levels obtained in real-time testing of fresh specimens. Isolates of H. capsulatum for this patient cohort were unavailable for voriconazole susceptibility testing; therefore, archived H. capsulatum isolates from AIDS patients who had either primary or relapsed histoplasmosis were employed for this testing by a modified CLSI (formerly NCCLS) method as described previously (1). A comparison of voriconazole susceptibilities (by MIC measurements) of these archived H. capsulatum isolates from patients with both primary and relapsed disease (Fig. ​(Fig.1)1) was made with the random voriconazole blood levels measured from the nine patients who were being treated with the drug for disseminated histoplasmosis (Fig. ​(Fig.11). FIG. 1. Comparison of antifungal susceptibilities of primary and relapse isolates of H. capsulatum to voriconazole and random voriconazole blood levels in patients receiving voriconazole for the treatment of histoplasmosis. The left-hand axis depicts the MIC ... Among 20 samples for the nine patients, voriconazole concentrations ranged from undetectable to 8.00 μg/ml (Fig. ​(Fig.1).1). Voriconazole blood levels were highly variable and possibly inadequate in several of our patients, with two random blood levels clearly falling below the median MIC for primary (0.015 μg/ml) and relapsed (0.030 μg/ml) isolates. Three other levels fell below the lowest calibrator (0.125 μg/ml) for serum voriconazole levels, and therefore we do not know if they were below these MIC medians. There were questions about medication compliance in three patients, two of whom had levels of <0.125 μg/ml. Nonetheless, all nine patients had already improved in response to amphotericin B or itraconazole before voriconazole was started, and no patient relapsed while receiving voriconazole, despite the documented low drug levels. Pascual et al. reported a 90% response for patients with aspergillosis or candidiasis with voriconazole trough levels of >1.0 mg/ml and only a 54% response for patients with lower troughs (6). Smith et al. reported findings for 28 patients with invasive mycoses, mostly aspergillosis, and observed favorable responses for 100% (10/10) of patients with random serum levels, >2.05 μg/ml, compared with unfavorable responses for 44% of patients with lower concentrations (9). Among our nine patients with histoplasmosis, random levels were <2.05 μg/ml in 60%, <1.0 μg/ml in 45%, and <0.125 μg/ml in 30%. Although we cannot establish a “subtherapeutic level” from our cases, since all appear to have responded to the therapies given, we suggest that levels that measure below the calibrator level of 0.125 μg/ml might be considered subtherapeutic. This task is further complicated by the paucity of voriconazole MIC data for histoplasmosis. Given the variability in serum levels in patients receiving voriconazole for histoplasmosis, the relatively high MIC90 of voriconazole for H. capsulatum noted herein, and the lack of prospective trials establishing the effectiveness of voriconazole for the treatment of histoplasmosis, we suggest that it may be prudent to measure trough concentrations of voriconazole in patients receiving it for treatment of histoplasmosis to ensure detectable drug levels.