Melissa C. Southey
University of Melbourne
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Melissa C. Southey.
Nature Genetics | 2008
Rosalind Eeles; Zsofia Kote-Jarai; Graham G. Giles; Ali Amin Al Olama; Michelle Guy; Sarah Jugurnauth; Shani Mulholland; Daniel Leongamornlert; Stephen M. Edwards; Jonathan Morrison; Helen I. Field; Melissa C. Southey; Gianluca Severi; Jenny Donovan; Freddie C. Hamdy; David P. Dearnaley; Kenneth Muir; Charmaine Smith; Melisa Bagnato; Audrey Ardern-Jones; Amanda L. Hall; Lynne T. O'Brien; Beatrice N. Gehr-Swain; Rosemary A. Wilkinson; Angie Cox; Sarah Lewis; Paul M. Brown; Sameer Jhavar; Malgorzata Tymrakiewicz; Artitaya Lophatananon
Prostate cancer is the most common cancer affecting males in developed countries. It shows consistent evidence of familial aggregation, but the causes of this aggregation are mostly unknown. To identify common alleles associated with prostate cancer risk, we conducted a genome-wide association study (GWAS) using blood DNA samples from 1,854 individuals with clinically detected prostate cancer diagnosed at ≤60 years or with a family history of disease, and 1,894 population-screened controls with a low prostate-specific antigen (PSA) concentration (<0.5 ng/ml). We analyzed these samples for 541,129 SNPs using the Illumina Infinium platform. Initial putative associations were confirmed using a further 3,268 cases and 3,366 controls. We identified seven loci associated with prostate cancer on chromosomes 3, 6, 7, 10, 11, 19 and X (P = 2.7 × 10−8 to P = 8.7 × 10−29). We confirmed previous reports of common loci associated with prostate cancer at 8q24 and 17q. Moreover, we found that three of the newly identified loci contain candidate susceptibility genes: MSMB, LMTK2 and KLK3.
PLOS Medicine | 2010
Fiona Blows; Kristy Driver; Marjanka K. Schmidt; Annegien Broeks; Flora E. van Leeuwen; Jelle Wesseling; Maggie Cheang; Karen A. Gelmon; Torsten O. Nielsen; Carl Blomqvist; Päivi Heikkilä; Tuomas Heikkinen; Heli Nevanlinna; Lars A. Akslen; Louis R. Bégin; William D. Foulkes; Fergus J. Couch; Xianshu Wang; Vicky Cafourek; Janet E. Olson; Laura Baglietto; Graham G. Giles; Gianluca Severi; Catriona McLean; Melissa C. Southey; Emad A. Rakha; Andrew R. Green; Ian O. Ellis; Mark E. Sherman; Jolanta Lissowska
Paul Pharoah and colleagues evaluate the prognostic significance of immunohistochemical subtype classification in more than 10,000 breast cancer cases with early disease, and examine the influence of a patients survival time on the prediction of future survival.
Nature Genetics | 2007
Angela Cox; Alison M. Dunning; Montserrat Garcia-Closas; Sabapathy P. Balasubramanian; Malcolm Reed; Karen A. Pooley; Serena Scollen; Caroline Baynes; Bruce A.J. Ponder; Stephen J. Chanock; Jolanta Lissowska; Louise A. Brinton; Beata Peplonska; Melissa C. Southey; John L. Hopper; Margaret McCredie; Graham G. Giles; Olivia Fletcher; Nichola Johnson; Isabel dos Santos Silva; Lorna Gibson; Stig E. Bojesen; Børge G. Nordestgaard; Christen K. Axelsson; Diana Torres; Ute Hamann; Christina Justenhoven; Hiltrud Brauch; Jenny Chang-Claude; Silke Kropp
The Breast Cancer Association Consortium (BCAC) has been established to conduct combined case-control analyses with augmented statistical power to try to confirm putative genetic associations with breast cancer. We genotyped nine SNPs for which there was some prior evidence of an association with breast cancer: CASP8 D302H (rs1045485), IGFBP3 −202 C → A (rs2854744), SOD2 V16A (rs1799725), TGFB1 L10P (rs1982073), ATM S49C (rs1800054), ADH1B 3′ UTR A → G (rs1042026), CDKN1A S31R (rs1801270), ICAM5 V301I (rs1056538) and NUMA1 A794G (rs3750913). We included data from 9–15 studies, comprising 11,391–18,290 cases and 14,753–22,670 controls. We found evidence of an association with breast cancer for CASP8 D302H (with odds ratios (OR) of 0.89 (95% confidence interval (c.i.): 0.85–0.94) and 0.74 (95% c.i.: 0.62–0.87) for heterozygotes and rare homozygotes, respectively, compared with common homozygotes; Ptrend = 1.1 × 10−7) and weaker evidence for TGFB1 L10P (OR = 1.07 (95% c.i.: 1.02–1.13) and 1.16 (95% c.i.: 1.08–1.25), respectively; Ptrend = 2.8 × 10−5). These results demonstrate that common breast cancer susceptibility alleles with small effects on risk can be identified, given sufficiently powerful studies.NOTE: In the version of this article initially published, there was an error that affected the calculations of the odds ratios, confidence intervals, between-study heterogeneity, trend test and test for association for SNP ICAM5 V301I in Table 1 (ICAM5 V301I); genotype counts in Supplementary Table 2 (ICAM5; ICR_FBCS and Kuopio studies) and minor allele frequencies, trend test and odds ratios for heterozygotes and rare homozygotes in Supplementary Table 3 (ICAM5; ICR_FBCS and Kuopio studies). The errors in Table 1 have been corrected in the PDF version of the article. The errors in supplementary information have been corrected online.
The New England Journal of Medicine | 2008
Katrina J. Allen; Lyle C. Gurrin; Clare C. Constantine; Nicholas J. Osborne; Martin B. Delatycki; Amanda Nicoll; Christine E. McLaren; Melanie Bahlo; Amy Nisselle; Chris D. Vulpe; Gregory J. Anderson; Melissa C. Southey; Graham G. Giles; Dallas R. English; John L. Hopper; John K. Olynyk; Lawrie W. Powell; Dorota M. Gertig
BACKGROUND Most persons who are homozygous for C282Y, the HFE allele most commonly asssociated with hereditary hemochromatosis, have elevated levels of serum ferritin and transferrin saturation. Diseases related to iron overload develop in some C282Y homozygotes, but the extent of the risk is controversial. METHODS We assessed HFE mutations in 31,192 persons of northern European descent between the ages of 40 and 69 years who participated in the Melbourne Collaborative Cohort Study and were followed for an average of 12 years. In a random sample of 1438 subjects stratified according to HFE genotype, including all 203 C282Y homozygotes (of whom 108 were women and 95 were men), we obtained clinical and biochemical data, including two sets of iron measurements performed 12 years apart. Disease related to iron overload was defined as documented iron overload and one or more of the following conditions: cirrhosis, liver fibrosis, hepatocellular carcinoma, elevated aminotransferase levels, physician-diagnosed symptomatic hemochromatosis, and arthropathy of the second and third metacarpophalangeal joints. RESULTS The proportion of C282Y homozygotes with documented iron-overload-related disease was 28.4% (95% confidence interval [CI], 18.8 to 40.2) for men and 1.2% (95% CI, 0.03 to 6.5) for women. Only one non-C282Y homozygote (a compound heterozygote) had documented iron-overload-related disease. Male C282Y homozygotes with a serum ferritin level of 1000 mug per liter or more were more likely to report fatigue, use of arthritis medicine, and a history of liver disease than were men who had the wild-type gene. CONCLUSIONS In persons who are homozygous for the C282Y mutation, iron-overload-related disease developed in a substantial proportion of men but in a small proportion of women.
The New England Journal of Medicine | 2014
Antonis C. Antoniou; Silvia Casadei; Tuomas Heikkinen; Daniel Barrowdale; Katri Pylkäs; Jonathan C. Roberts; Andrew Lee; Deepak Subramanian; Kim De Leeneer; Florentia Fostira; Eva Tomiak; Susan L. Neuhausen; Zhi L Teo; Sofia Khan; Kristiina Aittomäki; Jukka S. Moilanen; Clare Turnbull; Sheila Seal; Arto Mannermaa; Anne Kallioniemi; Geoffrey J. Lindeman; Saundra S. Buys; Irene L. Andrulis; Paolo Radice; Carlo Tondini; Siranoush Manoukian; Amanda Ewart Toland; Penelope Miron; Jeffrey N. Weitzel; Susan M. Domchek
BACKGROUND Germline loss-of-function mutations in PALB2 are known to confer a predisposition to breast cancer. However, the lifetime risk of breast cancer that is conferred by such mutations remains unknown. METHODS We analyzed the risk of breast cancer among 362 members of 154 families who had deleterious truncating, splice, or deletion mutations in PALB2. The age-specific breast-cancer risk for mutation carriers was estimated with the use of a modified segregation-analysis approach that allowed for the effects of PALB2 genotype and residual familial aggregation. RESULTS The risk of breast cancer for female PALB2 mutation carriers, as compared with the general population, was eight to nine times as high among those younger than 40 years of age, six to eight times as high among those 40 to 60 years of age, and five times as high among those older than 60 years of age. The estimated cumulative risk of breast cancer among female mutation carriers was 14% (95% confidence interval [CI], 9 to 20) by 50 years of age and 35% (95% CI, 26 to 46) by 70 years of age. Breast-cancer risk was also significantly influenced by birth cohort (P<0.001) and by other familial factors (P=0.04). The absolute breast-cancer risk for PALB2 female mutation carriers by 70 years of age ranged from 33% (95% CI, 25 to 44) for those with no family history of breast cancer to 58% (95% CI, 50 to 66) for those with two or more first-degree relatives with breast cancer at 50 years of age. CONCLUSIONS Loss-of-function mutations in PALB2 are an important cause of hereditary breast cancer, with respect both to the frequency of cancer-predisposing mutations and to the risk associated with them. Our data suggest the breast-cancer risk for PALB2 mutation carriers may overlap with that for BRCA2 mutation carriers. (Funded by the European Research Council and others.).
British Journal of Cancer | 2008
Antonis C. Antoniou; Alex P Cunningham; Julian Peto; D G R Evans; Fiona Lalloo; Steven A. Narod; Harvey A. Risch; Jorunn E. Eyfjörd; John L. Hopper; Melissa C. Southey; Håkan Olsson; Oskar Johannsson; Åke Borg; B. Passini; P. Radice; S. Manoukian; Diana Eccles; Nelson L.S. Tang; Edith Olah; Hoda Anton-Culver; Ellen Warner; Jan Lubinski; Jacek Gronwald; Bohdan Górski; Laufey Tryggvadottir; Kirsi Syrjäkoski; O-P Kallioniemi; Hannaleena Eerola; Heli Nevanlinna; Paul Pharoah
Multiple genetic loci confer susceptibility to breast and ovarian cancers. We have previously developed a model (BOADICEA) under which susceptibility to breast cancer is explained by mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2, as well as by the joint multiplicative effects of many genes (polygenic component). We have now updated BOADICEA using additional family data from two UK population-based studies of breast cancer and family data from BRCA1 and BRCA2 carriers identified by 22 population-based studies of breast or ovarian cancer. The combined data set includes 2785 families (301 BRCA1 positive and 236 BRCA2 positive). Incidences were smoothed using locally weighted regression techniques to avoid large variations between adjacent intervals. A birth cohort effect on the cancer risks was implemented, whereby each individual was assumed to develop cancer according to calendar period-specific incidences. The fitted model predicts that the average breast cancer risks in carriers increase in more recent birth cohorts. For example, the average cumulative breast cancer risk to age 70 years among BRCA1 carriers is 50% for women born in 1920–1929 and 58% among women born after 1950. The model was further extended to take into account the risks of male breast, prostate and pancreatic cancer, and to allow for the risk of multiple cancers. BOADICEA can be used to predict carrier probabilities and cancer risks to individuals with any family history, and has been implemented in a user-friendly Web-based program (http://www.srl.cam.ac.uk/genepi/boadicea/boadicea_home.html).
The New England Journal of Medicine | 2015
Douglas F. Easton; Paul Pharoah; Antonis C. Antoniou; Marc Tischkowitz; Sean V. Tavtigian; Katherine L. Nathanson; Peter Devilee; Alfons Meindl; Fergus J. Couch; Melissa C. Southey; David E. Goldgar; Gareth Evans; Georgia Chenevix-Trench; Nazneen Rahman; Mark E. Robson; Susan M. Domchek; William D. Foulkes
An international group of cancer geneticists review the level of evidence for the association of gene variants with the risk of breast cancer. It is difficult to draw firm conclusions from the data because of ascertainment bias and the lack of data from large populations.
Nature Genetics | 2009
Ali Amin Al Olama; Zsofia Kote-Jarai; Graham G. Giles; Michelle Guy; Jonathan Morrison; Gianluca Severi; Daniel Leongamornlert; Malgorzata Tymrakiewicz; Sameer Jhavar; Ed Saunders; John L. Hopper; Melissa C. Southey; Kenneth Muir; Dallas R. English; David P. Dearnaley; Audrey Ardern-Jones; Amanda L. Hall; Lynne T. O'Brien; Rosemary A. Wilkinson; Emma J. Sawyer; Artitaya Lophatananon; Uk Prostate testing for cancer; A. Horwich; Robert Huddart; Vincent Khoo; Chris Parker; Christopher Woodhouse; Alan Thompson; Tim Christmas; Chris Ogden
Previous studies have identified multiple loci on 8q24 associated with prostate cancer risk. We performed a comprehensive analysis of SNP associations across 8q24 by genotyping tag SNPs in 5,504 prostate cancer cases and 5,834 controls. We confirmed associations at three previously reported loci and identified additional loci in two other linkage disequilibrium blocks (rs1006908: per-allele OR = 0.87, P = 7.9 × 10−8; rs620861: OR = 0.90, P = 4.8 × 10−8). Eight SNPs in five linkage disequilibrium blocks were independently associated with prostate cancer susceptibility.
Breast Cancer Research | 2004
Esther M. John; John L. Hopper; Jeanne C. Beck; Julia A. Knight; Susan L. Neuhausen; Ruby T. Senie; Argyrios Ziogas; Irene L. Andrulis; Hoda Anton-Culver; Norman F. Boyd; Saundra S. Buys; Mary B. Daly; Frances P. O'Malley; Regina M. Santella; Melissa C. Southey; Vickie L. Venne; Deon J. Venter; Dee W. West; Alice S. Whittemore; Daniela Seminara
IntroductionThe etiology of familial breast cancer is complex and involves genetic and environmental factors such as hormonal and lifestyle factors. Understanding familial aggregation is a key to understanding the causes of breast cancer and to facilitating the development of effective prevention and therapy. To address urgent research questions and to expedite the translation of research results to the clinical setting, the National Cancer Institute (USA) supported in 1995 the establishment of a novel research infrastructure, the Breast Cancer Family Registry, a collaboration of six academic and research institutions and their medical affiliates in the USA, Canada, and Australia.MethodsThe sites have developed core family history and epidemiology questionnaires, data dictionaries, and common protocols for biospecimen collection and processing and pathology review. An Informatics Center has been established to collate, manage, and distribute core data.ResultsAs of September 2003, 9116 population-based and 2834 clinic-based families have been enrolled, including 2346 families from minority populations. Epidemiology questionnaire data are available for 6779 affected probands (with a personal history of breast cancer), 4116 unaffected probands, and 16,526 relatives with or without a personal history of breast or ovarian cancer. The biospecimen repository contains blood or mouthwash samples for 6316 affected probands, 2966 unaffected probands, and 10,763 relatives, and tumor tissue samples for 4293 individuals.ConclusionThis resource is available to internal and external researchers for collaborative, interdisciplinary, and translational studies of the genetic epidemiology of breast cancer. Detailed information can be found at the URL http://www.cfr.epi.uci.edu/.
Nature Genetics | 2009
Honglin Song; Susan J. Ramus; Jonathan Tyrer; Kelly L. Bolton; Aleksandra Gentry-Maharaj; Eva Wozniak; Hoda Anton-Culver; Jenny Chang-Claude; Daniel W. Cramer; Richard A. DiCioccio; Thilo Dörk; Ellen L. Goode; Marc T. Goodman; Joellen M. Schildkraut; Thomas A. Sellers; Laura Baglietto; Matthias W. Beckmann; Jonathan Beesley; Jan Blaakær; Michael E. Carney; Stephen J. Chanock; Zhihua Chen; Julie M. Cunningham; Ed Dicks; Jennifer A. Doherty; Matthias Dürst; Arif B. Ekici; David Fenstermacher; Brooke L. Fridley; Graham G. Giles
Epithelial ovarian cancer has a major heritable component, but the known susceptibility genes explain less than half the excess familial risk. We performed a genome-wide association study (GWAS) to identify common ovarian cancer susceptibility alleles. We evaluated 507,094 SNPs genotyped in 1,817 cases and 2,353 controls from the UK and ∼2 million imputed SNPs. We genotyped the 22,790 top ranked SNPs in 4,274 cases and 4,809 controls of European ancestry from Europe, USA and Australia. We identified 12 SNPs at 9p22 associated with disease risk (P < 10−8). The most significant SNP (rs3814113; P = 2.5 × 10−17) was genotyped in a further 2,670 ovarian cancer cases and 4,668 controls, confirming its association (combined data odds ratio (OR) = 0.82, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.79–0.86, Ptrend = 5.1 × 10−19). The association differs by histological subtype, being strongest for serous ovarian cancers (OR 0.77, 95% CI 0.73–0.81, Ptrend = 4.1 × 10−21).