Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Melissa G. Butler is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Melissa G. Butler.


Preventing Chronic Disease | 2012

Construction of a Multisite DataLink Using Electronic Health Records for the Identification, Surveillance, Prevention, and Management of Diabetes Mellitus: The SUPREME-DM Project

Gregory A. Nichols; Jay Desai; Jennifer Elston Lafata; Jean M. Lawrence; Patrick J. O'Connor; Ram D. Pathak; Marsha A. Raebel; Robert J. Reid; Joseph V. Selby; Barbara G. Silverman; John F. Steiner; W. F. Stewart; Suma Vupputuri; Beth Waitzfelder; Christina L. Clarke; William T. Donahoo; Glenn K. Goodrich; Andrea R. Paolino; Emily B. Schroeder; Michael Shainline; Stan Xu; Lora Bounds; Gabrielle Gundersen; Katherine M. Newton; Eileen Rillamas-Sun; Brandon Geise; Ronald Harris; Rebecca Stametz; Xiaowei Sherry Yan; Nonna Akkerman

Introduction Electronic health record (EHR) data enhance opportunities for conducting surveillance of diabetes. The objective of this study was to identify the number of people with diabetes from a diabetes DataLink developed as part of the SUPREME-DM (SUrveillance, PREvention, and ManagEment of Diabetes Mellitus) project, a consortium of 11 integrated health systems that use comprehensive EHR data for research. Methods We identified all members of 11 health care systems who had any enrollment from January 2005 through December 2009. For these members, we searched inpatient and outpatient diagnosis codes, laboratory test results, and pharmaceutical dispensings from January 2000 through December 2009 to create indicator variables that could potentially identify a person with diabetes. Using this information, we estimated the number of people with diabetes and among them, the number of incident cases, defined as indication of diabetes after at least 2 years of continuous health system enrollment. Results The 11 health systems contributed 15,765,529 unique members, of whom 1,085,947 (6.9%) met 1 or more study criteria for diabetes. The nonstandardized proportion meeting study criteria for diabetes ranged from 4.2% to 12.4% across sites. Most members with diabetes (88%) met multiple criteria. Of the members with diabetes, 428,349 (39.4%) were incident cases. Conclusion The SUPREME-DM DataLink is a unique resource that provides an opportunity to conduct comparative effectiveness research, epidemiologic surveillance including longitudinal analyses, and population-based care management studies of people with diabetes. It also provides a useful data source for pragmatic clinical trials of prevention or treatment interventions.


American Journal of Epidemiology | 2015

Trends in Diabetes Incidence Among 7 Million Insured Adults, 2006–2011 The SUPREME-DM Project

Gregory A. Nichols; Emily B. Schroeder; Andrew J. Karter; Edward W. Gregg; Jay Desai; Jean M. Lawrence; Patrick J. O'Connor; Stanley Xu; Katherine M. Newton; Marsha A. Raebel; Ram D. Pathak; Beth Waitzfelder; Jodi B. Segal; Jennifer Elston Lafata; Melissa G. Butler; H. Lester Kirchner; Abraham Thomas; John F. Steiner

An observational cohort analysis was conducted within the Surveillance, Prevention, and Management of Diabetes Mellitus (SUPREME-DM) DataLink, a consortium of 11 integrated health-care delivery systems with electronic health records in 10 US states. Among nearly 7 million adults aged 20 years or older, we estimated annual diabetes incidence per 1,000 persons overall and by age, sex, race/ethnicity, and body mass index. We identified 289,050 incident cases of diabetes. Age- and sex-adjusted population incidence was stable between 2006 and 2010, ranging from 10.3 per 1,000 adults (95% confidence interval (CI): 9.8, 10.7) to 11.3 per 1,000 adults (95% CI: 11.0, 11.7). Adjusted incidence was significantly higher in 2011 (11.5, 95% CI: 10.9, 12.0) than in the 2 years with the lowest incidence. A similar pattern was observed in most prespecified subgroups, but only the differences for persons who were not white were significant. In 2006, 56% of incident cases had a glycated hemoglobin (hemoglobin A1c) test as one of the pair of events identifying diabetes. By 2011, that number was 74%. In conclusion, overall diabetes incidence in this population did not significantly increase between 2006 and 2010, but increases in hemoglobin A1c testing may have contributed to rising diabetes incidence among nonwhites in 2011.


Annals of the American Thoracic Society | 2015

Primary Adherence to Controller Medications for Asthma Is Poor

Ann Chen Wu; Melissa G. Butler; Lingling Li; Vicki Fung; Elyse O. Kharbanda; Emma K. Larkin; William M. Vollmer; Irina Miroshnik; Robert L. Davis; Tracy A. Lieu; Stephen B. Soumerai

RATIONALE Few previous studies have evaluated primary adherence (whether a new prescription is filled within 30 d) to controller medications in individuals with persistent asthma. OBJECTIVE To compare adherence to the major controller medication regimens for asthma. METHODS This was a retrospective cohort study of enrollees from five large health plans. We used electronic medical data on patients of all ages with asthma who had experienced an asthma-related exacerbation in the prior 12 months. We studied adherence measures including proportion of days covered and primary adherence (first prescription filled within 30 d). MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS Our population included 69,652 subjects who had probable persistent asthma and were prescribed inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs), leukotriene antagonists (LTRAs), or ICS/long-acting β-agonists (ICS/LABAs). The mean age was 37 years and 58% were female. We found that 14-20% of subjects who were prescribed controller medicines for the first time did not fill their prescriptions. The mean proportion of days covered was 19% for ICS, 30% for LTRA, and 25% for ICS/LABA over 12 months. Using multivariate logistic regression, subjects prescribed LTRA were less likely to be primary adherent than subjects prescribed ICS (odds ratio, 0.82; 95% confidence interval, 0.74-0.92) or ICS/LABA (odds ratio, 0.88; 95% confidence interval, 0.80-0.97). Black and Latino patients were less likely to fill the prescription compared with white patients. CONCLUSIONS Adherence to controller medications for asthma is poor. In this insured population, primary adherence to ICSs was better than to LTRAs and ICS/LABAs. Adherence as measured by proportion of days covered was better for LTRAs and ICS/LABAs than for ICSs.


Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety | 2013

Validation of acute myocardial infarction in the Food and Drug Administration's Mini-Sentinel program.

Sarah L. Cutrona; Sengwee Toh; Aarthi Iyer; Sarah Foy; Gregory W. Daniel; Vinit P. Nair; Daniel Ng; Melissa G. Butler; Denise M. Boudreau; Susan Forrow; Robert J. Goldberg; Joel M. Gore; David D. McManus; Judith A. Racoosin; Jerry H. Gurwitz

To validate an algorithm based upon International Classification of Diseases, 9th revision, Clinical Modification (ICD‐9‐CM) codes for acute myocardial infarction (AMI) documented within the Mini‐Sentinel Distributed Database (MSDD).


JAMA Internal Medicine | 2013

Health system factors and antihypertensive adherence in a racially and ethnically diverse cohort of new users.

Alyce S. Adams; Connie S. Uratsu; Wendy Dyer; David J. Magid; Patrick G. O’Connor; Arne Beck; Melissa G. Butler; P. Michael Ho; Julie A. Schmittdiel

BACKGROUND The purpose of this study was to identify potential health system solutions to suboptimal use of antihypertensive therapy in a diverse cohort of patients initiating treatment. METHODS Using a hypertension registry at Kaiser Permanente Northern California, we conducted a retrospective cohort study of 44 167 adults (age, ≥18 years) with hypertension who were new users of antihypertensive therapy in 2008. We used multivariate logistic regression analysis to model the relationships between race/ethnicity, specific health system factors, and early nonpersistence (failing to refill the first prescription within 90 days) and nonadherence (<80% of days covered during the 12 months following the start of treatment), respectively, controlling for sociodemographic and clinical risk factors. RESULTS More than 30% of patients were early nonpersistent and 1 in 5 were nonadherent to therapy. Nonwhites were more likely to exhibit both types of suboptimal medication-taking behavior compared with whites. In logistic regression models adjusted for sociodemographic, clinical, and health system factors, nonwhite race was associated with early nonpersistence (black: odds ratio, 1.56 [95% CI, 1.43-1.70]; Asian: 1.40 [1.29-1.51]; Hispanic: 1.46 [1.35-1.57]) and nonadherence (black: 1.55 [1.37-1.77]; Asian: 1.13 [1.00-1.28]; Hispanic: 1.46 [1.31-1.63]). The likelihood of early nonpersistence varied between Asians and Hispanics by choice of first-line therapy. In addition, racial and ethnic differences in nonadherence were appreciably attenuated when medication co-payment and mail-order pharmacy use were accounted for in the models. CONCLUSIONS Racial/ethnic differences in medication-taking behavior occur early in the course of treatment. However, health system strategies designed to reduce patient co-payments, ease access to medications, and optimize the choice of initial therapy may be effective tools in narrowing persistent gaps in the use of these and other clinically effective therapies.


American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine | 2013

Statin Exposure Is Associated with Decreased Asthma-related Emergency Department Visits and Oral Corticosteroid Use

Sze Man Tse; Lingling Li; Melissa G. Butler; Vicki Fung; Elyse O. Kharbanda; Emma K. Larkin; William M. Vollmer; Irina Miroshnik; Donna Rusinak; Scott T. Weiss; Tracy A. Lieu; Ann Chen Wu

RATIONALE Statins, or HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors, may aid in the treatment of asthma through their pleiotropic antiinflammatory effects. OBJECTIVES To examine the effect of statin therapy on asthma-related exacerbations using a large population-based cohort. METHODS Statin users aged 31 years or greater with asthma were identified from the Population-Based Effectiveness in Asthma and Lung population, which includes data from five health plans. Statin exposure and asthma exacerbations were assessed over a 24-month observation period. Statin users with a statin medication possession ratio greater than or equal to 80% were matched to non-statin users by age, baseline asthma therapy, site of enrollment, season at baseline, and propensity score, which was calculated based on patient demographics and Deyo-Charlson conditions. Asthma exacerbations were defined as two or more oral corticosteroid dispensings, asthma-related emergency department visits, or asthma-related hospitalizations. The association between statin exposure and each of the three outcome measures was assessed using conditional logistic regression. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS Of the 14,566 statin users, 8,349 statin users were matched to a nonuser. After adjusting for Deyo-Charlson conditions that remained unbalanced after matching, among statin users, statin exposure was associated with decreased odds of having asthma-related emergency department visits (odds ratio [OR], 0.64; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.53-0.77; P < 0.0001) and two or more oral corticosteroid dispensings (OR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.81-0.99; P = 0.04). There were no differences in asthma-related hospitalizations (OR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.66-1.24; P = 0.52). CONCLUSIONS Among statin users with asthma, statin exposure was associated with decreased odds of asthma-related emergency department visits and oral corticosteroid dispensings.


Diabetes Care | 2015

Preventable Major Cardiovascular Events Associated With Uncontrolled Glucose, Blood Pressure, and Lipids and Active Smoking in Adults With Diabetes With and Without Cardiovascular Disease: A Contemporary Analysis

Gabriela Vazquez-Benitez; Jay Desai; Stanley Xu; Glenn K. Goodrich; Emily B. Schroeder; Gregory A. Nichols; Jodi B. Segal; Melissa G. Butler; Andrew J. Karter; John F. Steiner; Katherine M. Newton; Leo S. Morales; Ram D. Pathak; Abraham Thomas; Kristi Reynolds; H. Lester Kirchner; Beth Waitzfelder; Jennifer Elston Lafata; Renuka Adibhatla; Zhiyuan Xu; Patrick J. O’Connor

OBJECTIVE The objective of this study was to assess the incidence of major cardiovascular (CV) hospitalization events and all-cause deaths among adults with diabetes with or without CV disease (CVD) associated with inadequately controlled glycated hemoglobin (A1C), high LDL cholesterol (LDL-C), high blood pressure (BP), and current smoking. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS Study subjects included 859,617 adults with diabetes enrolled for more than 6 months during 2005–2011 in a network of 11 U.S. integrated health care organizations. Inadequate risk factor control was classified as LDL-C ≥100 mg/dL, A1C ≥7% (53 mmol/mol), BP ≥140/90 mm Hg, or smoking. Major CV events were based on primary hospital discharge diagnoses for myocardial infarction (MI) and acute coronary syndrome (ACS), stroke, or heart failure (HF). Five-year incidence rates, rate ratios, and average attributable fractions were estimated using multivariable Poisson regression models. RESULTS Mean (SD) age at baseline was 59 (14) years; 48% of subjects were female, 45% were white, and 31% had CVD. Mean follow-up was 59 months. Event rates per 100 person-years for adults with diabetes and CVD versus those without CVD were 6.0 vs. 1.7 for MI/ACS, 5.3 vs. 1.5 for stroke, 8.4 vs. 1.2 for HF, 18.1 vs. 40 for all CV events, and 23.5 vs. 5.0 for all-cause mortality. The percentages of CV events and deaths associated with inadequate risk factor control were 11% and 3%, respectively, for those with CVD and 34% and 7%, respectively, for those without CVD. CONCLUSIONS Additional attention to traditional CV risk factors could yield further substantive reductions in CV events and mortality in adults with diabetes.


Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety | 2012

A protocol for active surveillance of acute myocardial infarction in association with the use of a new antidiabetic pharmaceutical agent

Bruce Fireman; Sengwee Toh; Melissa G. Butler; Alan S. Go; Hylton V. Joffe; David J. Graham; Jennifer C. Nelson; Gregory W. Daniel; Joe V. Selby

To describe a protocol for active surveillance of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in users of a recently approved oral antidiabetic medication, saxagliptin, and to provide the rationale for decisions made in drafting the protocol.


Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety | 2014

Intensification of antihyperglycemic therapy among patients with incident diabetes: a Surveillance Prevention and Management of Diabetes Mellitus (SUPREME-DM) study

Marsha A. Raebel; Jennifer L. Ellis; Emily B. Schroeder; Stanley Xu; Patrick J. O'Connor; Jodi B. Segal; Melissa G. Butler; Julie A. Schmittdiel; H. Lester Kirchner; Glenn K. Goodrich; Jean M. Lawrence; Gregory A. Nichols; Katherine M. Newton; Ram D. Pathak; John F. Steiner

Antihyperglycemic medication intensification practices among patients with incident diabetes are incompletely understood. We characterized the first intensification the year after oral antihyperglycemic medication initiation among incident diabetes patients.


JAMA Surgery | 2014

Comparative Effectiveness of Laparoscopic Adjustable Gastric Banding vs Laparoscopic Gastric Bypass

David Arterburn; J. David Powers; Sengwee Toh; Sarit Polsky; Melissa G. Butler; J. Dickman Portz; William T. Donahoo; Lisa J. Herrinton; Vinutha Vijayadeva; David Fisher; Elizabeth A. Bayliss

IMPORTANCE Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) and laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (AGB) are 2 of the most commonly performed bariatric procedures worldwide. However, few large, multisite studies have directly compared the benefits and harms of these procedures. OBJECTIVE To compare the effect of laparoscopic RYGB vs AGB on short- and long-term health outcomes. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS A retrospective cohort study of 7457 individuals 21 years or older who underwent laparoscopic bariatric surgery from January 1, 2005, through December 31, 2009, with follow-up through December 31, 2010. All individuals were participants in the Scalable Partnering Network, a network of 10 demographically and geographically distributed health care systems in the United States. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The primary outcomes were (1) change in body mass index (BMI), (2) a composite end point of 30-day rate of major adverse outcomes (death, venous thromboembolism, subsequent intervention, and failure to discharge from the hospital), (3) subsequent hospitalization, and (4) subsequent intervention. RESULTS We identified 7457 patients who underwent laparoscopic AGB or RYGB procedures with a median follow-up time of 2.3 years (maximum, 6 years). The mean maximum BMI (calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared) loss was 8.0 (95% CI, 7.8-8.3) for AGB patients and 14.8 (95% CI, 14.6-14.9) for RYGB patients (P < .001). In propensity score-adjusted models, the hazard ratio for AGB vs RYGB patients experiencing any 30-day major adverse event was 0.46 (95% CI, 0.27-0.80; P = .006). The hazard ratios comparing AGB vs RYGB patients experiencing subsequent intervention and hospitalization were 3.31 (95% CI, 2.65-4.14; P < .001) and 0.73 (95% CI, 0.61-0.88; P < .001), respectively. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE In this large bariatric cohort from 10 health care systems, we found that RYGB resulted in much greater weight loss than AGB but had a higher risk of short-term complications and long-term subsequent hospitalizations. On the other hand, RYGB patients had a lower risk of long-term subsequent intervention procedures than AGB patients. Bariatric surgery candidates should be well informed of these benefits and risks when they make their decisions about treatment.

Collaboration


Dive into the Melissa G. Butler's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Katherine M. Newton

Group Health Research Institute

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge