Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Melissa Gardner is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Melissa Gardner.


Seminars in Reproductive Medicine | 2012

Psychological Aspects of the Treatment of Patients with Disorders of Sex Development

David E. Sandberg; Melissa Gardner; Peggy T. Cohen-Kettenis

Research on the psychological development of persons with Disorders of Sex Development (DSD) has focused on understanding the influence of atypical sex hormone exposure during steroid-sensitive periods of prenatal brain development on the process of psychosexual differentiation (i.e., gender identity, gender role, and sexual orientation). In contrast, analysis of clinical management strategies has focused on gender assignment and the desirability and timing of genital surgery. This review focuses on the psychological issues that confront clinicians managing the care of persons born with DSD and their families. Particular attention is paid to processes and factors that potentially mediate or moderate psychosocial and psychosexual outcomes within and across developmental stages.


Hormone Research in Paediatrics | 2012

Challenges of Disorders of Sex Development: Diverse Perceptions across Stakeholders

Barry A. Kogan; Melissa Gardner; Adrianne N. Alpern; Laura M. Cohen; Mary Beth Grimley; Alexandra L. Quittner; David E. Sandberg

Background/Aims: Disorders of sex development (DSD) are congenital conditions in which chromosomal, gonadal, or anatomic sex development is atypical. Optimal management is patient- and family-centered and delivered by interdisciplinary teams. The present pilot study elicits concerns held by important stakeholders on issues affecting young patients with DSD and their families. Methods: Content from focus groups with expert clinicians (pediatric urologists (n = 7), pediatric endocrinologists (n = 10), mental health professionals (n = 4), DSD patient advocates (n = 4), and interviews with parents of DSD-affected children (newborn to 6 years; n = 11) was coded and content-analyzed to identify health-related quality of life issues. Results: Key stressors varied across stakeholder groups. In general, family-centered issues were noted more than child-centered. In the child-centered domain, providers worried more about physical functioning; family and advocates emphasized gender concerns and body image. In the family-centered domain, parental concerns about medication management outweighed those of providers. Advocates reported more stressors regarding communication/information than other stakeholders. Conclusion: Variability exists across stakeholder groups in the key concerns affecting young children/families with DSD. Interdisciplinary DSD healthcare team development should account for varying perspectives when counseling families and planning treatment.


International Journal of Endocrinology | 2015

Parental Reports of Stigma Associated with Child’s Disorder of Sex Development

Aimee M. Rolston; Melissa Gardner; Eric Vilain; David E. Sandberg

Disorders of sex development (DSD) are congenital conditions in which chromosomal, gonadal, or anatomic sex development is atypical. DSD-associated stigma is purported to threaten positive psychosocial adaptation. Parental perceptions of DSD-related stigma were assessed in 154 parents of 107 children (newborn–17 years) questionnaire comprising two scales, child-focused and parent-focused, and three subscales, perceived stigmatization, future worries, and feelings about the childs condition. Medical chart excerpts identified diagnoses and clinical management details. Stigma scale scores were generally low. Parents of children with DSD reported less stigma than parents of children with epilepsy; however, a notable proportion rated individual items in the moderate to high range. Stigma was unrelated to childs age or the number of DSD-related surgeries. Child-focused stigma scores exceeded parent-focused stigma and mothers reported more stigma than fathers, with a moderate level of agreement. Within 46,XY DSD, reported stigma was higher for children reared as girls. In conclusion, in this first quantitative study of ongoing experiences, DSD-related stigma in childhood and adolescence, while limited in the aggregate, is reported at moderate to high levels in specific areas. Because stigma threatens positive psychosocial adaptation, systematic screening for these concerns should be considered and, when reported, targeted for psychoeducational counseling.


Journal of Pediatric Nursing | 2014

“It Was an Overwhelming Thing”: Parents' Needs After Infant Diagnosis With Congenital Adrenal Hyperplasia

Kyla L. Boyse; Melissa Gardner; Donna Marvicsin; David E. Sandberg

This study characterizes the experiences and expressed needs of parents following diagnosis of their newborn with congenital adrenal hyperplasia (CAH). Six parents (four mothers and two fathers) were interviewed about how they learned about CAH and its management, followed by qualitative data analysis. Coding of transcripts revealed several themes, including health communication problems, a lack of medical home and decision support, and a desire for parent-to-parent social support. Findings have implications for how family-centered health care is delivered following an unexpected newborn diagnosis.


The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism | 2016

Coming Up Short: Risks of Bias in Assessing Psychological Outcomes in Growth Hormone Therapy for Short Stature

Melissa Gardner; M. L. Boshart; C. E. Yeguez; K. M. Desai; David E. Sandberg

CONTEXT Two often cited assumptions for treating children with GH are that short stature (SS), as an isolated physical characteristic, is associated with psychosocial morbidity and that GH treatment may increase height and improve psychological adjustment. Findings across studies regarding the psychological consequences associated with GH management of children with SS are variable and frequently contradictory. The purpose of this systematic review is to evaluate the degree to which any conclusions about the relative risks or benefits of GH treatment on psychological outcomes can be made based on the published literature. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION Electronic databases were searched for randomized clinical trials and nonrandomized studies, published between 1958-2014, in which GH was administered for management of children with SS and psychosocial, cognitive, academic, or health-related quality of life outcomes were assessed. Methodological quality of each study was assessed using the Cochrane Collaborations tool for assessing risk of bias. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS Eighty studies were evaluated. No studies were rated as having a low risk of bias, the risk of bias was unclear in seven study outcome areas, and the remaining studies were judged as having a high risk of bias. CONCLUSIONS The high risk of bias present in the majority of the literature on GH treatment effects on psychological outcomes (in particular, lack of blinding) substantially weakens confidence in their results. This may serve to explain the variability of findings for these outcomes across studies.


Pediatric Clinics of North America | 2015

Short Stature: Is It a Psychosocial Problem and Does Changing Height Matter?

David E. Sandberg; Melissa Gardner

Some proponents of recombinant human growth hormone (rhGH) treatment in growth hormone-sufficient children cite height, as an isolated physical characteristic, as being associated with psychosocial morbidity. Others question the reliability of the evidence underpinning the quality-of-life rationale for treatment as well as the bioethics of rhGH treatment. The following questions are addressed: (1) Is short stature an obstacle to positive psychosocial adjustment? and (2) Does increasing height with rhGH treatment make a difference to the persons psychosocial adaptation and quality of life? Three clinical case examples are used to illustrate the complexities associated with decision-making surrounding rhGH use.


American Journal of Medical Genetics Part C-seminars in Medical Genetics | 2017

Disorders of sex development (DSD): Clinical service delivery in the United States

Aimee M. Rolston; Melissa Gardner; Lauren Mohnach; Catherine E. Keegan; Emmanuèle Délot; Eric Vilain; David E. Sandberg

Following the principles of care recommended in the 2006 Consensus Statement on Disorders of Sex Development (DSD), along with input from representatives of peer support and advocacy groups, this study surveyed DSD clinical management practices at healthcare facilities in the United States. DSD are congenital conditions in which development of chromosomal, gonadal, or anatomic sex is atypical. Facilities providing care for patients with DSD were targeted for participation. Specialty providers completed a survey with questions in six broad categories: Institution Information, Nomenclature and Care Guidelines, Interdisciplinary Services, Staff and Community Education, DSD Management, and Research. Twenty‐two of 36 targeted sites (61%) participated. Differences were observed between sites with regard to what conditions were considered to be DSD. All sites reported some degree of involvement of pediatric urology and/or surgery and pediatric endocrinology in the care of DSD patients. Gynecology and neonatology were most frequently not represented. Wide variation was observed across sites in continuing education standards, obtaining informed consent for clinical procedures, and in specific clinical management practices. This survey is the first to assess DSD clinical management practices in the United States. The findings establish a baseline of current practices against which providers delivering care to these patients and their families can benchmark their efforts. Such surveys also provide a practical framework for collaboration in identifying opportunities for change that enhance health and quality of life outcomes for patients and families affected by DSD.


Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology | 2011

Assessing Health-Related Quality of Life in Disorders of Sex Development: Phase I - Item Generation

David E. Sandberg; Melissa Gardner; Barry A. Kogan; Mary Beth Grimley; Laura M. Cohen; Adrianne N. Alpern; Alexandra L. Quittner

Disorders of sex development (DSD) are congenital conditions in which chromosomal, gonadal, or anatomic sex development is atypical [1]. Only anecdotal, retrospective reports exist regarding the experiences of children with DSD and their families, with no concurrently collected data on the specific stressors children and families face or on their processes of adaptation.


American Journal of Medical Genetics Part C-seminars in Medical Genetics | 2017

Interdisciplinary care in disorders/differences of sex development (DSD): The psychosocial component of the DSD—Translational research network

David E. Sandberg; Melissa Gardner; Nina Callens; Tom Mazur; Accord Alliance

Scientific discovery and clinical management strategies for Disorders/Differences of Sex Development (DSD) have advanced in recent years. The 2006 Consensus Statement on Management of Intersex Disorders stated that a mental health component to care is integral to promote positive adaptation, yet the parameters of this element have not been described. The objective of this paper is threefold: to describe the psychosocial screening protocol adopted by the clinical centers of the DSD‐Translational Research Network; to summarize psychosocial data collected at 1 of the 10 network sites; and to suggest how systematic behavioral health screenings can be employed to tailor care in DSD that results in better health and quality of life outcomes. Steps taken in developing the largely “noncategorical” screening protocol are described. These preliminary findings suggest that DSD, as one category of pediatric chronic conditions, is not associated with marked disturbances of psychosocial adaptation, either for the family or the child; however, screening frequently uncovered “risk factors” for individual families or patients that can potentially be addressed in the context of ongoing clinical care. Administration of the DSD‐TRN psychosocial screening protocol was demonstrated to be feasible in the context of interdisciplinary team care and was acceptable to families on a longitudinal basis. The ultimate value of systematic screening will be demonstrated through a tailoring of psychosocial, medical and surgical services, based on this information that enhances the quality of patient and family‐centered care and subsequent outcomes.


Psychology and Sexuality | 2014

Management of children with disorders of sex development: new care standards explained

S.F. Ahmed; Melissa Gardner; David E. Sandberg

Over the last decade, increasing attention has been focused on the health of children with disorders of sex development (DSD) and the gaps in our knowledge of how early care may be linked to long-term outcome. In the current environment of greater collaboration as part of clinical and research networks, stronger links have been forged between professionals, patients and parents and guidelines have been developed for directing care. With continuing technological advances it is likely that our ability to reach a firm diagnosis will improve but this needs to be put in context of optimal long-term outcome. Clinical centres of expertise for rare conditions such as DSD will need to work within a network of centres and contribute to a collective effort to improve the care of children and adults with DSD.

Collaboration


Dive into the Melissa Gardner's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Eric Vilain

University of California

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Aileen P. Schast

Children's Hospital of Philadelphia

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge