Melissa Skeans

The Effects of a Smoking Cessation Intervention on 14.5-Year Mortality: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Context Although there are many health benefits for smokers who stop smoking, we still lack evidence from randomized, controlled trials that smoking cessation programs reduce mortality. Contribution In this randomized, controlled trial of a 10-week-long smoking cessation intervention in 5887 smokers with asymptomatic airway obstruction, 14-year mortality rates were higher in the usual care group than in the smoking cessation group (hazard ratio, 1.18 [95% CI, 1.02 to 1.37]). The mortality benefit was greatest among the 21.7% of the intervention group who actually managed to quit smoking. Implications Smoking cessation programs substantially reduce mortality even when only a minority of patients stop smoking. The Editors Smoking cessation almost certainly has beneficial effects on subsequent mortality (1). However, the strongest support for this assertion comes from cohort studies, where smokers and quitters were self-selected. Results from randomized trials, which avoid the selection issue, have largely been disappointing because mortality benefits have not been clear or have not been clearly attributable to smoking cessation (1). The Lung Health Study (LHS) was a randomized clinical trial of smoking cessation and inhaled bronchodilator (ipratropium) therapy in smokers 35 to 60 years of age who did not consider themselves ill but had evidence of mild to moderate airway obstruction (2). Individuals with serious disease, hypertension, obesity, or excessive alcohol intake were excluded. The primary research questions were whether a smoking cessation program and use of inhaled ipratropium would decrease the rate of decline of lung function and would affect mortality and morbidity over 5 years. These results have been reported elsewhere (3, 4). The smoking cessation program was associated with cumulative reduced decline in lung function (FEV1) that was largest in participants who stopped smoking early in the study; inhaled ipratropium produced a small noncumulative increase in FEV1 that disappeared when the drug was withdrawn (3). Intention-to-treat analysis after 5 years did not reveal differences in morbidity or mortality among treatment groups (4), although subgroup analysis showed that smoking cessation was associated with significant reductions in fatal or nonfatal cardiovascular disease and coronary heart disease. This paper reports the effects of the study intervention on mortality in LHS participants 14.5 years after randomization. Methods The design of the LHS has been described in detail elsewhere (2). The participants, all volunteers, were smokers who did not consider themselves ill but had evidence of airway obstruction and little evidence of other disease. Researchers recruited participants from the community using a wide variety of techniques (5). In 10 clinical centers, 5887 participants were randomly assigned to 3 groups. Two special intervention groups received an intensive 10-week smoking cessation program. Briefly, the cessation intervention consisted of a strong physician message and 12 two-hour group sessions, using behavior modification and nicotine gum. Quitters entered a maintenance program that stressed coping skills. One special intervention group also received ipratropium, while the other received a placebo inhaler. A third group received usual care. About 75% of the original participants were followed continuously for the subsequent 10 years by biannual telephone contacts and 1 clinic visit at approximately 11 to 12 years after randomization (6). Telephone contacts served to check smoking status, morbidity, and mortality and were not part of the intervention. All study participants provided written informed consent for the original LHS before beginning the study. The consent documents stated that smoking increases the risk for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, respiratory tract cancer, and cardiovascular disease and that smoking cessation would decrease such risks. Additional written informed consent was obtained from persons who participated in the biannual telephone calls. Institutional review boards at each of the 10 clinical centers and the coordinating center approved the study design and consent documents. When biannual phone calls revealed a participant death, staff attempted to collect death certificates, autopsy reports, relevant medical records, and interviews with attending physicians or eyewitnesses. An independent mortality and morbidity review board examined these data and classified causes of death. In addition, a National Death Index review provided date and cause of death for all U.S. study participants through the end of 2001. Vital status at 31 December 2001 or 14.5 years, whichever was earlier, was successfully determined for 98.3% of all participants; missing individuals were Canadians who had been lost to follow-up and were not accessible through the National Death Index. Mortality end points were classified in 7 categories: coronary heart disease, cardiovascular disease including coronary heart disease, lung cancer, other cancer, respiratory disease excluding lung cancer, other, and unknown. The other category included but was not limited to liver disease, kidney disease, sepsis, accidents, suicide, and AIDS. Analyses were performed on an intention-to-treat basis, comparing the special intervention group with the usual care group. The special intervention group was a combination of the groups originally assigned to receive inhaled ipratropium or placebo therapy. Both of these groups, which were very similar at baseline, received the smoking cessation program and exhibited similar rates of smoking cessation (3). Participants were also divided into 3 groups according to smoking history during the initial 5 years of the trial. Sustained quitters were participants who stopped smoking in the first year after randomization and maintained biochemically validated abstinence (3) throughout follow-up. Continuing smokers were participants who reported smoking at all follow-up visits. Intermittent quitters were participants who reported smoking at some but not all of their follow-up visits or during the time between visits. Statistical Analysis Baseline differences between the special intervention and usual care groups were tested by using t-tests for continuous variables and chi-square statistics for categorical variables. Cause-specific death rates and times to events were analyzed by using the KaplanMeier product-limit method (7). Survival was compared among groups by using the log-rank test. Hazard ratios and adjusted analyses were obtained by using the Cox proportional hazards model. Interactions were assessed by comparing hierarchically related proportional hazards models. All P values result from 2-sided tests; no adjustments were made for multiple comparisons. Role of the Funding Source This study was funded by a contract and grants from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute of the National Institutes of Health. The funding source had a role in the design of the study and approved the manuscript before it was submitted for publication. Results Baseline characteristics of LHS participants are shown in Table 1. Most were middle-aged; smoked heavily; and had substantial smoking histories, airway obstruction (FEV1FVC ratio 70%), and borderline low FEV1 values. On average, participants were normotensive and had normal body mass indices. Most participants were of white ethnicity; 37% were women. The average participant had some postsecondary education and did not drink heavily. The special intervention and usual care groups did not significantly differ at baseline, except in percentage of participants who were married, which was higher in the special intervention group (P= 0.04). Smoking status after the first 5 years differed significantly between treatment groups (P 0.001). Among special intervention participants and usual care participants, respectively, 21.7% and 5.4% were sustained quitters, 29.3% and 23.3% were intermittent quitters, and 49.0% and 71.3% were continuing smokers. Table 1. Baseline Characteristics of Lung Health Study Participants There were 731 known deaths among LHS participants, as shown in Table 2. Lung cancer was the most common cause of death (n= 240 [33%]). Coronary heart disease accounted for 77 deaths (10.5%), and cardiovascular disease including coronary heart disease accounted for 163 deaths (22%). One hundred fifty-four participants (21%) died of cancer of organs other than the lung. Deaths due to respiratory disease other than cancer were relatively uncommon (n= 57 [7.8%]). The cause of death was unknown in only 17 participants (2.3%). Mortality did not significantly differ between the special intervention groups originally assigned to ipratropium or placebo (Table 2). Table 2. Causes of Death by Treatment Group Figure 1 shows all-cause survival rates in the 2 treatment groups. Death rates were significantly higher in the usual care group than in the special intervention group (10.38 per 1000 person-years vs. 8.83 per 1000 person-years; P= 0.03). The hazard ratio for mortality in the usual care group was 1.18 (95% CI, 1.02 to 1.37) compared with the special intervention group. Figure 2 shows categorical causes of death in the 2 treatment groups. In all categories except other, death rates were higher in the usual care group than in the special intervention group, but the difference was significant only for deaths from respiratory diseases not related to lung cancer (1.08 per 1000 person-years vs. 0.56 per 1000 person-years; P= 0.01). Figure 1. All-cause 14.5-year survival. P Figure 2. Mortality rates at 14.5 years by cause. When survival was analyzed according to smoking habit, it differed significantly between groups (P< 0.001), even after adjustment for baseline differences (data not shown). Mortality was 6.04 per 1000 person-years in sustained quitters, 7.77 per 1000 person-years in intermittent quitters, and 11.09 per 1000 p

Effect of inhaled triamcinolone on the decline in pulmonary function in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

BACKGROUND Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) results from a progressive decline in lung function, which is thought to be the consequence of airway inflammation. We hypothesized that antiinflammatory therapy with inhaled corticosteroids would slow this decline. METHODS We enrolled 1116 persons with COPD whose forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) was 30 to 90 percent of the predicted value in a 10-center, placebo-controlled, randomized trial of inhaled triamcinolone acetonide administered at a dose of 600 microg twice daily. The primary outcome measure was the rate of decline in FEV1 after the administration of a bronchodilator. The secondary outcome measures included respiratory symptoms, use of health care services, and airway reactivity. In a substudy of 412 participants, we measured bone density in the lumbar spine and femur at base line and one and three years after the beginning of treatment. RESULTS The mean duration of follow-up was 40 months. The rate of decline in the FEV1 after bronchodilator use was similar in the 559 participants in the triamcinolone group and the 557 participants in the placebo group (44.2+/-2.9 vs. 47.0+/-3.0 ml per year, P= 0.50). Members of the triamcinolone group had fewer respiratory symptoms during the course of the study (21.1 per 100 person-years vs. 28.2 per 100 person-years, P=0.005) and had fewer visits to a physician because of a respiratory illness (1.2 per 100 person-years vs. 2.1 per 100 person-years, P=0.03). Those taking triamcinolone also had lower airway reactivity in response to methacholine challenge at 9 months and 33 months (P=0.02 for both comparisons). After three years, the bone density of the lumbar spine and the femur was significantly lower in the triamcinolone group (P < or = 0.007). CONCLUSIONS Inhaled triamcinolone does not slow the rate of decline in lung function in people with COPD, but it improves airway reactivity and respiratory symptoms and decreases the use of health care services for respiratory problems. These benefits should be weighed against the potential long-term adverse effects of triamcinolone on bone mineral density.

OPTN/SRTR 2013 Annual Data Report: Kidney: OPTN/SRTR 2013 Annual Data Report

A new kidney allocation system, expected to be implemented in late 2014, will characterize donors on a percent scale (0%‐100%) using the kidney donor profile index (KDPI). The 20% of deceased donor kidneys with the greatest expected posttransplant longevity will be allocated first to the 20% of candidates with the best expected posttransplant survival; kidneys that are not accepted will then be offered to remaining 80% of candidates. Waiting time will start at the time of maintenance dialysis initiation (even if before listing) or at the time of listing with an estimated glomerular filtration rate of 20 mL/min/1.73 m2 or less. Under the current system, the number of candidates on the waiting list continues to increase, as each year more candidates are added than are removed. Median waiting times for adults increased from 3 years in 2003 to more than 4.5 years in 2009. Donation rates have not increased. Short‐term outcomes continue to improve; death‐censored graft survival at 90 days posttransplant was 97% or higher for deceased donor transplants and over 99% for living donor transplants. In 2013, 883 pediatric candidates were added to the waiting list; 65.8% of pediatric candidates on the list in 2013 underwent deceased donor transplant. Five‐year graft survival was highest for living donor recipients aged younger than 11 years (89%) and lowest for deceased donor recipients aged 11 to 17 years (68%).

Excerpts From the US Renal Data System 2009 Annual Data Report

This 21st US Renal Data System Annual Data Report covers data through 2007, and again includes a section on chronic kidney disease (CKD) in the United States. Using NHANES and employer group health plan data, we estimate the relationship between kidney disease markers and mortality risk and the likelihood of blood pressure and lipid control by CKD stage; illustrate use of the new ICD-9-CM CKD diagnosis codes; and report on morbidity, mortality, care and costs during the transition to ESRD. New chapters address CKD patient care, the transition to ESRD, and acute kidney injury. In 2007, 111,000 patients started end-stage renal disease (ESRD) therapy, and the prevalent population reached 527,283 (including 368,544 dialysis patients); 17,513 transplants were performed, and 158,739 patients had a functioning graft at year’s end. Program expenditures reached

OPTN/SRTR 2012 Annual Data Report: Pancreas: OPTN & SRTR Annual Data Report 2012

35.3 billion, with

OPTN/SRTR 2013 Annual Data Report: Liver: OPTN/SRTR 2013 Annual Data Report: Liver

23.9 billion from Medicare (accounting for 5.8% of total Medicare expenditures). The incident rate fell 2.1%, to 354 per million. Fistula use in prevalent patients declined 2.6 percent; catheter use continues to be a concern. The percentage of patients with hemoglobin levels above 13 g/dl has fallen since 2006, but levels in the incident population frequently exceed 12. First-year mortality and morbidity among hemodialysis patients—particularly the increasing rate of hospitalizations due to infections—continue to be major concerns, and pediatric patient survival has not improved. The public health impact of kidney disease is larger than previously appreciated, and early detection, education, intervention, and risk factor control need to address the heavy burden of cardiovascular disease and adverse events in this vulnerable population.

United States Renal Data System 2008 Annual Data Report Abstract

For most end‐stage renal disease patients, successful kidney transplant provides substantially longer survival and better quality of life than dialysis, and preemptive transplant is associated with better outcomes than transplants occurring after dialysis initiation. However, kidney transplant numbers in the us have not changed for a decade. Since 2004, the total number of candidates on the waiting list has increased annually. Median time to transplant for wait‐listed adult patients increased from 2.7 years in 1998 to 4.2 years in 2008. The discard rate of deceased donor kidneys has also increased, and the annual number of living donor transplants has decreased. The number of pediatric transplants peaked at 899 in 2005, and has remained steady at approximately 750 over the past 3 years; 40.9% of pediatric candidates undergo transplant within 1 year of wait‐listing. Graft survival continues to improve for both adult and pediatric recipients. Kidney transplant is one of the most cost‐effective surgical interventions; however, average reimbursement for recipients with primary Medicare coverage from transplant through 1 year posttransplant was comparable to the 1‐year cost of care for a dialysis patient. Rates of rehospitalization are high in the first year posttransplant; annual costs after the first year are lower.

OPTN/SRTR 2011 Annual Data Report: Lung

During 2013, 10,479 adult candidates were added to the liver transplant waiting list, compared with 10,185 in 2012; 5921 liver transplants were performed, and 211 of the transplanted organs were from living donors. As of December 31, 2013, 15,027 candidates were registered on the waiting list, including 12,407 in active status. The most significant change in allocation policy affecting liver waitlist trends in 2013 was the Share 35 policy, whereby organs from an entire region are available to candidates with model for end‐stage liver disease scores of 35 or higher. Median waiting time for such candidates decreased dramatically, from 14.0 months in 2012 to 1.4 months in 2013, but the effect on waitlist mortality is unknown. The number of new active pediatric candidates added to the liver transplant waiting list increased to 693 in 2013. Transplant rates were highest for candidates aged younger than 1 year (275.6 per 100 waitlist years) and lowest for candidates aged 11 to 17 years (97.0 per 100 waitlist years). Five‐year graft survival was 71.7% for recipients aged younger than 1 year, 74.9% for ages 1 to 5 years, 78.9% ages 6 to 10 years, and 77.4% for ages 11 to 17 years.

OPTN/SRTR 2015 Annual Data Report: Heart

In this age of modern era, the use of internet must be maximized. Yeah, internet will help us very much not only for important thing but also for daily activities. Many people now, from any level can use internet. The sources of internet connection can also be enjoyed in many places. As one of the benefits is to get the on-line united states renal data system 2008 annual data report book, as the world window, as many people suggest.

Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients: Collecting, analyzing, and reporting data on transplantation in the United States

ABSTRACT  Lungs are allocated in part based on the Lung Allocation Score (LAS), which considers risk of death without transplant and posttransplant. Wait‐list additions have been increasing steadily after an initial decline following LAS implementation. In 2011, the largest number of adult candidates were added to the waiting list in a single year since 1998; donation and transplant rates have been unable to keep pace with wait‐list additions. Candidates aged 65 years or older have been added faster than candidates in other age groups. After an initial decline following LAS implementation, wait‐list mortality increased to 15.7 per 100 wait‐list years in 2011. Short‐ and long‐term graft survival improved in 2011; 10‐year graft failure fell to an all‐time low. Since 1998, the number of new pediatric (aged 0–11 years) candidates added yearly to the waiting list has declined. In 2011, 19 pediatric lung transplants were performed, a transplant rate of 34.7 per 100 wait‐list years. The percentage of patients hospitalized before transplant has not changed. Both graft and patient survival have continued to improve over the past decade. Posttransplant complications for pediatric lung transplant recipients, similar to complications for adult recipients, include hypertension, renal dysfunction, diabetes, bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome, and malignancy.