Melissa Work
University of Pennsylvania
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Melissa Work.
Annals of Neurology | 2005
Murray Grossman; Jennifer M. Farmer; Susan Leight; Melissa Work; Peachie Moore; Vivianna M. Van Deerlin; Domenico Praticò; Christopher M. Clark; H. Branch Coslett; Anjan Chatterjee; James C. Gee; John Q. Trojanowski; Virginia M.-Y. Lee
We assessed cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) levels of tau and other biomarkers of neurodegenerative disease. CSF tau levels vary widely in reports of frontotemporal dementia (FTD). CSF samples were assayed for tau, amyloid β1‐42 (A1‐42), and the isoprostane 8,12‐iso‐iPF2a‐VI (iP) prospectively in 64 patients with FTD, retrospectively in 26 autopsied cases with FTD or Alzheimers disease (AD), and in 13 healthy seniors. To validate our observations in vivo, we correlated CSF tau levels with cortical atrophy in 17 FTD patients using voxel‐based morphometry analyses of high‐resolution magnetic resonance imaging. CSF levels of tau, Aβ1‐42, and iP differed significantly in FTD compared with AD. Individual patient analyses showed that 34% of FD patients had significantly low levels of CSF tau, although this was never seen in AD. A discriminant analysis based on CSF levels of tau, Aβ1‐42, and iP was able to classify 88.5% of these patients in a manner that corresponds to their clinical or autopsy diagnosis. Magnetic resonance imaging studies showed that CSF tau levels correlate significantly with right frontal and left temporal cortical atrophy, brain regions known to be atrophic in patients with autopsy‐proved FTD. We conclude that CSF tau levels are significantly reduced in many patients with FTD. Ann Neurol 2005;57:721–729
Neurology | 2006
Sharon Ash; Peachie Moore; Shweta Antani; G. McCawley; Melissa Work; Murray Grossman
Objective: To assess discourse in patients with frontotemporal dementia (FTD). Methods: The authors asked patients with progressive nonfluent aphasia (PNFA), patients with semantic dementia (SemD), and nonaphasic patients with a disorder of social comportment and executive functioning (SOC/EXEC) to narrate the story of a wordless childrens picture book. Results: The authors found significant discourse impairments in all three groups of patients. Moreover, there were qualitatively important differences between the groups. Patients with PNFA had the sparsest output, producing narratives with the fewest words per minute. Patients with SemD had difficulty retrieving words needed to tell their narratives. Though not aphasic, patients with SOC/EXEC had profound difficulty organizing their narratives, and they could not effectively express the point of the story. This deficit correlated with poor performance on a measure of executive resources requiring an organized mental search. In addition, a correlation of narrative organization with cortical atrophy in patients with SOC/EXEC was significant in right frontal and anterior temporal brain regions. Conclusions: Impaired day-to-day communication in nonaphasic frontotemporal dementia patients with a disorder of social comportment and executive functioning is due in part to a striking deficit in discourse organization associated with right frontotemporal disease. Difficulty with discourse in progressive aphasia is due largely to the language impairments of these patients.
NeuroImage | 2007
Susana Novais-Santos; James C. Gee; Maliha Shah; Vanessa Troiani; Melissa Work; Murray Grossman
We used functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to test competing claims about the role of executive resources during the disambiguation of a sentence featuring a temporary structural ambiguity. Written sentences with a direct object (DO) structure or a sentential complement (SC) structure were shown to 19 healthy, right-handed, young adults in a phrase-by-phrase manner. These sentences contained a main verb that is statistically more likely to be associated with a DO structure or an SC structure. Half of each type of sentence also contained an extra phrase strategically located to stress working memory prior to disambiguating the sentence. We found that sentences featuring a less consistent verb-structure mapping recruit greater dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (dlPFC) activation than sentences with a more consistent verb-structure mapping, implicating strategic on-line planning during resolution of a temporary structural ambiguity. By comparison, we observed left inferior parietal cortex (IPC) activation in sentences with an increased working memory demand compared to sentences with a low working memory load. These findings are consistent with a large-scale neural network for sentence processing that recruits distinct planning and working memory processing resources as needed to support the comprehension of sentences.
NeuroImage | 2006
Murray Grossman; Phyllis Koenig; John Kounios; Corey T. McMillan; Melissa Work; Peachie Moore
Much work has investigated the neural representation of specific categories of knowledge, but relatively scant attention has been paid in the cognitive neuroscience literature to the semantic processes that contribute to semantic memory. In this study, we monitored regional cortical activity with fMRI while healthy young adults evaluated visually displayed NATURAL KIND, ARTIFACT, and ABSTRACT nouns with two standard tasks: Typicality judgments and Pleasantness judgments. We observed a significant interaction effect between the category of knowledge and the type of judgment used to evaluate members of these semantic categories. Typicality judgments recruited greater temporal-occipital activation relative to Pleasantness judgments of the same category, and this was seen for comparisons of all three semantic categories. However, when contrasted with Typicality judgments, Pleasantness judgments activated a different anatomic distribution for each semantic category. These findings are consistent with a dynamic approach to semantic memory that includes at least two components: semantic knowledge and semantic processes that interpret this knowledge in several ways depending on the particular semantic challenge.
Brain and Language | 2006
Shaleigh Kwok; Jamie Reilly; Murray Grossman; Melissa Work
University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Department of Neurology, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, PA, USAAccepted 6 July 2006IntroductionSemantic dementia (SD) results in a progressive loss of conceptualknowledge in the context of preserved syntactic, auditory, and visual spa-tial abilities (Grossman & Ash, 2004; Hodges, 2003; Paterson, Knott, H moderate: 66). The mean MMSEwas 18.75 (mild: 24; moderate: 13.5). Semantic memory impairment asmeasured by the Pyramids and Palm Trees test (Howard & Patterson,1992) averaged, for pictures and words, 43.75/52 (mild: 47.25; moderate:40.25). Average confrontation naming on the Boston Naming Test (Kap-lan, Goodglass, & Weintraub, 1976) averaged 5.75 of 15 (mild: 9; moder-ate: 2.5). All patients passed a pure tone hearing screening at 1, 2, and4 kHz. Patients were instructed through training sessions before each task.All auditory stimuli were digitized and administered by headphones with afrequency response range of 8–25 kHz.Structural MRI scans of milder SD revealed atrophy in the left ventral,anterolateral cortex (see Fig. 1a for VBM analysis of significant corticalatrophy in a mild SD patient). Patients with moderate SD showed atrophyspread to the posterior temporal cortex (see Fig. 1b for a VBM analysis ofsignificant cortical atrophy in a moderate SD patient).Experiment 1: Pure tone acoustic discriminationPure tones varying in frequency from 300 to 5000 Hz were presented inpairs, with a 1000 ms interstimulus interval (ISI). Half the tone pairs wereidentical; the remainder differed by increments of 25–4000 Hz. ParticipantsindicatedwhethereachtonepairwastheSAMEorDIFFERENTwithakeypress.ResultsOverall accuracy of pure tone discrimination was 82.5% (p < .001,binomial test differing from chance). The within-group contrast of mildSD versus moderate SD demonstrated greater discrimination difficultyin moderate SD (mild accuracy: 90%; moderate accuracy: 75%;v
Brain and Language | 2006
Katy Cross; Jamie Reilly; Murray Grossman; Melissa Work
University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Department of Neurology, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USAAccepted 6 July 2006IntroductionAnomiacanresultfromarangeofperceptualdeficits(e.g.,agnosia);cen-tral semantic degradation (e.g., dementia); impaired linguistic access (e.g.,aphasia);oracombinationofthesefactors(HodgesPMar-tin & Saffran, 1990). One unexplored possibility, however, is that anomiamayalsostemfromimpairedmappingofarbitraryphonologicalformsontoconcepts. Here, we investigated integrity of the phonology-semantics map-pingprocessinapatientwithposteriorcorticalatrophyassociatedwithAlz-heimer’s disease. We predicted that visual deficits should interfere with theability to link phonetic attributes to a novel object. We introduce anapproach, known as phonetic symbolism, to test this hypothesis.Some phonemic combinations have been found to be associated withideas such as magnitude of physical size, brightness, affection, and propernounsacrossmanyunrelatedlanguages(Nuckolls,1999;Ohala,1994;Sapir,1949). This effect, phonetic symbolism, is tested with a novel object and achoiceofpossiblenonwordnames.The‘‘best’’nameisselectedbymappingacoustic-phoneticpropertiesofaworddirectlyontophysicalfeaturesoftheobject (Ohala, 1994). For example, if one is forced to choose between twonames (pleek or ploke) for a tiny, bright yellow animal, they choose Pleekwithagreementfargreaterthanchance.Thischoiceismadethroughnon-ar-bitrary mapping of phonology directly onto an object’s visual attributes.Phonetic symbolism taps many crucial elements of word learning thatarenotdirectlyaccessiblethroughassessmentofknownobjectsandwords.Inordertocorrectlychoosethename,Pleek,apersonmustperceivesalientvisual attributes (e.g., brightness), process acoustic-phonetic features (e.g.,vowel height), and then complete a mapping of these characteristics. Theuse of novel stimuli (both words and objects), therefore, provides a uniqueway of examining potential deficits in word to object mapping.MethodCase descriptionAtrophy in the occipital and temporal visual areas and posterior por-tions of the parietal lobes causes patients with the visual-variant of Alzhei-mer’s disease (vAD) to have object recognition deficits and visuospatialproblems including optic apraxia and simultanagnosia. As vAD evolves,memory and language difficulties also become prevalent (Levine, Lee, F Ross, Graham, Stuart-Green, & Prins, 1996). CP is a 61-year-old, right-handed female diagnosed with vAD through examinationby a behavioral neurologist and consensus review using NINCDS-ADRDA criteria (McKhann et al., 1984).CP initially presented to the University of Pennsylvania (12/03) withsignificant visual-perceptual difficulties (profound difficulty copying thesimplest visual geometric designs) and also demonstrates mild semanticimpairment (Pyramids & Palm Trees Words 46/52). CP shows impairedconfrontation naming of pictures (Boston Naming Test: 3/15) and speechproduction significant for frequent circumlocutions, word-finding pausesand anomia. She was able to read and could appreciate the color butnot the form of visual stimuli. Structural MRI obtained in 2003 revealedleft ventral-occipital and parietal-occipital atrophy as well as mild rightparietal and inferior frontal atrophy Fig. 1.Experiment 1—Phonetic symbolismCP viewed 25 randomized images of novel objects (i.e., blobs, n = 10)and pseudoanimals (n = 15) presented via E-prime software on a laptopcomputer. Stimuli were manipulated by salience of visual features, includ-ing: brightness, physical size, angularity, roundness, motion, and loudness.Two monosyllabic (CVC or CVCC) nonwords appeared below eachimage. Nonwords varied by medial vowel, which maximally differed byplace and height (e.g., pleek–ploke). CP was instructed to ‘‘choose the bestname’’ for each image by signaling with a key-press. 13 healthy controlsdemonstrated high agreement on the target nonword selected as a namefor each item. Small, bright pseudoanimals were associated with high fre-quency/narrow vocal tract vowels; large, dark pseudoanimals with low fre-quency/wide vocal tract vowels; dull, dark blobs with back vowelsproduced with lip rounding; and sharp, bright blobs with high frequen-cy/narrow vocal tract vowels.ResultsCP did show a strong effect of phonetic symbolism for the manipula-tion of ‘‘roundness’’ collapsed across conditions. That is, CP reliably asso-ciated back, rounded vowels (e.g., ‘‘mome’’) with rounded objects andpseudoanimals (8/8) p < .004. Otherwise she did not associate phoneticfeatures with visual-perceptual attributes of novel objects andpseudoanimals.doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2006.06.075* Corresponding author. Fax: +1 215 349 8464.www.elsevier.com/locate/b&lBrain and Language 99 (2006) 8–219
Brain | 2003
Murray Grossman; Corey T. McMillan; Peachie Moore; Lijun Ding; Guila Glosser; Melissa Work; James C. Gee
Neuropsychologia | 2007
Murray Grossman; Vanessa Troiani; Phyllis Koenig; Melissa Work; Peachie Moore
Brain and Language | 2004
Murray Grossman; Ayanna Cooke; Corey T. McMillan; Peachie Moore; James C. Gee; Melissa Work
NeuroImage | 2008
Susana Novais-Santos; James C. Gee; Maliha Shah; Vanessa Troiani; Melissa Work; Murray Grossman