Meltem Urgun-Demirtas

Achieving very low mercury levels in refinery wastewater by membrane filtration

Microfiltration (MF), ultrafiltration (UF), nanofiltration (NF) and reverse osmosis (RO) membranes were evaluated for their ability to achieve the worlds most stringent Hg discharge criterion (<1.3ng/L) in an oil refinerys wastewater. The membrane processes were operated at three different pressures to demonstrate the potential for each membrane technology to achieve the targeted effluent mercury concentrations. The presence of mercury in the particulate form in the refinery wastewater makes the use of MF and UF membrane technologies more attractive in achieving very low mercury levels in the treated wastewater. Both NF and RO were also able to meet the target mercury concentration at lower operating pressures (20.7bar). However, higher operating pressures (≥34.5bar) had a significant effect on NF and RO flux and fouling rates, as well as on permeate quality. SEM images of the membranes showed that pore blockage and narrowing were the dominant fouling mechanisms for the MF membrane while surface coverage was the dominant fouling mechanism for the other membranes. The correlation between mercury concentration and particle size distribution was also investigated to understand mercury removal mechanisms by membrane filtration. The mean particle diameter decreased with filtration from 1.1±0.0μm to 0.74±0.2μm after UF.

Meeting world's most stringent Hg criterion: A pilot-study for the treatment of oil refinery wastewater using an ultrafiltration membrane process

A membrane ultrafiltration (UF) technology was tested using an oil refinerys end-of-pipe effluent to demonstrate the proof of concept, i.e. can the Great Lakes Initiative criterion of less than 1.3 ppt be consistently met at the pilot-scale, and to provide the data necessary for preliminary full-scale process design. This study presents the successful pilot test conducted with continuous but varying feed conditions over a protracted period. The UF membrane process consistently provided a constant permeate quality at all tested operating conditions, virtually independent of the feed water characteristics and the feed Hg concentration (0.5-22.7 ppt). The treatment target of less than 1.3 ppt of Hg was met and exceeded for all tested conditions during the pilot study. Turbidity measurements were <0.5 NTU (with a MDL of 0.5 NTU) 85% of the time and <0.16 NTU 95% of the time when analyzed on-line. The TMP values were below the specification of (negative) 7-12 psi at all tested conditions during the pilot-study. Weekly maintenance cleans and monthly clean in place (CIP) events were very effective in consistently restoring the membrane permeability during the pilot-study.

In-situ biogas upgrading during anaerobic digestion of food waste amended with walnut shell biochar at bench scale:

A modified version of an in-situ CO2 removal process was applied during anaerobic digestion of food waste with two types of walnut shell biochar at bench scale under batch operating mode. Compared with the coarse walnut shell biochar, the fine walnut shell biochar has a higher ash content (43 vs. 36 wt%) and higher concentrations of calcium (31 vs. 19 wt% of ash), magnesium (8.4 vs. 5.6 wt% of ash) and sodium (23.4 vs. 0.3 wt% of ash), but a lower potassium concentration (0.2 vs. 40% wt% of ash). The 0.96–3.83 g biochar (g VSadded)-1 fine walnut shell biochar amended digesters produced biogas with 77.5%–98.1% CH4 content by removing 40%–96% of the CO2 compared with the control digesters at mesophilic and thermophilic temperature conditions. In a direct comparison at 1.83 g biochar (g VSadded)-1, the fine walnut shell biochar amended digesters (85.7% CH4 content and 61% CO2 removal) outperformed the coarse walnut shell biochar amended digesters (78.9% CH4 content and 51% CO2 removal). Biochar addition also increased alkalinity as CaCO3 from 2800 mg L-1 in the control digesters to 4800–6800 mg L-1, providing process stability for food waste anaerobic digestion.

Comparative evaluation of As, Se and V removal technologies for the treatment of oil refinery wastewater

In this study, a broad range of readily deployable metal removal technologies were tested on a US refinerys wastewater to determine vanadium, arsenic and selenium removal performance. The bench-scale treatability studies were designed and performed so that test conditions could be as uniform as possible given the different mechanisms of action and engineering applications of each technology. The experimental data show that both ferric precipitation and reactive filtration were able to remove As, Se and V more efficiently from the wastewater than other tested technologies. Additionally, granular ferric hydroxide (GFH) adsorption was also effective in both V and As removal. Although the thiol-SAMMS adsorbent was developed for mercury removal, it also demonstrated appreciable selenium removal. None of the tested membrane filtration technologies showed any significant metals removal. This was attributed to the dissolved form of the metals as well as the wastewaters fouling characteristics.

Achieving the Great Lakes Initiative mercury limits in oil refinery effluent.

To meet the stringent Great Lakes Initiative (GLI) wastewater discharge mercury (Hg) limit of 1.3 ppt (ng/L), mercury removal technologies need to be identified and investigated. The goals of this study were to (1) identify and assess available wastewater treatment technologies for mercury removal from an oil refinery wastewater; and (2) conduct bench-scale tests to provide comparable, transparent, and uniform results to assess their performance at low mercury concentrations. The study found that many tested technologies were able to achieve the GLI mercury target concentration at the bench-scale, albeit with different efficiencies and engineering implications. These results demonstrate that at this scale there is no fundamental physical or chemical barrier to achieving < 1.3 ng Hg/L in the tested wastewater. The study also found that some technologies were effective on particulate mercury whereas others were effective on dissolved mercury. One emerging treatment technology was found to be effective on both particulate and dissolved mercury. Three mercury-removal technologies--ultrafiltration (particulate mercury), adsorption (dissolved mercury), and an emerging reactive filtration technology (particulate and dissolved mercury)--are recommended for further study. This research offers treatment alternatives for different forms of mercury in an oil refinery wastewater, which might be applicable to other types of mercury-containing wastewater.