Melvin Churchill
University of Nebraska Medical Center
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Melvin Churchill.
Arthritis & Rheumatism | 2009
Paul Emery; Roy Fleischmann; Larry W. Moreland; Elizabeth C. Hsia; Ingrid Strusberg; Patrick Durez; Peter Nash; Eric Amante; Melvin Churchill; Won Park; Bernardo A. Pons-Estel; Mittie K. Doyle; Sudha Visvanathan; Weichun Xu; Mahboob Rahman
OBJECTIVE To assess the safety and efficacy of golimumab in methotrexate (MTX)-naive patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS MTX-naive patients with RA (n = 637) were randomized to receive placebo plus MTX (group 1), golimumab 100 mg plus placebo (group 2), golimumab 50 mg plus MTX (group 3), or golimumab 100 mg plus MTX (group 4). Subcutaneous injections of golimumab or placebo were administered every 4 weeks. The dosage of MTX/placebo capsules started at 10 mg/week and escalated to 20 mg/week. The primary end point, the proportion of patients meeting the American College of Rheumatology 50% improvement criteria (achieving an ACR50 response) at week 24, required significant differences between groups 3 and 4 combined (combined group) versus group 1 and significant differences in a pairwise comparison (group 3 or group 4 versus group 1). RESULTS An intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis of the ACR50 response at week 24 did not show a significant difference between the combined group and group 1 (38.4% and 29.4%, respectively; P=0.053), while a post hoc modified ITT analysis (excluding 3 untreated patients) of the ACR50 response showed statistically significant differences between the combined group and group 1 (38.5% versus 29.4%; P=0.049) and between group 3 (40.5%; P=0.038) but not group 4 (36.5%; P=0.177) and group 1. Group 2 was noninferior to group 1 for the ACR50 response at week 24 (33.1%; 95% confidence interval lower bound -5.2%; predefined delta value for noninferiority -10%). The combination of golimumab plus MTX demonstrated a significantly better response compared with placebo plus MTX in most other efficacy parameters, including response/remission according to the Disease Activity Score in 28 joints. Serious adverse events occurred in 7%, 3%, 6%, and 6% of patients in groups 1, 2, 3, and 4, respectively. CONCLUSION Although the primary end point was not met, the modified ITT analysis of the primary end point and other prespecified efficacy measures demonstrated that the efficacy of golimumab plus MTX is better than, and the efficacy of golimumab alone is similar to, the efficacy of MTX alone in reducing RA signs and symptoms in MTX-naive patients, with no unexpected safety concerns.
Arthritis & Rheumatism | 1999
James R. O'Dell; Gail Paulsen; Claire E. Haire; Kent Blakely; William E. Palmer; Steven Wees; P. James Eckhoff; Lynell W. Klassen; Melvin Churchill; Deborah K. Doud; Arthur L. Weaver; Gerald F. Moore
OBJECTIVE Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) causes substantial morbidity and mortality, and current treatments are suboptimal. Recent studies have demonstrated the short-term efficacy of minocycline in the treatment of patients with early RA. This study was undertaken to compare patients treated with conventional therapy in the early phase of their RA and those treated with minocycline, after 4 years of followup. METHODS Forty-six patients with seropositive RA of <1 years duration had been enrolled in a double-blind study of minocycline (100 mg twice daily) versus placebo. After the blinded portion of the study (3-6 months, depending upon response), all patients were treated with conventional therapy. This report compares those patients randomized to receive placebo for 3 months and then conventional therapy for the duration of 4 years versus those originally randomized to receive minocycline. RESULTS Twenty of the 23 original minocycline-treated patients and 18 of the 23 original placebo-treated patients were available for followup (mean 4 years). At followup, RA was in remission (American College of Rheumatology criteria) without disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD) or steroid therapy in 8 of the patients originally treated with minocycline compared with 1 patient in the placebo group (P = 0.02). Ten patients in the minocycline group versus 16 in the original placebo group currently require DMARD therapy (P = 0.02). CONCLUSION Among patients with seropositive RA, remissions are more frequent and the need for DMARD therapy is less in those treated early in the disease course with minocycline compared with those treated with conventional therapy delayed by an average of only 3 months. Minocycline appears to be an effective therapy for early RA; further investigation into its mechanism of action is needed.
Arthritis & Rheumatism | 2015
Jeffrey R. Curtis; Melvin Churchill; Alan Kivitz; Ahmed Samad; Laura Gauer; L. Gervitz; W. Koetse; Jeffrey M. Melin; Yusuf Yazici
The aim of the Patient/Physician Reported Efficacy Determination In Clinical Practice Trial (PREDICT; ClinicalTrials identifier NCT01255761) was to compare the patient‐reported Routine Assessment of Patient Index Data 3 (RAPID‐3) instrument with the investigator‐based Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) for assessing certolizumab pegol (CZP) treatment response in rheumatoid arthritis patients at 12 weeks and to predict the treatment response at week 52 using the data from week 12 (coprimary end points).
Arthritis Care and Research | 2016
Paul Emery; Roy Fleischmann; Ingrid Strusberg; Patrick Durez; Peter Nash; Eric Amante; Melvin Churchill; Won Park; Bernardo A. Pons-Estel; Chenglong Han; T. Gathany; Stephen Xu; Yiying Zhou; Jocelyn H. Leu; Elizabeth C. Hsia
To evaluate the safety and efficacy of golimumab through 5 years in adults with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who had not previously received methotrexate (MTX).
Arthritis Care and Research | 2016
Paul Emery; Roy Fleischmann; Ingrid Strusberg; Patrick Durez; Peter Nash; Eric Amante; Melvin Churchill; Won Park; Bernardo A. Pons-Estel; Chenglong Han; T. Gathany; Stephen Xu; Yiying Zhou; Jocelyn H. Leu; Elizabeth C. Hsia
To evaluate the safety and efficacy of golimumab through 5 years in adults with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who had not previously received methotrexate (MTX).
Arthritis Care and Research | 2016
Paul Emery; Roy Fleischmann; Ingrid Strusberg; Patrick Durez; Peter Nash; Eric Amante; Melvin Churchill; Won Park; Bernardo A. Pons-Estel; Chenglong Han; T. Gathany; Stephen Xu; Yiying Zhou; Jocelyn H. Leu; Elizabeth C. Hsia
To evaluate the safety and efficacy of golimumab through 5 years in adults with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who had not previously received methotrexate (MTX).
Arthritis & Rheumatism | 2002
James R. O'Dell; Robert Leff; Gail Paulsen; Claire E. Haire; Jack A. Mallek; P. James Eckhoff; Ana Fernandez; Kent Blakely; Steven Wees; Julie A. Stoner; Stephen Hadley; Jeffrey Felt; William E. Palmer; Paul Waytz; Melvin Churchill; Lynell W. Klassen; Gerald F. Moore
Arthritis & Rheumatism | 1997
James R. O'Dell; Claire E. Haire; William E. Palmer; Walter Drymalski; Steven Wees; Kent Blakely; Melvin Churchill; P. James Eckhoff; Arthur L. Weaver; Deborah K. Doud; Nils Erikson; Fred Dietz; Rich Olson; Pierre A. Maloley; Lynell W. Klassen; Gerald F. Moore
Arthritis Care and Research | 2013
Paul Emery; Roy Fleischmann; Mittie K. Doyle; Ingrid Strusberg; Patrick Durez; Peter Nash; Eric Amante; Melvin Churchill; Won Park; Bernardo A. Pons-Estel; Weichun Xu; Stephen Xu; Zhong Wu; Elizabeth C. Hsia
Rheumatology | 2014
Paul Emery; R. Fleischmann; Ingrid Strusberg; Patrick Durez; Peter Nash; Eric Amante; Melvin Churchill; Won Park; Bernardo A. Pons-Estel; Chenglong Han; Tim Gathany; Yiying Zhou; Stephen Xu; Elizabeth C. Hsia