Melvin P. Rosenwasser

Cost-effectiveness analysis of fixation options for intertrochanteric hip fractures.

BACKGROUNDnIntertrochanteric hip fractures are a major source of morbidity and financial burden, accounting for 7% of osteoporotic fractures and costing nearly

The Effects of Pain, Supination, and Grip Strength on Patient-Rated Disability After Operatively Treated Distal Radius Fractures

6 billion annually in the United States. Traditionally, stable fracture patterns have been treated with an extramedullary sliding hip screw whereas unstable patterns have been treated with the more expensive intramedullary nail. The purpose of this study was to identify parameters to guide cost-effective implant choices with use of decision-analysis techniques to model these common clinical scenarios.nnnMETHODSnAn expected-value decision-analysis model was constructed to estimate the total costs and health utility based on the choice of a sliding hip screw or an intramedullary nail for fixation of an intertrochanteric hip fracture. Values for critical parameters, such as fixation failure rate, were derived from the literature. Three scenarios were evaluated: (1) a clearly stable fracture (AO type 31-A1), (2) a clearly unstable fracture (A3), or (3) a fracture with questionable stability (A2). Sensitivity analysis was performed to test the validity of the model.nnnRESULTSnThe fixation failure rate and implant cost were the most important factors in determining implant choice. When the incremental cost for the intramedullary nail was set at the median value (

Collagen nerve protector in rat sciatic nerve repair: A morphometric and histological analysis

1200), intramedullary nailing had an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of

Scaphoid Excision and 4-Bone Arthrodesis Versus Proximal Row Carpectomy: A Comparison of Contact Biomechanics

50,000/quality-adjusted life year when the incremental failure rate of sliding hip screws was 1.9%. When the incremental failure rate of sliding hip screws was >5.0%, intramedullary nails dominated with lower cost and better health outcomes. The sliding hip screw was always more cost-effective for A1 fractures, and the intramedullary nail always dominated for A3 fractures. As for A2 fractures, the sliding hip screw was cost-effective in 70% of the cases, although this was highly sensitive to the failure rate.nnnCONCLUSIONSnSliding hip screw fixation is likely more cost-effective for stable intertrochanteric fractures (A1) or those with questionable stability (A2), whereas intramedullary nail fixation is more cost-effective for reverse obliquity fractures (A3). These conclusions are highly sensitive to the fixation failure rate, which was the major influence on the model results.

Inflammatory Response with Osteolysis Related to a Bioabsorbable Anchor in the Finger: a Case Report

PURPOSEnThe correlation between physician-observed parameters and patient-rated disability in distal radius fractures is complex and poorly understood. Anecdotal clinical experience suggests that supination is an important factor in the return of functional status after distal radius fracture. To explore this relationship, we conducted a retrospective multivariate linear regression analysis of an existing patient database to evaluate the hypothesis that range of motion and other objective parameters are important determinants of patient-rated disability.nnnMETHODSnWe analyzed a prospectively gathered registry of patients undergoing operative fixation of distal radius fractures using physical examination parameters measured at each follow-up visit and patient-based outcomes including Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) questionnaire and visual analog scale for pain. We constructed a multivariate linear regression model to evaluate the association of range of motion, grip strength, and visual analog scale score with the DASH score.nnnRESULTSnWe analyzed data from 190 patients and 611 total clinic visits. Pain, grip strength, and supination were significantly correlated with DASH scores, controlling for all other factors. These 3 variables were able to predict 56% of the variability of the DASH score. Flexion-extension, radial-ulnar deviation, and pronation had no significant correlation to DASH score.nnnCONCLUSIONSnPain, strength, and supination appear to be important determinants of patient-rated outcomes after distal radius fracture. Pain and strength continuously improve over time up to 2 years after surgery, whereas supination plateaus more quickly, usually within the first 3 to 6 months.nnnTYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCEnDiagnostic II.

A Cadaveric Study of Ulnar Nerve Innervation of the Medial Head of Triceps Brachii

Peripheral nerve repair is often complicated by fibroblastic scar formation, nerve dysfunction, and traumatic neuroma formation. Use of bio‐absorbable protective wraps may improve outcomes of these repairs. This study histologically compared the incidence of neuroma formation, connective tissue proliferation, and axonal regrowth in transected rat sciatic nerves repaired with and without tubular collagen nerve sleeves. Twenty Sprague‐Dawley rats underwent unilateral sharp sciatic nerve transection and microscopic nerve repair with four epineural sutures and were randomly treated with or without an encircling collagen nerve sleeve. Normal nerves from the contralateral sciatic nerve were also examined. At sacrifice three months later, the nerves were evaluated for traumatic neuroma formation, perineural scar formation, and morphometric analysis. Histological examination of normal and repaired nerves by a neuropathologist demonstrated healing, minimal Wallerian degeneration and no traumatic neuroma formation. Distal section analysis (nine nonwrapped, 10 wrapped), revealed no significant differences in total fascicular area, myelinated fibers per nerve, fiber density, myelin area per nerve, myelinated fiber diameter, axon diameter, myelin thickness, or G‐ratio. Significantly greater (P = 0.005) inner epineural connective tissue formation was observed in nonwrapped nerves (0.62 mm2 ± 0.2) versus wrapped nerves (0.35 mm2 ± 0.16). The ratio of connective tissue to fascicular area was larger in nonwrapped (1.08 ± 0.26) versus wrapped nerves (0.63 ± 0.22) (P < 0.001). This study demonstrated decreased inner epineural connective tissue formation with use of a collagen nerve wrap during primary repair of peripheral nerve transection in a rat sciatic nerve model.

Medial Collateral Ligament Reconstruction in the Baseball Pitcher's Elbow

PURPOSEnWe compare scaphoid excision and 4-bone arthrodesis (FBA) with proximal row carpectomy (PRC) in terms of contact pressure, area, and location.nnnMETHODSnSix cadaveric forearms underwent simulated FBA with K-wires. We measured pressures in the radiocarpal joint with Fuji contact film after we applied a 200-N load via the wrist tendons with the wrist in neutral, flexion, and extension. We repeated the experiment after excising the lunate and triquetrum, to create a PRC in the same specimens.nnnRESULTSnContact pressure in the PRC wrist was significantly greater, by 25%, compared with the FBA wrist for all wrist positions. The PRC wrist had a significantly smaller contact area, by 43%, compared with the FBA wrist. In the FBA wrist, lunate contact was more dorsal in flexion but more volar in extension. In the PRC wrist, capitate contact was more dorsal and radial in flexion, whereas the contact was more volar and ulnar in extension. Comparing contact location, FBA contact was significantly more ulnar than PRC contact in wrist flexion. We found no significant difference in contact translation (the distance between the contact locations in the positions of wrist flexion and extension) for the lunate in FBA or the capitate in PRC.nnnCONCLUSIONSnThe FBA wrist has significantly lower contact pressure (P < .001), greater contact area (P < .001), and equal contact translation compared with the PRC wrist. These qualities may make FBA less susceptible to degeneration over time. By advancing our understanding of the biomechanics of both wrist procedures, we may better tailor them to the individual patient.nnnCLINICAL RELEVANCEnCurrent biomechanical evidence is lacking for common motion-preserving procedures for wrist arthritis. Comparing contact pressure, area, and location provides a biomechanical basis of our clinical understanding of these surgeries.

Revision Wrist Arthroscopy after Failed Primary Arthroscopic Treatment

Soft tissue fixation of ligaments and tendons in the hand can be achieved by the use of metal or bioabsorbable suture anchors. Advantages of bioabsorbable suture anchors include lack of interference in magnetic resonance imaging, resorption of anchor, replacement by bone, and no need for hardware removal. However, complications of these bioabsorbable implants include inflammatory response to the material use. We present what we believe to be the first case in the hand of a poly(l-lactide-co-d,l-lacitide) suture anchor causing an inflammatory response leading to significant osteolysis 4xa0months postoperatively after repair of a ring finger flexor digitorum profundus avulsion. Exploration of the distal phalanx revealed an intact implant and repair, no signs of infection, and an extensive bone defect. Pathology showed chronically inflamed tissue. This case has led us to reconsider the use of bioabsorbable anchor sutures in the hand. Further research is necessary to better define the contraindications to bioabsorbable suture anchor use in the hand.

The Optimal Suture Placement and Bone Tunnels for TFCC Repair: A Cadaveric Study

The presence of a separately innervated muscle unit of the triceps may have possible surgical importance and can be used for motor reconstructions. The ulnar nerve is closely situated to the triceps muscle and rarely examined above the elbow. The aim of this cadaveric study was to explore a possible contribution of the ulnar nerve to motor innervation of the medial head of the triceps. We dissected 18 limbs from axillae to midforearm. The path of the ulnar nerve was followed, and examination was conducted of attachments to the triceps. Gross photographs were taken and samples histologically stained. Seventeen limbs had ulnar nerve branches proximal to the epicondyles that inserted on the medial head. Eleven of these branches were from the ulnar nerve trunk. The other six were nerve branches from the ulnar collateral branch of the radial nerve. The ulnar nerve and the ulnar collateral branch of the radial nerve are previously unrecognized sources of innervation of the medial head of the triceps brachii. These motor branches must be carefully preserved during the medial surgical approach above the elbow. The ulnar innervated part of the medial head of the triceps muscle may be used like an independent motor unit.

Association Between Radiological and Patient-Reported Outcome in Adults With a Displaced Distal Radius Fracture: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Pitchers are prone to elbow injuries because of high and repetitive valgus stresses on the elbow. The anterior bundle of the medial ulnar collateral ligament (MCL) of the elbow is the primary restraint and is often attenuated with time, leading to functional incompetence and ultimate failure. Pitchers with a history of medial elbow pain, reduced velocity, and loss of command may have an MCL injury in evolution. Physical examination and imaging can confirm the diagnosis. Treatment begins with rest and activity modification. All medial elbow pain is not MCL injury. Surgery is considered only for talented athletes who wish to return to competitive play and may include elite scholastic and other collegiates and professionals. The technique for MCL reconstruction was first described in 1986. Many variations have been offered since then, which can result in predictable outcomes, allowing many to return to the same level of competitive play.