Mercè Comas

Hospital costs of nosocomial multi-drug resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa acquisition

BackgroundWe aimed to assess the hospital economic costs of nosocomial multi-drug resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa acquisition.MethodsA retrospective study of all hospital admissions between January 1, 2005, and December 31, 2006 was carried out in a 420-bed, urban, tertiary-care teaching hospital in Barcelona (Spain). All patients with a first positive clinical culture for P. aeruginosa more than 48 h after admission were included. Patient and hospitalization characteristics were collected from hospital and microbiology laboratory computerized records. According to antibiotic susceptibility, isolates were classified as non-resistant, resistant and multi-drug resistant. Cost estimation was based on a full-costing cost accounting system and on the criteria of clinical Activity-Based Costing methods. Multivariate analyses were performed using generalized linear models of log-transformed costs.ResultsCost estimations were available for 402 nosocomial incident P. aeruginosa positive cultures. Their distribution by antibiotic susceptibility pattern was 37.1% non-resistant, 29.6% resistant and 33.3% multi-drug resistant. The total mean economic cost per admission of patients with multi-drug resistant P. aeruginosa strains was higher than that for non-resistant strains (15,265 vs. 4,933 Euros). In multivariate analysis, resistant and multi-drug resistant strains were independently predictive of an increased hospital total cost in compared with non-resistant strains (the incremental increase in total hospital cost was more than 1.37-fold and 1.77-fold that for non-resistant strains, respectively).ConclusionsP. aeruginosa multi-drug resistance independently predicted higher hospital costs with a more than 70% increase per admission compared with non-resistant strains. Prevention of the nosocomial emergence and spread of antimicrobial resistant microorganisms is essential to limit the strong economic impact.

Implementation of Digital Mammography in a Population-based Breast Cancer Screening Program: Effect of Screening Round on Recall Rate and Cancer Detection

PURPOSE To compare the effect of the introduction of digital mammography on the recall rate, detection rate, false-positive rate, and rates of invasive procedures performed in the first and successive rounds of a population-based breast cancer screening program with double reading in Barcelona, Spain. MATERIALS AND METHODS The study was approved by the ethics committee; informed consent was not required. Data were compared from 12,958 women aged 50-69 years old who participated in a screening round before the introduction of digital mammography (screen-film mammography group) with data from 6074 women who participated in another screening round after the introduction of digital mammography (digital mammography group). Groups were compared for recall rate and detection rate stratified according to first or successive screening rounds, and logistic regression analysis was performed. RESULTS Overall recall rates for screen-film and digital mammography groups were 5.5% and 4.2%, respectively (P < .001). The recall rate was higher in the first screening round (11.5% and 11.1% in the screen-film mammography and digital mammography groups, respectively; P = .68) than in successive screening rounds (3.6% and 2.4% in the screen-film mammography and digital mammography groups, respectively; P < .001). The main factors related to the risk of recall were screen-film mammography group (odds ratio = 1.28), first screening round (odds ratio = 3.53), menopausal status (odds ratio = 0.62), and history of personal benign breast disease (odds ratio = 2.26). No significant differences were found in the cancer detection rate between groups. In the first screening round, this rate was higher in the digital than in the screen-film mammography group (1.1% and 0.4%, respectively; P = .009). The invasive test rate was 2.6% and 1.3% in the screen-film and digital mammography groups, respectively (P < .001) and was lower with digital mammography than with screen-film mammography in both the first and successive screening rounds. CONCLUSION Digital mammography may reduce the adverse effects of screening programs if this technique is confirmed to have the same diagnostic accuracy as screen-film mammography.

Budget Impact Analysis of Thrombolysis for Stroke in Spain: A Discrete Event Simulation Model

OBJECTIVE Thrombolysis within the first 3 hours after the onset of symptoms of a stroke has been shown to be a cost-effective treatment because treated patients are 30% more likely than nontreated patients to have no residual disability. The objective of this study was to calculate by means of a discrete event simulation model the budget impact of thrombolysis in Spain. METHODS The budget impact analysis was based on stroke incidence rates and the estimation of the prevalence of stroke-related disability in Spain and its translation to hospital and social costs. A discrete event simulation model was constructed to represent the flow of patients with stroke in Spain. RESULTS If 10% of patients with stroke from 2000 to 2015 would receive thrombolytic treatment, the prevalence of dependent patients in 2015 would decrease from 149,953 to 145,922. For the first 6 years, the cost of intervention would surpass the savings. Nevertheless, the number of cases in which patient dependency was avoided would steadily increase, and after 2006 the cost savings would be greater, with a widening difference between the cost of intervention and the cost of nonintervention, until 2015. CONCLUSION The impact of thrombolysis on societys health and social budget indicates a net benefit after 6 years, and the improvement in health grows continuously. The validation of the model demonstrates the adequacy of the discrete event simulation approach in representing the epidemiology of stroke to calculate the budget impact.

Trends in hormone therapy use before and after publication of the Women's Health Initiative trial: 10 years of follow-up

Objective: The aim of this study was to assess the impact of the scientific evidence reported by Womens Health Initiative (WHI) trial on hormone therapy (HT) use in a 10-year follow-up retrospective cohort of women participating in a breast cancer screening program. Methods: Between 1998 and 2007, a retrospective cohort of participants in a population-based breast cancer screening program in the city of Barcelona (Catalonia, Spain) was assessed. The study population consisted of 50,918 women. Trends in current HT use and the annual rate of new users were analyzed by age group. Results: From 1998, successive annual increases were found in the prevalence levels of HT use in all age groups. In 2002, the prevalence peaked at 11% in 50- to 54-year-olds and at 10.1% in 55- to 59-year-olds, followed by a sudden reversal and a progressive decrease. In 2007, 5 years after the publication of the WHI trial, the HT use decreased by 89.1% in 50- to 54-year-olds, 87.5% in 55- to 59-year-olds, 84.6% in 60- to 64-year-olds, and 66.0% in 65- to 69-year-olds. The percentage of new users also fell substantially after 2002. Conclusions: HT use decreased during the 5 years after the publication of the WHI. This reduction was especially marked in the first 2 years, when the decrease in new treatments exceeded the number of continuations. In the following 3 years, the decrease was approximately equal in both groups.

Wide Social Participation in Prioritizing Patients on Waiting Lists for Joint Replacement: A Conjoint Analysis

Objective. The aim was to develop a priority scoring system for patients on waiting lists for joint replacement based on a wide social participation, and to analyze the differences among participants. Methods. Conjoint analysis. Focus groups in combination with a nominal technique were employed to identify the priority criteria (N=36). A rank-ordered logit model was then applied for scoring estimations. Participants (N=860) represented: consultants, allied-health professionals, patients and their relatives, and the general population of Catalonia. Results. Clinical and social criteria were selected, and their relative importance (over 100 points) was: pain (33), difficulty in doing activities of daily living (21), disease severity (18), limitations on ability to work (10), having someone to look after the patient (9), being a caregiver (6), and recovery probability (4). Estimated criteria coefficients had the expected positive sign and all were statistically significant (P < 0.001). There were differences between groups; pain was rated higher by patients/relatives, and difficulty in doing activities was rated lower by patients/relatives and the general public. Most interaction terms for these criteria and groups were significant (P < 0.001). Consultants and allied-health professionals had the most similar prioritization pattern (r=0.97). Conclusion. Both clinical and social criteria are considered for prioritization of joint replacement surgery from a wide social perspective. The preference among professional and social groups varies and this might impact the result of patient prioritization. A wide social participation for obtaining adequate prioritizing systems for patients on waiting lists is desirable.

Importance of appropriateness of empiric antibiotic therapy on clinical outcomes in intra-abdominal infections

OBJECTIVES The objective of this study is to describe the frequency of inappropriate empirical antibiotic therapy in secondary intra-abdominal infection and to identify the possible relationship between inappropriateness and some clinical outcomes. METHODS A retrospective descriptive multicenter study was conducted using hospital secondary databases developed at two university hospitals located in northeast Spain. Participants were patients 18 years of age or older who were diagnosed with community-acquired intra-abdominal infections between January 1, 1998, and December 31, 2000, identified through computerized patient records using ICD-9 codes. Appropriateness of empirical treatment was defined according to the recommendations of the literature. The clinical outcome of each patient was classified as one of the following: (i) resolved with initial therapy, (ii) required second-line antibiotics, (iii) required re-operation, or (iv) in-hospital death. The Fishers exact test or the Chi-squared test for categorical variables and the t-test or Mann-Whitney test for continuous variables were used for comparing groups. Conditional logistic and linear regression analyses were also applied. RESULTS Of 376 cases, 51 cases (13.6 percent, 95 percent confidence interval, 10-17 percent) received inappropriate empirical antibiotic therapy according to the scientific literature. Inappropriate initial empirical treatment was significantly associated with the need for a second line of antibiotics (p < .001), although not with re-operation, mortality, or length of hospitalization. CONCLUSIONS Approximately 14 percent of the patients received inappropriate empirical antibiotic treatment. Worse clinical outcomes consistently were observed in the group of patients receiving inappropriate empirical treatment. The appropriateness of antibiotic treatment for a given infection, in light of the availability of clearly defined clinical guidelines is an easily evaluated aspect of the quality of care.

Priorización de pacientes en lista de espera para cirugía de cataratas: diferencias en las preferencias entre ciudadanos

Objetivos: Estimar y comparar las preferencias de los ciudadanos sobre la priorizacion de pacientes en lista de espera para cirugia de cataratas. Metodo: Analisis de conjunto. Identificacion y seleccion de criterios de priorizacion: 4 grupos focales/nominales de poblacion general, pacientes/familiares, profesionales relacionados, y especialistas de Catalunya (n = 36). Estimacion de las preferencias (puntuaciones de los criterios): entrevista a una muestra representativa de los 4 grupos (n = 771) y aplicacion del modelo del rank-ordered logit. Las diferencias se estudiaron mediante analisis separado por grupo y su comparacion. Resultados: Los criterios seleccionados y su importancia relativa fueron: incapacidad visual (45%), limitacion de las actividades (15%), limitacion para trabajar (14%), tener alguna persona que le cuide (11%), ser cuidador (8%) y probabilidad de recuperacion (7%). Existieron diferencias entre grupos en la puntuacion de los criterios. La poblacion general y los pacientes/familiares valoraron mas la incapacidad visual que los otros grupos (p 0,9), la ordenacion final de estos en la lista de espera podia variar hasta 27 posiciones al aplicar las preferencias obtenidas de un grupo o de otro. Conclusiones: Se considero relevantes los criterios clinicos y los sociales. La existencia de diferencias sobre como deberian priorizarse los pacientes en espera recomienda tener en cuenta las preferencias de todas las partes afectadas.

Clinical outcomes and costs of cataract surgery performed by planned ECCE and phacoemulsification

AbstractPurpose: To compare clinical outcomes and costs of cataract surgery between patients operated with standard extracapsular extraction (ECCE) and those undergoing phacoemulsification. Setting: Patients from the Ophthalmology Department of a teaching hospital in Barcelona (Spain) scheduled for cataract surgery, not combined with any other ophthalmic procedure. Methods: A retrospective analysis has been performed on a database of 1046 patients undergoing ECCE and phacoemulsification. The outcome measures used were: surgical complications, visual acuity and costs of surgery and of follow-up. Overall rate of all complications and postoperative visual acuity were compared between the two groups, adjusting for age, preoperative visual acuity, medical and ocular comorbidity. Results: 31.9% of the patients (334) underwent phacoemulsification, and 68.1% (712) underwent ECCE. Patients undergoing phacoemulsification presented a frequency of intra- and postoperative complications lower than those undergoing ECCE (odds ratio 0.57, 95%Cl 0.37–0.87 and 0.66, 95%Cl 0.46–0.96, respectively), specifically for intraoperative iris trauma (3.1% vs 0.3%, p = 0.004), residual posterior capsular opacity (2% vs 0.3%, p = 0.035) and postoperative corneal edema (7.4% vs 3.6%, p = 0.016). Costs of intervention and follow-up were lower for phacoemulsification compared with ECCE (23.9% and 14%, respectively). But global costs were slightly higher for phacoemulsification (4.87%), due to supply costs, which were more than twice those ofECCE. Conclusions: Phacoemulsification, when performed by an experienced surgeon, has better clinical outcomes than planned extracapsular extraction, and costs may be lower since supply costs are expected to decrease as the phacoemulsification technique becomes more widespread.

Geographical variations in the benefit of applying a prioritization system for cataract surgery in different regions of Spain

BackgroundIn Spain, there are substantial variations in the utilization of health resources among regions. Because the need for surgery differs in patients with appropriate surgical indication, introducing a prioritization system might be beneficial. Our objective was to assess geographical variations in the impact of applying a prioritization system in patients on the waiting list for cataract surgery in different regions of Spain by using a discrete-event simulation model.MethodsA discrete-event simulation model to evaluate demand and waiting time for cataract surgery was constructed. The model was reproduced and validated in five regions of Spain and was fed administrative data (population census, surgery rates, waiting list information) and data from research studies (incidence of cataract). The benefit of introducing a prioritization system was contrasted with the usual first-in, first-out (FIFO) discipline. The prioritization system included clinical, functional and social criteria. Priority scores ranged between 0 and 100, with greater values indicating higher priority. The measure of results was the waiting time weighted by the priority score of each patient who had passed through the waiting list. Benefit was calculated as the difference in time weighted by priority score between operating according to waiting time or to priority.ResultsThe mean waiting time for patients undergoing surgery according to the FIFO discipline varied from 1.97 months (95% CI 1.85; 2.09) in the Basque Country to 10.02 months (95% CI 9.91; 10.12) in the Canary Islands. When the prioritization system was applied, the mean waiting time was reduced to a minimum of 0.73 months weighted by priority score (95% CI 0.68; 0.78) in the Basque Country and a maximum of 5.63 months (95% CI 5.57; 5.69) in the Canary Islands. The waiting time weighted by priority score saved by the prioritization system varied from 1.12 months (95% CI 1.07; 1.16) in Andalusia to 2.73 months (95% CI 2.67; 2.80) in Aragon.ConclusionThe prioritization system reduced the impact of the variations found among the regions studied, thus improving equity. Prioritization allocates the available resources within each region more efficiently and reduces the waiting time of patients with greater need. Prioritization was more beneficial than allocating surgery by waiting time alone.

Determining the lifetime density function using a continuous approach

Objective: To apply a continuous hazard function approach to calculate the lifetime density function (LDF) at any age, and to compare the life expectancies derived from the LDF with those obtained with standard life table (SLT) methods. Methods: Age-specific mortality rates were modeled through a continuous hazard function. To construct the cumulative hazard function, appropriate integration limits were considered as continuous random variables. The LDF at any age was defined on the basis of the elemental relationships with the cumulative hazard function. Life expectancies were calculated for a particular set of mortality data using the SLT approach and the expectancy of the LDF defined. Applications and comparisons: The proposed approach was applied using mortality data from the 2001 census of Catalonia (Spain). A Gompertz function was used to model the observed age-specific mortality rates, which fitted the observed data closely. The LDF and the life expectancy, median and standard deviation of the LDF were derived using mathematical software. All differences, in percentages, between the life expectancies obtained from the two methods were 1.1% or less. Conclusions: The LDF gives a wider interpretation of life duration, by extending a deterministic value like life expectancy to a fully informative measure like the LDF.