Meredith K. Steele
Virginia Tech
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Meredith K. Steele.
Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment | 2014
Peter M. Groffman; Jeannine Cavender-Bares; Neil D. Bettez; J. Morgan Grove; Sharon J. Hall; James B. Heffernan; Sarah E. Hobbie; Kelli L. Larson; Jennifer L. Morse; Christopher Neill; Kristen C. Nelson; Jarlath O'Neil-Dunne; Laura A. Ogden; Diane E. Pataki; Colin Polsky; Rinku Roy Chowdhury; Meredith K. Steele
A visually apparent but scientifically untested outcome of land-use change is homogenization across urban areas, where neighborhoods in different parts of the country have similar patterns of roads, residential lots, commercial areas, and aquatic features. We hypothesize that this homogenization extends to ecological structure and also to ecosystem functions such as carbon dynamics and microclimate, with continental-scale implications. Further, we suggest that understanding urban homogenization will provide the basis for understanding the impacts of urban land-use change from local to continental scales. Here, we show how multi-scale, multi-disciplinary datasets from six metropolitan areas that cover the major climatic regions of the US (Phoenix, AZ; Miami, FL; Baltimore, MD; Boston, MA; Minneapolis–St Paul, MN; and Los Angeles, CA) can be used to determine how household and neighborhood characteristics correlate with land-management practices, land-cover composition, and landscape structure and ecosystem functions at local, regional, and continental scales.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America | 2014
Colin Polsky; J. Morgan Grove; Chris Knudson; Peter M. Groffman; Neil D. Bettez; Jeannine Cavender-Bares; Sharon J. Hall; James B. Heffernan; Sarah E. Hobbie; Kelli L. Larson; Jennifer L. Morse; Christopher Neill; Kristen C. Nelson; Laura A. Ogden; Jarlath O'Neil-Dunne; Diane E. Pataki; Rinku Roy Chowdhury; Meredith K. Steele
Significance This paper offers conceptual and empirical contributions to sustainability science in general and urban-ecological studies in particular. We present a new analytical framework for classifying socioecological measures along a homogenization–differentiation spectrum. This simple 2 × 2 matrix highlights the multiscale nature of the processes and outcomes of interest. Our application of the conceptual framework produces needed empirical insights into the extent to which land management appears to be homogenizing in differing biophysical settings. Results suggest that US lawn care behaviors are more differentiated in practice than in theory. Thus even if the biophysical outcomes of urbanization are homogenizing, managing the associated sustainability implications may require a multiscale, differentiated approach. Changes in land use, land cover, and land management present some of the greatest potential global environmental challenges of the 21st century. Urbanization, one of the principal drivers of these transformations, is commonly thought to be generating land changes that are increasingly similar. An implication of this multiscale homogenization hypothesis is that the ecosystem structure and function and human behaviors associated with urbanization should be more similar in certain kinds of urbanized locations across biogeophysical gradients than across urbanization gradients in places with similar biogeophysical characteristics. This paper introduces an analytical framework for testing this hypothesis, and applies the framework to the case of residential lawn care. This set of land management behaviors are often assumed—not demonstrated—to exhibit homogeneity. Multivariate analyses are conducted on telephone survey responses from a geographically stratified random sample of homeowners (n = 9,480), equally distributed across six US metropolitan areas. Two behaviors are examined: lawn fertilizing and irrigating. Limited support for strong homogenization is found at two scales (i.e., multi- and single-city; 2 of 36 cases), but significant support is found for homogenization at only one scale (22 cases) or at neither scale (12 cases). These results suggest that US lawn care behaviors are more differentiated in practice than in theory. Thus, even if the biophysical outcomes of urbanization are homogenizing, managing the associated sustainability implications may require a multiscale, differentiated approach because the underlying social practices appear relatively varied. The analytical approach introduced here should also be productive for other facets of urban-ecological homogenization.
Ecological Applications | 2014
Meredith K. Steele; James B. Heffernan
The size, shape, and connectivity of water bodies (lakes, ponds, and wetlands) can have important effects on ecological communities and ecosystem processes, but how these characteristics are influenced by land use and land cover change over broad spatial scales is not known. Intensive alteration of water bodies during urban development, including construction, burial, drainage, and reshaping, may select for certain morphometric characteristics and influence the types of water bodies present in cities. We used a database of over one million water bodies in 100 cities across the conterminous United States to compare the size distributions, connectivity (as intersection with surface flow lines), and shape (as measured by shoreline development factor) of water bodies in different land cover classes. Water bodies in all urban land covers were dominated by lakes and ponds, while reservoirs and wetlands comprised only a small fraction of the sample. In urban land covers, as compared to surrounding undeveloped land, water body size distributions converged on moderate sizes, shapes toward less tortuous shorelines, and the number and area of water bodies that intersected surface flow lines (i.e., streams and rivers) decreased. Potential mechanisms responsible for changing the characteristics of urban water bodies include: preferential removal, physical reshaping or addition of water bodies, and selection of locations for development. The relative contributions of each mechanism likely change as cities grow. The larger size and reduced surface connectivity of urban water bodies may affect the role of internal dynamics and sensitivity to catchment processes. More broadly, these results illustrate the complex nature of urban watersheds and highlight the need to develop a conceptual framework for urban water bodies.
Urban Ecosystems | 2016
Kelli L. Larson; Kristen C. Nelson; S. R. Samples; Sharon J. Hall; Neil D. Bettez; Jeannine Cavender-Bares; Peter M. Groffman; Morgan Grove; James B. Heffernan; Sarah E. Hobbie; Jennifer Learned; Jennifer L. Morse; Christopher Neill; Laura A. Ogden; Jarlath O’Neil-Dunne; Diane E. Pataki; Colin Polsky; Rinku Roy Chowdhury; Meredith K. Steele; Tara L.E. Trammell
Although ecosystem services have been intensively examined in certain domains (e.g., forests and wetlands), little research has assessed ecosystem services for the most dominant landscape type in urban ecosystems—namely, residential yards. In this paper, we report findings of a cross-site survey of homeowners in six U.S. cities to 1) examine how residents subjectively value various ecosystem services, 2) explore distinctive dimensions of those values, and 3) test the urban homogenization hypothesis. This hypothesis posits that urbanization leads to similarities in the social-ecological dynamics across cities in diverse biomes. By extension, the thesis suggests that residents’ ecosystem service priorities for residential landscapes will be similar regardless of whether residents live in the humid East or the arid West, or the warm South or the cold North. Results underscored that cultural services were of utmost importance, particularly anthropocentric values including aesthetics, low-maintenance, and personal enjoyment. Using factor analyses, distinctive dimensions of residents’ values were found to partially align with the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment’s categories (provisioning, regulating, supporting, and cultural). Finally, residents’ ecosystem service priorities exhibited significant homogenization across regions. In particular, the traditional lawn aesthetic (neat, green, weed-free yards) was similarly important across residents of diverse U.S. cities. Only a few exceptions were found across different environmental and social contexts; for example, cooling effects were more important in the warm South, where residents also valued aesthetics more than those in the North, where low-maintenance yards were a greater priority.
Landscape Ecology | 2016
Sharon J. Hall; Jennifer Learned; Benjamin L. Ruddell; Kelli L. Larson; Jeannine Cavender-Bares; Neil D. Bettez; Peter M. Groffman; J. M. Grove; James B. Heffernan; Sarah E. Hobbie; Jennifer L. Morse; Christopher Neill; Kristen C. Nelson; Jarlath O’Neil-Dunne; Laura A. Ogden; Diane E. Pataki; William D. Pearse; Colin Polsky; Rinku Roy Chowdhury; Meredith K. Steele; Tara L.E. Trammell
Ecosystems | 2014
Meredith K. Steele; James B. Heffernan; Neil D. Bettez; Jeannine Cavender-Bares; Peter M. Groffman; J. M. Grove; Sharon J. Hall; Sarah E. Hobbie; Kelli L. Larson; Jennifer L. Morse; Christopher Neill; Kristen C. Nelson; Jarlath O'Neil-Dunne; Laura A. Ogden; Diane E. Pataki; Colin Polsky; Rinku Roy Chowdhury
Science of The Total Environment | 2016
Mohammed Baalousha; Yi Yang; Marina E. Vance; Benjamin P. Colman; Samantha McNeal; Jie Xu; Joanna R. Blaszczak; Meredith K. Steele; Emily S. Bernhardt; Michael F. Hochella
Landscape and Urban Planning | 2017
Megan M. Wheeler; Christopher Neill; Peter M. Groffman; Meghan L. Avolio; Neil D. Bettez; Jeannine Cavender-Bares; Rinku Roy Chowdhury; Lindsay Darling; J. Morgan Grove; Sharon J. Hall; James B. Heffernan; Sarah E. Hobbie; Kelli L. Larson; Jennifer L. Morse; Kristen C. Nelson; Laura A. Ogden; Jarlath O'Neil-Dunne; Diane E. Pataki; Colin Polsky; Meredith K. Steele; Tara L.E. Trammell
Ecosphere | 2018
William D. Pearse; Jeannine Cavender-Bares; Sarah E. Hobbie; Meghan L. Avolio; Neil D. Bettez; Rinku Roy Chowdhury; Lindsay Darling; Peter M. Groffman; J. Morgan Grove; Sharon J. Hall; James B. Heffernan; Jennifer Learned; Christopher Neill; Kristen C. Nelson; Diane E. Pataki; Benjamin L. Ruddell; Meredith K. Steele; Tara L.E. Trammell
Global Change Biology | 2018
Jinshi Jian; Meredith K. Steele; R. Quinn Thomas; Susan D. Day; Steven C. Hodges