Merete Krogh
Odense University Hospital
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Merete Krogh.
Melanoma Research | 2016
Merete Krogh; Ib Jarle Christensen; Marna G. Bouwhuis; Julia S. Johansen; Peter Nørgaard; Henrik Schmidt; Johan Hansson; Stefan Suciu; Alexander M.M. Eggermont; Lars Bastholt
This study investigates the prognostic and predictive value of YKL-40 in stage IIB–III melanoma patients who were randomized to adjuvant interferon &agr;-2b (IFN) or observation. Serum YKL-40 was determined postoperatively in patients from the Nordic IFN Trial (n=602), EORTC 18952 (n=246), and EORTC 18991 (n=386) (EORTC, European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer). YKL-40 protein expression was determined in 300 tissue sections of primary melanoma or lymph node metastases from 204 Danish patients from the Nordic IFN Trial. Multivariate Cox analysis (including sex, age, stage, ulceration, YKL-40) showed that elevated baseline YKL-40 level was associated with shorter overall survival (OS) in observation groups from the Nordic IFN Trial and EORTC 18952 [hazard ratio (HR)=1.33; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.01–1.74; P=0.04], but not in the interferon groups (1-year IFN: HR=0.97; 95% CI 0.76–1.25; P=0.83; 2-years IFN: HR=1.06; 95% CI 0.83–1.34; P=0.64). During follow-up, increases in YKL-40 were significantly associated with shorter OS, but not with recurrence-free survival in univariate analysis. YKL-40 expression was stronger in tumor-associated macrophages than melanoma cells in primary melanoma. High YKL-40 expression in macrophages in lymph node metastases was associated with shorter OS in the observation group (HR=2.76; 95% CI: 1.13–6.76, P=0.02), but not in the interferon-treated groups. YKL-40 was an independent prognostic biomarker of OS in melanoma patients stage IIB–III. High serum YKL-40 in poor-prognosis patients may originate from macrophages in the tumor microenvironment and the melanoma cells. Furthermore, we hypothesize that elevated serum YKL-40 after surgery may predict the efficacy of adjuvant IFN treatment.
Acta Oncologica | 2016
Stine Braendegaard Winther; Kanita Zubcevic; Camilla Qvortrup; Lene Weber Vestermark; Helle Anita Jensen; Merete Krogh; Halfdan Sorbye; Per Pfeiffer
Abstract Background: An aging population will increase the number of older patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). However, there is limited knowledge about treatment in older patients as they are under-represented in clinical trials. The oral fluoropyrimidine S-1 is associated with a lower rate of adverse events than capecitabine and may therefore be a suitable drug for elderly. However, data on the use of S-1 in Caucasian mCRC patients are lacking/scarce. Material and methods: In the present study we evaluated safety and the efficacy of S-1 alone or in combination with oxaliplatin (SOx) or irinotecan (IRIS) in older mCRC patients. Patients who received at least one cycle of S-1 (first-line therapy), SOx (mainly first-line therapy) or IRIS (second-line therapy) were included. Results: From June 2012 to December 2014, 71 older patients received ≥1 cycle of either S-1 (n = 9), SOx (n = 44) or IRIS (n = 18) for mCRC. Median age was 76 years and most patients had a WHO performance status of 0 (32%) or 1 (56%). All patients were evaluable for response and safety. In the SOx group, 18 (41%) and 20 patients (45%) had partial response (PR) and stable disease (SD), respectively (disease control rate 86%). Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 8.5 months and median overall survival (OS) was 18.5 months. In the S-1 group (median age 82 years), PR was 22%, median PFS 6.4 months and median OS 15.8 months. In the IRIS group, PR was 28%, median PFS 7.8 months and the median OS 16.5 months. In general, therapy was well tolerated; main non-hematological toxicities were fatigue and diarrhea. Conclusion: S-1 monotherapy, SOx and IRIS were well tolerated for older patients with mCRC and could become alternative regimens in older mCRC patients. These regimens are now further evaluated in the randomized ongoing NORDIC9 trial.
Acta Oncologica | 2016
Katrine R. Schønnemann; Michael Bau Mortensen; Merete Krogh; Eva Holtved; Mette Andersen; Per Pfeiffer
Abstract Background Upper gastro-intestinal cancer (UGIC) includes malignancies in esophagus, stomach and small intestine, and represents some of the most frequent malignancies worldwide. The aim of the present analysis was to describe incidence, mortality and survival in UGIC patients in Denmark from 1980 to 2012 according to differences in age and time periods. Material and methods UGIC was defined as ICD-10 codes C15-C17. Data derived from the NORDCAN database with comparable data on cancer incidence mortality, prevalence and relative survival in the Nordic countries, where the Danish data were delivered from the Danish Cancer Registry and the Danish Cause of Death Registry with follow-up for death or emigration until the end of 2013. Results The proportion of male patients over the age of 70 years diagnosed with esophageal cancer was constant over time (around 42%) but increased in females to 49% in 2012. Incidence rates increased with time and continued to rise in all ages. Mortality rates were clearly separated by age groups with increasing mortality rates by increasing age group for both sexes. Relative survival increased slowly over time in all age groups. The proportion of older male and female patients with stomach cancer increased to 50% and 54%, respectively, in 2012. Incidence rates decreased steadily with time, especially from 1980 to 1990 but continued to decrease in all age groups. Mortality rates decreased considerably from 1980 to 90 and have been almost constant during the last decade for both women and men. Relative survival increased modest over time in both genders and all age groups. In 2012, only 1471 persons were alive after a diagnosis of stomach cancer. Conclusion There is a need for clinical trials focusing on patients over the age of 70 years with co-existing comorbidity.
Acta Oncologica | 2017
Per Pfeiffer; Camilla Qvortrup; Merete Krogh; Katrine Rahbek Schoennemann; Lene Weber Vestermark; Helle Anita Jensen; Jon Kroll Bjerregaard
Abstract Background: Docetaxel in combination with cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) is one of several standard chemotherapy regimens for patients with advanced gastro-esophageal adenocarcinoma (aGEA) in Europe. To enable outpatient treatment, we evaluated the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), recommended dose (RD), dose limiting toxicity (DLT) and safety of docetaxel in combination with oxaliplatin (O) and S-1 (DOS) in Caucasian patients with aGEA. Methods: We present final results of two parallel phase 1/2a studies (3 + 3 design). Escalating doses of docetaxel and S-1 with fixed dose O were given for 18 weeks every second week (DOS2w) or every third week (DOS3w) followed by S-1 maintenance therapy. Results: Thirty-four patients (18 in DOS2w and 16 in DOS3w) were enrolled between October 2013 and June 2015. Median age was 65 years (range 49–78). DLT was most often febrile neutropenia. Most common severe non-hematological adverse events were diarrhea (9%) and fatigue (6%). The RD of DOS3w was: docetaxel 50 mg/m2, O 100 mg/m2 and S-1 25 mg/m2 twice daily and of DOS2w was: docetaxel 40 mg/m2, O 70 mg/m2 and S-1 35 mg/m2 twice daily. Overall, response rate was 56%; median progression-free survival was 9.1 months; and median overall survival was 13.2 months in 34 patients. Conclusions: At the RD, DOS2w and DOS3w showed an acceptable safety profile in patients with aGEA. Clinical trials ID: NCT-01928524 and EudraCT 2012-005187-10
Journal of Clinical Oncology | 2010
Merete Krogh; Ib Jarle Christensen; Marna G. Bouwhuis; Julia S. Johansen; Henrik Schmidt; Johan Hansson; Steinar Aamdal; Alessandro Testori; Alexander M.M. Eggermont; Lars Bastholt
Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology | 2018
Stine Braendegaard Winther; Jon Kroll Bjerregaard; Katrine R. Schønnemann; Mathilde Weisz Ejlsmark; Merete Krogh; Helle Anita Jensen; Per Pfeiffer
European Journal of Cancer | 2015
Per Pfeiffer; Mette Karen Yilmaz; L Bæksgaard; Katrine R. Schønnemann; Merete Krogh; Camilla Qvortrup; Jon Kroll Bjerregaard; Helle Anita Jensen; Lene Weber Vestermark
Annals of Oncology | 2016
Camilla Qvortrup; N. Keldsen; F. Andersen; Helle Anita Jensen; Merete Krogh; Lene Weber Vestermark; Jon Kroll Bjerregaard; Per Pfeiffer
Journal of Clinical Oncology | 2015
Lene Weber Vestermark; Helle Anita Jensen; Katrine Rahbek Schoennemann; Merete Krogh; Per Pfeiffer
European Journal of Cancer | 2015
K.R. Schoennemann; Lene Weber Vestermark; Merete Krogh; Camilla Qvortrup; M.W. Ejlsmark; Per Pfeiffer