Merete Watt Boolsen
University of Copenhagen
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Merete Watt Boolsen.
American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A | 2017
Anna Sundby; Merete Watt Boolsen; Kristoffer Sølvsten Burgdorf; Henrik Ullum; Thomas Hansen; Anna Middleton; Ole Mors
Increasingly more psychiatric research studies use whole genome sequencing or whole exome sequencing. Consequently, researchers face difficult questions, such as which genomic findings to return to research participants and how. This study aims to gain more knowledge on the attitudes among potential research participants and health professionals toward receiving pertinent and incidental findings. A cross‐sectional online survey was developed to investigate the attitudes among research participants toward receiving genomic findings. A total of 2,637 stakeholders responded: 241 persons with mental disorders, 671 relatives, 1,623 blood donors, 74 psychiatrists, and 28 clinical geneticists. Stakeholders wanted both pertinent findings (95%) and incidental findings (91%) to be made available for research participants. The majority (77%) stated that researchers should not actively search for incidental findings. Persons with mental disorders and relatives were generally more positive about receiving any kind of findings than clinical geneticists and psychiatrists. Compared with blood donors, persons with mental disorders reported to be more positive about receiving raw genomic data and information that is not of serious health importance. Psychiatrists and clinical geneticists were less positive about receiving genomic findings compared with blood donors. The attitudes toward receiving findings were very positive. Stakeholders were willing to refrain from receiving incidental information if it could compromise the research. Our results suggest that research participants consider themselves as altruistic participants. This study offers valuable insight, which may inform future programs aiming to develop new strategies to target issues relating to the return of findings in genomic research.
Human Genomics | 2018
Anna Sundby; Merete Watt Boolsen; Kristoffer Sølvsten Burgdorf; Henrik Ullum; Thomas Hansen; Ole Mors
BackgroundGenomic sequencing of children in research raises complex ethical issues. This study aims to gain more knowledge on the attitudes towards the inclusion of children as research subjects in genomic research and towards the disclosure of pertinent and incidental findings to the parents and the child.MethodsQualitative data were collected from interviews with a wide range of informants: experts engaged in genomic research, clinical geneticists, persons with mental disorders, relatives, and blood donors. Quantitative data were collected from a cross-sectional web-based survey among 1227 parents and 1406 non-parents who were potential stakeholders in psychiatric genomic research.ResultsParticipants generally expressed positive views on children’s participation in genomic research. The informants in the qualitative interviews highlighted the age of the child as a critical aspect when disclosing genetic information. Other important aspects were the child’s right to an autonomous choice, the emotional burden of knowing imposed on both the child and the parents, and the possibility of receiving beneficial clinical information regarding the future health of the child. Nevertheless, there was no consensus whether the parent or the child should receive the findings. A majority of survey stakeholders agreed that children should be able to participate in genomic research. The majority agreed that both pertinent and incidental findings should be returned to the parents and to the child when of legal age. Having children does not affect the stakeholder’s attitudes towards the inclusion of children as research subjects in genomic research.ConclusionOur findings illustrate that both the child’s right to autonomy and the parents’ interest to be informed are important factors that are found valuable by the participants. In future guidelines governing children as subjects in genomic research, it would thus be essential to incorporate the child’s right to an open future, including the right to receive information on adult-onset genetic disorders.
Archive | 2006
Merete Watt Boolsen
Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences | 2017
Britta Hørdam; Merete Watt Boolsen
Archive | 2004
Merete Watt Boolsen
Archive | 2018
Clive Tesar; Knud Falk; James D. Ford; Maria Ackrén; Merete Watt Boolsen; Sharon Edmunds-potvin; Anne Merrild Hansen; Linnea Ingebrigtson; Thomas Ingeman-Nielsen; Mickaël Lemay; Flemming Merkel; Thierry Rodon; Chris Southcott; Jean-Éric Tremblay; Susse Wegeberg
Archive | 2016
Rasmus Gjedssø Bertelsen; Merete Watt Boolsen; Palle Lennert; Jimmy Hymøller; Ilja Leo Lang; Patrick Werquin; Frank Sejersen; Kuupik Vandersee Kleist; Coco Smits; Jens Christian Svabo Justinussen; Anne-Mette Christiansen; Ulrik Jørgensen; Birgitte Hoffmann; Kåre Hendriksen; Anne Merrild Hansen; Pelle Tejsner; Parnuna Petrina Egede; Lill Rastad Bjørst; Nikoline Ziemer; Anders Øgaard
Archive | 2016
Rasmus Gjedssø Bertelsen; Merete Watt Boolsen; Palle Lennert; Jimmy Hymøller; Ilja Leo Lang; Patrick Werquin; Frank Sejersen; Kuupik Vandersee Kleist; Kåre Hendriksen; Coco Smits
Scandinavian Journal of Public Administration | 2013
Merete Watt Boolsen
Archive | 2010
Michael Hviid Jacobsen; Merete Watt Boolsen