Merina Ahmed
The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Merina Ahmed.
Lancet Oncology | 2013
A. Tree; Vincent Khoo; Rosalind Eeles; Merina Ahmed; David P. Dearnaley; M. Hawkins; Robert Huddart; Christopher M. Nutting; Peter Ostler; Nicholas Van As
The management of metastatic solid tumours has historically focused on systemic treatment given with palliative intent. However, radical surgical treatment of oligometastases is now common practice in some settings. The development of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT), building on improvements in delivery achieved by intensity-modulated and image-guided radiotherapy, now allows delivery of ablative doses of radiation to extracranial sites. Many non-randomised studies have shown that SBRT for oligometastases is safe and effective, with local control rates of about 80%. Importantly, these studies also suggest that the natural history of the disease is changing, with 2-5 year progression-free survival of about 20%. Although complete cure might be possible in a few patients with oligometastases, the aim of SBRT in this setting is to achieve local control and delay progression, and thereby also postpone the need for further treatment. We review published work showing that SBRT offers durable local control and the potential for progression-free survival in non-liver, non-lung oligometastatic disease at a range of sites. However, to test whether SBRT really does improve progression-free survival, randomised trials will be essential.
European Journal of Endocrinology | 2011
Merina Ahmed; Yolanda Barbachano; Angela M. Riddell; Jen Hickey; K. Newbold; Amaya Viros; Kevin J. Harrington; Richard Marais; Christopher M. Nutting
AIM To evaluate the tolerability and efficacy of sorafenib in patients with thyroid carcinoma. METHODS Patients with progressive locally advanced/metastatic medullary thyroid carcinoma (MTC), or differentiated thyroid carcinoma (DTC) with non-radioiodine-avid disease, were treated with sorafenib 400 mg twice daily until disease progression. The primary endpoint was the radiological response rate (RR) at 6 months. Secondary endpoints were RR at 3, 9 and 12 months, biochemical responses, toxicity, biomarker analyses and progression free and overall survival (OS). RESULTS A total of 34 patients were recruited to the study (15 medullary and 19 differentiated). After 6 months, the RR rate was 15% and a further 74% of patients achieved stable disease in the first 6 months. After 12 months of treatment, the RR was 21%. In the MTC patients, the RR at 12 months was 25% and OS was 100%. In DTC patients corresponding rates were 18 and 79% respectively. Median overall and progression-free survival points were not reached at 19 months. Commonest adverse events included hand-foot syndrome, other skin toxicities, diarrhoea and alopecia. Dose reduction was required in 79% patients. Median time on treatment was 16.5 months. CONCLUSION This study demonstrates that sorafenib is tolerable at reduced doses over prolonged periods of time in patients with thyroid cancer. Sorafenib leads to radiological and biochemical stabilisation of disease in the majority of these patients despite dose reductions.
Clinical Cancer Research | 2010
Kevin J. Harrington; Eleni M. Karapanagiotou; Victoria Roulstone; Katie Twigger; Christine L. White; L. Vidal; Debbie Beirne; Robin Prestwich; Kate Newbold; Merina Ahmed; Khin Thway; Christopher M. Nutting; Matt Coffey; Dean Harris; Richard Vile; Hardev Pandha; Johann S. DeBono; Alan Melcher
Purpose: To determine the safety and feasibility of combining intratumoral reovirus and radiotherapy in patients with advanced cancer and to assess viral biodistribution, reoviral replication in tumors, and antiviral immune responses. Experimental Design: Patients with measurable disease amenable to palliative radiotherapy were enrolled. In the first stage, patients received radiotherapy (20 Gy in five fractions) plus two intratumoral injections of RT3D at doses between 1 × 108 and 1 × 1010 TCID50. In the second stage, the radiotherapy dose was increased (36 Gy in 12 fractions) and patients received two, four, or six doses of RT3D at 1 × 1010 TCID50. End points were safety, viral replication, immunogenicity, and antitumoral activity. Results: Twenty-three patients with various solid tumors were treated. Dose-limiting toxicity was not seen. The most common toxicities were grade 2 (or lower) pyrexia, influenza-like symptoms, vomiting, asymptomatic lymphopenia, and neutropenia. There was no exacerbation of the acute radiation reaction. Reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) studies of blood, urine, stool, and sputum were negative for viral shedding. In the low-dose (20 Gy in five fractions) radiation group, two of seven evaluable patients had a partial response and five had stable disease. In the high-dose (36 Gy in 12 fractions) radiation group, five of seven evaluable patients had partial response and two stable disease. Conclusions: The combination of intratumoral RT3D and radiotherapy was well tolerated. The favorable toxicity profile and lack of vector shedding means that this combination should be evaluated in newly diagnosed patients receiving radiotherapy with curative intent. Clin Cancer Res; 16(11); 3067–77. ©2010 AACR.
Radiotherapy and Oncology | 2010
Merina Ahmed; Maria A. Schmidt; Aslam Sohaib; Christine Kong; Kevin Burke; Cheryl Richardson; Marianne Usher; Sinead Brennan; Angela M. Riddell; Mark Davies; Kate Newbold; Kevin J. Harrington; Christopher M. Nutting
INTRODUCTION Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) provides superior diagnostic accuracy over computed tomography (CT) in oropharyngeal tumours. Precise delineation of the gross tumour volume (GTV) is mandatory in radiotherapy planning when a GTV boost is required. CT volume definition in this regard is poor. We studied the feasibility of using flexible surface (flex-L) coils to obtain MR images for MR-CT fusion to assess the benefit of MRI over CT alone in planning base of tongue tumours. METHODS Eight patients underwent CT and MRI radiotherapy planning scans with an immobilisation device. Distortion-corrected T1-weighted post-contrast MR scans were fused to contrast-enhanced planning CT scans. GTV, clinical target and planning target volumes (CTV, PTV) and organs at risk (OAR) were delineated on CT, then on MRI with blinding to the CT images. The volumetric and spatial differences between MRI and CT volumes for GTV, CTV, PTV and OAR were compared. MR image distortions due to field inhomogeneity and non-linear gradients were corrected and the need for such correction was evaluated. RESULTS The mean primary GTV was larger on MRI (22.2 vs. 9.5 cm(3), p=0.05) than CT. The mean primary and nodal GTV (i.e. BOT and macroscopic nodes) was significantly larger on MRI (27.2 vs. 14.4 cm(3), p=0.05). The volume overlap index (VOI) between MRI and CT for the primary was 0.34 suggesting that MRI depicts parts of the primary tumour not detected by CT. There was no significant difference in volume delineation between MR and CT for CTV, PTV, nodal CTV and nodal PTV. MRI volumes for brainstem and spinal cord were significantly smaller due to improved organ definition (p=0.002). Susceptibility and gradient-related distortions were not found to be clinically significant. CONCLUSION MRI improves the definition of tongue base tumours and neurological structures. The use of MRI is recommended for GTV dose-escalation techniques to provide precise depiction of GTV and improved sparing of spinal cord and brainstem.
Medical Dosimetry | 2009
Merina Ahmed; Vibeke N. Hansen; Kevin J. Harrington; Christopher M. Nutting
Radiation therapy for squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity may be curative, but carries a risk of permanent damage to bone, salivary glands, and other soft tissues. We studied the potential of intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) to improve target volume coverage, and normal tissue sparing for advanced oral cavity carcinoma (OCC). Six patients with advanced OCC requiring bilateral irradiation to the oral cavity and neck were studied. Standard 3D conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT) and inverse-planned IMRT dose distributions were compared by using dose-volume histograms. Doses to organs at risk, including spinal cord, parotid glands, and mandible, were assessed as surrogates of radiation toxicity. PTV1 mean dose was 60.8 +/- 0.8 Gy for 3DCRT and 59.8 +/- 0.1 Gy for IMRT (p = 0.04). PTV1 dose range was 24.7 +/- 6 Gy for 3DCRT and 15.3 +/- 4 Gy for IMRT (p = 0.001). PTV2 mean dose was 54.5 +/- 0.8 Gy for 3DCRT and for IMRT was 54.2 +/- 0.2 Gy (p = 0.34). PTV2 dose range was improved by IMRT (7.8 +/- 3.2 Gy vs. 30.7 +/- 12.8 Gy, p = 0.006). Homogeneity index (HI) values for PTV2 were closer to unity using IMRT (p = 0.0003). Mean parotid doses were 25.6 +/- 2.7 Gy for IMRT and 42.0 +/- 8.8 Gy with 3DCRT (p = 0.002). The parotid V30 in all IMRT plans was <45%. The mandible V50, V55, and V60 were significantly lower for the IMRT plans. Maximum spinal cord and brain stem doses were similar for the 2 techniques. IMRT provided superior target volume dose homogeneity and sparing of organs at risk. The magnitude of reductions in dose to the salivary glands and mandible are likely to translate into reduced incidence of xerostomia and osteoradionecrosis for patients with OCC.
British Journal of Cancer | 2008
Shreerang A. Bhide; Merina Ahmed; Yolanda Barbachano; K. Newbold; Kevin J. Harrington; Christopher M. Nutting
We describe a retrospective series of patients with advanced head-and-neck cancer who were treated with induction chemotherapy followed by radical chemo-radiation. Patients treated with two cycles of induction chemotherapy followed by definitive chemo-radiation for squamous cell carcinoma of the head-and-neck region, from 2001 – 2006 at the Royal Marsden Hospital, formed the basis of this study. Cisplatin (75 mg m−2) on day 1 and 5-FU (1000 mg m−2) day 1 – 4 was the standard regimen used for induction treatment. Cisplatin (100 mg m−2) on day 1 and day 29 was used for concomitant treatment. The radiation was delivered using conformal technique. Tissues containing macroscopic and microscopic disease were treated to doses of 65 Gray (Gy) in 30 fractions and 50 Gy in 25 fractions, respectively. Data on patterns of relapse and acute toxicity (NCICTCv.3.0) were collected. A total of 129 patients were included, median age was 58 (range: 27 – 78). The site of tumour was: oropharynx 70 (54%), larynx 30 (23%), hypopharynx 24 (19%) and other 5 (4%). The median follow-up was 19 months (range: 4 – 58). Local control, disease-specific survival and overall survival at 2 years were 71%, 68% and 63%, respectively. The distant recurrence rate at 2 years was 9%. Ten patients required dose reduction during induction chemotherapy due to toxicity. The dose of 5-FU was reduced in six patients and that of cisplatin in four patients. The incidence of grade 3/4 toxicity was: neutropenia 5%, thrombocytopenia 1%, nausea and vomiting 3%. One cycle of concurrent cisplatin was omitted in 23 patients due to toxicity. Full-dose radiotherapy was administered to 98% of patients. The incidence of grade 3/4 toxicity was: skin 20%, dysphagia 65%, mucositis 60%, neutropenia 3%, anaemia 1%, nausea and vomiting 4%, nephrotoxicity 1%. Induction chemotherapy followed by radical chemo-radiation is a safe and tolerable regimen in the treatment of advanced head-and-neck cancer. Distant recurrence rates are lower with equivalent local control and survival compared to chemo-radiation alone (historical controls).
Lancet Oncology | 2016
Amelia O Clive; Hazel Taylor; Lee Dobson; Paula Wilson; Emma de Winton; Niki Panakis; Justin Pepperell; Timothy Howell; Samuel Alan Stewart; Erika Penz; Nikki Jordan; Anna J Morley; Natalie Zahan-Evans; Sarah Smith; T. Batchelor; Adrian Marchbank; Lesley Bishop; Alina Ionescu; Mike Bayne; Samantha Cooper; Anthony L Kerry; Peter Jenkins; Elizabeth Toy; Vallipuram Vigneswaran; James Gildersleve; Merina Ahmed; F. McDonald; Mick Button; Conrad R. Lewanski; Charles Comins
Summary Background The use of prophylactic radiotherapy to prevent procedure-tract metastases (PTMs) in malignant pleural mesothelioma remains controversial, and clinical practice varies worldwide. We aimed to compare prophylactic radiotherapy with deferred radiotherapy (given only when a PTM developed) in a suitably powered trial. Methods We did a multicentre, open-label, phase 3, randomised controlled trial in 22 UK hospitals of patients with histocytologically proven mesothelioma who had undergone large-bore pleural interventions in the 35 days prior to recruitment. Eligible patients were randomised (1:1), using a computer-generated sequence, to receive immediate radiotherapy (21 Gy in three fractions within 42 days of the pleural intervention) or deferred radiotherapy (same dose given within 35 days of PTM diagnosis). Randomisation was minimised by histological subtype, surgical versus non-surgical procedure, and pleural procedure (indwelling pleural catheter vs other). The primary outcome was the incidence of PTM within 7 cm of the site of pleural intervention within 12 months from randomisation, assessed in the intention-to-treat population. This trial is registered with ISRCTN, number ISRCTN72767336. Findings Between Dec 23, 2011, and Aug 4, 2014, we randomised 203 patients to receive immediate radiotherapy (n=102) or deferred radiotherapy (n=101). The patients were well matched at baseline. No significant difference was seen in PTM incidence in the immediate and deferred radiotherapy groups (nine [9%] vs 16 [16%]; odds ratio 0·51 [95% CI 0·19–1·32]; p=0·14). The only serious adverse event related to a PTM or radiotherapy was development of a painful PTM within the radiotherapy field that required hospital admission for symptom control in one patient who received immediate radiotherapy. Common adverse events of immediate radiotherapy were skin toxicity (grade 1 in 50 [54%] and grade 2 in four [4%] of 92 patients vs grade 1 in three [60%] and grade 2 in two [40%] of five patients in the deferred radiotherapy group who received radiotherapy for a PTM) and tiredness or lethargy (36 [39%] in the immediate radiotherapy group vs two [40%] in the deferred radiotherapy group) within 3 months of receiving radiotherapy. Interpretation Routine use of prophylactic radiotherapy in all patients with mesothelioma after large-bore thoracic interventions is not justified. Funding Research for Patient Benefit Programme from the UK National Institute for Health Research.
International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics | 2009
Shreerang A. Bhide; Merina Ahmed; Vijayan Rengarajan; Ceri Powell; Aisha Miah; Kate Newbold; Christopher M. Nutting; Kevin J. Harrington
PURPOSE Sequential treatment (chemotherapy followed by concomitant chemoradiation; CCRT) is increasingly being used for radical treatment of squamous cell cancer of the head and neck (SCCHN), which results in increased myelosuppression. In this study, we review the incidence of anemia and the effect of a policy of hemoglobin (Hb) maintenance by blood transfusion on disease outcomes in these patients. METHODS AND MATERIALS Retrospective review of the records of patients with SCCHN treated with sequential CCRT formed the basis of this study. The incidence of anemia and statistics on blood transfusion were documented. For the purpose of outcome analyses, patients were divided into four categories by (1) transfusion status, (2) nadir Hb concentration, (3) number of transfusion episodes, and (4) number of units of blood transfused (NOUT). Data on 3-year locoregional control (LRC), relapse-free survival (RFS), disease-specific survival (DSS), and overall survival (OS) were analyzed. RESULTS One hundred and sixty-nine patients were identified. The median follow-up was 23.6 months. The RFS (52% vs. 41%, p = 0.03), DSS (71% vs. 66%, p = 0.02), and OS (58% vs. 42% p = 0.005) were significantly better for patients who did not have a transfusion vs. those who did. The LRC, RFS, DSS, and OS were also significantly better for patients with nadir Hb level >12 vs. <12 g/dL and NOUT 1-4 vs. >4. CONCLUSION Our study seems to suggest that blood transfusion during radical treatment for SCCHN might be detrimental. Further research should be undertaken into the complex interactions among tumor hypoxia, anemia, and the treatment of anemia before making treatment recommendations.
Clinical Oncology | 2015
K. Aitken; A. Tree; K. Thomas; Christopher M. Nutting; M. Hawkins; D. Tait; H. Mandeville; Merina Ahmed; Susan Lalondrelle; Aisha Miah; A. Taylor; Gillian Ross; V. Khoo; N. van As
AIMS To retrospectively review the toxicity and early outcome data from patients who have received stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for extracranial oligometastases at a single UK institution. MATERIALS AND METHODS Eligible patients had ≤3 extracranial metastases and performance status ≤2. Prior systemic therapy and radical treatment of oligometastastic relapse with any standard treatment modality was permitted. Patients with synchronous metastatic disease were excluded unless they had evidence of controlled primary disease after radical therapy. Follow-up consisted of clinical examination, biochemical and radiological assessments in accordance with standard clinical care. Progression events were defined using RECIST. Toxicity was evaluated using CTCAE v4.0. Local control, progression-free survival (PFS), freedom from widespread distant metastasis (defined as disease not amenable to further radical salvage therapy) and overall survival were calculated. RESULTS Between July 2011 and April 2014, 73 patients with 87 metastases received SBRT (range 1-3 per patient). The median follow-up was 14.5 months (range 0-26.4). The median PFS was 14.5 months (1 year PFS 57%, 2 year 28%); 1 year overall survival 96%, 2 year 79.8%; 2 year local control 88%. At 2 years, 46% of patients were free from widespread distant metastases. No ≥ grade 3 acute or late toxicity was observed. CONCLUSION At this time point, observed toxicity is minimal with excellent local control rates. This promising treatment paradigm requires further investigation in the context of a randomised controlled trial to establish if the addition of SBRT to standard care improves survival outcomes.
Lung Cancer | 2013
Doraid Alrifai; Sanjay Popat; Merina Ahmed; David Gonzalez; Andrew G. Nicholson; John du Parcq; Tim Benepal
The management of non-small cell lung cancer has significantly changed over the past few years through greater understanding of tumour biology. The identification of activating mutations has led to the development of targeted agents. Coexisting mutations in non-small cell lung cancer is uncommon, particularly in squamous cell carcinoma. Our case represents a late gentleman with squamous cell carcinoma of the lung with both a BRAF mutation and ALK rearrangement prior to treatment.