Merrilee R. Flannery

Cloning, characterization, and expression of a human calcitonin receptor from an ovarian carcinoma cell line.

A human ovarian small cell carcinoma line (BIN-67) expresses abundant calcitonin (CT) receptors (CTR) (143,000 per cell) that are coupled, to adenylate cyclase. The dissociation constants (Kd) for the CTRs on these BIN-67 cells is approximately 0.42 nM for salmon CT and approximately 4.6 nM for human CT. To clone a human CTR (hCTR), a BIN-67 cDNA library was screened using a cDNA probe from a porcine renal CTR (pCTR) that we recently cloned. One positive clone of 3,588 bp was identified. Transfection of this cDNA into COS cells resulted in expression of receptors with high affinity for salmon CT (Kd = approximately 0.44 nM) and for human CT (Kd = approximately 5.4 nM). The expressed hCTR was coupled to adenylate cyclase. Northern analysis with the hCTR cDNA probe indicated a single transcript of approximately 4.2 kb. The cloned cDNA encodes a putative peptide of 490 amino acids with seven potential transmembrane domains. The amino acid sequence of the hCTR is 73% identical to the pCTR, although the hCTR contains an insert of 16 amino acids between transmembrane domain I and II. The structural differences may account for observed differences in binding affinity between the porcine renal and human ovarian CTRs. The CTRs are closely related to the receptors for parathyroid hormone-parathyroid hormone-related peptide and secretin; these receptors comprise a distinct family of G protein-coupled seven transmembrane domain receptors. Interestingly, the hCTR sequence is remotely related to the cAMP receptor of Dictyostelium discoideum (21% identical), but is not significantly related to other G protein-coupled receptor sequences now in the data bases.

PU.1 and NFATc1 mediate osteoclastic induction of the mouse β3 integrin promoter

Expression of the αvβ3 integrin is required for normal osteoclast function. We previously showed that an evolutionary conserved NFATc1 binding site is required for RANKL induction and NFATc1 transactivation of the human β3 promoter. The mechanism conferring specificity for RANKL induction and NFATc1 transduction of the β3 gene in osteoclast differentiation is unclear since NFATc1 is expressed and activated in numerous cell types that do not express the β3 gene. PU.1 is an ETS family transcription factor in myeloid cells associated with expression of various osteoclast genes. The present study investigates the role of NFATc1 in concert with PU.1 in osteoclast‐specific transcription of the mouse β3 integrin gene. The mouse β3 promoter was transactivated by NFATc1 in RAW264.7 cells and deletion or mutation of either of the conserved NFAT and PU.1 binding sites abrogated transactivation. NFATc1 transactivation of the mouse β3 promoter was specifically dependent on co‐transfected PU.1 in HEK293 cells, to the exclusion of other ETS family members. Direct binding of NFATc1 and PU.1 to their cognate sequences was demonstrated by EMSA and NFATc1 and PU.1 occupy their cognate sites in RANKL‐treated mouse marrow precursors in chromatin immuno‐precipitation (ChIP) assays. TAT‐mediated transduction with dominant‐negative NFATc1 dose‐dependently blocked endogenous expression of the mouse β3 integrin and the formation of TRAP positive multinucleated cells in RANKL‐treated mouse macrophages. These data provide evidence that NFATc1, in concert with PU.1, are involved in regulation of β3 integrin expression during osteoclast differentiation and suggest that PU.1 confers specificity to the NFATc1 response to macrophage lineage cells. J. Cell. Physiol. 215: 636–644, 2008.

Bone remodelling in inflammatory arthritis

The inflammatory arthropathies that include rheumatoid arthritis, the seronegative spondyloarthropathies and systemic lupus erythematosus are characterised by marked alterations in the architecture and structural integrity of peri-articular bone; however, the pattern and natural history of the skeletal changes differs in these conditions. In part, this can be attributed to differences in the primary anatomical site of the inflammation, but also there is evidence that there are differences in the biological properties and products produced by inflammatory tissues. This review will focus on recent advances in the understanding of the cellular and molecular mechanisms that contribute to the differential pattern of articular bone remodelling in these prototypical inflammatory forms of arthritis.

Bone matrix regulates osteoclast differentiation and annexin A8 gene expression

While attachment to bone is required for optimal osteoclast function, the molecular events that underlie this fact are unclear, other than that the cell requires adhesion to mineralized matrix to assume a fully differentiated phenotype. To address this issue, we cultured murine bone marrow‐derived osteoclasts on either cell culture plastic or devitalized mouse calvariae to identify the distinct genetic profile induced by interaction with bone. Among a number of genes previously unknown to be expressed in osteoclasts we found that Annexin A8 (AnxA8) mRNA was markedly up‐regulated by bone. AnxA8 protein was present at high levels in osteoclasts present in human tissues recovered from sites of pathological bone loss. The presence of bone mineral was required for up‐regulation of AnxA8 mRNA since osteoclasts plated on decalcified bone express AnxA8 at low levels as did osteoclasts plated on native or denatured type I collagen. Finally, AnxA8‐regulated cytoskeletal reorganization in osteoclasts generated on a mineralized matrix. Thus, we used a novel approach to define a distinct bone‐dependent genetic program associated with terminal osteoclast differentiation and identified Anxa8 as a gene strongly induced late in osteoclast differentiation and a protein that regulates formation of the cells characteristic actin ring. J. Cell. Physiol. 226: 3413–3421, 2011.

Role of cell-matrix interactions in osteoclast differentiation

Osteoclast and their mononuclear cell precursors are present within the bone microenvironment at sites of physiologic and pathologic bone resorption. Analysis of tissues from sites of bone resorption reveal that cells expressing the full morphological and functional properties of mature osteoclasts are restricted to the immediate bone surface. We hypothesize that in addition to cytokines, components of the bone matrix and specific cell surface receptors on osteoclasts and their precursors play an essential role in determining the genetic profile and functional properties of fully differentiated resorbing osteoclasts. We have employed expression profiling, with an in vitro model of matrix-dependent osteoclast differentiation, to identify the molecular pathways by which bone matrix-interactions induce terminal osteoclast differentiation and activation. In preliminary studies, we have identified unique genes and transcriptional pathways that are induced by interaction of osteoclast precursors with specific components of the mineralized bone matrix. The authenticity of the gene profiles, as markers of osteoclast differentiation and activation, have been provisionally validated using an in vivo animal bone implantation model and by examination of tissues from patients with specific forms of pathologic osteoclast-mediated bone resorption. The ultimate goal of our studies is to identify new molecular targets for inhibiting osteoclast-mediated bone loss in disorders of pathologic bone loss. The early work of Walker et al. (Walker 1972) in parabiotic animals, and the subsequent studies of Burger et al. (Burger, Van der Meer, van de Gevel, et al. 1982) using a co-culture model with fetal bone rudiments and bone marrow-derived cells, have helped to establish that osteoclasts are derived from macrophage precursors of colony forming unit-macrophage (CFU-M lineage). As such, they share a common hematopoietic origin with other CFU-M lineage cells, including tissue macrophages that populate the lung (alveolar macrophages), liver (Kupfer cells), synovium (synovial macrophages) and other organs. They also share a common lineage

The role of cell-substrate interaction in regulating osteoclast activation: potential implications in targeting bone loss in rheumatoid arthritis.

Analysis of tissues retrieved from the bone–pannus interface from patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and studies in animal models of inflammatory arthritis provide strong evidence that osteoclasts, the cells that are essential for physiological bone resorption, are responsible for articular bone destruction in RA. However, current treatments that specifically target osteoclast-mediated bone resorption in RA have not been successful in preventing bone erosions, and new therapeutic strategies are needed. It has been noted that, although osteoclast precursors are present within the bone microenvironment at sites of pathological bone resorption, cells expressing the full morphological and functional properties of mature osteoclasts are restricted to the immediate bone surface and adjacent calcified cartilage. These findings provide evidence that, in addition to requirements for specific cytokines, interaction of osteoclast precursors with these mineralised matrices results in activation of specific signal pathways and the induction of unique gene products that are essential for terminal osteoclast differentiation and activation. These studies are designed to define the gene products and signalling pathways regulated by bone and calcified cartilage, to identify new molecular targets and novel therapeutic approaches for preventing osteoclast-mediated joint destruction in RA and related forms of pathological bone loss.