Merritt H. Raitt

Clinical predictors of the defibrillation threshold with the unipolar implantable defibrillation system

OBJECTIVESnThe purpose of this study was to determine the relation between clinical variables and the defibrillation threshold by using a standardized testing protocol and a uniform implantable defibrillator system.nnnBACKGROUNDnPast studied have not revealed useful correlations between clinical variables and the energy required to terminate ventricular fibrillation. Most of these studies did not use a uniform implantable defibrillator system or a standardized protocol to measure the defibrillation threshold and, thus, did not control for the influence of these technical influences. We postulated that defibrillator and defibrillation threshold measurement-based sources of variability overshadowed important clinical predictors.nnnMETHODSnThe defibrillation threshold was measured by using a standardized protocol in 101 consecutive patients. We used a transvenous unipolar pectoral defibrillation system that employed a single endocardial right ventricular defibrillation coil as the anode and the shell of an 80-cm3 pulse generator as the cathode to deliver a 65% tilt biphasic pulse.nnnRESULTSnSeveral clinical variables were found to be significantly associated with the defibrillation threshold: patient gender, height, weight, body surface area, heart rate at rest, QRS and corrected QT (QTc) intervals, left ventricular mass and several measures of heart and chest size by chest roentgenogram. None of these variables had a correlation coefficient > 0.45 with the defibrillation threshold. On multivariate analysis, left ventricular mass and heart rate at rest were the only independent predictors of the defibrillation threshold and explained only 25% of the observed variability.nnnCONCLUSIONSnDespite the use of a uniform transvenous defibrillation system and a standardized protocol to measure the defibrillation threshold, no clinically relevant correlation was found between clinical variables and the defibrillation threshold. The defibrillation threshold is probably a function of a complex interaction of anatomic, physiologic and cellular variables that are not adequately represented by easily obtainable clinical information. It is probably not possible to predict defibrillation outcome from standard clinical variables.

Subacute ventricular free wall rupture complicating myocardial infarction

Myocardial free wall rupture accounts for between 8% and 17% of mortality after myocardial infarction. In up to 40% of cases death occurs subacutely over a matter of hours, not minutes. Illustrative clinical cases and data suggest that a high degree of clinical suspicion, along with the early use of echocardiography, could significantly reduce mortality resulting from myocardial free wall rupture complicating myocardial infarction. Myocardial free wall rupture should be suspected in patients with recent myocardial infarction who have recurrent or persistent chest pain, hemodynamic instability, syncope, pericardial tamponade, or transient electromechanical dissociation. In this clinical situation, emergent echocardiography showing a pericardial effusion or pericardial thrombus is highly suggestive of free wall rupture. Surgical exploration and rupture repair is the definitive diagnostic and therapeutic procedure.

Relation between symptom duration before thrombolytic therapy and final myocardial infarct size.

BACKGROUNDnMyocardial salvage is most likely to occur when thrombolytic therapy is administered within 4 to 6 hours of the onset of symptoms of myocardial infarction. The impact of delays within this early time period on final myocardial infarct size are unknown. The purpose of this study was to quantitate the relation between final myocardial infarct size and duration of symptoms before initiation of thrombolytic therapy in patients treated within 6 hours of symptom onset.nnnMETHODS AND RESULTSnThe findings from patients in four prospective randomized trials of thrombolytic therapy were combined for analysis. The study population consisted of 432 patients presenting within 6 hours of onset of symptoms of first acute myocardial infarction who met ECG criteria that allowed estimation of myocardial area at risk before treatment with thrombolytic therapy and who had thallium-201 myocardial infarct-size measurements performed several weeks after infarction. ECG analysis revealed no difference in myocardium at risk for infarction as a function of duration of symptoms before initiation of thrombolytic therapy. In contrast, univariate and multivariate analysis showed that final infarct size was highly dependent on duration of symptoms before initiation of therapy. Each 30-minute increase in symptom duration before thrombolytic therapy was associated with an increase in infarct size of 1% of the myocardium. Final infarct size in patients treated 4 to 6 hours after symptom onset was indistinguishable from patients who did not receive thrombolytic therapy.nnnCONCLUSIONSnThese findings suggest that for patients treated within 4 to 6 hours of the onset of symptoms, there is a progressive decline in the extent of myocardium salvaged as the duration of symptoms before therapy increases. These results support efforts to minimize the time delay between symptom onset and initiation of reperfusion therapy in all eligible patients.

Ventricular Arrhythmias Detected After Transvenous Defibrillator Implantation in Patients With a Clinical History of Only Ventricular Fibrillation Implications for Use of Implantable Defibrillator

BACKGROUNDnPatients with a history of ventricular fibrillation (VF) have been shown to have a clinical profile, response to electrophysiological testing (EPS), and response to antiarrhythmic therapy that distinguishes them from patients with a history of sustained monomorphic ventricular tachycardia (MVT). Despite these differences, it is not clear whether VF in these patients is triggered by MVT or occurs de novo. The incidence of MVT and VF in such patients after their index VF event has important implications for therapeutic decisions regarding implantable defibrillator selection and programming.nnnMETHODS AND RESULTSnThe records of 111 consecutive patients who had undergone transvenous cardioverter/defibrillator (ICD) implantation for malignant ventricular arrhythmias were reviewed retrospectively. For each patient, all device tachyarrhythmia detections were examined and classified as VF, MVT, rapid polymorphic VT, or other. The number of events, time to first arrhythmia detection, and cycle length of MVTs were recorded. There were 55 patients with a history of only VF and 56 with a history that included an episode of MVT. Over 14 months of follow-up, with all patients initially off of antiarrhythmic medications, MVT was detected by only 18% of patients with a history of only VF compared with 54% of those with a history that included MVT (P = .002). Among patients who did detect MVT, those with a history of only VF had fewer episodes (7 +/- 7 versus 20 +/- 31, P = .001) and a shorter mean MVT cycle length (279 versus 314 ms, P = .03) than those with a clinical history of MVT. Abrupt onset of VF not preceded by MVT was detected in 11% of patients with VF only. In addition to a history of MVT, male sex, age < 60 years, and MVT inducible on EPS were all significantly associated with an increased likelihood of MVT detection. On multivariate analysis, the inducibility of MVT was the primary independent predictor of MVT detection but was of minimal incremental predictive value in the subgroup of patients with a history of only VF. When EPS results were not considered, arrhythmia history was the primary independent predictor of MVT detection.nnnCONCLUSIONSnPatients with a history of only VF infrequently have MVT detected by their defibrillators. When these patients do detect MVT, it is faster than that detected in patients with a clinical history of MVT before ICD surgery. A significant percentage of VF survivors detected the abrupt onset of VF not preceded by MVT, suggesting that the deterioration of rapid MVT to VF is not the only clinically important mechanism of VF induction. These findings may have important implications for the understanding of the mechanism of VF induction and for use of an implantable defibrillator.

Appearance of abnormal Q waves early in the course of acute myocardial infarction: Implications for efficacy of thrombolytic therapy

OBJECTIVESnThe purpose of this study was to determine the time course of the appearance of abnormal Q waves on the electrocardiogram (ECG) over the first 6 h of symptoms of myocardial infarction and to determine what implications, if any, such Q waves have for the efficacy of thrombolytic therapy.nnnBACKGROUNDnSevere myocardial ischemia can produce early QRS changes in the absence of infarction. Abnormal Q waves on the baseline ECG may not be an accurate marker of irreversibly injured myocardium.nnnMETHODSnData from 695 patients who had no past history of myocardial infarction and whose admission ECG allowed prediction of myocardial infarct size in the absence of thrombolytic therapy (Aldrich score) were pooled from four prospective trials of thrombolytic therapy. The presence and number of abnormal Q waves on each patients initial ECG were recorded. Four hundred thirty-six patients had left ventricular infarct size measured using quantitative thallium-201 tomography a mean (+/- SD) of 52 +/- 43 days after admission.nnnRESULTSnOf patients admitted within 1 h of symptoms, 53% had abnormal Q waves on the initial ECG. Both predicted and final infarct size were larger in patients with abnormal Q waves on the initial ECG independent of the duration of symptoms before therapy (p < 0.001). Despite this finding, the presence of abnormal Q waves on the admission ECG did not eliminate the effect of thrombolytic therapy on reducing final infarct size (p < 0.0001).nnnCONCLUSIONSnAbnormal Q waves are a common finding early in the course of acute myocardial infarction. However, there is no evidence that abnormal Q waves are associated with less benefit in terms of reduction of infarct size after thrombolytic therapy.

A prospective randomized comparison in humans of biphasic waveform 60-μF and 120-μF capacitance pulses using a unipolar defibrillation system

Background Improving unipolar implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) effectiveness has favorable implications for ICD safety, efficacy, and size. Advances in defibrillation efficacy would accelerate ICD ease of use by decreasing device size and by minimizing morbidity and mortality related to an improved defibrillation safety margin. The specific purpose of the present study was to determine whether unipolar defibrillation efficacy could be improved further in humans by lowering biphasic waveform capacitance. Methods and Results We prospectively and randomly compared the defibrillation efficacy of a 60-μF and a 120-μF capacitance asymmetrical 65% tilt biphasic waveform using a unipolar defibrillation system in 38 consecutive cardiac arrest survivors before implantation of a presently available standard transvenous defibrillation system. The right ventricular defibrillation electrode had a 5-cm coil located on a 10.5F lead and was used as the anode. The system cathode was the electrically active 108-...

Combined historical and electrocardiographic timing of acute anterior and inferior myocardial infarcts for prediction of reperfusion acheivable size limitation

The historical time of acute symptom onset is not always an accurate indication of the timing of onset of an acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Consideration of electrocardiographic (ECG) timing parameters could supplement historical timing alone as a clinical guide for decisions regarding the use of reperfusion therapy. Three hundred ninety-five patients from 4 trials of thrombolytic therapy conducted in the northwestern United States and western Canada are included in the present study. A total of 316 patients received either streptokinase or tissue plasminogen activator, and 79 received no reperfusion therapy. Historical time of symptom onset was acquired by emergency or cardiology department personnel and recorded on patient report forms. An ECG method for estimating the timing of the AMI, the Anderson-Wilkins (AW) acuteness score, was calculated from the initial standard 12-lead recording by investigators blinded to the knowledge of symptom duration or any other study variables. Tomographic thallium-201 imaging 7 weeks after hospital admission was used to measure final AMI size. The ECG timing method achieved a relation with final AMI size similar to that previously reported for historical timing. The AW acuteness score proved most useful for anterior AMI location when there was a > or = 2 hour delay following symptom onset, but was most useful for the inferior AMI location when there was a < 2 hour delay. Despite a longer delay, patients with high AW acuteness scores had 50% lower final anterior AMI size than those with low scores; and despite a shorter delay, those with low ECG acuteness scores had 50% greater final inferior AMI size than those with high scores. The AW acuteness score combined with the historical estimation of symptom duration should provide a more accurate basis for predicting the potential for limitation of final AMI size than either method alone. These results could potentially provide the basis for developing a new method for noninvasive guidance of clinical decisions regarding administration of reperfusion therapy in the initial evaluation of patients with AMI.

Prospective Randomized Comparison of Biphasic Waveform Tilt Using a Unipolar Defibrillation System

Background: A unipolar defihrillation system using a single right ventricular (RV) electrode and the active shell or container of an implantable cardioverter defibrillator situated in a left infraclavicular pocket has been shown to be as efficient in defibrillation as an epicardial lead system. Additional improvements in this system would have favorable practice implications and could derive from alterations in pulse waveform shape. The specific purpose of this study is to determine whether defibrillation efficacy can be improved further in humans by lowering biphasic waveform tilt. Methods: We prospectively and randomly compared the defibrillation efficacy of a 50% and a 65% tilt asymmetric biphasic waveform using the unipolar defibrillation system in 15 consecutive cardiac arrest survivors prior to implantation of a presently available standard transvenous defibrillation system. The RV defibrillation electrode has a 5‐cm coil located on a 10.5 French lead and was used as the anode. The system cathode was the active 108 cm2 surface area shell (or “CAN”) of a prototype titanium alloy pulse generator placed in the left infraclavicular pocket. The defibrillation pulse derived from a 120‐μF capacitor and was delivered from RV ± CAN, with RV positive with respect to the CAN during the initial portion of the cycle. Defibrillation threshold (DFT) stored energy, delivered energy, leading edge voltage and current, pulse resistance, and pulse width were measured for both tilts examined. Results: The unipolar single lead system, RV ± CAN, using a 65% tilt biphasic pulse resulted in a stored energy DFT of 8.7 ± 5.7 J and a delivered energy DFT of 7.6 ± 5.0 J. In ail 15 patients, stored and delivered energy DFTs were < 20 J. The 50% tilt biphasic pulse resulted in a stored energy DFT of 8.2 ± 5.4 J and a delivered energy DFT of 6.1 ± 4.0 J;P = 0.69 and 0.17, respectively. As with the 65% tilt pulse, all 15 patients had stored and delivered energy DFTs < 20 J. Conclusion: The unipolar single lead transvenous defibrillation system provides defibrillation at energy levels comparable to that reported with epicardial lead systems. This system is not improved by use of a 50% tilt biphasic waveform instead of a standard 65% tilt biphasic pulse. (PACE 1995; 18:1369–1373)

A Prospective Randomized Evaluation of Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Size on Unipolar Defibrillation System Efficacy

BACKGROUNDnThe active can unipolar implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) has been shown to defibrillate efficiently, but its current 80-cc size limits use in the pectoral position in many patients. Decreasing can size will facilitate pectoral insertion and will soon be feasible as an inevitable consequence of technological advancements. However, decreasing the can size has the potential to compromise unipolar defibrillation efficacy. It is the purpose of this study, therefore, to prospectively and randomly compare unipolar defibrillation efficacy with 80-cc, 60-cc, and 40-cc can sizes in patients immediately before ICD surgery in anticipation of advances in technology that will make smaller ICDs possible.nnnMETHODS AND RESULTSnTwenty-four consecutive patients underwent prospective, randomized evaluation of the effect of ICD can size on defibrillation efficacy during standard ICD surgery. Each patient had the unipolar defibrillation threshold (DFT) measured with 80-cc, 60-cc, or 40-cc active can placed in the left subcutaneous infraclavicular region. The system included a 10.5F tripolar right ventricular electrode that served as the shock anode. The shock waveform used in each instance was a single capacitor biphasic 65% pulse delivered from a 120-microF capacitor. Stored energy at the DFT for the 80-cc, 60-cc, and 40-cc cans were 8.1 +/- 4.7 J, 8.7 +/- 5.8 J, and 9.5 +/- 4.8 J, respectively. There was no statistical significant difference between the DFTs for the three unipolar can electrodes (P = 39). Leading edge voltage also did not differ significantly among the three unipolar cans (356 +/- 92 V, 365 +/- 110 V, and 387 +/- 94 V, respectively, P = .29). There was, however, a slight progressive increase in resistance with decreasing can size (57 +/- 7 omega, 60 +/- 9 omega, and 65 +/- 9 omega, respectively, P < .001).nnnCONCLUSIONSnDecreasing can volume from 80 cc to 60 cc to 40 cc does not compromise unipolar defibrillation efficacy despite a slight rise in shock resistance. These findings indicate that technological advances that allow for smaller-volume ICDs will not compromise defibrillation efficacy for unipolar systems.

Development of an aortic valve mass after radiofrequency catheter ablation

A 49‐year‐old woman underwenl a successful radiofrequency catheter ablation of a left‐sided accessory pathway using a retrograde approach across the aortic valve. Routine echocardiogruphy performed 20 hours after the procedure revealed a new aortic valve mass. Five blood cultures were negative. An echocardiogram after 2 days of heparin therapy showed complete resolution of the mass. There was no clinical evidence of embolization. Echocardiography may need to be performed routinely after catheter ablations performed retrograde across the aortic valve so that this potentially devastating complication can be diagnosed and treated early in its course.