Micaela Caserta

Chromatin remodeling during Saccharomyces cerevisiae ADH2 gene activation.

We have analyzed at both low and high resolution the distribution of nucleosomes over the Saccharomyces cerevisiae ADH2 promoter region in its chromosomal location, both under repressing (high-glucose) conditions and during derepression. Enzymatic treatments (micrococcal nuclease and restriction endonucleases) were used to probe the in vivo chromatin structure during ADH2 gene activation. Under glucose-repressed conditions, the ADH2 promoter was bound by a precise array of nucleosomes, the principal ones positioned at the RNA initiation sites (nucleosome +1), at the TATA box (nucleosome -1), and upstream of the ADR1-binding site (UAS1) (nucleosome -2). The UAS1 sequence and the adjacent UAS2 sequence constituted a nucleosome-free region. Nucleosomes -1 and +1 were destabilized soon after depletion of glucose and had become so before the appearance of ADH2 mRNA. When the transcription rate was high, nucleosomes -2 and +2 also underwent rearrangement. When spheroplasts were prepared from cells grown in minimal medium, detection of this chromatin remodeling required the addition of a small amount of glucose. Cells lacking the ADR1 protein did not display any of these chromatin modifications upon glucose depletion. Since the UAS1 sequence to which Adr1p binds is located immediately upstream of nucleosome -1, Adr1p is presumably required for destabilization of this nucleosome and for aiding the TATA-box accessibility to the transcription machinery.

Hyperacetylation of chromatin at the ADH2 promoter allows Adr1 to bind in repressed conditions

We report that in vivo increased acetylation of the repressed Saccharomyces cerevisiae ADH2 promoter chromatin, as obtained by disrupting the genes for the two deacetylases HDA1 and RPD3, destabilizes the structure of the TATA box‐containing nucleosome. This acetylation‐dependent chromatin remodeling is not sufficient to allow the binding of the TATA box‐binding protein, but facilitates the recruitment of the transcriptional activator Adr1 and induces faster kinetics of mRNA accumulation when the cells are shifted to derepressing conditions.

The ISWI and CHD1 chromatin remodelling activities influence ADH2 expression and chromatin organization

Nucleosome remodelling complexes play a key role in gene activation in response to environmental changes by driving promoter chromatin to reach an accessible configuration. They also mediate genome‐wide chromatin organization, although their role in processes other than activation‐related chromatin remodelling are poorly understood. The Saccharomyces cerevisiae ADH2 gene represents an excellent model for understanding the role of chromatin structure and remodelling in gene regulation. Following glucose depletion, highly positioned promoter nucleosomes are destabilized leading to strictly regulated kinetics of transcriptional activation. Nevertheless, no chromatin remodelling activities responsible for establishing or remodelling ADH2 chromatin structure have been identified to date. Here we show that the absence of the Isw1 and Chd1 ATP‐dependent chromatin remodelling activities delays the maximal expression of ADH2 without impairing the chromatin remodelling that occurs upon activation. Instead, a destabilized chromatin structure on the ADH2 coding and termination region is observed in the absence of Isw1 or Chd1 in repressing conditions. The specific Isw1 complex involved in this nucleosome repositioning is Isw1b because the deletion of Ioc2 and Ioc4, but not of Ioc3, causes the same phenotype as the deletion of Isw1. Moreover, the lack of Chd1 combined with the absence of Isw1 and Isw2 impairs nucleosome spacing along the ADH2 gene, and genome‐wide in S. cerevisiae. Thus, the ISWI and Chd1 remodelling factors are not only involved in transcription‐related chromatin remodelling, but also are required to maintain a specific chromatin configuration across the yeast genome.

Snf1/AMPK regulates Gcn5 occupancy, H3 acetylation and chromatin remodelling at S. cerevisiae ADY2 promoter

The ability of cells to respond to changes in their environment is mediated by transcription factors that remodel chromatin and reprogram expression of specific subsets of genes. In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, changes in carbon source lead to gene induction by Adr1 and Cat8 that are known to require the upstream function of the Snf1 protein kinase, the central regulator of carbon metabolism, to exert their activating effect. How Snf1 facilitates transcription activation by Adr1 and Cat8 is not known. Here we show that under derepressing conditions, deletion of SNF1 abolishes the increase of histone H3 acetylation at the promoter of the glucose-repressed ADY2 gene, and as a consequence profoundly affects the chromatin structural alterations accompanying transcriptional activation. Adr1 and Cat8 are not required to regulate the acetylation switch and show only a partial influence on chromatin remodelling at this promoter, though their double deletion completely abolishes mRNA accumulation. Finally, we show that under derepressing conditions the recruitment of the histone acetyltransferase Gcn5 is abolished by SNF1 deletion, possibly explaining the lack of increased histone H3 acetylation and nucleosome remodelling. The results highlight a mechanism by which signalling to chromatin provides an essential permissive signal that is required for activation by glucose-responsive transcription factors.

The DNA Sequence-dependence of Nucleosome Positioning in vivo and in vitro

Abstract The contribution of histone-DNA interactions to nucleosome positioning in vivo is currently a matter of debate. We argue here that certain nucleosome positions, often in promoter regions, in yeast may be, at least in part, specified by the DNA sequence. In contrast other positions may be poorly specified. Positioning thus has both statistical and DNA-determined components. We further argue that the relative affinity of the octamer for different DNA sequences can vary and therefore the interaction of histones with the DNA is a ‘tunable’ property.

A translational signature for nucleosome positioning in vivo.

In vivo nucleosomes often occupy well-defined preferred positions on genomic DNA. An important question is to what extent these preferred positions are directly encoded by the DNA sequence itself. We derive here from in vivo positions, accurately mapped by partial micrococcal nuclease digestion, a translational positioning signal that identifies the approximate midpoint of DNA bound by a histone octamer. This midpoint is, on average, highly A/T rich (∼73%) and, in particular, the dinucleotide TpA occurs preferentially at this and other outward-facing minor grooves. We conclude that in this set of sequences the sequence code for DNA bending and nucleosome positioning differs from the other described sets and we suggest that the enrichment of AT-containing dinucleotides at the centre is required for local untwisting. We show that this signature is preferentially associated with nucleosomes flanking promoter regions and suggest that it contributes to the establishment of gene-specific nucleosome arrays.

H4 acetylation does not replace H3 acetylation in chromatin remodelling and transcription activation of Adr1‐dependent genes

Histone acetylation regulates gene expression. Whether this is caused by a general increase in nucleosome fluidity due to charge neutralization or by a more specific code is still matter of debate. By using a set of glucose‐repressed Adr1‐dependent genes of Saccharomyces cerevisiae, whose transcription was previously shown to require both Gcn5 and Esa1, we asked how changes of histone acetylation patterns at the promoter nucleosomes regulate chromatin remodelling and activation. When the signal of glucose reduction reaches the cells, H4 acetylation is kept constant while an increase of H3 acetylation occurs, in an Adr1‐ and Gcn5‐dependent manner. In cells lacking Gcn5 activity, the H3 acetylation increase does not occur and an unexpected increase of histone H4 acetylation is observed. Nevertheless, chromatin remodelling and transcription activation are impaired, suggesting that acetylation of H3 and H4 histones plays different roles.

The conformation of constitutive DNA interaction sites for eukaryotic DNA topoisomerase I on intrinsically curved DNAs

The analysis of the sites which are cleaved constitutively and preferentially by eukaryotic DNA topoisomerase I on two intrinsically curved DNAs reveals the conformational features that provoke the cleavage reaction on the curve-inducing sequence elements in the absence of supercoiling. This analysis is based on the observation (Caserta et al. (1989) Nucleic Acids Res. 17, 8521-8532 and (1990) Biochemistry 29, 8152-8157) that the reaction of eukaryotic DNA topoisomerase I occurs on two types of DNA sites: sites S (Supercoiled induced) and sites C (Constitutive, whose presence is topology-independent). We report that sites C are abundant on the intrinsically curved DNAs analyzed. The DNAs studied were two intrinsically curved segments of different origin: the Crithidia fasciculata kinetoplast DNA and the bent-containing domain B of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae ARS1. On these DNA segments DNA topoisomerase I cleaves at the junctions between the poly(A) tracts and mixed-sequence DNA. Analysis of the conformation of the double helix around the cleavage sites has revealed that the reaction occurs in correspondence of a defined DNA conformational motif. This motif is described by the set of Eulerian angular values that define the axial path of DNA (helical twist, deflection angle, direction) and of the orthogonal components of wedge (roll and tilt).

Nucleosome positioning—what do we really know?

The positioning of nucleosomes on the DNA of eukaryotic genomes is a major determinant of gene expression. In particular nucleosomes in close proximity to regulatory regions are often more precisely positioned in vivo than nucleosomes located elsewhere. In this article we compare data obtained from the most recent studies by a variety of techniques. We argue that the disparate conclusions in the literature could be a consequence of procedural differences sampling alternative arrays of nucleosomes on the same DNA sequence. Importantly, the ostensibly least invasive techniques identify differences between nucleosomes in the vicinity of transcription start sites in budding yeast and those positioned distally within the transcribed region.

Topological modifications and template activation are induced in chimaeric plasmids by inserted sequences.

The effect of the insertion of foreign genes or gene systems in closed DNA domains has been investigated in vitro in purified systems. We observe that in chimaeric plasmids two apparently independent classes of modifications, (1) functional and (2) topological, do take place in defined instances. (1) Among the screened yeast gene systems, examples have been found of DNA sequences that upon insertion cause activation of in vitro transcription of distant genes. (2) Foreign DNA sequences may lead to new topological features of the harbouring plasmids; it is shown that more than one S1-sensitive secondary structure may be contemporaneously present on the same chimaeric plasmid. DNA superhelicity is a prerequisite of these modifications. The two classes of effects (1) functional and (2) topological are not a priori directly related one to the other but appear to be two independent consequences of the same cause: the insertion of foreign DNA sequences into closed DNA domains. These observations suggest a regulatory model of gene expression based on alternative topologies of closed DNA domains.