Micaela Hernberg

Nivolumab in Previously Untreated Melanoma without BRAF Mutation

BACKGROUND Nivolumab was associated with higher rates of objective response than chemotherapy in a phase 3 study involving patients with ipilimumab-refractory metastatic melanoma. The use of nivolumab in previously untreated patients with advanced melanoma has not been tested in a phase 3 controlled study. METHODS We randomly assigned 418 previously untreated patients who had metastatic melanoma without a BRAF mutation to receive nivolumab (at a dose of 3 mg per kilogram of body weight every 2 weeks and dacarbazine-matched placebo every 3 weeks) or dacarbazine (at a dose of 1000 mg per square meter of body-surface area every 3 weeks and nivolumab-matched placebo every 2 weeks). The primary end point was overall survival. RESULTS At 1 year, the overall rate of survival was 72.9% (95% confidence interval [CI], 65.5 to 78.9) in the nivolumab group, as compared with 42.1% (95% CI, 33.0 to 50.9) in the dacarbazine group (hazard ratio for death, 0.42; 99.79% CI, 0.25 to 0.73; P<0.001). The median progression-free survival was 5.1 months in the nivolumab group versus 2.2 months in the dacarbazine group (hazard ratio for death or progression of disease, 0.43; 95% CI, 0.34 to 0.56; P<0.001). The objective response rate was 40.0% (95% CI, 33.3 to 47.0) in the nivolumab group versus 13.9% (95% CI, 9.5 to 19.4) in the dacarbazine group (odds ratio, 4.06; P<0.001). The survival benefit with nivolumab versus dacarbazine was observed across prespecified subgroups, including subgroups defined by status regarding the programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1). Common adverse events associated with nivolumab included fatigue, pruritus, and nausea. Drug-related adverse events of grade 3 or 4 occurred in 11.7% of the patients treated with nivolumab and 17.6% of those treated with dacarbazine. CONCLUSIONS Nivolumab was associated with significant improvements in overall survival and progression-free survival, as compared with dacarbazine, among previously untreated patients who had metastatic melanoma without a BRAF mutation. (Funded by Bristol-Myers Squibb; CheckMate 066 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01721772.).

Autoimmune Antibodies and Recurrence-Free Interval in Melanoma Patients Treated With Adjuvant Interferon

BACKGROUND Appearance of autoantibodies and clinical manifestations of autoimmunity in melanoma patients treated with adjuvant interferon (IFN)-alpha2b was reported to be associated with improved prognosis. We assessed the association of the appearance of autoantibodies after initiation of treatment with recurrence-free interval in two randomized trials that compared intermediate doses of IFN with observation for the treatment of melanoma patients. METHODS Serum levels of anticardiolipin, antithyroglobulin, and antinuclear antibodies were determined using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays in 187 and 356 patients in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) 18952 and Nordic IFN trials, respectively, immediately before and up to 3 years after random assignment. The association of the presence of at least one of the three autoantibodies with risk of recurrence was assessed by three Cox models in patients negative for all three autoantibodies at baseline (125 from the EORTC 18952 trial and 230 from the Nordic IFN trial): 1) a model that considered appearance of autoantibodies as a time-independent variable, 2) one that considered a patient autoantibody positive once a positive test for an autoantibody was obtained, and 3) a model in which the status of the patient was defined by the most recent autoantibody test. All statistical tests were two-sided. RESULTS When treated as a time-independent variable (model 1), appearance of autoantibodies was associated with improved relapse-free interval in both trials (EORTC 18952, hazard ratio [HR] = 0.41, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.25 to 0.68, P < .001; and Nordic IFN, HR = 0.51, 95% CI = 0.34 to 0.76, P < .001). However, on correction for guarantee-time bias, the association was weaker and not statistically significant (model 2: EORTC 18952, HR = 0.81, 95% CI = 0.46 to 1.40, P = .44; and Nordic IFN, HR = 0.85, 95% CI = 0.55 to 1.30, P = .45; model 3: EORTC 18952, HR = 1.05, 95% CI = 0.59 to 1.87, P = .88; and Nordic IFN, HR = 0.78, 95% CI = 0.49 to 1.24, P = .30). CONCLUSIONS In two randomized trials of IFN for the treatment of melanoma patients, appearance of autoantibodies was not strongly associated with improved relapse-free interval when correction was made for guarantee-time bias.

Two different durations of adjuvant therapy with intermediate-dose interferon alfa-2b in patients with high-risk melanoma (Nordic IFN trial): a randomised phase 3 trial

BACKGROUND Adjuvant high-dose interferon alfa-2b improves relapse-free survival (RFS) in patients with high-risk melanoma, although benefits in overall survival are uncertain. Because of the toxic effects of high-dose regimens, intermediate doses are being explored. We investigated whether adjuvant therapy with intermediate-dose interferon alfa-2b for 1 or 2 years would improve outcomes in patients with stage IIB-IIC or III resected cutaneous melanoma. METHODS This randomised, open-label, phase 3, parallel-group trial was undertaken between 1996 and 2004. 855 patients were randomly assigned at 35 centres in the Nordic countries by block randomisation to three groups: observation only (group A); 4 weeks of induction (interferon alfa-2b 10 million units flat dose subcutaneously 5 days per week) followed by 12 months of maintenance therapy (interferon alfa-2b 10 million units flat dose subcutaneously 3 days per week; group B); or 1 month of induction and 24 months of maintenance (group C). Neither investigators nor patients were masked to treatment assignment. Patients were stratified for country and tumour stage; patients with stage III disease were further stratified for presence of metastatic lymph nodes at primary diagnosis versus at relapse, palpable versus non-palpable lymph-node metastases, and number of metastatic lymph nodes. The primary endpoint was overall survival in the two interferon alfa-2b groups combined. Analyses were by intention to treat. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01259934. FINDINGS 284 patients were assigned to group A, 285 to group B, and 286 to group C; all patients were analysed. The median follow-up time was 72·4 months (IQR 46·9-98·0). We recorded no significant improvement in overall survival in patients given interferon alfa-2b compared with observation: median overall survival was 56·1 months (IQR 22·3 to >120·0) in group A, 72·1 months (25·8 to >120) in group B, and 64·3 months (24·7 to >120) in group C (p=0·600). Hazard ratios (HR) for overall survival were 0·91 (95% CI 0·74-1·10; p=0·642) for groups B and C combined versus observation; 0·91 (0·72-1·14; p=0·652) for group B versus observation; and 0·91 (0·72-1·15; p=0·858) for group C versus observation. Median RFS was 23·2 months (IQR 5·6 to <120) in group A, 37·8 months (10·8 to >120) in group B, and 28·6 months (8·6 to >120) in group C (p=0·034). HRs for RFS were 0·80 (0·67-0·96; p=0·030) for groups B and C combined versus observation, 0·77 (0·63-0·96; p=0·034) for group B versus observation, and 0·83 (0·68-1·03; p=0·178) for group C versus observation. The most common grade 3 and 4 adverse events were fatigue (five in group A [1·8%], 28 in group B [9·8%], and 32 in group C [11·2%]), myalgia (three [1·1%], 15 [5·3%], 14 [4·9%], respectively), and thrombocytopenia (15 [5·3%], 23 [8·1%], eight [2·8%], respectively). INTERPRETATION Adjuvant therapy with intermediate-dose interferon alfa-2b did not significantly improve overall survival. Interferon alfa-2b with 1-year maintenance therapy significantly improved RFS, but we recorded no significant effect for 2-year maintenance therapy. Further research is in progress to define the subgroup of patients who benefit from adjuvant interferon alfa-2b. FUNDING Schering-Plough (now Merck); the Radiumhemmet Research Funds, Stockholm; the Stockholm County Council; and the Swedish Cancer Society.

Regimens With or Without Interferon-α as Treatment for Metastatic Melanoma and Renal Cell Carcinoma: An Overview of Randomized Trials

The effect of interferon-alpha (IFN-alpha) as single agent or in combination in the treatment of metastatic malignant melanoma (MM) or of advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) has been widely explored in phase II trials. To evaluate the net benefit of IFN-alpha therapy in these diseases, we performed a meta-analysis comprising all available randomized trials comparing regimens with or without IFN-alpha. Data were obtained from the Medline data base, and from the data bases at the National Cancer Institute, Schering-Plough, and Hoffmann-La Roche. A total of six published and five unpublished studies on metastatic MM, as well as six published and two unpublished studies on advanced RCC, comprising altogether 1,164 and 525 patients, respectively, fulfilled our criteria. In MM, the overall response rate for the IFN-alpha-containing regimens was 24% (range, 10-46%), compared with 17% (range, 5-30%) for those without IFN-alpha. In RCC, the overall response rate for IFN-alpha-containing regimens was 14% (range, 4-33%), and 8% (range, 3-27%) for those without IFN-alpha. A meta-analysis showed that regimens including IFN-alpha improved response rates compared with regimens without IFN-alpha. The pooled odds ratio (OR) for improved response with IFN-alpha in metastatic MM was 0.65 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.48 to 0.87], and in advanced RCC the OR was 0.47 (95% CI 0.26-0.85). In five metastatic MM trials and three RCC trials, enough data on survival were reported to estimate a pooled 1-year OR for survival. The pooled OR for improved survival with IFN-alpha was 0.69 (95% CI 0.50-0.94), and 0.46 (95% CI 0.28-0.75), respectively. The data on both metastatic MM and advanced RCC indicate that better response rates and prolonged survival can be achieved with regimens including IFN-alpha. The clinical relevance of these findings will be discussed.

Interferon Alfa-2b Three Times Daily and Thalidomide in the Treatment of Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma

PURPOSE The antiangiogenic effect of interferon (IFN) may improve with frequent dosing and by combination with other agents with antiangiogenic activity. To evaluate this potential, we treated patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) with frequently dosed IFN and thalidomide. PATIENTS AND METHODS Thirty patients were given IFN-alpha-2b 0.9 MU subcutaneously three times daily for 1 month and subsequently 1.2 MU tid unless serious toxicity was encountered. Thalidomide was first given 100 mg/d for 1 week and 300 mg/d thereafter. Sera were collected before and during treatment for serum vascular endothelial growth factor (S-VEGF) analyses performed using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. RESULTS The intention-to-treat response rate was 20% (95% CI, 6% to 34%) and response rate for assessable patients (n = 27) was 22% (95% CI, 6% to 38%). All responses were partial. In addition, 17 patients (63%; 95% CI, 45% to 81%) had stable disease for 3 months or longer. The median time to treatment failure was 7.7 months, and median survival time was 14.9 months. The most common cause of thalidomide discontinuation was neuropathy. S-VEGF levels decreased more in patients who responded to therapy compared with those in patients whose condition had stabilized or who had progressive disease (P =.036). CONCLUSION The combination of frequently dosed IFN-alpha-2b and low-dose thalidomide is feasible and active in advanced RCC, but the clinical benefit may remain small compared with that of IFN alone. Results from an ongoing phase III trial comparing IFN-alpha with or without thalidomide need to be analyzed before this combination can be recommended for use outside clinical studies.

A phase Ii trial of bevacizumab with dacarbazine and daily low-dose interferon-α2a as first line treatment in metastatic melanoma

Metastatic melanomas are hypervascular tumours with poor prognosis. We hypothesized that treatment of metastatic melanoma with a combination of bevacizumab, a monoclonal antibody against vascular endothelial growth factor, dacarbazine (DTIC) and low-dose interferon α-2a (IFN-α2a) might lead to a synergistic inhibition of angiogenesis and regression of tumours. Patients with metastatic melanoma were treated with bevacizumab (5 mg/kg every 2 weeks), DTIC (200 mg/m2 days 1–5 every 4 weeks) and IFN-α2a (three MIU subcutaneously daily from day 15 onwards). Patients exhibiting response or stable disease after 6 months were treated with bevacizumab±IFN-α2a until disease progression. The primary study objectives were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival and safety. Twenty-six patients were accrued. Response rate was 23% (two complete responses, four partial responses), and six patients showed stable disease. The median PFS for all patients was 2.3 months and for responders 8.1 months. The median overall survival for all patients was 11.5 months. Four life-threatening adverse events were seen: two pulmonary thromboembolisms, an intracerebral haemorrhage, and one grade 4 hypertension. One of the pulmonary emboli and the intracerebral haemorrhage were observed ≥3 months after the last bevacizumab–DTIC dose. Serum matrix metalloproteinase-9 and vascular endothelial growth factor levels changed during therapy. There was a trend towards favourable PFS among patients with only minimal or moderate change in these marker expression levels. The present regimen was active in this patient group but was also associated with remarkable vascular events.

Pulmonary toxicity after radiotherapy in primary breast cancer patients: Results from a randomized chemotherapy study

PURPOSE Pulmonary toxicity was prospectively evaluated within a randomized trial for breast cancer patients at high risk for relapse, who postoperatively received as adjuvant therapy either 9 cycles of tailored chemotherapy (20 patients) (cyclophosphamide, epirubicin, 5-fluorouracil [FEC]) or standard FEC x 3 followed by high-dose chemotherapy (cyclophosphamide, thiotepa, carboplatin [CTCb]) supported by peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (14 patients). After high-dose chemotherapy or tailored FEC, all patients received locoregional radiotherapy (50 Gy/5 weeks), plus tamoxifen for 5 years. METHODS AND MATERIALS Lung function tests (FVC, FEV1, and DL(CO)) were performed before chemotherapy and 9 months after radiotherapy. Computed tomography of the lungs was performed before radiotherapy and 6 weeks, 3 months, and 9 months after radiotherapy. RESULTS Clinical signs of suspected pneumonitis were noted in 29% of patients, but only 1 patient needed symptomatic therapy. Radiologic changes were detected in 68% of patients, and they were most frequent at 3 months after radiotherapy. FVC decreased in both groups (tailored FEC: mean difference, -6.5%, p = 0.0005; CTCb: -2.0%, p = 0.21; tailored FEC vs. CTCb: -4.5%, p = 0.05). DL(CO) decreased significantly in both groups (tailored FEC: mean difference, -11.2%, p < 0.0001; CTCb: -5.6%, p = 0.02; tailored FEC vs. CTCb: -5.6%, p = 0.07). FEV1 decreased by 7.3% in patients treated with tailored FEC (p < 0.0001) and by 2.5% in patients treated with CTCb (p = 0.03) (tailored FEC vs. CTCb: 3.7%, p = 0.08). CONCLUSIONS Changes in pulmonary function were thus detected in both groups, although to a greater extent in the tailored FEC group. The clinical significance of these findings should be balanced carefully against the improved, statistically significant relapse-free survival achieved with the tailored FEC regimen compared to high-dose CTCb + peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (PSCT).

Nivolumab improved survival vs dacarbazine in patients with untreated advanced melanoma

The hazard ratio (HR) for death was 0.42 (99.79% CI 0.25–0.73; P < 0.0001) in favor of nivolumab, with 1year OS rate 73% (95% CI, 66%–79%) for nivolumab vs 42% (95% CI, 33%–51%) for dacarbazine. Median OS was not reached for nivolumab and was 10.8 months for dacarbazine. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 5.1 months for nivolumab and 2.2 months for dacarbazine (HR for death or progression 0.43, 95% CI 0.34–0.56; P < 0.0001). Objective response rate was 40% (84/210) vs 14% (29/208) for nivolumab and dacarbazine, respectively (P < 0.0001). Median duration of response was not reached for nivolumab and 6 months for dacarbazine. At the time of data cutoff, responses were ongoing in 86% (72/84) of nivolumab and 52% (15/29) of dacarbazine responders. PD-L1 positivity (using a 5% tumor cell surface staining cutoff) appeared to be associated with improved OS in the nivolumab arm (85% of PD-L1+ and 71% of PD-L1-/ indeterminate patients alive at the time of last followup). Both PD-L1+ and PD-L1-/indeterminate patients receiving nivolumab had improved OS vs dacarbazine (un-stratified HR 0.30, 95% CI, 0.15–0.60 in PD-L1+ patients; 0.48, 95% CI, 0.32–0.71 in PD-L1-/indeterminate patient, both in favor of the nivolumab arm). The most common nivolumab-related adverse events (AEs) were fatigue, pruritus, and nausea. Drug-related grade 3–4 AEs were reported in 12% vs 18% of patients receiving nivolumab vs dacarbazine, respectively. AEs led to discontinuation in 7% and 12% of dacarbazinevs nivolumab-treatment patients, respectively. Conclusions Compared to dacarbazine, nivolumab significantly improved OS and PFS in previously untreated patients with BRAF wild-type metastatic melanoma with an acceptable safety profile.

Immunohistochemically Detectable Bcl-2 Expression in Metastatic Melanoma: Association with Survival and Treatment Response

Objective: The antiapoptotic protein Bcl-2 is supposed to influence the treatment responsiveness of different malignancies. In the present study the prognostic and predictive significance of Bcl-2 expression for survival and response to an administered therapy was explored in patients with metastatic melanoma. Also, the correlation between Bcl-2 expression and proliferation activity of tumor cells was defined to examine the regulatory role of Bcl-2 in proliferation. Materials and Methods: Sixty metastatic melanomas obtained from patients treated with chemoimmunotherapy were examined by immunohistochemistry with anti-Bcl-2 and anti-Ki-67 (MIB-1) antibodies. Proliferation activity was expressed in percentages as MIB-1 index. Results: The presence of Bcl-2 immunoreactivity was associated with a significantly lower MIB-1 index (p = 0.016), and a longer disease-free survival (p = 0.004). The lack of Bcl-2 expression was related to a higher response rate to therapy in comparison to a diffuse and focal pattern of Bcl-2 expression (p = 0.017). Although the presence of Bcl-2 immunoreactivity as such did not correlate with survival after the initiation of chemoimmunotherapy, the focal Bcl-2 expression pattern was strongly associated with a worse prognosis compared to a diffuse expression or a lack of Bcl-2 staining (p < 0.0001). Conclusions: Our results support the role of Bcl-2 in the regulation of cell proliferation and suggest that an increase of metastatic potential and progression of malignant melanoma is associated with a loss of Bcl-2 expression. The lack of Bcl-2 expression could be a predictor of the response to chemoimmunotherapy, whereas the Bcl-2 expression pattern, possibly indicating the heterogeneity of the tumors, might be a potential prognostic factor for survival after the initiation of therapy.

The CD4+/CD8+ ratio as a prognostic factor in patients with metastatic melanoma receiving chemoimmunotherapy

PURPOSE As reported earlier, a chemotherapy regimen that consisted of dacarbazine, vincristine, lomustine, and bleomycin (DOBC) combined with natural leukocyte interferon (IFN) has been administered with favorable results to patients with metastatic melanoma. In this study, lymphocyte subsets (CD4+ and CD8+) were analyzed before and during treatment to elucidate if alterations in the CD4+/CD8+ ratio had any prognostic value. MATERIALS AND METHODS Blood samples were systematically obtained from 54 patients with metastatic melanoma who received this chemoimmunotherapy. The frequencies of peripheral-blood lymphocyte subsets were monitored by flow cytometry using the monoclonal antibodies OKT4 (CD4+, T-helper cells) and OKT8 (CD8+, T-suppressor cells). RESULTS Twenty-seven patients had a constantly increasing ratio, while the remaining 27 patients had a fluctuating or constantly decreasing ratio. The former group had a median survival time of 11.8 months, as compared with 6.5 months for the latter (P = .008, log-rank test). This difference was generated among patients who had an objective response. Responding patients with a constantly increasing ratio had a median survival time of 21.7 months, as compared with 10.2 months for patients with no constant increase in the ratio (P = .038, log-rank test). In nonresponders, no difference in survival was observed between the two groups. CONCLUSION The monitoring of early changes in the CD4+/CD8+ ratio can provide valuable information that predicts the prognosis of metastatic melanoma patients receiving chemoimmunotherapy.