Micah D. Schuster
San Diego State University
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Micah D. Schuster.
The Astrophysical Journal | 2010
Daniel A. Dale; Rebecca J. Barlow; Seth A. Cohen; David O. Cook; L. Clifton Johnson; ShiAnne Kattner; Carolynn A. Moore; Micah D. Schuster; Shawn M. Staudaher
The Wyoming Survey for H-alpha, or WySH, is a large-area, ground-based imaging survey for H-alpha-emitting galaxies at redshifts of z ~ 0.16, 0.24, 0.32, and 0.40. The survey spans up to four square degrees in a set of fields of low Galactic cirrus emission, using twin narrowband filters at each epoch for improved stellar continuum subtraction. H-alpha luminosity functions are presented for each Delta(z) ~ 0.02 epoch based on a total of nearly 1200 galaxies. These data clearly show an evolution with lookback time in the volume-averaged cosmic star formation rate. Integrals of Schechter fits to the incompleteness- and extinction-corrected H-alpha luminosity functions indicate star formation rates per co-moving volume of 0.010, 0.013, 0.020, 0.022 h_70 M_sun yr^{-1} Mpc^{-3} at z ~ 0.16, 0.24, 0.32, and 0.40, respectively. Statistical and systematic measurement uncertainties combined are on the order of 25% while the effects of cosmic variance are at the 20% level. The bulk of this evolution is driven by changes in the characteristic luminosity L_* of the H-alpha luminosity functions, with L_* for the earlier two epochs being a factor of two larger than L_* at the latter two epochs; it is more difficult with this data set to decipher systematic evolutionary differences in the luminosity function amplitude and faint-end slope. Coupling these results with a comprehensive compilation of results from the literature on emission line surveys, the evolution in the cosmic star formation rate density over 0 < z < 1.5 is measured to be rho_dot_SFR(z) = rho_dot_SFR(0) (1+z)^{3.4+/-0.4}.
Physical Review C | 2014
Micah D. Schuster; Sofia Quaglioni; Calvin W. Johnson; Eric Jurgenson; Petr Navratil
The past two decades have seen a revolution in ab initio calculations of nuclear properties. One key element has been the development of a rigorous effective interaction theory, applying unitary transformations to soften the nuclear Hamiltonian and hence accelerate the convergence as a function of the model space size. For consistency, however, one ought to apply the same transformation to other operators when calculating transitions and mean values from the eigenstates of the renormalized Hamiltonian. Working in a translationally-invariant harmonic oscillator basis for the two- and three-nucleon systems, we evolve the Hamiltonian, square-radius and total dipole strength operators by the similarity renormalization group (SRG). The inclusion of up to three-body matrix elements in the 4He nucleus all but completely restores the invariance of the expectation values under the transformation. We also consider a Gaussian operator with adjustable range and find at short ranges an increased contribution from such induced three-body terms.
Physical Review C | 2014
Micah D. Schuster; Sofia Quaglioni; Calvin W. Johnson; Eric Jurgenson; Petr Navratil
The past two decades have seen a revolution in ab initio calculations of nuclear properties. One key element has been the development of a rigorous effective interaction theory, applying unitary transformations to soften the nuclear Hamiltonian and hence accelerate the convergence as a function of the model space size. For consistency, however, one ought to apply the same transformation to other operators when calculating transitions and mean values from the eigenstates of the renormalized Hamiltonian. Working in a translationally-invariant harmonic oscillator basis for the two- and three-nucleon systems, we evolve the Hamiltonian, square-radius and total dipole strength operators by the similarity renormalization group (SRG). The inclusion of up to three-body matrix elements in the 4He nucleus all but completely restores the invariance of the expectation values under the transformation. We also consider a Gaussian operator with adjustable range and find at short ranges an increased contribution from such induced three-body terms.
Physical Review C | 2014
Micah D. Schuster; Sofia Quaglioni; Calvin W. Johnson; Eric Jurgenson; Petr Navratil
The past two decades have seen a revolution in ab initio calculations of nuclear properties. One key element has been the development of a rigorous effective interaction theory, applying unitary transformations to soften the nuclear Hamiltonian and hence accelerate the convergence as a function of the model space size. For consistency, however, one ought to apply the same transformation to other operators when calculating transitions and mean values from the eigenstates of the renormalized Hamiltonian. Working in a translationally-invariant harmonic oscillator basis for the two- and three-nucleon systems, we evolve the Hamiltonian, square-radius and total dipole strength operators by the similarity renormalization group (SRG). The inclusion of up to three-body matrix elements in the 4He nucleus all but completely restores the invariance of the expectation values under the transformation. We also consider a Gaussian operator with adjustable range and find at short ranges an increased contribution from such induced three-body terms.
Physical Review C | 2015
Micah D. Schuster; Sofia Quaglioni; Calvin W. Johnson; Eric Jurgenson; Petr Navartil
Proceedings of the Conference on Advances in Radioactive Isotope Science (ARIS2014) | 2015
Sofia Quaglioni; Guillaume Hupin; Joachim Langhammer; Carolina Romero-Redondo; Micah D. Schuster; Calvin W. Johnson; Petr Navratil; Robert Roth
Bulletin of the American Physical Society | 2014
Micah D. Schuster; Sofia Quaglioni; Calvin W. Johnson; Eric Jurgenson; Petr Navratil
Archive | 2013
Micah D. Schuster; Sofia Quaglioni; Calvin W. Johnson; Eric Jurgenson; Petr Navratil
Bulletin of the American Physical Society | 2012
Micah D. Schuster; Sofia Quaglioni; Calvin W. Johnson; Eric Jurgenson; Petr Navr '{a}til
arXiv: Atomic Physics | 2011
Micah D. Schuster; Calvin W. Johnson; Joshua Staker