Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Michael A. Henning is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Michael A. Henning.


Discrete Mathematics | 2009

A survey of selected recent results on total domination in graphs

Michael A. Henning

A set S of vertices in a graph G is a total dominating set of G if every vertex of G is adjacent to some vertex in S. In this paper, we offer a survey of selected recent results on total domination in graphs.


SIAM Journal on Discrete Mathematics | 2002

Domination in Graphs Applied to Electric Power Networks

Teresa W. Haynes; Sandra Mitchell Hedetniemi; Stephen T. Hedetniemi; Michael A. Henning

The problem of monitoring an electric power system by placing as few measurement devices in the system as possible is closely related to the well-known vertex covering and dominating set problems in graphs. We consider the graph theoretical representation of this problem as a variation of the dominating set problem and define a set S to be a power dominating set of a graph if every vertex and every edge in the system is monitored by the set S (following a set of rules for power system monitoring). The minimum cardinality of a power dominating set of a graph G is the power domination number


Journal of Graph Theory | 2000

Graphs with large total domination number

Michael A. Henning

\gamma_P(G)


Discrete Applied Mathematics | 2006

Locating and total dominating sets in trees

Teresa W. Haynes; Michael A. Henning; Jamie Howard

. We show that the power dominating set (PDS) problem is NP-complete even when restricted to bipartite graphs or chordal graphs. On the other hand, we give a linear algorithm to solve the PDS for trees. In addition, we investigate theoretical properties of


Graphs and Combinatorics | 2004

Paired-Domination in Claw-Free Cubic Graphs

Odile Favaron; Michael A. Henning

\gamma_P(T)


Journal of Graph Theory | 2000

Total domination in graphs with minimum degree three

Odile Favaron; Michael A. Henning; Christina M. Mynhart; Joël Puech

in trees T.


Discussiones Mathematicae Graph Theory | 2002

A characterization of roman trees

Michael A. Henning

Let G = (V,E) be a graph. A set S ⊆ V is a total dominating set if every vertex of V is adjacent to some vertex in S. The total domination number of G, denoted by Υt(G), is the minimum cardinality of a total dominating set of G. We establish a property of minimum total dominating sets in graphs. If G is a connected graph of order n ≥ 3, then (see [3]) Υt(G) ≤ 2n-3. We show that if G is a connected graph of order n with minimum degree at least 2, then either Υt(G) ≤ 4n-7 or G e {C3, C5, C6, C10}. A characterization of those graphs of order n which are edge-minimal with respect to satisfying G connected, δ(G) e 2 and Υt(G) ≥ 4n-7 is obtained. We establish that if G is a connected graph of size q with minimum degree at least 2, then Υt(G) ≤(q + 2)-2. Connected graphs G of size q with minimum degree at least 2 satisfying Υt(G) > q-2 are characterized.


Discrete Mathematics | 2004

The diameter of total domination vertex critical graphs

Wayne Goddard; Teresa W. Haynes; Michael A. Henning; Lucas C. van der Merwe

A set S of vertices in a graph G = (V, E) is a total dominating set of G if every vertex of V is adjacent to a vertex in S. We consider total dominating sets of minimum cardinality which have the additional property that distinct vertices of V are totally dominated by distinct subsets of the total dominating set.


Discrete Applied Mathematics | 2010

k-tuple total domination in graphs

Michael A. Henning; Adel P. Kazemi

Abstract.A set S of vertices in a graph G is a paired-dominating set of G if every vertex of G is adjacent to some vertex in S and if the subgraph induced by S contains a perfect matching. The minimum cardinality of a paired-dominating set of G is the paired-domination number of G, denoted by γpr(G). If G does not contain a graph F as an induced subgraph, then G is said to be F-free. In particular if F=K1,3 or K4−e, then we say that G is claw-free or diamond-free, respectively. Let G be a connected cubic graph of order n. We show that (i) if G is (K1,3,K4−e,C4)-free, then γpr(G)≤3n/8; (ii) if G is claw-free and diamond-free, then γpr(G)≤2n/5; (iii) if G is claw-free, then γpr(G)≤n/2. In all three cases, the extremal graphs are characterized.


Discrete Applied Mathematics | 2006

A note on power domination in grid graphs

Michael Dorfling; Michael A. Henning

We consider the equivalence classes of graphs induced by the unsigned versions of the Reidemeister moves on knot diagrams. Any graph that is reducible by some finite sequence of these moves, to a graph with no edges, is called a knot graph. We show that the class of knot graphs strictly contains the set of delta-wye graphs. We prove that the dimension of the intersection of the cycle and cocycle spaces is an effective numerical invariant of these classes.

Collaboration


Dive into the Michael A. Henning's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Anders Yeo

University of Johannesburg

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Teresa W. Haynes

East Tennessee State University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Justin Southey

University of Johannesburg

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge