Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Michael Athans is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Michael Athans.


IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control | 1986

Distributed asynchronous deterministic and stochastic gradient optimization algorithms

John N. Tsitsiklis; Dimitri P. Bertsekas; Michael Athans

We present a model for asynchronous distributed computation and then proceed to analyze the convergence of natural asynchronous distributed versions of a large class of deterministic and stochastic gradient-like algorithms. We show that such algorithms retain the desirable convergence properties of their centralized counterparts, provided that the time between consecutive interprocessor communications and the communication delays are not too large.


IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control | 1978

Survey of decentralized control methods for large scale systems

Nils R. Sandell; Pravin Varaiya; Michael Athans; M G Safonov

This paper surveys the control theoretic literature on decentralized and hierarchical control, and methods of analysis of large scale systems.


IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control | 1990

Analysis of gain scheduled control for nonlinear plants

Jeff S. Shamma; Michael Athans

Gain scheduling has proven to be a successful design methodology in many engineering applications. In the absence of a sound theoretical analysis, these designs come with no guarantees of the robustness, performance, or even nominal stability of the overall gain-scheduled design. An analysis is presented for two types of nonlinear gain-scheduled control systems: (1) scheduling on a reference trajectory, and (2) scheduling on the plant output. Conditions which guarantee stability, robustness, and performance properties of the global gain schedule designs are given. These conditions confirm and formalize popular notions regarding gain scheduled designs, such as that the scheduling variable should vary slowly, and capture the plants nonlinearities. >


IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control | 1987

The LQG/LTR procedure for multivariable feedback control design

Gunter Stein; Michael Athans

This paper provides a tutorial overview of the LQG/LTR design procedure for linear multivariable feedback systems. LQG/LTR is interpreted as the solution of a specific weighted H2-tradeoff between transfer functions in the frequency domain. Properties of this solution are examined for both minimum-phase and nonminimum-phase systems. This leads to a formal weight augmentation procedure for the minimum-phase case which permits essentially arbitrary specification of system sensitivity functions in terms of the weights. While such arbitrary specifications are not possible for nonminimum-phase problems, a direct relationship between weights and sensitivities is developed for nonminimum-phase SISO and certain nonminimum-phase MIMO cases which guides the weight selection process.


IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control | 1985

Robustness of continuous-time adaptive control algorithms in the presence of unmodeled dynamics

Charles E. Rohrs; Lena S. Valavani; Michael Athans; Gunter Stein

This paper examines the robustness properties of existing adaptive control algorithms to unmodeled plant high-frequency dynamics and unmeasurable output disturbances. It is demonstrated thai there exist two infinite-gain operators in the nonlinear dynamic system which determines the time-evolution of output and parameter errors. The pragmatic implication of the existence of such infinite-gain operators is that 1) sinusoidal reference inputs at specific frequencies and/or 2) sinusoidal output disturbances at any frequency (including dc), can cause the loop gain to increase without bound, thereby exciting the unmodeled high-frequency dynamics, and yielding an unstable control system. Hence, it is concluded that existing adaptive control algorithms as they are presented in the literature referenced in this paper, cannot be used with confidence in practical designs where the plant contains unmodeled dynamics because instability is likely to result. Further understanding is required to ascertain how the currently implemented adaptive systems differ from the theoretical systems studied here and how further theoretical development can improve the robustness of adaptive controllers.


Automatica | 1991

Guaranteed properties of gain scheduled control for linear parameter-varying plants

Jeff S. Shamma; Michael Athans

Abstract Gain scheduling has proven to be a successful design methodology in many engineering applications. However in the absence of a sound theoretical analysis, these designs come with no guarantees on the robustness, performance, or even nominal stability of the overall gain scheduled design. This paper presents such an analysis for one type of gain scheduled system, namely, a linear parameter-varying plant scheduling on its exogenous parameters. Conditions are given which guarantee that the stability, robustness, and performance properties of the fixed operating point designs carry over to the global gain scheduled design. These conditions confirm and formalize popular notions regarding gain scheduled design, such as the scheduling variable should “vary slowly.”


IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control | 1981

Robustness results in linear-quadratic Gaussian based multivariable control designs

N. Lehtomaki; Nils R. Sandell; Michael Athans

The robustness of control systems with respect to model uncertainty is considered using simple frequency domain criteria. Available and new results are derived under a common framework in which the minimum singular value of the return differences transfer matrix is the key quantity. In particular, robustness results associated with multivariable control systems designed on the basis of linear-quadratic (LQ) and the linear-quadratic Gaussian (LQG) design methodologies are presented.


IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control | 1971

The role and use of the stochastic linear-quadratic-Gaussian problem in control system design

Michael Athans

The role of the linear-quadratic stochastic control problem in engineering design is reviewed in tutorial fashion. The design approach is motivated by considering the control of a non-linear uncertain plant about a desired input-output response. It is demonstrated how a design philosophy based on 1) deterministic perturbation control, 2) stochastic state estimation, and 3) linearized stochastic control leads to an overall closed-loop control system. The emphasis of the paper is on the philosophy of the design process, the modeling issue, and the formulation of the problem; the results are given for the sake of completeness, but no proofs are included. The systematic off-line nature of the design process is stressed throughout.


Information & Computation | 1967

The Matrix Minimum Principle

Michael Athans

The purpose of this paper is to provide an alternate statement of the Pontryagin maximum principle as applied to systems which are most conveniently and naturally described by matrix, rather than vector, differential or difference equations. The use of gradient matrices facilitates the manipulation of the resultant equations. The theory is applied to the solution of a simple optimization problem.


conference on decision and control | 1982

Robustness of adaptive control algorithms in the presence of unmodeled dynamics

Charles E. Rohrs; Lena Valavani; Michael Athans; Gunter Stein

This paper reports the outcome of an exhaustive analytical and numerical investigation of stability and robustness properties of a wide class of adaptive control algorithms in the presence of unmodeled dynamics and output disturbances. The class of adaptive algorithms considered are those commonly referred to as model-reference adaptive control algorithms, self-tuning controllers, and dead-beat adaptive controllers; they have been developed for both continuous-time systems and discrete-time systems. The existing adaptive control algorithms have been proven to be globally assymptotically stable under certain assumptions, the key ones being (a) that the number of poles and zeroes of the unknown plant are known, and (b) that the primary performance criterion is related to good command following. These theoretical assumptions are too restrictive from an engineering point of view. Real plants always contain unmodeled high-frequency dynamics and small delays, and hence no upper bound on the number of the plant poles and zeroes exists. Also real plants are always subject to unmeasurable output additive disturbances, although these may be quite small. Hence, it is important to critically examine the stability robustness properties of the existing adaptive algorithms when some of the theoretical assumptions are removed; in particular, their stability and performance properties in the presence of unmodeled dynamics and output disturbances. A unified analytical approach has been developed and documented in the recently completed Ph.D. thesis by Rohrs [15] that can be used to examine the class of existing adaptive algorithms. It was discovered that all existing algorithms contain an infinite-gain operator in the dynamic system that defines command reference errors and parameter errors; it is argued that such an infinite gain operator appears to be generic to all adaptive algorithms, whether they exhibit explicit or implicit parameter identification. The practical engineering consequences of the existence of the infinite-gain operator are disastrous. Analytical and simulation results demonstrate that sinusoidal reference inputs at specific frequencies and/or sinusoidal output disturbances at any frequency (including d.c.) cause the loop gain of the adaptive control system to increase without bound, thereby exciting the (unmodeled) plant dynamics, and yielding an unstable control system. Hence, it is concluded that none of the adaptive algorithms considered can be used with confidence in a practical control system design, because instability will set in with a high probability.

Collaboration


Dive into the Michael Athans's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

A. Pascoal

Instituto Superior Técnico

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Nils R. Sandell

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Jeff S. Shamma

King Abdullah University of Science and Technology

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Lena Valavani

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Sajjad Fekri

University of Leicester

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Vahid Hassani

Norwegian University of Science and Technology

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

John N. Tsitsiklis

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Stanley B. Gershwin

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge