Michael C. Gerling

Dropped head deformity due to cervical myopathy: surgical treatment outcomes and complications spanning twenty years.

Study Design. Case series. Objective. Report long-term outcomes, complications, and surgical technique of cervical myopathy (CM) patients treated with posterior instrumented, cervico-thoracic (C-T) fusions. Summary of Background Data. CM is a rare, progressive, debilitating condition where weakness of neck extensor muscles results in a dropped head deformity (DHD), or severe flexible, cervico-thoracic kyphosis. Treatment algorithms are currently based on small case reports and only 1 patient’s short-term surgical outcome. Methods. Re-examination at follow-up, chart review, and radiographic analysis was carried out for all CM patients with DHD treated by the senior author. Additional outcome measures included Odom criteria, verbal rating scores for pain, and patient satisfaction ratings. Patients with less than 2-years follow-up, previous cervical spine surgery or intrinsic, structural spinal deformities were excluded. Results. Nine CM patients met the study inclusion criteria with average follow-up of 6 years (range, 2–17 years) and average age 67 years. Four primary and 5 secondary myopathies after radiotherapy underwent deformity correction and posterior arthrodesis with instrumentation from the second cervical level to the upper thoracic spine. Patient presentation, deformity correction, and surgical techniques are described. All pain ratings improved, satisfaction was excellent in 7 and fair in 2 patients, and Odom scores were good to excellent in 7 and fair in 2 patients. Shoulder weakness remained equivalent or improved after surgery and all ambulated independently, though 1 continued to use a walker. Eleven postoperative complications are described. Conclusion. Surgical correction with posterior, instrumented C-T spinal fusion is associated with high patient satisfaction rates in CM patients with DHD. Complications are frequent but do not diminish long-term outcomes. New rod and screw instrumentation with bone morphogenic protein may improve arthrodesis and correction.

Risk Factors for Reoperation in Patients Treated Surgically for Lumbar Stenosis: A Subanalysis of the 8-year Data From the SPORT Trial.

Study Design. A retrospective subgroup analysis was performed on surgically treated patients from the lumbar spinal stenosis (SpS) arm of the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial (SPORT), randomized, and observational cohorts. Objective. To identify risk factors for reoperation in patients treated surgically for SpS and compare outcomes between patients who underwent reoperation with those who did not. Summary of Background Data. SpS is one of the most common indications for surgery in the elderly; however, few long-term studies have identified risk factors for reoperation. Methods. A post-hoc subgroup analysis was performed on patients from the SpS arm of the SPORT, randomized and observational cohorts. Baseline characteristics were analyzed between reoperation and no-reoperation groups using univariate and multivariate analysis on data 8 years postoperation. Results. Of the 417 study patients, 88% underwent decompression only, 5% noninstrumented fusion, and 6% instrumented fusion. At the 8-year follow-up, the reoperation rate was 18%; 52% of reoperations were for recurrent stenosis or progressive spondylolisthesis, 25% for complication or other reason, and 16% for new condition. Of patients who underwent a reoperation, 42% did so within 2 years, 70% within 4 years, and 84% within 6 years. Patients who underwent reoperation were less likely to have presented with any neurological deficit (43% reop vs. 57% no reop, P = 0.04). Patients improved less at follow-up in the reoperation group (P < 0.001). Conclusion. In patients undergoing surgical treatment for SpS, the reoperation rate at 8-year follow-up was 18%. Patients with a reoperation were less likely to have a baseline neurological deficit. Patients who did not undergo reoperation had better patient reported outcomes at 8-year follow-up compared with those who had repeat surgery. Level of Evidence: 2

Morbidity of Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery in Elderly Has Declined Over Time

Study Design. A retrospective review of a prospectively collected database, the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS), years 2003 to 2012. Objectives. The aim of this study was to examine trends in the management of scoliosis in elderly (age >75 yrs) patients from 2003 to 2012. Summary of Background Data. Scoliosis incidence rises with increasing age, and age has been shown to be an independent risk factor for surgical complications in scoliosis surgery. Previous studies have displayed increasing surgical frequency on elderly scoliotic patients in the last decade, but have not investigated complications in the same years. Methods. ICD-9 coding identified elderly (age ≥75 yrs) patients with a primary diagnosis of scoliosis undergoing lumbar fusion or decompression. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) comparisons and linear trend analysis described changes from 2003 to 2012 in surgical invasiveness (Mirza scale: levels fused/decompressed/instrumented and by approach), intraoperative complications, and Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI). Secondary outcome measures included cost and discharge outcomes. Results. Eight thousand one elderly patients with ASD from 2003 to 2012 were included for analysis. Fusion incidence increased on average 13.8% per year (P < 0.001), surgical invasiveness by Mirza scale increased from 2.0 in 2003 to 5.9 in 2012 (P < 0.001), and CCI increased from 0.77 to 1.44 (p < 0.001). Over the same interval, elderly patients undergoing fusion displayed overall reduction in complications (excluding anemia)—from 26.7% to 8.6% (P < 0.001); specifically, surgical complications decreased from 11.7% to 0.7% (P < 0.001) and respiratory complications decreased from 6.7% to 1.4% (P = 0.004). Conclusion. From 2003 to 2012, surgical management of ASD in the elderly population increased in incidence and complexity, while number of patient comorbidities increased and in-hospital morbidity decreased. This may indicate increased willingness of surgeons to operate on elderly patients, and reflect a development of overall understanding of deformity in the past decade. Level of Evidence: 3

Management of Dural Tears in Spinal Surgery

Dural tears are one of the most common complications of spinal surgery. Deleterious consequences of dural leaks include dural-cutaneous fistulas that can lead to meningitis, arachnoiditis or epidural abscess, impaired wound healing, wound infection, pseudomeningocele formation, nerve root entrapment, and headache. Primary watertight closure is the most important aspect of treatment. If a dural tear is encountered during spine surgery, a direct suture repair is recommended. If the repair is tenuous or if suture repair is not possible due to location or tissue quality, use of adjuncts should be considered.

Differences in primary and revision deformity surgeries: following 1,063 primary thoracolumbar adult spinal deformity fusions over time

Background This study aims to describe properties of adult spinal deformity (ASD) revisions relative to primary surgeries and determine clinical variables that can predict revision. ASD is a common pathology that can lead to decreased quality of life, pain, physical limitations, and dissatisfaction with self-image. Durability of interventions for deformity treatment is of paramount concern to surgeons, as revision rates remain high. Methods Patients undergoing thoracolumbar fusion, five or more levels, for scoliosis (primary diagnosis ICD-9 737.x) were identified on a state-wide database. Primary and revision (returning for re-fusion procedure) surgeries were compared based on demographic, hospital stay, and clinical characteristics. Differences between primary and revision surgeries, and predictors of primary surgeries requiring revision, utilized binary logistic regression controlling for age, comorbidity burden, and levels fused. Results A total of 1,063 patients (average 7.4 levels fused, mean age: 47.6 years, 69.0% female) undergoing operative treatment for ASD were identified, of which 123 (average 7.1 levels fused, 11.6%, mean age 61.43, 80.5% female) had surgical revision. Primary surgeries were ~0.3 levels longer (P=0.013), used interbody ~11% more frequently (P=0.020), and used BMP ~12% less frequently (P=0.008). Revisions occurred 176.4 days after the primary on average. The most frequent causes of revisions were: 43.09% implant failure, 24.39% acquired kyphosis, and 14.63% enduring scoliosis. After controlling for age, comorbidities, and levels fused older, more comorbid, female, and white-race patients were more likely to be revised. Upon multivariate regression, after controlling for age and levels fused, overall complications remained non-different (OR: 0.8, 95% CI: 0.6-1.2). However, revision remained an independent predictor for infection (OR: 5.5, 95% CI: 2.8-10.5). Conclusions In a statewide database with individual patient follow up of up to 4 years 10% of ASD patients undergoing scoliosis correction required revision. Revision surgeries had higher infection incidence.