Michael C. Kiel

Orientation of ribosome recycling factor in the ribosome from directed hydroxyl radical probing.

Ribosome recycling factor (RRF) disassembles posttermination complexes in conjunction with elongation factor EF-G, liberating ribosomes for further rounds of translation. The striking resemblance of its L-shaped structure to that of tRNA has suggested that the mode of action of RRF may be based on mimicry of tRNA. Directed hydroxyl radical probing of 16S and 23S rRNA from Fe(II) tethered to ten positions on the surface of E. coli RRF constrains it to a well-defined location in the subunit interface cavity. Surprisingly, the orientation of RRF in the ribosome differs markedly from any of those previously observed for tRNA, suggesting that structural mimicry does not necessarily reflect functional mimicry.

Post‐termination complex disassembly by ribosome recycling factor, a functional tRNA mimic

Ribosome recycling factor (RRF) together with elongation factor G (EF‐G) disassembles the post‐ termination ribosomal complex. Inhibitors of translocation, thiostrepton, viomycin and aminoglycosides, inhibited the release of tRNA and mRNA from the post‐termination complex. In contrast, fusidic acid and a GTP analog that fix EF‐G to the ribosome, allowing one round of tRNA translocation, inhibited mRNA but not tRNA release from the complex. The release of tRNA is a prerequisite for mRNA release but partially takes place with EF‐G alone. The data are consistent with the notion that RRF binds to the A‐site and is translocated to the P‐site, releasing deacylated tRNA from the P‐ and E‐sites. The final step, the release of mRNA, is accompanied by the release of RRF and EF‐G from the ribosome. With the model post‐termination complex, 70S ribosomes were released from the post‐termination complex by the RRF reaction and were then dissociated into subunits by IF3.

Release of Ribosome-bound Ribosome Recycling Factor by Elongation Factor G

Elongation factor G (EF-G) and ribosome recycling factor (RRF) disassemble post-termination complexes of ribosome, mRNA, and tRNA. RRF forms stable complexes with 70 S ribosomes and 50 S ribosomal subunits. Here, we show that EF-G releases RRF from 70 S ribosomal and model post-termination complexes but not from 50 S ribosomal subunit complexes. The release of bound RRF by EF-G is stimulated by GTP analogues. The EF-G-dependent release occurs in the presence of fusidic acid and viomycin. However, thiostrepton inhibits the release. RRF was shown to bind to EF-G-ribosome complexes in the presence of GTP with much weaker affinity, suggesting that EF-G may move RRF to this position during the release of RRF. On the other hand, RRF did not bind to EF-G-ribosome complexes with fusidic acid, suggesting that EF-G stabilized by fusidic acid does not represent the natural post-termination complex. In contrast, the complexes of ribosome, EF-G and thiostrepton could bind RRF, although with lower affinity. These results suggest that thiostrepton traps an intermediate complex having RRF on a position that clashes with the P/E site bound tRNA. Mutants of EF-G that are impaired for translocation fail to disassemble post-termination complexes and exhibit lower activity in releasing RRF. We propose that the release of ribosome-bound RRF by EF-G is required for post-termination complex disassembly. Before release from the ribosome, the position of RRF on the ribosome will change from the original A/P site to a new location that clashes with tRNA on the P/E site.

Morphine-conditioned cue alters c-Fos protein expression in the brain of crayfish.

With a highly organized stereotypic behavior and a simplified neuronal system that is characterized by cellular modularity, crayfish (Orconectes rusticus) represents an excellent model that we used in this study to explore how a drug-conditioned-cue alters c-Fos protein expression in the brain of an invertebrate species. The first set of experiments revealed that a single injection of different doses of morphine (3.0 μg/g, 6.0 μg/g and 12.0 μg/g) into the circulatory system of crayfish significantly increased locomotor activity. Repeated injections of morphine increased locomotion at lower doses (3.0 μg/g and 6.0 μg/g), and decreased locomotion at a higher dose of 12.0 μg/g. The second experiment revealed that a repeated or single injection of morphine serves as reward when paired with a distinct visual environment. In the third experiment, we found that the c-Fos profile of morphine treated crayfish in an unconditioned environment did not show a significant increase from the basal level comparable to saline treated crayfish. The brains of crayfish were more active during exposure to the cue-elicited drug conditioned environment than the unconditioned environment. These results indicate that chronic morphine treatment alone is not sufficient to induce changes in the expression of c-Fos; instead, morphine-environment pairing in a specific context contributes to the expression of alterations in c-Fos regulation. The enhancement of c-Fos expression in the brain of crayfish seems to reflect the sensory or anticipatory facets of conditioning that suggests that potential and even unanticipated hypotheses in drug addiction can emerge from studies of addiction in crayfish.

Ribosome recycling: An essential process of protein synthesis

A preponderance of textbooks outlines cellular protein synthesis (translation) in three basic steps: initiation, elongation, and termination. However, researchers in the field of translation accept that a vital fourth step exists; this fourth step is called ribosome recycling. Ribosome recycling occurs after the nascent polypeptide has been released during the termination step. Despite the release of the polypeptide, ribosomes remain bound to the mRNA and tRNA. It is only during the fourth step of translation that ribosomes are ultimately released from the mRNA, split into subunits, and are free to bind new mRNA, thus the term “ribosome recycling.” This step is essential to the viability of cells. In bacteria, it is catalyzed by two proteins, elongation factor G and ribosome recycling factor, a near perfect structural mimic of tRNA. Eukaryotic organelles such as mitochondria and chloroplasts possess ribosome recycling factor and elongation factor G homologues, but the nature of ribosome recycling in eukaryotic cytoplasm is still under investigation. In this review, the discovery of ribosome recycling and the basic mechanisms involved are discussed so that textbook writers and teachers can include this vital step, which is just as important as the three conventional steps, in sections dealing with protein synthesis.