Michael C. Kirk

Tomotherapy and Multifield Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy Planning Reduce Cardiac Doses in Left-Sided Breast Cancer Patients With Unfavorable Cardiac Anatomy

PURPOSE For patients with left-sided breast cancers, radiation treatment to the intact breast results in high doses to significant volumes of the heart, increasing the risk of cardiac morbidity, particularly in women with unfavorable cardiac anatomy. We compare helical tomotherapy (TOMO) and inverse planned intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) with three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy using opposed tangents (3D-CRT) for reductions in cardiac volumes receiving high doses. METHODS AND MATERIALS Fifteen patients with left-sided breast cancers and unfavorable cardiac anatomy, determined by a maximum heart depth (MHD) of >or=1.0 cm within the tangent fields, were planned for TOMO and IMRT with five to seven beam angles, in addition to 3D-CRT. The volumes of heart and left ventricle receiving >or=35 Gy (V35) were compared for the plans, as were the mean doses to the contralateral breast and the volume receiving >or=20 Gy (V20) for the ipsilateral lung. RESULTS The mean MHD was 1.7 cm, and a significant correlation was observed between MHD and both heart and left ventricle V35. The V35s for IMRT (0.7%) and TOMO (0.5%) were significantly lower than for 3D-CRT (3.6%). The V20 for IMRT (22%) was significantly higher than for 3D-CRT (15%) or TOMO (18%), but the contralateral breast mean dose for TOMO (2.48 Gy) was significantly higher than for 3D-CRT (0.93 Gy) or IMRT (1.38 Gy). CONCLUSIONS Both TOMO and IMRT can significantly reduce cardiac doses, with modest increases in dose to other tissues in left-sided breast cancer patients with unfavorable cardiac anatomy.

Cosmetic Outcome and Incidence of Infection with the MammoSite Breast Brachytherapy Applicator

Abstract:  We present our results regarding the cosmetic outcome achieved and the rate of infection using the MammoSite breast brachytherapy applicator to treat patients with partial breast irradiation. In addition, factors associated with cosmetic outcome and infection are analyzed. The study population consisted of 30 patients with early stage breast cancer treated using the MammoSite device from October 28, 2002, to February 13, 2004. Cosmetic outcome was analyzed for its association with the following parameters: volume of the balloon, balloon‐to‐skin distance, maximal skin point dose per fraction, V100 (percent of volume that received 100% of the prescription dose), V150 (percent of volume that received 150% of the prescription dose), and V200 (percent of volume that received 200% of the prescription dose). The occurrence of infection at the time of treatment and during follow‐up was also recorded. At a median follow‐up of 13 months (range 1–16 months), 53.3% of the patients (16/30) were reported to have an excellent cosmetic outcome and 40.0% (12/30) had a good cosmetic outcome. Excellent cosmetic outcome was associated with a greater mean balloon‐to‐skin distance compared to those who achieved a good cosmetic outcome (1.5 cm versus 1.2 cm) (p = 0.164). The mean V100, V150, and V200 of those in the excellent cosmetic outcome group were 92.1%, 34.5%, and 7.6% versus 93.0%, 34.7%, and 7.6% in the good cosmetic outcome group (p = 0.642, 0.926, and 0.853), The mean balloon volumes were 47.7 cm3 and 56.9 cm3, respectively (p = 0.063) in the excellent and good outcome groups. The mean maximal skin doses per fraction in the excellent and good outcome groups were 354.8 cGy and 422.3 cGy (p = 0.286), respectively. Infection occurred in 13.3% of the patients (4/30). An excellent or good cosmetic outcome was achieved in 93.3% of patients and infection occurred in 13.3% of patients treated with the MammoSite breast brachytherapy applicator. Excellent cosmetic outcome was associated with a greater balloon‐to‐skin distance, lower maximal skin dose per fraction, and smaller mean balloon volume; however, the results did not reach statistical significance. 

Dosimetric characteristics of the Leipzig surface applicators used in the high dose rate brachy radiotherapy

The nucletron Leipzig applicator is designed for (HDR) 192Ir brachy radiotherapy of surface lesions. The dosimetric characteristics of this applicator were investigated using simulation method based on Monte Carlo N-particle (MCNP) code and phantom measurements. The simulation method was validated by comparing calculated dose rate distributions of nucletron microSelectron HDR 192Ir source against published data. Radiochromic films and metal-oxide-semiconductor field-effect transistor (MOSFET) detectors were used for phantom measurements. The double exposure technique, correcting the nonuniform film sensitivity, was applied in the film dosimetry. The linear fit of multiple readings with different irradiation times performed for each MOSFET detector measurement was used to obtain the dose rate of each measurement and to correct the source transit-time error. The film and MOSFET measurements have uncertainties of 3%-7% and 3%-5%, respectively. The dose rate distributions of the Leipzig applicator with 30 mm opening calculated by the validated MC method were verified by measurements of film and MOSFET detectors. Calculated two-dimensional planar dose rate distributions show similar patterns as the film measurement. MC calculated dose rate at a reference point defined at depth 5 mm on the applicators central axis is 7% lower than the film and 3% higher than the MOSFET measurements. The dose rate of a Leipzig applicator with 30 mm opening at reference point is 0.241+/-3% cGy h(-1) U(-1). The MC calculated depth dose rates and profiles were tabulated for clinic use.

Dose perturbation induced by radiographic contrast inside brachytherapy balloon applicators

Phantom measurements and Monte Carlo calculations have been performed for the purpose of characterizing the dose perturbation caused by radiographic contrast inside the MammoSite breast brachytherapy applicator. Specifically, the dose perturbation is quantified as a heterogeneity correction factor (HCF) for various balloon radii and contrast concentration levels. The dose perturbation is larger for larger balloon radii and higher contrast concentrations. Based on a validated Monte Carlo simulation, the calculated HCF values are 0.99 for a 2 cm radius balloon and 0.98 for a 3 cm radius balloon at 6% contrast concentration levels, and 0.89 and 0.87 for 2 and 3 cm radius balloons, respectively, at 100% contrast concentrations. For a typical implanted balloon radius of 2.4 cm, the HCF values decrease from 0.99 at 6% contrast concentration to 0.90 at 100% contrast concentration. For balloons implanted in patients at our institution, the mean HCF is 0.99, corresponding to a dose reduction of approximately 1%. The contrast effect results in a systematic reduction in the delivered dose, therefore the minimal amount of radiographic contrast necessary should be used.

A dosimetric comparison of Xoft Axxent Electronic Brachytherapy and iridium-192 high-dose-rate brachytherapy in the treatment of endometrial cancer

PURPOSE This analysis was undertaken to dosimetrically compare iridium-192 high-dose-rate brachytherapy (IB) and Xoft Axxent Electronic Brachytherapy (XB; Xoft Inc., Sunnyvale, CA) in the treatment of endometrial cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS The planning CT scans from 11 patients previously treated with IB were used to construct hypothetical treatment plans using the source characteristics of the XB device. The mean V95, V100, and V150 (percent of the planning target volume that received 95%, 100%, and 150% of the prescription dose) were calculated. For both the bladder and rectum, the V35 (percent of the organ that received 35% of the prescription dose) and V50 (percent of the organ that received 50% of the prescription dose) were calculated for each patient using both methods of vaginal brachytherapy. RESULTS The mean %V95 was 99.7% vs. 99.6% (p = ns) and the mean %V100 was 99.0% vs. 99.1% (p = ns) for the IB and XB methods, respectively. The mean %V150 was 35.8% vs. 58.9% (p < 0.05) for the IB and XB methods, respectively. The mean bladder %V35 was 47.7% vs. 27.4% (p < 0.05) and the mean bladder %V50 was 26.5% vs. 15.9% (p < 0.05) for the IB and XB methods, respectively. The mean rectal %V35 was 48.3% vs. 28.3% (p < 0.05) and the mean rectal %V50 was 27.8% vs. 17.0% (p < 0.05) for the IB and XB methods, respectively. CONCLUSIONS The IB and XB methods of vaginal brachytherapy offer equivalent target volume coverage; however, the XB method allows increased sparing of the bladder and rectum.

A dosimetric comparison of MammoSite and ClearPath high-dose-rate breast brachytherapy devices

PURPOSE A new form of partial breast irradiation (PBI), ClearPath (CP) breast brachytherapy, has been introduced. We present our results of a dosimetric comparison of MammoSite (MS) and CP PBI. METHODS AND MATERIALS The dimensions of the CP device were reconstructed onto the MS planning CT scans for 15 previously treated patients. The mean %V(100), %V(150), %V(200) (percent of the PTV that received 100%, 150%, and 200% of the prescription dose, respectively), ipsilateral breast %V(50) (percent of the ipsilateral normal breast that received 50% of the prescription dose), ipsilateral lung %V(30) (percent of the ipsilateral lung that received 30% of the prescription dose), the heart %V(5) (percent of the heart that received 5% of the prescription dose), and the maximum skin point dose per fraction were then determined for each patient using the two methods of balloon-based PBI. RESULTS The mean %V(100) was 96.5% vs. 96.5%, the mean %V(150) was 42.1% vs. 42.9% (p=ns), and the mean V(200) was 11.4% vs. 15.2% (p<.05) for the MS and CP methods, respectively. The mean ipsilateral breast %V(50) was 19.8% vs.18.0% (p<.05), the mean ipsilateral lung %V(30) was 3.7% vs. 2.8% (p<.05), the mean heart %V(5) was 57.0% vs. 54.3% (p<.05), and the maximum skin point dose per fraction was 312.2 and 273.6cGy (p<.05) for the MS and CP methods, respectively. CONCLUSIONS The MS and CP methods of PBI offer comparable target volume coverage; however, the CP device achieves increased normal tissue sparing.

A dosimetric analysis comparing treatment of low-risk prostate cancer with TomoTherapy versus static field intensity modulated radiation therapy.

Objectives:Static field intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) has demonstrated dosimetric and clinical benefits over 3-dimensional conformal radiation therapy. TomoTherapy is a unique form of IMRT that may offer further improvements. Methods:The study population consisted of 15 patients with low-risk prostate cancer treated at Rush University with TomoTherapy (n = 7) or IMRT (n = 8). For each patient, both a TomoTherapy plan and an IMRT plan were generated using identical planning objectives. The planning target volume (PTV) was defined as the prostate and proximal seminal vesicles plus a margin. The prescription dose was 7740 cGy in 43 fractions. Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) normal tissue guidelines were used as constraints, and the PTV coverage was made equivalent for the paired plans by equalizing the PTV V100. RTOG benchmark DVH values for the rectum and bladder and mean dose to the penile bulb were recorded. The volume of PTV receiving ≥105% of the prescription dose was measured. Results:The mean DVH values for each of the RTOG constraints for rectum and bladder were significantly improved using TomoTherapy. The volume of the PTV that received at least 105% of the dose was higher with IMRT (11.7% vs. 0.2%, <0.001). The mean dose to the penile bulb was higher with TomoTherapy (40.4 Gy vs. 27.4 Gy, P = 0.005). Conclusions:TomoTherapy offers a more favorable dose distribution to the bladder and rectum, as well as improved target homogeneity in comparison with IMRT.

A dosimetric analysis comparing electron beam with the MammoSite brachytherapy applicator for intact breast boost

INTRODUCTION Electron beam radiation is the modality most often used to deliver an operative bed boost to breast cancer patients after completing whole breast radiation. However, electrons can potentially provide inadequate coverage. The MammoSite breast brachytherapy applicator may provide dosimetric advantages in the delivery of an operative bed boost and its role in this setting is not yet defined. MATERIALS AND METHODS The study population consisted of 15 patients with early stage breast cancer treated with partial breast irradiation (PBI) using the MammoSite device. For each patient, a theoretical boost plan using electrons and a second theoretical boost plan using the MammoSite applicator were created. To assess the adequacy of each boost plan, the PTV V90, PTV V95, and PTV V100 were calculated. To assess dose to normal tissues, the ipsilateral breast V50, ipsilateral lung V30, and heart V20 were calculated. RESULTS The mean PTV V100 for the MammoSite boost was 95.5%, compared to 77.4% for the electron boost (p<0.001). The mean PTV V95 was 97.8%, compared to 93.3% for the electron boost (p=0.02). The mean PTV V90, mean breast V50, mean lung V30, and mean heart V20 were not statistically different for MammoSite compared to electrons. CONCLUSIONS A tumor bed boost using the MammoSite breast brachytherapy applicator provides superior target coverage and delivers similar doses to the ipsilateral breast and lung compared to a boost delivered with electrons. More investigation into the role of balloon brachytherapy in the delivery of a breast boost is warranted.

Application of holographic display in radiotherapy treatment planning II: a multi-institutional study.

We hypothesized that use of a true 3D display providing easy visualization of patient anatomy and dose distribution would lead to the production of better quality radiation therapy treatment plans. We report on a randomized prospective multi‐institutional study to evaluate a novel 3D display for treatment planning. The Perspecta® Spatial 3D System produces 360° holograms by projecting cross‐sectional images on a diffuser screen rotating at 900 rpm. Specially‐developed software allows bi‐directional transfer of image and dose data between Perspecta and the Pinnacle planning system. Thirty‐three patients previously treated at three institutions were included in this IRB‐approved study. Patient data were de‐identified, randomized, and assigned to different planners. A physician at each institution reviewed the cases and established planning objectives. Two treatment plans were then produced for each patient, one based on the Pinnacle system alone and another in conjunction with Perspecta. Plan quality was then evaluated by the same physicians who established the planning objectives. All plans were viewable on both Perspecta and Pinnacle for review. Reviewing physicians were blinded to the planning device used. Data from a 13‐patient pilot study were also included in the analysis. Perspecta plans were considered better in 28 patients (61%), Pinnacle in 14 patients (30%), and both were equivalent in 4 patients. The use of non‐coplanar beams was more common with Perspecta plans (82% vs. 27%). The mean target dose differed by less than 2% between rival plans. Perspecta plans were somewhat more likely to have the hot spot located inside the target (43% vs. 33%). Conversely, 30% of the Pinnacle plans had the hot spot outside the target compared with 18% for Perspecta plans. About 57% of normal organs received less dose from Perspecta plans. No statistically significant association was found between plan preference and planning institution or planner. The study found that use of the holographic display leads to radiotherapy plans preferred in a majority of cases over those developed with 2D displays. These data indicate that continued development of this technology for clinical implementation is warranted. PACS numbers: 87.55.D

Upright 3D treatment planning using a vertical CT.

In this report, we describe a novel technique used to plan and administer external beam radiation therapy to a patient in the upright position. A patient required reirradiation for thymic carcinoma but was unable to tolerate the supine position due to bilateral phrenic nerve injury and paralysis of the diaphragm. Computed tomography (CT) images in the upright position were acquired at the Northern Illinois University Institute for Neutron Therapy at Fermilab. The CT data were imported into a standard 3-dimensional (3D) treatment planning system. Treatment was designed to deliver 24 Gy to the target volume while respecting normal tissue tolerances. A custom chair that locked into the treatment table indexing system was constructed for immobilization, and port films verified the reproducibility of setup. Radiation was administered using mixed photon and electron AP fields.