Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Michael C. Neale is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Michael C. Neale.


The Lancet | 2013

Identification of risk loci with shared effects on five major psychiatric disorders: a genome-wide analysis

Jordan W. Smoller; Kenneth S. Kendler; Nicholas John Craddock; Phil H. Lee; Benjamin M. Neale; John I. Nurnberger; Stephan Ripke; Susan L. Santangelo; Patrick F. Sullivan; Shaun Purcell; Richard Anney; Jan K. Buitelaar; Ayman H. Fanous; Stephen V. Faraone; Witte J. G. Hoogendijk; Klaus-Peter Lesch; Douglas F. Levinson; Roy H. Perlis; Marcella Rietschel; Brien P. Riley; Edmund Sonuga-Barke; Russell Schachar; Thomas G. Schulze; Anita Thapar; Michael C. Neale; Patrick Bender; Sven Cichon; Mark J. Daly; John R. Kelsoe; Thomas Lehner

BACKGROUND: Findings from family and twin studies suggest that genetic contributions to psychiatric disorders do not in all cases map to present diagnostic categories. We aimed to identify specific variants underlying genetic effects shared between the five disorders in the Psychiatric Genomics Consortium: autism spectrum disorder, attention deficit-hyperactivity disorder, bipolar disorder, major depressive disorder, and schizophrenia. METHODS: We analysed genome-wide single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) data for the five disorders in 33,332 cases and 27,888 controls of European ancestory. To characterise allelic effects on each disorder, we applied a multinomial logistic regression procedure with model selection to identify the best-fitting model of relations between genotype and phenotype. We examined cross-disorder effects of genome-wide significant loci previously identified for bipolar disorder and schizophrenia, and used polygenic risk-score analysis to examine such effects from a broader set of common variants. We undertook pathway analyses to establish the biological associations underlying genetic overlap for the five disorders. We used enrichment analysis of expression quantitative trait loci (eQTL) data to assess whether SNPs with cross-disorder association were enriched for regulatory SNPs in post-mortem brain-tissue samples. FINDINGS: SNPs at four loci surpassed the cutoff for genome-wide significance (p<5x10(-8)) in the primary analysis: regions on chromosomes 3p21 and 10q24, and SNPs within two L-type voltage-gated calcium channel subunits, CACNA1C and CACNB2. Model selection analysis supported effects of these loci for several disorders. Loci previously associated with bipolar disorder or schizophrenia had variable diagnostic specificity. Polygenic risk scores showed cross-disorder associations, notably between adult-onset disorders. Pathway analysis supported a role for calcium channel signalling genes for all five disorders. Finally, SNPs with evidence of cross-disorder association were enriched for brain eQTL markers. INTERPRETATION: Our findings show that specific SNPs are associated with a range of psychiatric disorders of childhood onset or adult onset. In particular, variation in calcium-channel activity genes seems to have pleiotropic effects on psychopathology. These results provide evidence relevant to the goal of moving beyond descriptive syndromes in psychiatry, and towards a nosology informed by disease cause. FUNDING: National Institute of Mental Health.BACKGROUNDnFindings from family and twin studies suggest that genetic contributions to psychiatric disorders do not in all cases map to present diagnostic categories. We aimed to identify specific variants underlying genetic effects shared between the five disorders in the Psychiatric Genomics Consortium: autism spectrum disorder, attention deficit-hyperactivity disorder, bipolar disorder, major depressive disorder, and schizophrenia.nnnMETHODSnWe analysed genome-wide single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) data for the five disorders in 33,332 cases and 27,888 controls of European ancestory. To characterise allelic effects on each disorder, we applied a multinomial logistic regression procedure with model selection to identify the best-fitting model of relations between genotype and phenotype. We examined cross-disorder effects of genome-wide significant loci previously identified for bipolar disorder and schizophrenia, and used polygenic risk-score analysis to examine such effects from a broader set of common variants. We undertook pathway analyses to establish the biological associations underlying genetic overlap for the five disorders. We used enrichment analysis of expression quantitative trait loci (eQTL) data to assess whether SNPs with cross-disorder association were enriched for regulatory SNPs in post-mortem brain-tissue samples.nnnFINDINGSnSNPs at four loci surpassed the cutoff for genome-wide significance (p<5×10(-8)) in the primary analysis: regions on chromosomes 3p21 and 10q24, and SNPs within two L-type voltage-gated calcium channel subunits, CACNA1C and CACNB2. Model selection analysis supported effects of these loci for several disorders. Loci previously associated with bipolar disorder or schizophrenia had variable diagnostic specificity. Polygenic risk scores showed cross-disorder associations, notably between adult-onset disorders. Pathway analysis supported a role for calcium channel signalling genes for all five disorders. Finally, SNPs with evidence of cross-disorder association were enriched for brain eQTL markers.nnnINTERPRETATIONnOur findings show that specific SNPs are associated with a range of psychiatric disorders of childhood onset or adult onset. In particular, variation in calcium-channel activity genes seems to have pleiotropic effects on psychopathology. These results provide evidence relevant to the goal of moving beyond descriptive syndromes in psychiatry, and towards a nosology informed by disease cause.nnnFUNDINGnNational Institute of Mental Health.


Addiction | 2010

Genetic and environmental influences on cannabis use initiation and problematic use: A meta-analysis of twin studies

Karin J. H. Verweij; Brendan P. Zietsch; Michael T. Lynskey; Sarah E. Medland; Michael C. Neale; Nicholas G. Martin; Dorret I. Boomsma; Jacqueline M. Vink

BACKGROUNDnBecause cannabis use is associated with social, physical and psychological problems, it is important to know what causes some individuals to initiate cannabis use and a subset of those to become problematic users. Previous twin studies found evidence for both genetic and environmental influences on vulnerability, but due to considerable variation in the results it is difficult to draw clear conclusions regarding the relative magnitude of these influences.nnnMETHODSnA systematic literature search identified 28 twin studies on cannabis use initiation and 24 studies on problematic cannabis use. The proportion of total variance accounted for by genes (A), shared environment (C) and unshared environment (E) in (i) initiation of cannabis use and (ii) problematic cannabis use was calculated by averaging corresponding A, C and E estimates across studies from independent cohorts and weighting by sample size.nnnRESULTSnFor cannabis use initiation, A, C and E estimates were 48%, 25% and 27% in males and 40%, 39% and 21% in females. For problematic cannabis use A, C and E estimates were 51%, 20% and 29% for males and 59%, 15% and 26% for females. Confidence intervals of these estimates are considerably narrower than those in the source studies.nnnCONCLUSIONSnOur results indicate that vulnerability to both cannabis use initiation and problematic use was influenced significantly by A, C and E. There was a trend for a greater C and lesser A component for cannabis use initiation compared to problematic use for females.


Nature Neuroscience | 2016

Genetic influences on schizophrenia and subcortical brain volumes: large-scale proof of concept.

Barbara Franke; Jason L. Stein; Stephan Ripke; Verneri Anttila; Derrek P. Hibar; van Hulzen Kje.; Alejandro Arias-Vasquez; Jordan W. Smoller; Thomas E. Nichols; Michael C. Neale; Andrew M. McIntosh; Phil H. Lee; Francis J. McMahon; Andreas Meyer-Lindenberg; Manuel Mattheisen; Ole A. Andreassen; Oliver Gruber; Perminder S. Sachdev; Roberto Roiz-Santiañez; Andrew J. Saykin; Stefan Ehrlich; Karen A. Mather; Jessica A. Turner; Emanuel Schwarz; Anbupalam Thalamuthu; Yin Yao Shugart; Yvonne Y.W. Ho; Nicholas G. Martin; Margaret J. Wright; Michael Conlon O'Donovan

Schizophrenia is a devastating psychiatric illness with high heritability. Brain structure and function differ, on average, between people with schizophrenia and healthy individuals. As common genetic associations are emerging for both schizophrenia and brain imaging phenotypes, we can now use genome-wide data to investigate genetic overlap. Here we integrated results from common variant studies of schizophrenia (33,636 cases, 43,008 controls) and volumes of several (mainly subcortical) brain structures (11,840 subjects). We did not find evidence of genetic overlap between schizophrenia risk and subcortical volume measures either at the level of common variant genetic architecture or for single genetic markers. These results provide a proof of concept (albeit based on a limited set of structural brain measures) and define a roadmap for future studies investigating the genetic covariance between structural or functional brain phenotypes and risk for psychiatric disorders.


Nature Neuroscience | 2016

Genetic influences on schizophrenia and subcortical brain volumes

Barbara Franke; Jason L. Stein; Stephan Ripke; Verneri Anttila; Derrek P. Hibar; Kimm J. E. van Hulzen; Alejandro Arias-Vasquez; Jordan W. Smoller; Thomas E. Nichols; Michael C. Neale; Andrew M. McIntosh; Phil H. Lee; Francis J. McMahon; Andreas Meyer-Lindenberg; Manuel Mattheisen; Ole A. Andreassen; Oliver Gruber; Perminder S. Sachdev; Roberto Roiz-Santiañez; Andrew J. Saykin; Stefan Ehrlich; Karen A. Mather; Jessica A. Turner; Emanuel Schwarz; Anbupalam Thalamuthu; Yin Yao; Yvonne Y.W. Ho; Nicholas G. Martin; Margaret J. Wright; Michael Conlon O'Donovan

Schizophrenia is a devastating psychiatric illness with high heritability. Brain structure and function differ, on average, between people with schizophrenia and healthy individuals. As common genetic associations are emerging for both schizophrenia and brain imaging phenotypes, we can now use genome-wide data to investigate genetic overlap. Here we integrated results from common variant studies of schizophrenia (33,636 cases, 43,008 controls) and volumes of several (mainly subcortical) brain structures (11,840 subjects). We did not find evidence of genetic overlap between schizophrenia risk and subcortical volume measures either at the level of common variant genetic architecture or for single genetic markers. These results provide a proof of concept (albeit based on a limited set of structural brain measures) and define a roadmap for future studies investigating the genetic covariance between structural or functional brain phenotypes and risk for psychiatric disorders.


Journal of Personality Disorders | 2010

Genetic covariance structure of the four main features of borderline personality disorder

Marijn A. Distel; Gonneke Willemsen; Lannie Ligthart; Catherine Derom; Nicholas G. Martin; Michael C. Neale; Timothy J. Trull; Dorret I. Boomsma

The patient population of borderline personality disorder (BPD) is heterogeneous; many different combinations of BPD symptoms can lead to a BPD diagnosis. We investigated to what extent the covariance among four main components of BPD is explained by shared genetic and environmental factors. Using an extended twin design, multivariate genetic models were applied to the scales of the PAI-BOR, a self-report questionnaire tapping four main features of BPD (affective instability, identity problems, negative relationships, and self-harm). Data on the four BPD scales were available for 5,533 twins and 1,202 siblings from the Netherlands, Belgium, and Australia. The correlations among the scales ranged from 0.23 to 0.50 and were best explained by a genetic common pathway model. This model specifies that genes and environment influence the covariance between four main features of BPD in qualitatively similar ways, through a single latent factor representing the BPD construct. The heritability of the latent BPD factor was 51% and the remainder of its variance was explained by unique environmental influences. For each BPD scale, except self-harm, around 50% of its variance was explained by the latent BPD factor. The remaining variance for each of the four scales was explained by genetic (4% for affective instability to 20% for self-harm) and environmental (38% for negative relationships to 67% for self-harm) factors that were specific to each scale.


Genes, Brain and Behavior | 2010

Anxiety and depression in children and adults: influence of serotonergic and neurotrophic genes?

Christel M. Middeldorp; M.C.T. Slof-Op 't Landt; S. E. Medland; C.E.M. van Beijsterveldt; Meike Bartels; Gonneke Willemsen; J.J. Hottenga; E.J.C. de Geus; H.E.D. Suchiman; Conor V. Dolan; Michael C. Neale; P. E. Slagboom; Dorret I. Boomsma

There are two major hypotheses regarding the etiology of anxiety and depression: the mono‐amine hypothesis and the hypothesis of an abnormal stress response acting partly via reduced neurogenesis. Association studies have focused on genes involved in these processes, but with inconclusive results. This study investigated the effect of 45 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in genes encoding for serotonin receptors 1A, 1D, 2A, catechol‐O‐methyltransferase (COMT), tryptophane hydroxylase type 2 (TPH2), brain derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF), PlexinA2 and regulators of G‐protein‐coupled signaling (RGS) 2, 4, 16. Anxious depression (A/D) symptoms were assessed five times in 11 years in over 11 000 adults with 1504 subjects genotyped and at age 7, 10, 12 and during adolescence in over 20 000 twins with 1078 subjects genotyped. In both cohorts, a longitudinal model with one latent factor loading on all A/D measures over time was analysed. The genetic association effect modeled at the level of this latent factor was 60% and 70% heritable in the children and adults, respectively, and explained around 50% of the total phenotypic variance. Power analyses showed that the samples contained 80% power to detect an effect explaining between 1.4% and 3.6% of the variance. However, no SNP showed a consistent effect on A/D. To conclude, this longitudinal study in children and adults found no association of SNPs in the serotonergic system or core regulators of neurogenesis with A/D. Overall, there has been no convincing evidence, so far, for a role of genetic variation in these pathways in the development of anxiety and depression.


Addiction | 2014

Polygenic risk scores for smoking: predictors for alcohol and cannabis use?

Jacqueline M. Vink; Jouke-Jan Hottenga; Eco J. C. de Geus; Gonneke Willemsen; Michael C. Neale; Helena Furberg; Dorret I. Boomsma

BACKGROUND AND AIMSnA strong correlation exists between smoking and the use of alcohol and cannabis. This paper uses polygenic risk scores to explore the possibility of overlapping genetic factors. Those scores reflect a combined effect of selected risk alleles for smoking.nnnMETHODSnSummary-level P-values were available for smoking initiation, age at onset of smoking, cigarettes per day and smoking cessation from the Tobacco and Genetics Consortium (n between 22,000 and 70,000 subjects). Using different P-value thresholds (0.1, 0.2 and 0.5) from the meta-analysis, sets of risk alleles were defined and used to generate a polygenic risk score (weighted sum of the alleles) for each subject in an independent target sample from the Netherlands Twin Register (nu2009=u20091583). The association between polygenic smoking scores and alcohol/cannabis use was investigated with regression analysis.nnnRESULTSnThe polygenic scores for cigarettes per day were associated significantly with the number of glasses alcohol per week (Pu2009=u20090.005, R2 =u20090.4-0.5%) and cannabis initiation (Pu2009=u20090.004, R2 =u20090.6-0.9%). The polygenic scores for age at onset of smoking were associated significantly with age at regular drinking (Pu2009=u20090.001, R2 =u20091.1-1.5%), while the scores for smoking initiation and smoking cessation did not significantly predict alcohol or cannabis use.nnnCONCLUSIONSnSmoking, alcohol and cannabis use are influenced by aggregated genetic risk factors shared between these substances. The many common genetic variants each have a very small individual effect size.


Behavior Genetics | 2016

Testing Causal Effects of Maternal Smoking During Pregnancy on Offspring's Externalizing and Internalizing Behavior.

Conor V. Dolan; Lot M. Geels; Jacqueline M. Vink; C.E.M. van Beijsterveldt; Michael C. Neale; Meike Bartels; Dorret I. Boomsma

Maternal smoking during pregnancy (SDP) is associated with increased risk of externalizing and internalizing behaviors in offspring. Two explanations (not mutually exclusive) for this association are direct causal effects of maternal SDP and the effects of genetic and environmental factors common to parents and offspring which increase smoking as well as problem behaviors. Here, we examined the associations between parental SDP and mother rated offspring externalizing and internalizing behaviors (rated by the Child Behavior Checklist/2–3) at age three in a population-based sample of Dutch twins (Nxa0=xa015,228 pairs). First, as a greater effect of maternal than of paternal SDP is consistent with a causal effect of maternal SDP, we compared the effects of maternal and paternal SDP. Second, as a beneficial effect of quitting smoking before pregnancy is consistent with the causal effect, we compared the effects of SDP in mothers who quit smoking before pregnancy, and mothers who continued to smoke during pregnancy. All mothers were established smokers before their pregnancy. The results indicated a greater effect of maternal SDP, compared to paternal SDP, for externalizing, aggression, overactive and withdrawn behavior. Quitting smoking was associated with less externalizing, overactive behavior, aggression, and oppositional behavior, but had no effect on internalizing, anxious depression, or withdrawn behavior. We conclude that these results are consistent with a causal, but small, effect of smoking on externalizing problems at age 3. The results do not support a causal effect of maternal SDP on internalizing behaviors.


Journal of Personality Disorders | 2012

Borderline Personality Traits and Substance Use: Genetic Factors Underlie the Association with Smoking and Ever Use of Cannabis, but Not with High Alcohol Consumption

Marijn A. Distel; Timothy J. Trull; Marleen M. H. de Moor; Jacqueline M. Vink; Lot M. Geels; Jenny H. D. A. van Beek; Meike Bartels; Gonneke Willemsen; Evert Thiery; Catherine Derom; Michael C. Neale; Dorret I. Boomsma

Borderline personality disorder (BPD) and substance use disorders often co-occur. Both disorders are heritable and family studies showed that there are familial factors that increase the risk for BPD as well as substance use/abuse. This is the first study that investigates whether the association of borderline personality traits (BPT) with substance use reflects an underlying genetic vulnerability or nongenetic familial influences. To this end we analyzed data of 5,638 Dutch and Belgian twins aged between 21-50 years from 3,567 families. Significant associations between BPT and high alcohol consumption (r = .192), regular smoking (r = .299), and ever use of cannabis (r = .254) were found. Bivariate genetic analyses showed that the associations of BPT and substance use had different etiologies. For regular smoking and for ever use of cannabis, the correlation with BPT was explained by common genetic factors. Interestingly, for high alcohol consumption and BPT the association was explained by unique environmental factors that influence both traits rather than common genetic factors.


Addictive Behaviors | 2010

Heritability of cannabis initiation in Dutch adult twins

Jacqueline M. Vink; Liselot M.C. Wolters; Michael C. Neale; Dorret I. Boomsma

Previous studies exploring the heritability of cannabis initiation have been carried out in the United States, Australia and United Kingdom. In the present study we assess cannabis initiation in The Netherlands, where the use of cannabis in small amounts is permitted. The sample included 3115 twins with a mean age of 27.4 years (SD 4.7) who are registered with the Netherlands Twin Register (NTR). Individual differences in cannabis initiation showed moderate genetic influences (44%). The remaining variance was explained by environmental influences shared by twins (31%) and by unique environmental factors (24%). Compared to studies from other countries, these results suggest that the relative importance of genetic and environmental factors is not different in a country with a more liberal cannabis policy.

Collaboration


Dive into the Michael C. Neale's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Jacqueline M. Vink

Radboud University Nijmegen

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Nicholas G. Martin

QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge