Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Michael Carter is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Michael Carter.


Journal of Business and Technical Communication | 2007

Writing to Learn by Learning to Write in the Disciplines

Michael Carter; Miriam Ferzli; Eric N. Wiebe

The traditional distinction between writing across the curriculum and writing in the disciplines (WID) as writing to learn versus learning to write understates WIDs focus on learning in the disciplines. Advocates of WID have described learning as socialization, but little research addresses how writing disciplinary discourses in disciplinary settings encourages socialization into the disciplines. Data from interviews with students who wrote lab reports in a biology lab suggest five ways in which writing promotes learning in scientific disciplines. Drawing on theories of situated learning, the authors argue that apprenticeship genres can encourage socialization into disciplinary communities.


conference on software engineering education and training | 2011

Communication genres: Integrating communication into the software engineering curriculum

Michael Carter; Mladen A. Vouk; Gerald C. Gannod; Janet E. Burge; Paul V. Anderson; Mark E. Hoffman

One way to improve the communication abilities of new software engineering graduates in the workplace is to integrate communication more effectively in the software engineering curriculum. But faculty typically conceive of communication as outside their realm of expertise. Based on the results of an NSF-funded project, we use theories of situated learning and genre to make the case that communication is integral to software engineering and that faculty are in the best position to guide students in becoming better communicators in the field. We identify software engineering genres and show how those genres may be used to integrate communication in the classroom and throughout the curriculum.


Journal of Science Teacher Education | 2010

The Cross-Case Analyses of Elementary Students’ Engagement in the Strands of Science Proficiency

James Minogue; Lauren Madden; John Bedward; Eric N. Wiebe; Michael Carter

Recent reports have begun to lay the foundation for a re-visioned K-8 science curriculum which includes four strands that could be used to define and assess science proficiency for all students. Using these strands as an analytic lens, this pre-post multiple-case case study explores elementary school science teachers’ practices and their students’ actions. This work focuses on naturally occurring ordinary events and builds a description of how these strands of proficiencies are being developed. The results of cross-case analyses suggest that while the participating teachers do engage their students in activities and exercises that contribute to the development of all 4 strands of science proficiency; the nature, duration, and distribution (across the 4 strands) of these activities varied.


technical symposium on computer science education | 2014

Developing CS/SE students' communication abilities through a program-wide framework

Janet E. Burge; Gerald C. Gannod; Michael Carter; Alanna Howard; Brian Schultz; Mladen A. Vouk; David R. Wright; Paul V. Anderson

Communication skills, including reading, writing, speaking, and teaming, are among the most sought after by employers of recent Computer Science/Software Engineering (CS/SE) graduates. We have been conducting a project that has developed a general framework for program-level integration of communication into CS/SE education. Our framework has been developed through workshops and field evaluation of training materials (and other resources) by faculty from a wide variety of institutions under the guidance of experts in writing and communication across the curriculum. This paper discusses the current state of communication teaching in the CS/SE domain, and presents our framework and experiences for program-wide implementation of communication skills.


Written Communication | 2016

Value Arguments in Science Research Articles Making the Case for the Importance of Research

Michael Carter

It is in the interest of scholarly journals to publish important research and of researchers to publish in important journals. One key to making the case for the importance of research in a scholarly article is to incorporate value arguments. Yet there has been no rhetorical analysis of value arguments in the literature. In the context of rhetorical situation, stasis theory, and Swales’s linguistic analysis of moves in introductions, this article examines value arguments in introductions of science research articles. Employing a corpus of 60 articles from three science journals, the author analyzes value arguments based on Toulmin’s definition of argument and identifies three classes of value arguments and seven functions of these arguments in introductions. This analysis illuminates the rhetorical construction of value in science articles and provides a foundation for the empirical study of value in scholarship.


technical symposium on computer science education | 2012

Helping students become better communicators (abstract only)

Janet E. Burge; Paul V. Anderson; Gerald C. Gannod; Michael Carter; Deanna P. Dannels; Margaret R. Heil; Mladen A. Vouk

To be successful, CS and SE graduates need strong communication skills (writing, speaking, and teaming), particularly within their discipline. Students exercise these skills during their classes but are not always given explicit domain-specific instruction on these skills, instead relying on instruction provided outside the program. CS and SE faculty are not always comfortable in evaluating these aspects of their assignments and are often unhappy with the results. In this workshop we will lead sessions on teaching writing, speaking, and teaming; situating assignments in workplace-scenarios (to motivate students); and writing communication rubrics that convey faculty expectations to students and support evaluation of student work. For more information, see www.muohio.edu/sigcse_workshop11. A laptop is recommended but not mandatory for this workshop.


Rhetoric Review | 1988

Stasis and kairos: Principles of social construction in classical rhetoric∗

Michael Carter


Research in The Teaching of English | 2004

Teaching Genre to English First-Language Adults: A Study of the Laboratory Report.

Michael Carter; Miriam Ferzli; Eric N. Wiebe


Rhetorica-a Journal of The History of Rhetoric | 1991

The Ritual Functions of Epideictic Rhetoric: The Case of Socrates' Funeral Oration

Michael Carter


2001 Annual Conference | 2001

Supporting Lab Report Writing in an Introductory Materials Engineering Lab

Eric N. Wiebe; Thomas M. Hare; Michael Carter; Yusef Fahmy; Roger Russell; Miriam Ferzli

Collaboration


Dive into the Michael Carter's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Eric N. Wiebe

North Carolina State University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

James Minogue

North Carolina State University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

John Bedward

North Carolina State University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Lauren Madden

North Carolina State University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Mladen A. Vouk

North Carolina State University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Miriam Ferzli

North Carolina State University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

David R. Wright

North Carolina State University

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge