Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Michael D Martin is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Michael D Martin.


Emerging Infectious Diseases | 2003

Applying Network Theory to Epidemics: Control Measures for Mycoplasma pneumoniae Outbreaks

Lauren Ancel Meyers; M. E. J. Newman; Michael D Martin; Stephanie J. Schrag

We introduce a novel mathematical approach to investigating the spread and control of communicable infections in closed communities. Mycoplasma pneumoniae is a major cause of bacterial pneumonia in the United States. Outbreaks of illness attributable to mycoplasma commonly occur in closed or semi-closed communities. These outbreaks are difficult to contain because of delays in outbreak detection, the long incubation period of the bacterium, and an incomplete understanding of the effectiveness of infection control strategies. Our model explicitly captures the patterns of interactions among patients and caregivers in an institution with multiple wards. Analysis of this contact network predicts that, despite the relatively low prevalence of mycoplasma pneumonia found among caregivers, the patterns of caregiver activity and the extent to which they are protected against infection may be fundamental to the control and prevention of mycoplasma outbreaks. In particular, the most effective interventions are those that reduce the diversity of interactions between caregivers and patients.


Behavioral Ecology | 2018

On the role of male competition in speciation: a review and research agenda

Robin M. Tinghitella; Alycia C R Lackey; Michael D Martin; Peter D. Dijkstra; Jonathan P. Drury; Robert J.P. Heathcote; Jason Keagy; Elizabeth S. C. Scordato; Alexandra M. Tyers

Little attention has been given to how males competing for mates can facilitate the evolution and persistence of new species. We expand the current framework for how new species evolve (speciation) to include male competition, drawing on recent research to show how male competition contributes to divergence between co-occurring or spatially isolated populations. We also identify interactions with female mate choice and environmental variation, and formulate a research program that will move this field forward.


Current Zoology | 2018

Interspecific competition, hybridization, and reproductive isolation in secondary contact: missing perspectives on males and females

Sara E Lipshutz; Alycia R Lackey; Michael D Martin; Robin M. Tinghitella

Abstract Research on sexual selection and hybridization has focused on female mate choice and male–male competition. While the evolutionary outcomes of interspecific female preference have been well explored, we are now gaining a better understanding of the processes by which male–male competition between species in secondary contact promotes reproductive isolation versus hybridization. What is relatively unexplored is the interaction between female choice and male competition, as they can oppose one another or align with similar outcomes for reproductive isolation. The role of female–female competition in hybridization is also not well understood, but could operate similarly to male–male competition in polyandrous and other systems where costs to heterospecific mating are low for females. Reproductive competition between either sex of sympatric species can cause the divergence and/or convergence of sexual signals and recognition, which in turn influences the likelihood for interspecific mating. Future work on species interactions in secondary contact should test the relative influences of both mate choice and competition for mates on hybridization outcomes, and should not ignore the possibilities that females can compete over mating resources, and males can exercise mate choice.


Current Zoology | 2018

Intrasexual competition enhances reproductive isolation between locally adapted populations

David Bierbach; Lenin Arias-Rodriguez; Martin Plath; Alycia R Lackey; Michael D Martin; Robin M. Tinghitella

Abstract During adaptation to different habitat types, both morphological and behavioral traits can undergo divergent selection. Males often fight for status in dominance hierarchies and rank positions predict reproductive success. Ecotypes with reduced fighting abilities should have low reproductive success when migrating into habitats that harbor ecotypes with superior fighting abilities. Livebearing fishes in the Poecilia mexicana-species complex inhabit not only regular freshwater environments, but also independently colonized sulfidic (H2S-containing) habitats in three river drainages. In the current study, we found fighting intensities in staged contests to be considerably lower in some but not all sulfidic surface ecotypes and the sulfidic cave ecotype compared with populations from non-sulfidic surface sites. This is perhaps due to selection imposed by H2S, which hampers oxygen uptake and transport, as well as cellular respiration. Furthermore, migrants from sulfidic habitats may lose fights even if they do not show overall reduced aggressiveness, as physiological performance is likely to be challenged in the non-sulfidic environment to which they are not adapted. To test this hypothesis, we simulated migration of H2S-adapted males into H2S-free waters, as well as H2S-adapted cave-dwelling males into sulfidic surface waters. We found that intruders established dominance less often than resident males, independent of whether or not they showed reduced aggressiveness overall. Our study shows that divergent evolution of male aggressive behavior may also contribute to the maintenance of genetic differentiation in this system and we call for more careful evaluation of male fighting abilities in studies on ecological speciation.


Evolution | 2018

Preference for conspecifics evolves earlier in males than females in a sexually dimorphic radiation of fishes: MALE MATE CHOICE IN EARLY BEHAVIORAL ISOLATION

Tamra C. Mendelson; Jennifer M. Gumm; Michael D Martin; Patrick J. Ciccotto

Speciation by sexual selection is generally modeled as the coevolution of female preferences and elaborate male ornaments leading to behavioral (sexual) reproductive isolation. One prediction of these models is that female preference for conspecific males should evolve earlier than male preference for conspecific females in sexually dimorphic species with male ornaments. We tested that prediction in darters, a diverse group of freshwater fishes with sexually dimorphic ornamentation. Focusing on the earliest stages of divergence, we tested preference for conspecific mates in males and females of seven closely related species pairs. Contrary to expectation, male preference for conspecific females was significantly greater than female preference for conspecific males. Males in four of the 14 species significantly preferred conspecific females; whereas, females in no species significantly preferred conspecific males. Relationships between the strength of preference for conspecifics and genetic distance revealed no difference in slope between males and females, but a significant difference in intercept, also suggesting that male preference evolves earlier than females’. Our results are consistent with other recent studies in darters and suggest that the coevolution of female preferences and male ornaments may not best explain the earliest stages of behavioral isolation in this lineage.


Current Zoology | 2018

Color and behavior differently predict competitive outcomes for divergent stickleback color morphs

Robin M. Tinghitella; Whitley R. Lehto; V. Faith Lierheimer; Alycia R Lackey; Michael D Martin

Abstract Our knowledge of how male competition contributes to speciation is dominated by investigations of competition between within-species morphs or closely related species that differ in conspicuous traits expressed during the breeding season (e.g. color, song). In such studies, it is important to consider the manner in which putatively sexually selected traits influence the outcome of competitive interactions within and between types because these traits can communicate information about competitor quality and may not be utilized by homotypic and heterotypic receivers in the same way. We studied the roles of breeding color and aggressive behaviors in competition within and between two divergent threespine stickleback Gasterosteus aculeatus color types. Our previous work in this system showed that the switch from red to black breeding coloration is associated with changes in male competition biases. Here, we find that red and black males also use different currencies in competition. Winners of both color types performed more aggressive behaviors than losers, regardless of whether the competitor was of the same or opposite color type. But breeding color differently predicted competitive outcomes for red and black males. Males who were redder at the start of competition were more likely to win when paired with homotypic competitors and less likely to win when paired with heterotypic competitors. In contrast, black color, though expressed in the breeding season and condition dependent, was unrelated to competitive outcomes. Placing questions about the role of male competition in speciation in a sexual signal evolution framework may provide insight into the “why and how” of aggression biases and asymmetries in competitive ability between closely related morphs and species.


Current Zoology | 2018

The roles of inter- and intra-sexual selection in behavioral isolation between native and invasive pupfishes

Cory Becher; Jennifer M. Gumm; Alycia R Lackey; Michael D Martin; Robin M. Tinghitella

Abstract Male–male competition and female mate choice may both play important roles in driving and maintaining reproductive isolation between species. When previously allopatric species come into secondary contact with each other due to introductions, they provide an opportunity to evaluate the identity and strength of reproductive isolating mechanisms. If reproductive isolation is not maintained, hybridization may occur. We examined how reproductive isolating mechanisms mediate hybridization between endemic populations of the Red River pupfish Cyprinodon rubrofluviatilis and the recently introduced sheepshead minnow C. variegatus. In lab-based dominance trials, males of both species won the same number of competitions. However, male C. rubrofluviatilis that won competitions were more aggressive than C. variegatus winners, and more aggression was needed to win against competitor C. variagatus than allopatric C. rubrofluviatilis. Duration of fights also differed based on the relatedness of the competitor. In dichotomous mate choice trials, there were no conspecific or heterospecific preferences expressed by females of either species. Our findings that male–male aggression differs between closely and distantly related groups, but female choice does not suggest that male–male competition may be the more likely mechanism to impede gene flow in this system.


Environmental Biology of Fishes | 2018

Hybrid sterility increases with genetic distance in snubnose darters (Percidae: Etheostoma)

Michael D Martin; Tamra C. Mendelson

The original version of this article unfortunately contained a mistake. The correct equation is now given below.


Emerging Infectious Diseases | 2001

Advanced age a risk factor for illness temporally associated with yellow fever vaccination.

Michael D Martin; Leisa H. Weld; Theodore F. Tsai; Gina T. Mootrey; Robert T. Chen; Manette T. Niu; Martin S. Cetron; Jeff Altman; Vernon E. Ansdell; Elizabeth D. Barnett; Michele Barry; Bradley A. Connor; David O. Freedman; Alejandra Gurtman; Elaine Jong; Phyllis E. Kozarsky; Russell McMullen; Jan E. Patterson; Bradley Sack; Mary E. Wilson; Martin S. Wolfe


Archive | 2001

Applying network theory to epidemics: Modelling the spread and control of Mycoplasma pneumoniae

Lauren W. Ancel; M. E. J. Newman; Michael D Martin; Stephanie J. Schrag

Collaboration


Dive into the Michael D Martin's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Jennifer M. Gumm

Stephen F. Austin State University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Peter D. Dijkstra

University of Texas at Austin

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Stephanie J. Schrag

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge