Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Michael D. Tyka is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Michael D. Tyka.


Methods in Enzymology | 2011

Rosetta3: An Object-Oriented Software Suite for the Simulation and Design of Macromolecules

Andrew Leaver-Fay; Michael D. Tyka; Steven M. Lewis; Oliver F. Lange; James Thompson; Ron Jacak; Kristian W. Kaufman; P. Douglas Renfrew; Colin A. Smith; Will Sheffler; Ian W. Davis; Seth Cooper; Adrien Treuille; Daniel J. Mandell; Florian Richter; Yih-En Andrew Ban; Sarel J. Fleishman; Jacob E. Corn; David E. Kim; Sergey Lyskov; Monica Berrondo; Stuart Mentzer; Zoran Popović; James J. Havranek; John Karanicolas; Rhiju Das; Jens Meiler; Tanja Kortemme; Jeffrey J. Gray; Brian Kuhlman

We have recently completed a full re-architecturing of the ROSETTA molecular modeling program, generalizing and expanding its existing functionality. The new architecture enables the rapid prototyping of novel protocols by providing easy-to-use interfaces to powerful tools for molecular modeling. The source code of this rearchitecturing has been released as ROSETTA3 and is freely available for academic use. At the time of its release, it contained 470,000 lines of code. Counting currently unpublished protocols at the time of this writing, the source includes 1,285,000 lines. Its rapid growth is a testament to its ease of use. This chapter describes the requirements for our new architecture, justifies the design decisions, sketches out central classes, and highlights a few of the common tasks that the new software can perform.


Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America | 2011

Algorithm discovery by protein folding game players

Firas Khatib; Seth Cooper; Michael D. Tyka; Kefan Xu; Ilya Makedon; Zoran Popović; David Baker; Foldit Players

Foldit is a multiplayer online game in which players collaborate and compete to create accurate protein structure models. For specific hard problems, Foldit player solutions can in some cases outperform state-of-the-art computational methods. However, very little is known about how collaborative gameplay produces these results and whether Foldit player strategies can be formalized and structured so that they can be used by computers. To determine whether high performing player strategies could be collectively codified, we augmented the Foldit gameplay mechanics with tools for players to encode their folding strategies as “recipes” and to share their recipes with other players, who are able to further modify and redistribute them. Here we describe the rapid social evolution of player-developed folding algorithms that took place in the year following the introduction of these tools. Players developed over 5,400 different recipes, both by creating new algorithms and by modifying and recombining successful recipes developed by other players. The most successful recipes rapidly spread through the Foldit player population, and two of the recipes became particularly dominant. Examination of the algorithms encoded in these two recipes revealed a striking similarity to an unpublished algorithm developed by scientists over the same period. Benchmark calculations show that the new algorithm independently discovered by scientists and by Foldit players outperforms previously published methods. Thus, online scientific game frameworks have the potential not only to solve hard scientific problems, but also to discover and formalize effective new strategies and algorithms.


Proteins | 2009

Structure prediction for CASP8 with all-atom refinement using Rosetta

Srivatsan Raman; Robert B. Vernon; James Thompson; Michael D. Tyka; Ruslan I. Sadreyev; Jimin Pei; David E. Kim; Elizabeth H. Kellogg; Frank DiMaio; Oliver F. Lange; Lisa N. Kinch; Will Sheffler; Bong Hyun Kim; Rhiju Das; Nick V. Grishin; David Baker

We describe predictions made using the Rosetta structure prediction methodology for the Eighth Critical Assessment of Techniques for Protein Structure Prediction. Aggressive sampling and all‐atom refinement were carried out for nearly all targets. A combination of alignment methodologies was used to generate starting models from a range of templates, and the models were then subjected to Rosetta all atom refinement. For the 64 domains with readily identified templates, the best submitted model was better than the best alignment to the best template in the Protein Data Bank for 24 cases, and improved over the best starting model for 43 cases. For 13 targets where only very distant sequence relationships to proteins of known structure were detected, models were generated using the Rosetta de novo structure prediction methodology followed by all‐atom refinement; in several cases the submitted models were better than those based on the available templates. Of the 12 refinement challenges, the best submitted model improved on the starting model in seven cases. These improvements over the starting template‐based models and refinement tests demonstrate the power of Rosetta structure refinement in improving model accuracy. Proteins 2009.


Science | 2010

NMR structure determination for larger proteins using backbone-only data.

Srivatsan Raman; Oliver F. Lange; Paolo Rossi; Michael D. Tyka; Xu Wang; James M. Aramini; Gaohua Liu; Theresa A. Ramelot; Alexander Eletsky; Thomas Szyperski; Michael A. Kennedy; James H. Prestegard; Gaetano T. Montelione; David Baker

Examining the Backbone Determination of tertiary protein structures by nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) currently relies heavily on side-chain NMR data. The assignment of side-chain atoms is challenging. In addition, proteins larger than 15 kilodaltons (kD) must be deuterated to improve resolution and this eliminates the possibility of measuring long-range interproton distance constraints. Now Raman et al. (p. 1014, published online 4 February) use backbone-only NMR data—chemical shifts, residual dipolar coupling, and backbone amide proton distances—available from highly deuterated proteins to guide conformational searching in the Rosetta structure prediction protocol. Using this new protocol, they were able to generate accurate structures for proteins of up to 25 kD. Protein structures can be determined by using the limited nuclear magnetic resonance information obtainable for larger proteins. Conventional protein structure determination from nuclear magnetic resonance data relies heavily on side-chain proton-to-proton distances. The necessary side-chain resonance assignment, however, is labor intensive and prone to error. Here we show that structures can be accurately determined without nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) information on the side chains for proteins up to 25 kilodaltons by incorporating backbone chemical shifts, residual dipolar couplings, and amide proton distances into the Rosetta protein structure modeling methodology. These data, which are too sparse for conventional methods, serve only to guide conformational search toward the lowest-energy conformations in the folding landscape; the details of the computed models are determined by the physical chemistry implicit in the Rosetta all-atom energy function. The new method is not hindered by the deuteration required to suppress nuclear relaxation processes for proteins greater than 15 kilodaltons and should enable routine NMR structure determination for larger proteins.


Journal of Molecular Biology | 2009

Refinement of Protein Structures into Low-Resolution Density Maps Using Rosetta

Frank DiMaio; Michael D. Tyka; Matthew L. Baker; Wah Chiu; David Baker

We describe a method based on Rosetta structure refinement for generating high-resolution, all-atom protein models from electron cryomicroscopy density maps. A local measure of the fit of a model to the density is used to directly guide structure refinement and to identify regions incompatible with the density that are then targeted for extensive rebuilding. Over a range of test cases using both simulated and experimentally generated data, the method consistently increases the accuracy of starting models generated either by comparative modeling or by hand-tracing the density. The method can achieve near-atomic resolution starting from density maps at 4-6 A resolution.


Proteins | 2007

Structure prediction for CASP7 targets using extensive all-atom refinement with Rosetta@home

Rhiju Das; Bin Qian; Srivatsan Raman; Robert B. Vernon; James Thompson; Philip Bradley; Sagar D. Khare; Michael D. Tyka; Divya Bhat; Dylan Chivian; David E. Kim; William Sheffler; Lars Malmström; Andrew M. Wollacott; Chu Wang; Ingemar André; David Baker

We describe predictions made using the Rosetta structure prediction methodology for both template‐based modeling and free modeling categories in the Seventh Critical Assessment of Techniques for Protein Structure Prediction. For the first time, aggressive sampling and all‐atom refinement could be carried out for the majority of targets, an advance enabled by the Rosetta@home distributed computing network. Template‐based modeling predictions using an iterative refinement algorithm improved over the best existing templates for the majority of proteins with less than 200 residues. Free modeling methods gave near‐atomic accuracy predictions for several targets under 100 residues from all secondary structure classes. These results indicate that refinement with an all‐atom energy function, although computationally expensive, is a powerful method for obtaining accurate structure predictions. Proteins 2007.


Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation | 2015

Combined Covalent-Electrostatic Model of Hydrogen Bonding Improves Structure Prediction with Rosetta

Matthew J. O’Meara; Andrew Leaver-Fay; Michael D. Tyka; Amelie Stein; Kevin Houlihan; Frank DiMaio; Philip Bradley; Tanja Kortemme; David Baker; Jack Snoeyink; Brian Kuhlman

Interactions between polar atoms are challenging to model because at very short ranges they form hydrogen bonds (H-bonds) that are partially covalent in character and exhibit strong orientation preferences; at longer ranges the orientation preferences are lost, but significant electrostatic interactions between charged and partially charged atoms remain. To simultaneously model these two types of behavior, we refined an orientation dependent model of hydrogen bonds [Kortemme et al. J. Mol. Biol. 2003, 326, 1239] used by the molecular modeling program Rosetta and then combined it with a distance-dependent Coulomb model of electrostatics. The functional form of the H-bond potential is physically motivated and parameters are fit so that H-bond geometries that Rosetta generates closely resemble H-bond geometries in high-resolution crystal structures. The combined potentials improve performance in a variety of scientific benchmarks including decoy discrimination, side chain prediction, and native sequence recovery in protein design simulations and establishes a new standard energy function for Rosetta.


Protein Science | 2014

Relaxation of backbone bond geometry improves protein energy landscape modeling

Patrick Conway; Michael D. Tyka; Frank DiMaio; David E. Konerding; David Baker

A key issue in macromolecular structure modeling is the granularity of the molecular representation. A fine‐grained representation can approximate the actual structure more accurately, but may require many more degrees of freedom than a coarse‐grained representation and hence make conformational search more challenging. We investigate this tradeoff between the accuracy and the size of protein conformational search space for two frequently used representations: one with fixed bond angles and lengths and one that has full flexibility. We performed large‐scale explorations of the energy landscapes of 82 protein domains under each model, and find that the introduction of bond angle flexibility significantly increases the average energy gap between native and non‐native structures. We also find that incorporating bonded geometry flexibility improves low resolution X‐ray crystallographic refinement. These results suggest that backbone bond angle relaxation makes an important contribution to native structure energetics, that current energy functions are sufficiently accurate to capture the energetic gain associated with subtle deformations from chain ideality, and more speculatively, that backbone geometry distortions occur late in protein folding to optimize packing in the native state.


Proteins | 2011

Structure-guided forcefield optimization.

Yifan Song; Michael D. Tyka; Andrew Leaver-Fay; James Thompson; David Baker

Accurate modeling of biomolecular systems requires accurate forcefields. Widely used molecular mechanics (MM) forcefields obtain parameters from experimental data and quantum chemistry calculations on small molecules but do not have a clear way to take advantage of the information in high‐resolution macromolecular structures. In contrast, knowledge‐based methods largely ignore the physical chemistry of interatomic interactions, and instead derive parameters almost exclusively from macromolecular structures. This can involve considerable double counting of the same physical interactions. Here, we describe a method for forcefield improvement that combines the strengths of the two approaches. We use this method to improve the Rosetta all‐atom forcefield, in which the total energy is expressed as the sum of terms representing different physical interactions as in MM forcefields and the parameters are tuned to reproduce the properties of macromolecular structures. To resolve inaccuracies resulting from possible double counting of interactions, we compare distribution functions from low‐energy modeled structures to those from crystal structures. The structural and physical bases of the deviations between the modeled and reference structures are identified and used to guide forcefield improvements. We describe improvements resolving double counting between backbone hydrogen bond interactions and Lennard‐Jones interactions in helices; between sidechain‐backbone hydrogen bonds and the backbone torsion potential; and between the sidechain torsion potential and Lennard‐Jones interactions. Discrepancies between computed and observed distributions are also used to guide the incorporation of an explicit Cα‐hydrogen bond in β sheets. The method can be used generally to integrate different sources of information for forcefield improvement. Proteins 2011;


Protein Science | 2010

Prediction of structures of zinc-binding proteins through explicit modeling of metal coordination geometry

Chu Wang; Robert B. Vernon; Oliver F. Lange; Michael D. Tyka; David Baker

Metal ions play an essential role in stabilizing protein structures and contributing to protein function. Ions such as zinc have well‐defined coordination geometries, but it has not been easy to take advantage of this knowledge in protein structure prediction efforts. Here, we present a computational method to predict structures of zinc‐binding proteins given knowledge of the positions of zinc‐coordinating residues in the amino acid sequence. The method takes advantage of the “atom‐tree” representation of molecular systems and modular architecture of the Rosetta3 software suite to incorporate explicit metal ion coordination geometry into previously developed de novo prediction and loop modeling protocols. Zinc cofactors are tethered to their interacting residues based on coordination geometries observed in natural zinc‐binding proteins. The incorporation of explicit zinc atoms and their coordination geometry in both de novo structure prediction and loop modeling significantly improves sampling near the native conformation. The method can be readily extended to predict protein structures bound to other metal and/or small chemical cofactors with well‐defined coordination or ligation geometry.

Collaboration


Dive into the Michael D. Tyka's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

David Baker

University of Washington

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Frank DiMaio

University of Washington

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

David E. Kim

University of Washington

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

James Thompson

University College London

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Andrew Leaver-Fay

University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Chu Wang

Scripps Research Institute

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Philip Bradley

Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge