Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Michael De Georgia is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Michael De Georgia.


Intensive Care Medicine | 2014

Consensus summary statement of the International Multidisciplinary Consensus Conference on Multimodality Monitoring in Neurocritical Care: A statement for healthcare professionals from the Neurocritical Care Society and the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine

Peter Le Roux; David K. Menon; Giuseppe Citerio; Paul Vespa; Mary Kay Bader; Gretchen M. Brophy; Michael N. Diringer; Nino Stocchetti; Walter Videtta; Rocco Armonda; Neeraj Badjatia; Julian Böesel; Randall M. Chesnut; Sherry Chou; Jan Claassen; Marek Czosnyka; Michael De Georgia; Anthony A. Figaji; Jennifer E. Fugate; Raimund Helbok; David Horowitz; Peter J. Hutchinson; Monisha A. Kumar; Molly McNett; Chad Miller; Andrew M. Naidech; Mauro Oddo; DaiWai M. Olson; Kristine O'Phelan; J. Javier Provencio

Neurocritical care depends, in part, on careful patient monitoring but as yet there are little data on what processes are the most important to monitor, how these should be monitored, and whether monitoring these processes is cost-effective and impacts outcome. At the same time, bioinformatics is a rapidly emerging field in critical care but as yet there is little agreement or standardization on what information is important and how it should be displayed and analyzed. The Neurocritical Care Society in collaboration with the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine, the Society for Critical Care Medicine, and the Latin America Brain Injury Consortium organized an international, multidisciplinary consensus conference to begin to address these needs. International experts from neurosurgery, neurocritical care, neurology, critical care, neuroanesthesiology, nursing, pharmacy, and informatics were recruited on the basis of their research, publication record, and expertise. They undertook a systematic literature review to develop recommendations about specific topics on physiologic processes important to the care of patients with disorders that require neurocritical care. This review does not make recommendations about treatment, imaging, and intraoperative monitoring. A multidisciplinary jury, selected for their expertise in clinical investigation and development of practice guidelines, guided this process. The GRADE system was used to develop recommendations based on literature review, discussion, integrating the literature with the participants’ collective experience, and critical review by an impartial jury. Emphasis was placed on the principle that recommendations should be based on both data quality and on trade-offs and translation into clinical practice. Strong consideration was given to providing pragmatic guidance and recommendations for bedside neuromonitoring, even in the absence of high quality data.


Neurocritical Care | 2014

Consensus Summary Statement of the International Multidisciplinary Consensus Conference on Multimodality Monitoring in Neurocritical Care: A statement for healthcare professionals from the Neurocritical Care Society and the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine

Peter D. Le Roux; David K. Menon; Giuseppe Citerio; Paul Vespa; Mary Kay Bader; Gretchen M. Brophy; Michael N. Diringer; Nino Stocchetti; Walter Videtta; Rocco Armonda; Neeraj Badjatia; Julian Böesel; Randall M. Chesnut; Sherry Chou; Jan Claassen; Marek Czosnyka; Michael De Georgia; Anthony A. Figaji; Jennifer E. Fugate; Raimund Helbok; David Horowitz; Peter J. Hutchinson; Monisha A. Kumar; Molly McNett; Chad Miller; Andrew M. Naidech; Mauro Oddo; DaiWai W. Olson; Kristine O’Phelan; J. Javier Provencio

Neurocritical care depends, in part, on careful patient monitoring but as yet there are little data on what processes are the most important to monitor, how these should be monitored, and whether monitoring these processes is cost-effective and impacts outcome. At the same time, bioinformatics is a rapidly emerging field in critical care but as yet there is little agreement or standardization on what information is important and how it should be displayed and analyzed. The Neurocritical Care Society in collaboration with the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine, the Society for Critical Care Medicine, and the Latin America Brain Injury Consortium organized an international, multidisciplinary consensus conference to begin to address these needs. International experts from neurosurgery, neurocritical care, neurology, critical care, neuroanesthesiology, nursing, pharmacy, and informatics were recruited on the basis of their research, publication record, and expertise. They undertook a systematic literature review to develop recommendations about specific topics on physiologic processes important to the care of patients with disorders that require neurocritical care. This review does not make recommendations about treatment, imaging, and intraoperative monitoring. A multidisciplinary jury, selected for their expertise in clinical investigation and development of practice guidelines, guided this process. The GRADE system was used to develop recommendations based on literature review, discussion, integrating the literature with the participants’ collective experience, and critical review by an impartial jury. Emphasis was placed on the principle that recommendations should be based on both data quality and on trade-offs and translation into clinical practice. Strong consideration was given to providing pragmatic guidance and recommendations for bedside neuromonitoring, even in the absence of high quality data.


Neurocritical Care | 2014

The International Multidisciplinary Consensus Conference on Multimodality Monitoring in Neurocritical Care: Evidentiary Tables: A Statement for Healthcare Professionals from the Neurocritical Care Society and the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine

Peter D. Le Roux; David K. Menon; Giuseppe Citerio; Paul Vespa; Mary Kay Bader; Gretchen M. Brophy; Michael N. Diringer; Nino Stocchetti; Walter Videtta; Rocco Armonda; Neeraj Badjatia; Julian Bösel; Randall M. Chesnut; Sherry Chou; Jan Claassen; Marek Czosnyka; Michael De Georgia; Anthony A. Figaji; Jennifer E. Fugate; Raimund Helbok; David Horowitz; Peter J. Hutchinson; Monisha A. Kumar; Molly McNett; Chad Miller; Andrew M. Naidech; Mauro Oddo; DaiWai W. Olson; Kristine O’Phelan; J. Javier Provencio

A variety of technologies have been developed to assist decision-making during the management of patients with acute brain injury who require intensive care. A large body of research has been generated describing these various technologies. The Neurocritical Care Society (NCS) in collaboration with the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine (ESICM), the Society for Critical Care Medicine (SCCM), and the Latin America Brain Injury Consortium (LABIC) organized an international, multidisciplinary consensus conference to perform a systematic review of the published literature to help develop evidence-based practice recommendations on bedside physiologic monitoring. This supplement contains a Consensus Summary Statement with recommendations and individual topic reviews on physiologic processes important in the care of acute brain injury. In this article we provide the evidentiary tables for select topics including systemic hemodynamics, intracranial pressure, brain and systemic oxygenation, EEG, brain metabolism, biomarkers, processes of care and monitoring in emerging economies to provide the clinician ready access to evidence that supports recommendations about neuromonitoring.


Neurocritical Care | 2014

The International Multidisciplinary Consensus Conference on Multimodality Monitoring in Neurocritical Care: a list of recommendations and additional conclusions: a statement for healthcare professionals from the Neurocritical Care Society and the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine.

Peter D. Le Roux; David K. Menon; Giuseppe Citerio; Paul Vespa; Mary Kay Bader; Gretchen M. Brophy; Michael N. Diringer; Nino Stocchetti; Walter Videtta; Rocco Armonda; Neeraj Badjatia; Julian Bösel; Randall M. Chesnut; Sherry Chou; Jan Claassen; Marek Czosnyka; Michael De Georgia; Anthony A. Figaji; Jennifer E. Fugate; Raimund Helbok; David Horowitz; Peter J. Hutchinson; Monisha A. Kumar; Molly McNett; Chad Miller; Andrew M. Naidech; Mauro Oddo; DaiWai W. Olson; Kristine O’Phelan; J. Javier Provencio

Abstract Careful patient monitoring using a variety of techniques including clinical and laboratory evaluation, bedside physiological monitoring with continuous or non-continuous techniques and imaging is fundamental to the care of patients who require neurocritical care. How best to perform and use bedside monitoring is still being elucidated. To create a basic platform for care and a foundation for further research the Neurocritical Care Society in collaboration with the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine, the Society for Critical Care Medicine and the Latin America Brain Injury Consortium organized an international, multidisciplinary consensus conference to develop recommendations about physiologic bedside monitoring. This supplement contains a Consensus Summary Statement with recommendations and individual topic reviews as a background to the recommendations. In this article, we highlight the recommendations and provide additional conclusions as an aid to the reader and to facilitate bedside care.


Journal of Critical Care | 2014

History of brain death as death: 1968 to the present

Michael De Georgia

The concept of brain death was formulated in 1968 in the landmark report A Definition of Irreversible Coma. While brain death has been widely accepted as a determination of death throughout the world, many of the controversies that surround it have not been settled. Some may be rooted in a misconstruction about the history of brain death. The concept evolved as a result of the convergence of several parallel developments in the second half of the 20th century including advances in resuscitation and critical care, research into the underlying physiology of consciousness, and growing concerns about technology, medical futility, and the ethics of end of life care. Organ transplantation also developed in parallel, and though it clearly benefited from a new definition of death, it was not a principal driving force in its creation. Since 1968, the concept of brain death has been extensively analyzed, debated, and reworked. Still there remains much misunderstanding and confusion, especially in the general public. In this comprehensive review, I will trace the evolution of the definition of brain death as death from 1968 to the present, providing background, history and context.


Journal of Intensive Care Medicine | 2015

Brain Tissue Oxygen Monitoring in Neurocritical Care

Michael De Georgia

Brain injury results from ischemia, tissue hypoxia, and a cascade of secondary events. The cornerstone of neurocritical care management is optimization and maintenance of cerebral blood flow (CBF) ...Brain injury results from ischemia, tissue hypoxia, and a cascade of secondary events. The cornerstone of neurocritical care management is optimization and maintenance of cerebral blood flow (CBF) and oxygen and substrate delivery to prevent or attenuate this secondary damage. New techniques for monitoring brain tissue oxygen tension (PtiO2) are now available. Brain PtiO2 reflects both oxygen delivery and consumption. Brain hypoxia (low brain PtiO2) has been associated with poor outcomes in patients with brain injury. Strategies to improve brain PtiO2 have focused mainly on increasing oxygen delivery either by increasing CBF or by increasing arterial oxygen content. The results of nonrandomized studies comparing brain PtiO2-guided therapy with intracranial pressure/cerebral perfusion pressure-guided therapy, while promising, have been mixed. More studies are needed including prospective, randomized controlled trials to assess the true value of this approach. The following is a review of the physiology of brain tissue oxygenation, the effect of brain hypoxia on outcome, strategies to increase oxygen delivery, and outcome studies of brain PtiO2-guided therapy in neurocritical care.


Neurocritical Care | 2014

Multimodality Monitoring: Informatics, Integration Data Display and Analysis

J. Michael Schmidt; Michael De Georgia

The goal of multimodality neuromonitoring is to provide continuous, real-time assessment of brain physiology to prevent, detect, and attenuate secondary brain injury. Clinical informatics deals with biomedical data, information, and knowledge including their acquisition, storage, retrieval, and optimal use for clinical decision-making. An electronic literature search was conducted for English language articles describing the use of informatics in the intensive care unit setting from January 1990 to August 2013. A total of 64 studies were included in this review. Clinical informatics infrastructure should be adopted that enables a wide range of linear and nonlinear analytical methods be applied to patient data. Specific time epochs of clinical interest should be reviewable. Analysis strategies of monitor alarms may help address alarm fatigue. Ergonomic data display that present results from analyses with clinical information in a sensible uncomplicated manner improve clinical decision-making. Collecting and archiving the highest resolution physiologic and phenotypic data in a comprehensive open format data warehouse is a crucial first step toward information management and two-way translational research for multimodality monitoring. The infrastructure required is largely the same as that needed for telemedicine intensive care applications, which under the right circumstances improves care quality while reducing cost.


Journal of Stroke & Cerebrovascular Diseases | 2014

Moyamoya disease associated with asymptomatic mosaic turner syndrome: A rare cause of hemorrhagic stroke

Sunil Manjila; Benjamin R. Miller; Anitha Rao-Frisch; Balint Otvos; Anna L. Mitchell; Nicholas C. Bambakidis; Michael De Georgia

Moyamoya disease is a rare cerebrovascular anomaly involving the intracranial carotid arteries that can present clinically with either ischemic or hemorrhagic disease. Moyamoya syndrome, indistinguishable from moyamoya disease at presentation, is associated with multiple clinical conditions including neurofibromatosis type 1, autoimmune disease, prior radiation therapy, Down syndrome, and Turner syndrome. We present the first reported case of an adult patient with previously unrecognized mosaic Turner syndrome with acute subarachnoid and intracerebral hemorrhage as the initial manifestation of moyamoya syndrome. A 52-year-old woman was admitted with a subarachnoid hemorrhage with associated flame-shaped intracerebral hemorrhage in the left frontal lobe. Physical examination revealed short stature, pectus excavatum, small fingers, micrognathia, and mild facial dysmorphism. Cerebral angiography showed features consistent with bilateral moyamoya disease, aberrant intrathoracic vessels, and an unruptured 4-mm right superior hypophyseal aneurysm. Genetic analysis confirmed a diagnosis of mosaic Turner syndrome. Our case report is the first documented presentation of adult moyamoya syndrome with subarachnoid and intracerebral hemorrhage as the initial presentation of mosaic Turner syndrome. It illustrates the utility of genetic evaluation in patients with cerebrovascular disease and dysmorphism.


Neurocritical Care | 2014

The International Multidisciplinary Consensus Conference on Multimodality Monitoring in Neurocritical Care: A List of Recommendations and Additional Conclusions

Peter D. Le Roux; David K. Menon; Giuseppe Citerio; Paul Vespa; Mary Kay Bader; Gretchen M. Brophy; Michael N. Diringer; Nino Stocchetti; Walter Videtta; Rocco Armonda; Neeraj Badjatia; Julian Bösel; Randall M. Chesnut; Sherry Chou; Jan Claassen; Marek Czosnyka; Michael De Georgia; Anthony A. Figaji; Jennifer E. Fugate; Raimund Helbok; David Horowitz; Peter J. Hutchinson; Monisha A. Kumar; Molly McNett; Chad Miller; Andrew M. Naidech; Mauro Oddo; DaiWai M. Olson; Kristine O’Phelan; J. Javier Provencio

Abstract Careful patient monitoring using a variety of techniques including clinical and laboratory evaluation, bedside physiological monitoring with continuous or non-continuous techniques and imaging is fundamental to the care of patients who require neurocritical care. How best to perform and use bedside monitoring is still being elucidated. To create a basic platform for care and a foundation for further research the Neurocritical Care Society in collaboration with the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine, the Society for Critical Care Medicine and the Latin America Brain Injury Consortium organized an international, multidisciplinary consensus conference to develop recommendations about physiologic bedside monitoring. This supplement contains a Consensus Summary Statement with recommendations and individual topic reviews as a background to the recommendations. In this article, we highlight the recommendations and provide additional conclusions as an aid to the reader and to facilitate bedside care.


Spinal cord series and cases | 2017

Spinal cord infarct caused from suspected fibrocartilaginous embolism

Ayham M. Alkhachroum; Danielle Weiss; Alan Lerner; Michael De Georgia

Introduction:We report a case of spinal cord infarct as a result of suspected fibrocartilaginous embolism (FCE).Case presentation:A 23-year-old man presented with sudden onset cervical and upper back pain followed by progressive weakness in his extremities after throwing a baseball. History, neurologic examination and spinal cord imaging were consistent with spinal cord infarct. We believe the cause was from FCE.Discussion:Though rare, physicians should be familiar with this diagnosis and the proposed mechanisms. There is no specific treatment for FCE-related spinal cord infarct and long-term prognosis is largely dependent on the degree of spinal cord injury.

Collaboration


Dive into the Michael De Georgia's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

David Horowitz

University of Pennsylvania

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Gretchen M. Brophy

Virginia Commonwealth University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Michael N. Diringer

Washington University in St. Louis

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge